Instructions to use kirp/jpt-0.8b with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.

Libraries

How to use kirp/jpt-0.8b with Transformers:

# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper
from transformers import pipeline

pipe = pipeline("image-text-to-text", model="kirp/jpt-0.8b")
messages = [
    {
        "role": "user",
        "content": [
            {"type": "image", "url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/p-blog/candy.JPG"},
            {"type": "text", "text": "What animal is on the candy?"}
        ]
    },
]
pipe(text=messages)

# Load model directly
from transformers import AutoProcessor, AutoModelForMultimodalLM

processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained("kirp/jpt-0.8b")
model = AutoModelForMultimodalLM.from_pretrained("kirp/jpt-0.8b", device_map="auto")
messages = [
    {
        "role": "user",
        "content": [
            {"type": "image", "url": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images/resolve/main/p-blog/candy.JPG"},
            {"type": "text", "text": "What animal is on the candy?"}
        ]
    },
]
inputs = processor.apply_chat_template(
	messages,
	add_generation_prompt=True,
	tokenize=True,
	return_dict=True,
	return_tensors="pt",
).to(model.device)

outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40)
print(processor.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:]))

Notebooks
Google Colab
Kaggle
Local Apps Settings

vLLM

How to use kirp/jpt-0.8b with vLLM:

Install from pip and serve model

# Install vLLM from pip:
pip install vllm
# Start the vLLM server:
vllm serve "kirp/jpt-0.8b"
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "kirp/jpt-0.8b",
		"messages": [
			{
				"role": "user",
				"content": [
					{
						"type": "text",
						"text": "Describe this image in one sentence."
					},
					{
						"type": "image_url",
						"image_url": {
							"url": "https://cdn.britannica.com/61/93061-050-99147DCE/Statue-of-Liberty-Island-New-York-Bay.jpg"
						}
					}
				]
			}
		]
	}'

Use Docker

docker model run hf.co/kirp/jpt-0.8b

SGLang

How to use kirp/jpt-0.8b with SGLang:

Install from pip and serve model

# Install SGLang from pip:
pip install sglang
# Start the SGLang server:
python3 -m sglang.launch_server \
    --model-path "kirp/jpt-0.8b" \
    --host 0.0.0.0 \
    --port 30000
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "kirp/jpt-0.8b",
		"messages": [
			{
				"role": "user",
				"content": [
					{
						"type": "text",
						"text": "Describe this image in one sentence."
					},
					{
						"type": "image_url",
						"image_url": {
							"url": "https://cdn.britannica.com/61/93061-050-99147DCE/Statue-of-Liberty-Island-New-York-Bay.jpg"
						}
					}
				]
			}
		]
	}'

Use Docker images

docker run --gpus all \
    --shm-size 32g \
    -p 30000:30000 \
    -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \
    --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \
    --ipc=host \
    lmsysorg/sglang:latest \
    python3 -m sglang.launch_server \
        --model-path "kirp/jpt-0.8b" \
        --host 0.0.0.0 \
        --port 30000
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "kirp/jpt-0.8b",
		"messages": [
			{
				"role": "user",
				"content": [
					{
						"type": "text",
						"text": "Describe this image in one sentence."
					},
					{
						"type": "image_url",
						"image_url": {
							"url": "https://cdn.britannica.com/61/93061-050-99147DCE/Statue-of-Liberty-Island-New-York-Bay.jpg"
						}
					}
				]
			}
		]
	}'

Docker Model Runner
How to use kirp/jpt-0.8b with Docker Model Runner:
```
docker model run hf.co/kirp/jpt-0.8b
```

JPT-0.8B

JPT-0.8B · JPT-4B · JPT-9B · JPT-35B-A3B · llm2jev

What is JPT-0.8B

JPT-0.8B is a fast, open decision model: give it a situation and typed questions, get a calibrated probability for every option from one forward pass. No generated explanation, no reasoning tokens — latency is one prefill.

