Splice-QFN

tl;dr: This is a merge of the Swift 1.5 and OrcaRouter-Uncensored finetunes of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next; it does a fairly decent job at combining the shorter chain-of-thought from Swift and the reduced refusal from the OrcaRouter finetune. My own home inference server has four AMD Radeon Pro V620 GPUs, the W4A16 quant here runs great in the leapdragon vLLM fork on that machine. Your own mileage may, of course, vary.

for lack of a better name, I'm calling this thing Splice-QFN.

I had gork do the merge and it wrote a long and poorly-written system card here that I deleted. Short version is that it went through every tensor and did this:

output = swift + 1.0 * (orcarouter - qwen3.8-flash-next)

The n-gram table is not included here and didn't change in the merge so download it elsewhere. If you're following that leapdragon franken-vllm you can grab it form the same place it suggests: primitive-ai/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-PLE-quant, put it in the folder ples_int4/.

Quantization

routed experts are 4-bit and shared experts and other important stuff is bf16

Benchmark

I had gork spend a few hours to benchmark this against OrcaRouter's ablit and the stock Qwen weights, I'll let it explain:

Compared against the OrcaRouter W4A16 quant and the stock Qwen3.8-Flash-Next W4A16 quant on the same server. One sample, temperature 0, thinking left at the chat template default (xhigh). Do not pass reasoning_effort=low for this comparison: that flag writes "keep your thinking brief" into the prompt and makes the base model look short too. Generation cap 24,576 tokens. Run on 2026-10-04.

The 12 items were fixed before any of these outputs:

  • AIME 2024: I-8, I-15, II-8, II-15 (Maxwell-Jia/AIME_2024)
  • GPQA-Diamond rows 17, 53, 89, 125 in dataset order (fingertap/GPQA-Diamond)
  • HumanEval 32, 68, 85, 129, graded by executing the official tests
Correct Median thinking tokens Mean thinking tokens Hit the 24,576 cap
Splice 11 / 12 7,228 8,068 1
OrcaRouter W4A16 9 / 12 16,010 12,748 3
Stock Qwen W4A16 8 / 12 11,474 12,025 4

Paired over all 12 items, Splice's median thinking-token ratio is 0.66 versus OrcaRouter and 0.70 versus the stock model. Those ratios count a capped trace as 24,576, which hides how long the capped runs would have gone. On items both sides actually finished, the median ratio is about 0.48 versus OrcaRouter and about 0.70 versus the stock model.

Every miss is an unfinished trace. A capped run was still inside the thinking block and had not emitted a final answer. No finished answer from any model was wrong.

Item Splice OrcaRouter Stock
AIME 2024-I-8 correct, 6,873 correct, 14,206 correct, 10,241
AIME 2024-I-15 correct, 12,397 correct, 17,813 correct, 16,553
AIME 2024-II-8 correct, 7,584 correct, 21,883 correct, 12,707
AIME 2024-II-15 correct, 15,436 capped capped
GPQA row 17 correct, 459 correct, 616 correct, 461
GPQA row 53 correct, 502 correct, 609 correct, 897
GPQA row 89 correct, 8,271 correct, 18,653 capped
GPQA row 125 correct, 18,402 capped capped
HumanEval/129 correct, 1,994 correct, 4,830 correct, 4,779
HumanEval/68 correct, 135 correct, 442 correct, 186
HumanEval/85 correct, 181 correct, 201 correct, 168
HumanEval/32 capped capped capped

HumanEval/32 never produced code from any of the three models, so it says nothing. GPQA rows 17 and 53 are a few hundred tokens for everyone, so they do not show a chain-of-thought difference. The gap is the AIME problems and the harder GPQA items: Splice finished them, including the three the others did not finish inside the cap, and used substantially fewer thinking tokens where all three finished.

Twelve questions, one sample each. This is not Swift's published suite (GPQA-Diamond full, AIME 2026, LiveCodeBench, Terminal-Bench), and it is not a refusal benchmark. It is enough to see that the short traces survived the graft and that the finished answers were at least as good as the other two W4A16 checkpoints.

anecdotally it seems to be at least as good as the OrcaRouter finetune alone, which I was using for a couple weeks before I cooked this thing up.

License

my attorney, who is also a large language model, has instructed me to state the following:

The Swift contribution in these weights is under the Swift Open License v1.0, included here as LICENSE. That license's redistributor notice covers a merge and a quant: keep that license, keep the attribution, and also comply with the Qwen Community License 1.0 for the base model. The Swift commercial threshold (gross revenue of one million USD, above which their enterprise license is required) still applies to the Swift part of this checkpoint. Nothing here grants use of the Swift, UkisAI, Qwen, or OrcaRouter names as if those projects shipped Splice.

Downloads last month
68
Safetensors
Model size
127B params
Tensor type
I32
路
I64
路
BF16
路
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 馃檵 Ask for provider support

Model tree for jdagostino/Splice-QFN-W4A16