Upload folder using huggingface_hub

.gitattributes

@@ -30567,3 +30567,95 @@ A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=l
 A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene with two characters in a bathroom setting, which appears relatively natural in terms of composition and context. The lighting and shadows are consistent with indoor environments, and the characters' postures and actions seem plausible. However, there are some subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of the characters and minor distortions in the reflections in the mirrors. These factors slightly detract from the overall naturalness and introduce minor artifacts. Therefore, the naturalness score is 8, and the artifacts score is 7."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
-      7
+      9
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman's pose has been successfully altered to show her adjusting her outfit, which aligns well with the instruction. Her hand is now positioned near her neck/chest area, indicating she is making adjustments. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the positioning of her arms and hands, which could be more naturalistic. Overall, the editing is effective but slightly overdone in minor details."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the woman adjusting her outfit while looking into the mirror, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times in the image, indicating a successful edit. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and composition of the original image. Therefore, the editing success score is high, and the overediting score is also high since the changes are subtle yet impactful."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements, such as the characters' attire and the bathroom setting. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with a typical indoor environment, contributing to a natural feel. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details, such as the hair texture and facial features, which suggest some AI-generated artifacts. Overall, while the scene is convincing, minor imperfections in detail and realism slightly detract from a perfect score."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      9
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman's posture has changed to reflect her adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the instruction. Her hands are now positioned near her shoulders, indicating she is making adjustments. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, showing minimal overediting. The changes are subtle but effective in conveying the intended action."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the woman adjusting her outfit while looking into the mirror, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times, indicating a high level of editing success. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and composition of the original image, hence the scores reflect both the successful execution and minimal overediting."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor scene with two characters in a bathroom setting. The naturalness is high due to the plausible environment, lighting, and positioning of objects like the mirror, sink, and door. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details that suggest it might be AI-generated, such as minor distortions in the hair texture and subtle irregularities in the clothing folds. The artifacts are noticeable but not overwhelming; there are no major distortions or obvious watermarks, but some elements lack perfect sharpness or detail, which slightly detracts from the overall realism."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
+      5,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman is indeed adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the instruction. However, the overall composition and setting remain consistent with the first image, indicating that the edit was minimal and focused specifically on the action of adjusting the outfit. The reflection in the mirror also shows the woman's new pose, reinforcing the adjustment. The degree of overediting is moderate since the change is noticeable but does not alter the core elements of the scene."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image shows the woman adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the editing instruction. However, the man's presence remains unchanged, and there is no indication of him interacting with the mirror or the woman's actions. This suggests partial success in editing but not a complete fulfillment of the instruction. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the core elements of the scene remain intact, but the focus on the woman's action could have been more pronounced."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements such as clothing, lighting, and reflections in the mirror. The characters' postures and expressions seem natural, contributing to a believable interaction. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the fine details of the background or subtle textures that could indicate AI generation. The overall lighting and shadows are consistent, and there are no obvious artifacts like blurring, distortion, or unnatural body parts. Therefore, the image scores high in both naturalness and lack of artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while the woman listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture with arms crossed, suggesting she is listening. The overall scene change is minimal but effective, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overedit in the man's facial expression and body language, which could be perceived as more pronounced than necessary, hence the slightly lower overediting score."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and speaking to the woman, while the woman appears to be listening intently. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, which adheres to the editing instruction. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the context and setting of the original image. The degree of overediting is low, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only necessary adjustments made to reflect the new action."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements such as the characters' attire, the bathroom setting, and the overall lighting. The naturalness is high due to the coherent environment and plausible interactions between the characters. However, there are subtle signs of artificiality, such as slightly stiff postures and facial expressions that lack the fluidity seen in real-life photography. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are minor inconsistencies in texture and detail, particularly around the edges of objects and clothing, which suggest some AI generation artifacts. Overall, the image is quite convincing but not entirely indistinguishable from a real photograph."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       9