The small sibling of JPT-4B: the same recipe and the same data, small enough for CPU or edge serving.

It implements the typed-decision interface introduced by Jev from TypeSafe AI [1]: a caller sends a state plus questions, and each question is one of three types. JPT is an independent model, not derived from Jev and not trained on Jev outputs; it is an open alternative behind the same interface.

Question type	What it answers	Options
`choice`	pick one	2–255 labels
`score`	a level on an ordered scale	the scale's levels
`noul`	yes / no	`true`, `false`

Built on Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B: a LoRA fine-tune merged into full weights. The vision tower is unchanged.

Probabilities use one temperature T = 1.140, fit once on a held-out split — never per benchmark.

❯❯ Benchmarks

❯ JevBench v1.4.0

JevBench [2] scores general typed decisions; JPT-0.8B reaches 0.736 public accuracy, above every sub-2B system in the v1.4 results and 0.113 above its base model. v1.4.0 has 231 public items and 308 sealed items only the maintainer can run, so JPT-0.8B has no official v1.4 score yet.

Table

System	Params	Public accuracy (231)
JPT-35B-A3B (ours)	35B-A3B	0.892
JPT-4B (ours)	4B	0.879
Jev 1.13.0 (TypeSafe AI, API)	closed	0.866
JPT-9B (ours)	9B	0.853
JPT-0.8B	0.8B	0.736
decider-2b	2B	0.710
kev 0.6B	0.6B	0.667
Open-Jev 2B	2B	0.645
Qwen3.5-0.8B, same prompt, zero-shot (our run)	0.8B	0.623
SimpleJev (Qwen3.5-0.8B)	0.8B	0.545
kev 0.5B	0.5B	0.494

Source: other rows from results/v1.4/jevbench-v1.4-results.json at jevbench commit 2fa63fa (2026-09-23); ours scored with the benchmark's own CLI.

❯ Decision Index 0.2.1

Decision Index [3] 0.2.1 (2026-09-27) is the broadest test: the full frozen suite, 38 scored benchmarks in five areas, chance-corrected — JPT-0.8B scores 19.22, the best 0.8B on the board. Run through llm2jev over SGLang and submitted as apolinario/decision-index#7; 0.2.1 rescores the same run (17.07 under 0.2).

Table

Model	Params	Decision Index 0.2.1
Jev 1.13.0 (TypeSafe AI, API)	closed	57.91
JPT-35B-A3B (ours, not on the board yet)	35B-A3B	52.89
JPT-0.8B	0.8B	19.22
Decision 1.0 Eos	0.8B	18.41
Kev 0.8B	0.8B	14.60
MoJev	0.8B	11.69

Source: live board data/index-v0.2.1.json (generated 2026-09-27 16:59 UTC); full run and scores.json in kirp/decision-index-results-jpt-0.8b (gated: it carries the suite's GPQA/HLE item text).

By area, against Jev 1.13.0 on the same items and scorer: JPT-0.8B is behind Jev in all five areas and ahead of it on 1 of the 38 index benchmarks.

Per-area and per-benchmark skill vs Jev 1.13.0

Area	Jev 1.13.0	JPT-0.8B
Knowledge	51.4	9.9
Language	62.0	23.0
Retrieval	55.4	16.4
Tools	75.1	36.2
Arts	37.7	8.0

