Overall really good

#4
by Grio43 - opened

Overall this is very good.

It can loose things like the subject within the paragraph and shift things so they don't make sense. Overall likely the strongest model for the current use case.

Data does inject spelling errors and grammar errors.
Overall fairly good.

Thanks so much for trying this out and for the write up!

Those are both good points. The spelling/grammar issues are actually due to the training data - the 'human' side was actual human writing (with typos, etc) and the model kind of picked up on that. And yes, it dropping the subject or rearranging stuff to the point where it makes no sense is something I'm still training it out of (ie - meaning drift is something the fact judge penalizes)

In the meantime, you could do the rewrite then have an AI assistant do a comparison to your draft and just correct the problems (ie - subject drop, fact change, typo) but not everything else so you still have the rewrite style but without the errors. (Agents could call the model and do this step automatically)

Thanks you so much again

I look forward to the future releases

Thanks, Im currently making some high quality quantizations for edge devices(it's much more better than the regular/popular quantization method). I got a little bit stuck on improving the rewrites quality, but, will do!

I don't really think a more powerful model or quant is currently needed.

I would suspect a supervisor that punishes for subject shift would help. Possibly a larger dataset of scholar articles, papers, and news prior to 2015 to avoid data poisoning. That would likely be a primary focus so it has a larger example set to not bake in a pitcular way of writing, and has more varried gradients.

Its hard to say currently if the best use is for multiple paragraphs or a single. Multi paragraphs, facts start getting lost. Single paragraphs things won't make overall sense sometimes in the big picture.

Yes, I totally agree with it. But it seems I Encounter some problem with it, like there's a ceiling of the accuracy rates and I didn't really came out a good method to break it. Maybe adding chain of thought is a good idea, but crafting this kind of data for chain of thought make me flagged by the AI company for distillation.

Right now using an agent to do a before And after compression is doing the job fairly well. Ensure it isn't turning a paragraph that is supporting a subject to advocating against it. Agent also repairs facts. Even with the repairs+ grammerly grammer repair. The output is still 90% human on gptzero..panagram is still a failure..

Sign up or log in to comment