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while the woman listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture, suggesting she is listening. The changes are subtle but effective, indicating successful execution of the instruction. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, showing minimal overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and gesturing towards the woman, indicating he is speaking to her. The woman maintains her position, appearing to listen intently, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the man's posture and gesture changed. Therefore, both scores reflect a successful and minimally invasive edit."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be highly detailed and realistic, with natural lighting and shadows that contribute to a believable setting. The characters' expressions and body language seem coherent with the scene, suggesting a natural interaction. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in texture or fine details that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10 for naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, blurring, or unusual elements, indicating high quality and minimal artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while she listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture, suggesting she is listening. The overall context and characters remain consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. However, there is a slight change in the positioning and expression of both characters, which slightly deviates from the original but still effectively conveys the intended interaction."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and speaking to the woman, while the woman listens intently. There is no repetition of characters, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the necessary changes made to reflect the new action."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements, such as the characters' attire, the setting, and the lighting. The naturalness is high due to the coherent environment and the characters' positioning, which suggests a plausible interaction. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the details, such as the reflections in the mirror and some minor distortions in the characters' features, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are subtle signs of AI generation, like minor blurring around the edges of objects and slight irregularities in the texture of clothing and hair, leading to a moderate artifact score."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned his head towards the woman, indicating a shift in focus and engagement, which aligns with the instruction. This change effectively conveys the initiation of a conversation. However, the overall composition and setting remain largely unchanged, suggesting that the edit was minimal but successful. The degree of overediting is low, as the core elements of the scene, including the characters and environment, are preserved."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction to initiate conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the edit is noticeable, it maintains the overall context and setting of the original image, indicating minimal overediting."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor scene with two characters in a bathroom setting. The naturalness is high due to the plausible environment, lighting, and positioning of the characters. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details that suggest it might be AI-generated. The artifacts are minimal but noticeable upon close inspection, particularly in the texture of the clothing and some facial features, which appear slightly smoothed or less detailed compared to a real photograph."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction. His posture and gaze suggest he is engaging with her, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the man's facial expression and body language, which appear somewhat unnatural compared to the first image. Overall, the scene maintains its context while effectively showing the intended interaction."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction to initiate conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the edit is noticeable, it maintains the overall context and setting of the original image, indicating minimal overediting."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic lighting and shadows, contributing to a natural feel. The characters' postures and expressions seem plausible for the setting, which enhances the naturalness. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the fine details of the clothing texture or background elements that could be improved. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, blurring, or unusual features, indicating high quality. The reflections in the mirror and the overall clarity suggest careful attention to detail, resulting in a low artifact score."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      9
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction. His posture and gaze suggest he is engaging with her, indicating successful execution of the instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the man's orientation changed. Therefore, the scores reflect high success in executing the instruction and minimal overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, initiating conversation, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated more than once, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the same setting and characters while only altering the man's position to face the woman."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be an airport setting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and emotional context feel plausible and relatable. However, there is a slight artificiality in the lighting and shadows, which slightly detracts from the realism. The artifacts score is moderate (7) as the image shows some minor inconsistencies, such as potential blurring around the edges of the figures and subtle distortions in the background details, but these are not overly distracting."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to zoom in on the couple's faces to highlight their emotional connection. In the second image, the camera has indeed zoomed in closer to focus on the couple's faces, effectively capturing the intimacy and emotional connection between them. This aligns well with the instruction. However, while the zoom is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance of the scene. The background details are less prominent, but the core elements of the original image are still recognizable, indicating that the overediting is minimal."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the focus is effectively shifted to their faces, some details from the background are lost, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The overall scene remains recognizable as a continuation of the original, maintaining context and continuity."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals sharing a kiss. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and interaction between the characters appear quite realistic. The lighting is soft and focused, creating a warm and intimate atmosphere, which enhances the natural feel. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the background details or shadows that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10.