Area	Benchmark	Jev 1.13.0	JPT-0.8B
Arts	BPoMP	81.8	0.0
Arts	ForecastBench	30.6	5.8
Arts	Habermas Machine	21.5	12.1
Arts	Humicroedit	23.7	4.4
Arts	New Yorker	62.6	25.2
Arts	POP909-CL	15.9	1.7
Arts	cfcolor	28.8	7.2
Games	ChessBench	9.8	0.3
Knowledge	BBH	89.7	21.2
Knowledge	CLadder	45.3	8.8
Knowledge	CRUXEval	57.1	0.0
Knowledge	GPQA Diamond	71.4	6.8
Knowledge	GSM8K	75.6	20.7
Knowledge	HLE	4.7	0.9
Knowledge	MMLU-Pro	80.5	19.0
Knowledge	MuSR	46.1	16.7
Knowledge	SATA-Bench	25.4	2.7
Language	ACOS	27.3	4.4
Language	ANLI	62.2	8.0
Language	ContractNLI	59.1	60.6
Language	FinEntity	80.8	67.7
Language	HellaSwag	92.7	31.5
Language	NLI4CT	69.0	27.7
Language	RAGTruth	51.3	7.4
Language	VAST	46.9	16.0
Language	WinoGrande	83.9	6.4
Language	iSarcasmEval	36.3	5.5
Retrieval	Amazon ESCI	43.8	12.3
Retrieval	BANKING77	79.5	34.6
Retrieval	BRIGHT	40.6	23.9
Retrieval	CLINC150+OOS	89.2	9.9
Retrieval	HoVer	45.7	9.7
Retrieval	PhishNChips phishing decisions	25.1	4.1
Tools	API-Bank	88.0	28.8
Tools	BFCL	94.3	68.6
Tools	Home appliance simulator	52.3	0.0
Tools	ToolRet	59.9	45.6
Tools	When2Call	74.6	33.3

Chance-corrected skill × 100 (0 = random, 100 = perfect). Jev's numbers are its official entry on the live board (jev-1.13.0); ours are from the same kit and suite.

❯ More benchmarks

The same evals as the larger JPTs, at T = 1.140. Same-prompt base-model rows have not been run for these at 0.8B.

Benchmark (version, n)	What it tests	JPT-0.8B	Jev 1.13.0
JevBench v1.4.0 public hard tier [2] (111)	hardest general decisions	0.577 (ECE 0.156)	—
Typed decisions test (ours, 2,000)	in-distribution typed decisions	0.768 (ECE 0.162)	—
ANLI r1 / r3 [4] (dev)	adversarial NLI	0.437 / 0.483	—
Banking77 [5] / MASSIVE 1.1 [6] (en / de / zh)	intent classification	0.650 / 0.797 / 0.697 / 0.760	—
EnvBench v0.1 (ours) public / held-out [10] (skill 0–100)	sequential decisions in game envs	37.8 / 35.0	—
ScreenSpot-v2 [7] SoM / Screen2Words [8] / ERQA [9] (images, zero-shot)	GUI grounding, screen summary, embodied reasoning	0.787 / 0.740 / 0.302	—

Jev 1.13.0 has no official score on these splits (our own test/dev cuts, EnvBench, and the image sets), so its column is "—"; its official scores on the Decision Index versions of ANLI and BANKING77 are in the per-benchmark table above. Running the Jev API on these splits would fill them.

Banking77, MASSIVE and typed rows are in-distribution (train splits in the mix, test items not).

❯❯ Quick Start

Two pieces: an engine that holds the weights, and llm2jev (>= 0.6.1) in front of it, reading option probabilities off the engine.

⚡ SGLang (recommended)

python -m sglang.launch_server --model-path kirp/jpt-0.8b --port 30000 \
  --context-length 32768 --mamba-scheduler-strategy extra_buffer &  # Qwen3.5's DeltaNet layers need this flag
llm2jev --model kirp/jpt-0.8b --backend sglang --url http://127.0.0.1:30000 --port 8080 --temperature 1.140

Tested with SGLang 0.5.9; install cuDNN 9.15+ over its pinned 9.10: pip install "sglang==0.5.9" && pip install "nvidia-cudnn-cu12>=9.15".

🔁 vLLM

vllm serve kirp/jpt-0.8b --max-logprobs 256 --return-tokens-as-token-ids --enable-scale-out --port 8000
llm2jev --model kirp/jpt-0.8b --backend vllm --url http://127.0.0.1:8000 --port 8080 --temperature 1.140

The three vLLM flags are required: without them every request is a bare HTTP 400.

