SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model Type: Sentence Transformer
- Base model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
- Maximum Sequence Length: 512 tokens
- Output Dimensionality: 768 tokens
- Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
Model Sources
Full Model Architecture
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': True, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)
Usage
Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
pip install -U sentence-transformers
Then you can load this model and run inference.
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
model = SentenceTransformer("jet-taekyo/snowflake_finetuned_semantic")
sentences = [
'What must lenders provide to consumers who are denied credit under the Fair Credit Reporting Act?',
'that consumers who are denied credit receive "adverse action" notices. Anyone who relies on the information in a \ncredit report to deny a consumer credit must, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, provide an "adverse action" \nnotice to the consumer, which includes "notice of the reasons a creditor took adverse action on the application \nor on an existing credit account."90 In addition, under the risk-based pricing rule,91 lenders must either inform \nborrowers of their credit score, or else tell consumers when "they are getting worse terms because of \ninformation in their credit report." The CFPB has also asserted that "[t]he law gives every applicant the right to \na specific explanation if their application for credit was denied, and that right is not diminished simply because \na company uses a complex algorithm that it doesn\'t understand."92 Such explanations illustrate a shared value \nthat certain decisions need to be explained.',
'measures to prevent, flag, or take other action in response to outputs that \nreproduce particular training data (e.g., plagiarized, trademarked, patented, \nlicensed content or trade secret material). \nIntellectual Property; CBRN \nInformation or Capabilities',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
Evaluation
Metrics
Information Retrieval
| Metric |
Value |
| cosine_accuracy@1 |
0.875 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 |
0.9671 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 |
0.9868 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 |
0.9934 |
| cosine_precision@1 |
0.875 |
| cosine_precision@3 |
0.3224 |
| cosine_precision@5 |
0.1974 |
| cosine_precision@10 |
0.0993 |
| cosine_recall@1 |
0.875 |
| cosine_recall@3 |
0.9671 |
| cosine_recall@5 |
0.9868 |
| cosine_recall@10 |
0.9934 |
| cosine_ndcg@10 |
0.9421 |
| cosine_mrr@10 |
0.9249 |
| cosine_map@100 |
0.9255 |
| dot_accuracy@1 |
0.875 |
| dot_accuracy@3 |
0.9671 |
| dot_accuracy@5 |
0.9868 |
| dot_accuracy@10 |
0.9934 |
| dot_precision@1 |
0.875 |
| dot_precision@3 |
0.3224 |
| dot_precision@5 |
0.1974 |
| dot_precision@10 |
0.0993 |
| dot_recall@1 |
0.875 |
| dot_recall@3 |
0.9671 |
| dot_recall@5 |
0.9868 |
| dot_recall@10 |
0.9934 |
| dot_ndcg@10 |
0.9421 |
| dot_mrr@10 |
0.9249 |
| dot_map@100 |
0.9255 |
Information Retrieval
| Metric |
Value |
| cosine_accuracy@1 |
0.8906 |
| cosine_accuracy@3 |
0.9688 |
| cosine_accuracy@5 |
0.9688 |
| cosine_accuracy@10 |
0.9766 |
| cosine_precision@1 |
0.8906 |
| cosine_precision@3 |
0.3229 |
| cosine_precision@5 |
0.1938 |
| cosine_precision@10 |
0.0977 |
| cosine_recall@1 |
0.8906 |
| cosine_recall@3 |
0.9688 |
| cosine_recall@5 |
0.9688 |
| cosine_recall@10 |
0.9766 |
| cosine_ndcg@10 |
0.9391 |
| cosine_mrr@10 |
0.9266 |
| cosine_map@100 |
0.9282 |
| dot_accuracy@1 |
0.8906 |
| dot_accuracy@3 |
0.9688 |
| dot_accuracy@5 |
0.9688 |
| dot_accuracy@10 |
0.9766 |
| dot_precision@1 |
0.8906 |
| dot_precision@3 |
0.3229 |
| dot_precision@5 |
0.1938 |
| dot_precision@10 |
0.0977 |
| dot_recall@1 |
0.8906 |
| dot_recall@3 |
0.9688 |
| dot_recall@5 |
0.9688 |
| dot_recall@10 |
0.9766 |
| dot_ndcg@10 |
0.9391 |
| dot_mrr@10 |
0.9266 |
| dot_map@100 |
0.9282 |
Training Details
Training Dataset
Unnamed Dataset
- Size: 714 training samples
- Columns:
sentence_0 and sentence_1
- Approximate statistics based on the first 714 samples:
|
sentence_0 |
sentence_1 |
| type |
string |
string |
| details |
- min: 7 tokens
- mean: 17.69 tokens
- max: 32 tokens
|
- min: 2 tokens
- mean: 175.22 tokens
- max: 512 tokens
|
- Samples:
| sentence_0 |
sentence_1 |
What are the limitations of current pre-deployment testing approaches for GAI applications? |
49 early lifecycle TEVV approaches are developed and matured for GAI, organizations may use recommended “pre-deployment testing” practices to measure performance, capabilities, limits, risks, and impacts. This section describes risk measurement and estimation as part of pre-deployment TEVV, and examines the state of play for pre-deployment testing methodologies. Limitations of Current Pre-deployment Test Approaches Currently available pre-deployment TEVV processes used for GAI applications may be inadequate, non- systematically applied, or fail to reflect or mismatched to deployment contexts. For example, the anecdotal testing of GAI system capabilities through video games or standardized tests designed for humans (e.g., intelligence tests, professional licensing exams) does not guarantee GAI system validity or reliability in those domains. |
How do organizations measure performance and risks during pre-deployment testing of GAI systems? |