\n\nFor artifacts, the score is 7 because the image appears mostly clean with minimal visible distortions or unusual elements. The faces and bodies are well-defined, and there are no obvious signs of blurring or unnatural features. However, upon closer inspection, there could be minor imperfections in the texture or fine details that slightly detract from a perfect score."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image effectively captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate kiss and emotional connection. The focus on their facial expressions and the close-up framing align well with the goal of highlighting their bond. However, while the zoom is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between intimacy and context. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the connection to the original setting, but the tight framing could be seen as a minor overedit."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. The emotional connection is effectively highlighted, adhering closely to the editing instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context from the original setting but still maintains recognizability."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be a parking garage at night. The lighting, shadows, and overall composition contribute to a relatively natural feel, with realistic reflections on the cars and soft ambient lighting. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and facial details, which slightly detracts from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and well-defined elements, though there might be some minor inconsistencies in the background details that could be considered artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to zoom in on the couple's faces to emphasize their emotional connection during the kiss. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted closer to focus on their faces, effectively capturing the intimacy and emotional depth as intended. This aligns well with the instruction, earning a high score for editing success. However, while the zoom is successful, some elements of the background and overall composition have changed slightly more than necessary, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The transition maintains recognizable continuity with the original image but includes noticeable changes beyond just the zoom."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the focus is effectively shifted to their faces, some details around them are slightly less defined compared to the original, indicating a moderate level of overediting. Overall, the emotional connection is highlighted, and the scene remains recognizable as a minimal yet effective edit."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene inside a spacious hangar with cars, airplanes, and two people embracing under dramatic lighting. The overall composition feels somewhat natural due to the realistic lighting effects, shadows, and the placement of objects. However, there is a slight artificiality in the way the light beams and shadows interact, which slightly detracts from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image appears relatively clean with minimal distortions or unusual elements. The details in the cars and the figures are mostly coherent, though some minor blurring or lack of sharpness can be observed in certain areas, particularly around the edges of objects and the figures."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to enhance the romantic and dramatic atmosphere by emphasizing the bright spotlight illuminating the couple as they kiss passionately. In the second image, the spotlight effect is more pronounced, casting a brighter and more focused light on the couple, which aligns well with the instruction. The overall mood is enhanced, making the scene more intimate and dramatic. However, while the spotlight effect is improved, some elements of the background, such as the cars and the hangar structure, remain consistent with the original image, indicating that the editing was done with care to maintain the context. The scores reflect the successful execution of the instruction while keeping the image recognizable as a minimal yet effective edit."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by enhancing the brightness of the spotlight, which effectively illuminates the couple kissing passionately. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, the increased brightness slightly alters the overall mood and lighting balance compared to the original, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The core elements remain intact, but the dramatic lighting change is noticeable."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two people kissing under dramatic lighting in what appears to be a garage or workshop setting. The naturalness is high due to the realistic lighting effects, shadows, and composition, which create a moody and intimate atmosphere. However, there is a slight artificiality in the overall tone and some minor inconsistencies in the details, such as the sharpness of the light beams and the reflections on the cars. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly coherent, there are subtle signs of AI generation, such as slightly smoothed-out textures on the cars and minor distortions in the background elements like the windows and structural details. Overall, the image is quite convincing but not entirely free of typical AI-generated quirks."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
-      7
+      9
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to enhance the romantic and dramatic atmosphere by focusing on the passionate kiss between the man and woman under a bright spotlight. In the second image, the spotlight effect is more pronounced, casting a strong beam directly onto the couple, which effectively highlights their intimate moment. This aligns well with the instruction, making the scene more visually striking and emotionally impactful. However, while the spotlight addition is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the light source, which slightly detracts from the overall balance of the image. The rest of the elements, including the cars and the hangar setting, remain consistent with the original, ensuring that the image retains its core identity despite the enhancements."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by showing the man and woman kissing passionately under a bright spotlight, which enhances the romantic atmosphere of the scene. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall composition and context of the original image while adding the desired lighting effect. The degree of overediting is low, as the core elements of the scene remain intact, making it easy to recognize as a minimal yet impactful edit."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "SC": {
+    "score": [
+      8,
+      9
+    ],
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by maintaining the passionate kiss between the man and woman under the bright spotlight. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The scene remains consistent with the original image, with only minor adjustments to enhance the romantic atmosphere, indicating minimal overediting."
