EfficientNet-B4 Deepfake Detector with Grad-CAM Explainability
A high-accuracy deepfake face detector trained on Celeb-DF v2, combining an EfficientNet-B4 backbone with Grad-CAM spatial attribution and a deterministic forensic report generator. The model classifies face images as real or fake and highlights which facial region triggered the decision.
Bachelor project β Sapienza UniversitΓ di Roma, AI & Applied Computer Science
Model Performance
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Frame-Level AUC-ROC | 0.9933 |
| Video-Level AUC-ROC | 0.9990 |
| Frame Accuracy | 97.46% |
| Frame F1 Score | 98.55% |
| False Negative Rate | 0.44% (37 / 8,475 fakes missed) |
Video-level scores are computed by mean-aggregating frame probabilities per video ID, which suppresses single-frame noise and reflects real-world deployment.
What Makes This Different
- Explainable predictions β Grad-CAM heatmaps highlight the exact facial zone (forehead, eyes, nose, jaw, or hairline) that triggered the detection.
- Forensic text output β A template engine converts confidence + activated zones into a structured human-readable forensic report (4 confidence tiers).
- Video-level reasoning β Frame scores are aggregated per video for a single robust verdict.
- Interactive demo β Gradio app supports both image and video input.
Architecture
Input (224Γ224 face crop)
ββ EfficientNet-B4 backbone (ImageNet pretrained)
ββ Blocks 0β4 β frozen (feature extraction)
ββ Blocks 5β8 β fine-tuned (LR = 1e-4)
ββ Global Average Pooling
ββ Dropout(0.4) β Linear(1792β256) β ReLU β Dropout(0.2) β Linear(256β1)
ββ Sigmoid β probability [0, 1] (β₯ 0.5 = Fake)
- Loss: Focal Loss (Ξ±=0.25, Ξ³=2.0) β handles the 5:1 fake/real imbalance
- Optimizer: AdamW with differential learning rates (backbone 1e-4, head 5e-4)
- Scheduler: CosineAnnealingLR over 20 epochs with early stopping (patience=5)
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX A4000
Dataset
Celeb-DF v2 β 590 real celebrity videos + 5,639 high-quality deepfake videos.
- 15 frames extracted per video (uniform temporal sampling)
- MTCNN face detection β 224Γ224 crops, 20 px margin
- Split by video ID (80/10/10) β prevents identity leakage between train and test
- ~74,000 real face crops Β· ~477,000 fake face crops
Usage
Quick inference (image)
import torch
from torchvision import transforms
from PIL import Image
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
# Download checkpoint
ckpt_path = hf_hub_download(repo_id="honi05/deepfake-detection", filename="best_model.pt")
# Load model
from src.model import DeepfakeClassifier
model = DeepfakeClassifier(freeze_blocks=5, dropout=0.4, backbone='b4')
state = torch.load(ckpt_path, map_location="cpu", weights_only=True)
model.load_state_dict(state["model_state_dict"])
model.eval()
# Preprocess
transform = transforms.Compose([
transforms.Resize((224, 224)),
transforms.ToTensor(),
transforms.Normalize([0.485, 0.456, 0.406], [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]),
])
img = Image.open("face.jpg").convert("RGB")
x = transform(img).unsqueeze(0)
with torch.no_grad():
logit = model(x)
prob = torch.sigmoid(logit).item()
print(f"Fake probability: {prob:.3f}")
print("Verdict:", "FAKE" if prob >= 0.5 else "REAL")
Grad-CAM explainability
from src.gradcam import GradCAM
grad_cam = GradCAM(model)
heatmap, confidence = grad_cam.compute(img_tensor) # (224,224) heatmap in [0,1]
overlay = grad_cam.overlay(img_pil, heatmap) # PIL image with jet overlay
top_zones = grad_cam.get_top_zones(heatmap, top_k=2)
print("Most activated zones:", top_zones)
Forensic report
from src.forensic_text import generate_forensic_report
report = generate_forensic_report(confidence=0.91, zone1="eyes", zone2="jaw")
print(report)
# HIGH CONFIDENCE FAKE (91.0%) β Eyes region shows unnatural reflection/texture
# patterns inconsistent with genuine facial geometry. Jaw area exhibits visible
# blending seam characteristic of face-swap artefacts.
Gradio demo (image + video)
python demo/app.py
Explainability β Facial Zones
The model maps Grad-CAM activations to 5 facial zones (pixel rows in the 224Γ224 crop):
| Zone | Rows | Common deepfake artefacts |
|---|---|---|
| Forehead | 0β60 | Hair boundary blending, skin tone mismatch |
| Eyes | 60β100 | Unnatural reflection, pupil shape, lash generation |
| Nose | 100β145 | Texture discontinuity, geometry distortion |
| Jaw | 145β185 | Blending seam at jaw-line, edge softening |
| Hairline | 185β224 | Hair generation artefacts, boundary warping |
The top-2 activated zones are included in the forensic report.
Ablation Results
| Configuration | Test AUC | vs Baseline |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline (this model) | 0.9933 | β |
| No data augmentation | 0.9701 | β2.32% |
| EfficientNet-B0 backbone | 0.9612 | β3.21% |
| BCE loss (no focal) | 0.9814 | β1.19% |
| Fully fine-tuned (no freezing) | 0.9878 | β0.55% |
Key findings: data augmentation and the larger B4 backbone provide the biggest gains. Focal loss measurably improves handling of the class imbalance. Selective freezing slightly outperforms full fine-tuning (likely due to overfitting risk with the large backbone).
Limitations
- Binary classification only (real vs. fake) β does not identify the generation method
- No temporal modelling β each frame is classified independently
- Trained on Celeb-DF v2 only β may not generalise equally to StyleGAN or diffusion-based fakes
- High-compression video can suppress the artefacts the model relies on
- False Positive Rate of ~15.9% on the test set
Files
| File | Description |
|---|---|
best_model.pt |
Trained weights (model_state_dict + training metadata) |
app.py |
Gradio demo (image + video tabs) |
requirements.txt |
Python dependencies |
Full source code: github.com/Honi05/DeepFakeDetector
Citation
If you use this model, please cite:
@misc{arora2026deepfake,
title = {Deepfake Detection with Explainable Forensic Analysis Using EfficientNet-B4 and Grad-CAM},
author = {Arora, Honi},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/honi05/deepfake-detection}
}
Acknowledgements
- Celeb-DF v2 β Li et al., CVPR 2020
- EfficientNet β Tan & Le, ICML 2019
- Grad-CAM β Selvaraju et al., ICCV 2017
- Focal Loss β Lin et al., ICCV 2017
- facenet-pytorch β MTCNN implementation
Papers for honi05/deepfake-detection
Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization
Evaluation results
- Frame-Level AUC-ROC on Celeb-DF v2self-reported0.993
- Frame Accuracy on Celeb-DF v2self-reported0.975
- Frame F1 Score on Celeb-DF v2self-reported0.986
- Video-Level AUC-ROC on Celeb-DF v2self-reported0.999