49 early lifecycle TEVV approaches are developed and matured for GAI, organizations may use recommended “pre-deployment testing” practices to measure performance, capabilities, limits, risks, and impacts. This section describes risk measurement and estimation as part of pre-deployment TEVV, and examines the state of play for pre-deployment testing methodologies. Limitations of Current Pre-deployment Test Approaches Currently available pre-deployment TEVV processes used for GAI applications may be inadequate, non- systematically applied, or fail to reflect or mismatched to deployment contexts. For example, the anecdotal testing of GAI system capabilities through video games or standardized tests designed for humans (e.g., intelligence tests, professional licensing exams) does not guarantee GAI system validity or reliability in those domains. |
What are the key aspects of the broad application scope mentioned in the context? |
broad application scope, fine-tuning, and varieties of data sources (e.g., grounding, retrieval-augmented generation). Data Privacy; Intellectual Property
|
- Loss:
MatryoshkaLoss with these parameters:{
"loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss",
"matryoshka_dims": [
768,
512,
256,
128,
64
],
"matryoshka_weights": [
1,
1,
1,
1,
1
],
"n_dims_per_step": -1
}
Training Hyperparameters
Non-Default Hyperparameters
eval_strategy: steps
per_device_train_batch_size: 20
per_device_eval_batch_size: 20
num_train_epochs: 5
multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin
All Hyperparameters
Click to expand
overwrite_output_dir: False
do_predict: False
eval_strategy: steps
prediction_loss_only: True
per_device_train_batch_size: 20
per_device_eval_batch_size: 20
per_gpu_train_batch_size: None
per_gpu_eval_batch_size: None
gradient_accumulation_steps: 1
eval_accumulation_steps: None
torch_empty_cache_steps: None
learning_rate: 5e-05
weight_decay: 0.0
adam_beta1: 0.9
adam_beta2: 0.999
adam_epsilon: 1e-08
max_grad_norm: 1
num_train_epochs: 5
max_steps: -1
lr_scheduler_type: linear
lr_scheduler_kwargs: {}
warmup_ratio: 0.0
warmup_steps: 0
log_level: passive
log_level_replica: warning
log_on_each_node: True
logging_nan_inf_filter: True
save_safetensors: True
save_on_each_node: False
save_only_model: False
restore_callback_states_from_checkpoint: False
no_cuda: False
use_cpu: False
use_mps_device: False
seed: 42
data_seed: None
jit_mode_eval: False
use_ipex: False
bf16: False
fp16: False
fp16_opt_level: O1
half_precision_backend: auto
bf16_full_eval: False
fp16_full_eval: False
tf32: None
local_rank: 0
ddp_backend: None
tpu_num_cores: None
tpu_metrics_debug: False
debug: []
dataloader_drop_last: False
dataloader_num_workers: 0
dataloader_prefetch_factor: None
past_index: -1
disable_tqdm: False
remove_unused_columns: True
label_names: None
load_best_model_at_end: False
ignore_data_skip: False
fsdp: []
fsdp_min_num_params: 0
fsdp_config: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}
fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap: None
accelerator_config: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}
deepspeed: None
label_smoothing_factor: 0.0
optim: adamw_torch
optim_args: None
adafactor: False
group_by_length: False
length_column_name: length
ddp_find_unused_parameters: None
ddp_bucket_cap_mb: None
ddp_broadcast_buffers: False
dataloader_pin_memory: True
dataloader_persistent_workers: False
skip_memory_metrics: True
use_legacy_prediction_loop: False
push_to_hub: False
resume_from_checkpoint: None
hub_model_id: None
hub_strategy: every_save
hub_private_repo: False
hub_always_push: False
gradient_checkpointing: False
gradient_checkpointing_kwargs: None
include_inputs_for_metrics: False
eval_do_concat_batches: True
fp16_backend: auto
push_to_hub_model_id: None
push_to_hub_organization: None
mp_parameters:
auto_find_batch_size: False
full_determinism: False
torchdynamo: None
ray_scope: last
ddp_timeout: 1800
torch_compile: False
torch_compile_backend: None
torch_compile_mode: None
dispatch_batches: None
split_batches: None
include_tokens_per_second: False
include_num_input_tokens_seen: False
neftune_noise_alpha: None
optim_target_modules: None
batch_eval_metrics: False
eval_on_start: False
eval_use_gather_object: False
batch_sampler: batch_sampler
multi_dataset_batch_sampler: round_robin
Training Logs
| Epoch |
Step |
cosine_map@100 |
| 1.0 |
36 |
0.9145 |
| 1.3889 |
50 |
0.9256 |
| 2.0 |
72 |
0.9246 |
| 2.7778 |
100 |
0.9282 |
| 3.0 |
108 |
0.9245 |
| 4.0 |
144 |
0.9244 |
| 4.1667 |
150 |
0.9244 |
| 5.0 |
180 |
0.9255 |
| 1.0 |
31 |
0.9282 |
Framework Versions
- Python: 3.11.9
- Sentence Transformers: 3.1.0
- Transformers: 4.44.2
- PyTorch: 2.4.1+cu121
- Accelerate: 0.34.2
- Datasets: 3.0.0
- Tokenizers: 0.19.1
Citation
BibTeX
Sentence Transformers
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = "11",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}
MatryoshkaLoss
@misc{kusupati2024matryoshka,
title={Matryoshka Representation Learning},
author={Aditya Kusupati and Gantavya Bhatt and Aniket Rege and Matthew Wallingford and Aditya Sinha and Vivek Ramanujan and William Howard-Snyder and Kaifeng Chen and Sham Kakade and Prateek Jain and Ali Farhadi},
year={2024},
eprint={2205.13147},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG}
}
MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
@misc{henderson2017efficient,
title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
year={2017},
eprint={1705.00652},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}