+  }
+}

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals kissing in front of an airport setting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and context feel plausible for a nighttime airport environment. The lighting from the street lamps and the airplane tail light contribute to a realistic ambiance. However, there is a slight artificiality in the way the characters' features and clothing details are rendered, which slightly detracts from full naturalness.\n\nFor artifacts, the score is 7 because while the image appears mostly coherent, there are subtle signs of AI generation, such as minor inconsistencies in texture and detail, particularly around the edges of objects and the characters' skin. These imperfections are noticeable upon close inspection but do not significantly disrupt the overall harmony of the scene."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. The intimacy and emotional connection are effectively conveyed, which aligns well with the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between the environment and the subjects. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the context of the original image, but the tight framing could be considered a minor overedit."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the recognition of the scene while effectively emphasizing the couple."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing under artificial lighting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and interaction between the characters appear plausible and emotionally engaging. However, there is a slight unnaturalness in the lighting reflections and shadows, which slightly detracts from the realism. The artifact score is moderate (7) as the image shows some minor distortions, particularly around the edges of the figures and the background elements, but these are not severe enough to significantly disrupt the overall harmony of the scene."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. The intimacy and emotional connection are effectively conveyed, which aligns well with the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between the environment and the subjects. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the context of the original image, but the focus is heavily shifted towards the couple, which is intentional but leans towards a more pronounced edit."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be a dimly lit garage setting. The naturalness is high due to the realistic lighting, shadows, and composition, which convey an intimate atmosphere. However, there is a slight artificiality in the details of the characters' features and clothing textures, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are minor inconsistencies in the fine details of the characters' faces and clothing, as well as some blurring around the edges, indicating the presence of subtle AI-generated artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to zoom in on the couple's faces while they kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. In the second image, the camera has indeed zoomed in closer to the couple, focusing more on their faces and the intimate moment, which aligns well with the instruction. The soft glow of the hanging lamp remains prominent, maintaining the romantic ambiance. However, the background details are less visible due to the zoom, which is expected but slightly reduces the context. The overall effect is successful, but there is a minor loss of environmental detail, indicating a slight overedit. Therefore, the scores reflect high execution of the instruction with a moderate level of overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of the camera zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the context and environment while effectively emphasizing the couple's intimate moment."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      6,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts two characters wearing black masks with red eyes, which gives it a somewhat surreal and stylized appearance. The naturalness score is 6 because while the overall composition and lighting seem coherent, the context and setting feel slightly artificial due to the mask design and the lack of clear environmental details. The artifacts score is 7 because there are no obvious distortions, watermarks, or blurring, but the sharpness and detail in the background suggest some level of AI generation artifacts, particularly around the edges of objects."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      0,
+      5
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to introduce another guest approaching the person in costume with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, this goal is largely achieved as there is indeed another figure present, wearing a black mask that obscures their face. The positioning suggests they are approaching the person in costume, fulfilling the instruction effectively. However, the overediting score is slightly lower because while the addition is noticeable, it doesn't feel overly intrusive or excessive; the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image shows the same character (the person in costume) appearing twice in the frame, which violates the rule of not generating the same character multiple times within the same image. This results in a score of 0 for editing success. However, the overall context and setting appear consistent with the original image, indicating that the overediting score is moderate at 5, as the scene still maintains some resemblance to the original while introducing the duplicate character."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a scene with two characters, one in focus and another partially obscured by darkness. The naturalness score is 7 because while the overall composition and lighting seem plausible, there is a slight artificiality in the details of the characters' features and clothing, which may not fully align with real-world textures or proportions. The artifacts score is 8 because the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements; however, there might be some minor blurring or lack of fine detail in the darker areas, which is typical for AI-generated images."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to create a medium close-up of another guest approaching the person in costume, with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, the new character is indeed present, and their face is partially obscured by a mask, which aligns well with the instruction. The setting appears consistent with the first image, maintaining the context of a costume event. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the darkness around the masked figure, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is successful but slightly overdone in terms of contrast and shadowing."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces another character approaching the person in costume, adhering to the instruction of a medium close-up. The new character's face is partially obscured by a mask, which aligns with the editing goal. However, there is a slight overediting issue as the new character appears somewhat out of context compared to the original setting, but it does not generate the same character multiple times. The overall scene maintains recognizable elements from the original image while effectively incorporating the new character."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts two figures wearing dark hooded garments with one figure having visible face paint. The overall composition appears coherent, with a sense of depth and context, contributing to a relatively natural feel. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the lighting and shadows, particularly around the edges of the hoods, which slightly detract from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and well-defined features. The faces and clothing appear smooth without significant blurring or unnatural body parts, indicating a low level of artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      7,
-      8
+      0,
+      5
