int8 versus fp32 recall and the 24 hand-written fragments

#1
by guicybercode - opened

Recall drops from 0.999 on the synthetic test corpus to 0.956 on the 24 hand-written fragments. Which labels account for most of the misses there? Names in lowercase or inside long legal sentences are where I would expect trouble, especially with max length 128 during training. Did you compare the int8 per-channel export with the fp32 checkpoint on those same fragments? On a 109 MB model running on the user's own computer, knowing whether quantization or the training data causes the misses would help me decide how to use it.

Sign up or log in to comment