🧪 No engine (quick check only)

pip install "llm2jev[hf,vision]"
llm2jev --model kirp/jpt-0.8b --backend hf --port 8080 --temperature 1.140

Serializes requests; fine on CPU at this size, for traffic use SGLang or vLLM.

📨 Ask it a question

import requests
r = requests.post("http://127.0.0.1:8080/v1/systemone", json={
    "state": "Refund policy: full refund within 30 days of purchase; 50% until day 60; none after.\n"
             "Order 1182 was bought on 3 March and returned on 20 April.",
    "questions": {
        "refund": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "What refund does order 1182 get?",
                   "criteria": {"full": "Full refund", "half": "50% refund", "none": "No refund"}},
        "late":   {"type": "noul", "instructions": "Was the return made after day 30?",
                   "criteria": {"true": "Yes", "false": "No"}}}})
print(r.json()["answers"])   # each answer has the per-option probabilities

🖼️ With images

state = [{"role": "user", "content": [
    {"type": "image", "image": "https://example.com/screen.png"},
    {"type": "text", "text": "Task: open the settings page. Numbered boxes mark clickable elements."}]}]
questions = {"click": {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which box should be clicked?",
                       "criteria": {"1": None, "2": None, "3": None, "4": None, "5": None}}}

❯❯ Training

The JPT-4B recipe and data (mix_train_env_v11, 49,221 typed questions) on a larger base, one epoch, merged into full weights.

Part	What it is
Method	LoRA r=16 on every attention, DeltaNet and MLP projection of the language model, lr 5e-5; vision tower untouched
Loss	multi-class Brier over the option labels, on llm2jev's chat prompt with thinking disabled
Batch	2 GPUs × 5 × 4 gradient-accumulation steps = 40 questions per step
Data	49,221 questions in 32,835 records; one epoch over two option-shuffled copies — sources on the JPT-4B card
Held out	no item from JevBench, EnvBench held-out seeds, the Decision Index frozen suite or our typed test split

❯❯ Limitations

Much weaker than JPT-4B on hard questions: long-document and multi-step decisions (hard tier 0.577 vs 0.784).
Adversarial NLI is weak (ANLI r1 0.437).
Arithmetic and dates are the weakest area at every size: no reasoning phase by design.
Up to 255 options are accepted; training covered up to 77. English first. Images are zero-shot.

❯❯ References

TypeSafe AI. Jev. https://typesafe.ai
F. Standhartinger. JevBench, v1.4.0. https://github.com/fstandhartinger/jevbench
Decision Index, edition 0.2.1. https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/jev-decision-index
Nie et al. Adversarial NLI. ACL 2020.
Casanueva et al. Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoders (Banking77). NLP4ConvAI 2020.
FitzGerald et al. MASSIVE. ACL 2023.
Wu et al. OS-Atlas (ScreenSpot-v2). 2024.
Wang et al. Screen2Words. UIST 2021.
Gemini Robotics Team. Gemini Robotics (ERQA). 2025.
EnvBench, v0.1 (ours, frozen 2026-09-23; not yet public): programmatically solved game, planning and rule decisions with exact gold answers.

❯❯ License

CC BY-NC 4.0. The weights derive from Qwen3.5-0.8B (Apache-2.0), but some training datasets allow only non-commercial or research use, so the model is released for non-commercial use.

JPT-0.8B is an independent open model that implements a typed-decision interface (noul, choice and score questions answered with probabilities). It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or derived from TypeSafe AI or its Jev model, and it was not trained on Jev outputs.

Downloads last month: 240

Safetensors

Model size

0.9B params

Tensor type

F32

BF16

Model tree for kirp/jpt-0.8b

Base model

Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B-Base

Finetuned

Qwen/Qwen3.5-0.8B