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to introduce a new character (another guest) into the scene, with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, this has been achieved effectively, as there is now a second figure visible, wearing a costume and a mask that obscures part of their face. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the composition but maintains the integrity of the original scene."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image fails the primary objective because it shows the same character (the person in costume) appearing twice within the same frame, which violates the rule of not generating the same character more than once. This results in a score of 0 for editing success. However, the image does attempt to introduce another character with a mask, indicating some effort towards the instruction, but the duplication overshadows this. For the degree of overediting, while the addition of another character is noticeable, the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, earning a moderate score of 5."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a person in a costume with a somewhat natural setting, including background elements like cups and decorations. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with indoor lighting, contributing to a reasonable sense of naturalness. However, there is a slight artificiality in the facial features and expression, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and well-defined features, indicating low artifact presence."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the facial details, which slightly detracts from the natural flow of the image. Overall, the editing is effective but could be slightly more subtle to avoid overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully maintains the focus on the character's face with a close-up shot, capturing the intended determined expression. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times within the image, adhering to the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall composition and context remain consistent with the original image, with only slight adjustments to emphasize the facial expression."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to be AI-generated with a relatively high level of detail and naturalness. The facial features and makeup are well-defined, and the lighting seems consistent with the environment. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and some minor inconsistencies in the background details, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clean lines and coherent composition, indicating a low presence of artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the lighting or shading around the eyes, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the edit effectively conveys the intended mood while maintaining recognition as a minimal yet impactful adjustment to the original image."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image does not generate the same character multiple times, adhering to the rule. The character's face remains in close-up with a determined expression, effectively capturing the intended mood. There is minimal overediting, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a person with detailed makeup and a costume, which looks relatively natural in terms of facial features and expression. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the lighting and shadows around the face, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. The artifacts are minimal, with no obvious distortions, watermarks, or blurring. The makeup application and costume details are well-executed, contributing to a high artifact score."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the facial details, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the editing aligns well with the instruction while maintaining recognizable continuity with the original image."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image does not generate the same character multiple times, adhering to the rule. The character's determined expression is effectively captured in a close-up, focusing on the facial details as instructed. The background remains consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting while still enhancing the intended mood. However, there is a slight shift in the character's gaze and facial tension, which could be seen as a minor overedit but does not detract significantly from the overall effectiveness."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene with two children dressed in costumes, one as a devil-like character and the other as a superhero. The naturalness is relatively high as the interaction between the characters appears plausible, with the child in the superhero costume offering a lollipop to the other. However, there is a slight artificiality in the facial expressions and details, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear and coherent details in the costumes and background. The lighting and shadows appear consistent, further supporting the lack of significant artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, this has been effectively achieved as a new child wearing a superhero costume is visible, holding a lollipop and appearing excited. The addition of the child aligns well with the instruction, indicating successful execution. However, the background and setting remain consistent with the first image, suggesting that the editing was done minimally while still achieving the desired effect. The slight shift in focus and the introduction of the new character do not feel overly intrusive, maintaining the context of the original scene."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character (a child in a different costume) without duplicating the original character, adhering to the editing instruction. The new character is clearly distinct in appearance and costume, indicating successful editing. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the composition, but it does not deviate excessively from the original scene, maintaining recognizability."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts two children in costumes, one offering a lollipop to the other, which conveys a natural and relatable scene. The expressions and interactions appear genuine, contributing to the overall naturalness. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the details, such as the costume textures and facial features, which introduce minor artifacts. The lighting and shadows are mostly consistent but could be slightly more refined for a perfect natural look."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, this has been effectively achieved as a new child in a colorful costume is visible, holding out a lollipop with an excited expression. The transition between the two images suggests a panning motion, which aligns with the instruction. However, the background elements remain consistent, indicating that the focus was on adding the new character rather than altering the entire scene. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the addition of the new character is noticeable but does not drastically change the overall context or setting of the original image."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character without duplicating the existing one, adhering to the editing instruction. The addition of the second child in a different costume, reaching for candy, enhances the scene effectively. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the positioning and interaction between the two characters, which could be more natural. Overall, the edit is successful but slightly overdone."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      7,
-      8
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a child interacting with a lollipop, and the overall scene appears relatively natural. The expressions and actions of the child seem plausible, contributing to a sense of realism. However, there is a slight artificiality in the background character's appearance, which might affect the naturalness slightly. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and coherent composition. The lighting and shadows appear consistent, further supporting the lack of significant artifacts."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, a new child wearing a blue costume is visible, and they are indeed reaching out for a colorful lollipop with an expression of excitement. This effectively fulfills the instruction. However, the background and setting remain consistent with the first image, indicating that the edit was minimal and focused only on adding the new character and action. The overall context and environment are preserved, which helps maintain the connection between the two images. Therefore, the editing is successful but not overly aggressive."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character (a child in a different costume) without duplicating the original character, adhering to the editing instruction. The new character is clearly distinct and positioned appropriately, indicating a successful edit. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the overall composition, but it does not deviate excessively from the original scene, maintaining recognizability."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "SC": {
+    "score": [
+      8,
+      7
+    ],
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman, capturing her as the central figure with others leaning in attentively, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the framing has changed slightly, which could be seen as a minor overedit, hence the second score is slightly lower but still acceptable."
+  }
+}

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "SC": {
+    "score": [
+      8,
+      7
+    ],
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman speaking, with others leaning in attentively, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, indicating successful editing. However, the framing has been adjusted slightly, which could be seen as a minor overedit, but it does not significantly alter the overall scene or context. Therefore, the editing is mostly effective with minimal overediting."
+  }
+}

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "SC": {
+    "score": [
+      8,
+      7
+    ],
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman speaking, with others leaning in attentively, following the editing instruction effectively. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, indicating no failure in this regard. However, while the focus is well-executed, there is a slight shift in composition compared to the original, which slightly increases the perception of overediting. Overall, the changes are minimal but noticeable."
+  }
+}

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears relatively natural with realistic lighting and shadows, contributing to a believable atmosphere. However, there are subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of the characters' clothing and minor distortions in the background elements like the curtains and plant. The overall composition is coherent, but these small imperfections slightly detract from the naturalness. The artifacts are minimal but noticeable upon close inspection, particularly in the finer details of the characters' attire and the background textures."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      10,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on her expression and body language, which aligns well with the editing instruction. The close-up effectively highlights her facial features and posture, making the editing successful. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context of the surrounding environment compared to the original image. Overall, the editing is effective but leans towards a more focused view, indicating some overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the context and setting remain recognizable from the original image, but the focus has shifted significantly to highlight the central figure."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor setting with two individuals engaged in what seems like a serious conversation. The lighting is warm and consistent with indoor environments, contributing to a natural atmosphere. However, there are subtle signs of artificiality, such as slightly off proportions in the hands and minor inconsistencies in the texture of clothing and skin. The background elements, like the lamp and curtains, are well-integrated but show some minor blurring or lack of fine detail, which might indicate AI generation. Overall, while the image feels mostly natural, there are slight artifacts that detract from its perfection."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      10,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on her expression and body language, which aligns well with the editing instruction. This highlights her presence and details effectively. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context of the surrounding environment compared to the original image. Overall, the editing is successful but leans towards a more focused view, which could be considered a minor overedit."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the context and setting remain recognizable from the original image, but the perspective change is significant enough to alter the overall composition."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals engaged in a conversation, which seems plausible and contextually appropriate. The lighting and shadows are relatively consistent, contributing to a sense of naturalness. However, there are subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of some figures and minor distortions in the background elements, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. The clothing and postures of the characters are generally well-rendered, but there are minor artifacts visible, particularly in the finer details like hair and fabric textures, which affect the artifact rating."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing more closely on their expression and body language compared to the first image. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the zoom is effective, some elements around the edges appear slightly distorted or less detailed, indicating a minor degree of overediting. Overall, the transition maintains the context of the original scene while emphasizing the intended subject."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining recognition of the scene while achieving the intended zoom effect."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears quite natural in terms of composition and lighting, with realistic facial expressions and body language that suggest a serious conversation. The environment, including the furniture and decor, contributes to a believable setting. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and hair details, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and well-defined features, indicating high-quality generation. There are no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual body parts, making it nearly artifact-free."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera indeed zooms in or focuses more closely on the central figure, effectively highlighting their presence and importance compared to the broader group shot in the first image. This change aligns well with the instruction, making the central figure the clear focal point. However, while the focus shift is successful, there is a slight overemphasis, as the background details are now less visible, which could be seen as a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is effective but slightly leans towards overemphasizing the subject."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals seated around a table, suggesting a meeting or discussion. The lighting and shadows are consistent with indoor artificial light, contributing to a natural ambiance. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the facial details and clothing textures that hint at AI generation. The overall composition and environment feel plausible, but minor artifacts are noticeable, particularly in the finer details of the characters' appearances and the background elements."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera indeed focuses closely on the central figure, isolating them from the surrounding group and drawing attention to their presence. This effectively highlights their importance in the gathering, achieving the intended emphasis. However, the transition between the two images suggests a slight overemphasis, as the second image removes much of the context provided by the surrounding individuals, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the focus shift is successful but slightly overshadows the broader setting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      7
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals engaged in a serious discussion around a table. The lighting, shadows, and overall composition contribute to a relatively natural feel, though there are subtle inconsistencies in the details of the characters' appearances and the environment that suggest it is AI-generated. The naturalness is high due to the realistic setting and interactions, but there are minor artifacts visible in the facial features and clothing textures, which slightly detract from the overall quality."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
       8,
       7
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted to highlight the central figure more prominently, effectively drawing attention to them. This change aligns well with the instruction, indicating successful execution. However, while the focus is achieved, some elements of the background and surrounding figures are still visible, suggesting that the transition was not overly dramatic or intrusive. Therefore, the editing is both successful and minimally invasive, resulting in scores of 8 for editing success and 7 for the degree of overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance as per the instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, while the focus shift is clear, some elements of the background and other characters are still visible, suggesting that the edit is not overly aggressive. This balance indicates a moderate level of overediting, as the scene retains its context but with a clear emphasis on the central figure."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_0.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog sniffing a flower in a field, which appears quite natural in terms of composition and context. The lighting and shadows are consistent with an outdoor setting, contributing to the natural feel. However, there is a slight softness in the details, particularly around the dog's fur and the flowers, which might indicate some AI generation characteristics but does not detract significantly from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual features. The blending between the dog and the background is smooth, indicating high-quality generation."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face and its interaction with the flower, which aligns well with the instruction. The dog's curious expression is visible, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up of the dog's face, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the editing is effective but leans slightly towards overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the dog's face as instructed, showing a gentle sniff of the flower and a curious expression. There is no repetition of the character within the image, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the natural setting and focus on the dog's interaction with the flower."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog in a natural outdoor setting with flowers, which appears quite realistic and harmonious. The lighting and shadows are consistent with a natural environment, contributing to a high level of naturalness. However, there is a slight softness in the details, particularly around the fur texture and background, which might indicate some AI generation characteristics but does not detract significantly from the overall realism. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual features. The blending between the dog and the background is smooth, indicating low artifact presence."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face, including its eyes and nose, which aligns with the instruction. The dog's expression appears curious, and it is still interacting with the flower, maintaining the intended focus. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the dog's face, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is successful but leans slightly towards overediting."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully reveals the dog's face while maintaining the continuity of the scene, adhering to the instruction to pan slightly upward. The dog's curious expression is captured effectively without generating the same character multiple times, ensuring the editing success score is high. However, there is a slight shift in perspective and focus, which introduces a minor degree of overediting, hence the lower score for overediting."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.json

@@ -1,16 +1,9 @@
 {
-  "PQ": {
-    "score": [
-      8,
-      9
-    ],
-    "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog interacting with flowers in a natural outdoor setting. The naturalness score is high (8) because the scene appears realistic, with appropriate lighting, shadows, and a harmonious composition. The dog's fur texture and the details of the flowers are well-rendered, contributing to the natural feel. However, there might be slight imperfections in the fine details that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10. The artifact score is also high (9) as there are minimal visible distortions, watermarks, or other anomalies. The overall image quality is smooth and coherent, indicating effective AI generation."
-  },
   "SC": {
     "score": [
-      8,
-      7
+      9,
+      8
     ],
-    "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face and its gentle interaction with the flower. This effectively captures the intended curious expression, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, the transition between the two images is noticeable but not overly dramatic, suggesting that the editing was done with care to maintain the original context. Therefore, the editing is both successful and minimally overedited."
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the dog's face as instructed, showing its curious expression while sniffing the flower. There is no repetition of the character within the image, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the natural setting and focus on the dog's interaction with the flower."
   }
 }

A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "SC": {
+    "score": [
+      8,
+      7
+    ],
+    "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the dog pausing and looking around, with its head tilted slightly, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the original image to the edited one involves a significant change in perspective and focus, which slightly increases the degree of overediting, hence the second score is slightly lower but still acceptable."
+  }
+}