| | --- |
| | license: mit |
| | datasets: |
| | - mahdin70/balanced_merged_bigvul_primevul |
| | base_model: |
| | - microsoft/unixcoder-base |
| | tags: |
| | - Code |
| | - Vulnerability |
| | - Detection |
| | metrics: |
| | - accuracy |
| | pipeline_tag: text-classification |
| | library_name: transformers |
| | --- |
| | |
| | # UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul Model Card |
| |
|
| | ## Model Overview |
| |
|
| | `UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul` is a multi-task model based on Microsoft's `unixcoder-base`, fine-tuned to detect vulnerabilities (`vul`) and classify Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) types in code snippets. It was developed by [mahdin70](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70) and trained on a balanced dataset combining BigVul and PrimeVul datasets. The model performs binary classification for vulnerability detection and multi-class classification for CWE identification. |
| |
|
| | - **Model Repository**: [mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul](https://huggingface.co/mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul) |
| | - **Base Model**: [microsoft/unixcoder-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/unixcoder-base) |
| | - **Tasks**: Vulnerability Detection (Binary), CWE Classification (Multi-class) |
| | - **License**: MIT (assumed; adjust if different) |
| | - **Date**: Trained and uploaded as of March 11, 2025 |
| |
|
| | ## Model Architecture |
| |
|
| | The model extends `unixcoder-base` with two task-specific heads: |
| | - **Vulnerability Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 2 classes (vulnerable or not). |
| | - **CWE Head**: A linear layer mapping 768-dimensional hidden states to 135 classes (134 CWE types + 1 for "no CWE"). |
| |
|
| | The architecture is implemented as a custom `MultiTaskUnixCoder` class in PyTorch, with the loss computed as the sum of cross-entropy losses for both tasks. |
| |
|
| | ## Training Dataset |
| |
|
| | The model was trained on the `mahdin70/balanced_merged_bigvul_primevul` dataset, which combines: |
| | - **BigVul**: A dataset of real-world vulnerabilities from open-source projects. |
| | - **PrimeVul**: A dataset focused on prime vulnerabilities in code. |
| |
|
| | ### Dataset Details |
| | - **Splits**: |
| | - Train: 124,780 samples |
| | - Validation: 26,740 samples |
| | - Test: 26,738 samples |
| | |
| | - **Features**: |
| | - `func`: Code snippet (text) |
| | - `vul`: Binary label (0 = non-vulnerable, 1 = vulnerable) |
| | - `CWE ID`: CWE identifier (e.g., CWE-89) or None for non-vulnerable samples |
| | |
| | - **Preprocessing**: |
| | - CWE labels were encoded using a `LabelEncoder` with 134 unique CWE classes identified across the dataset. |
| | - Non-vulnerable samples assigned a CWE label of -1 (mapped to 0 in the model). |
| | |
| | The dataset is balanced to ensure a fair representation of vulnerable and non-vulnerable samples, with a maximum of 10 samples per commit where applicable. |
| |
|
| | ## Training Details |
| |
|
| | ### Training Arguments |
| | The model was trained using the Hugging Face `Trainer` API with the following arguments: |
| | - **Output Directory**: `./unixcoder_multitask` |
| | - **Evaluation Strategy**: Per epoch |
| | - **Save Strategy**: Per epoch |
| | - **Learning Rate**: 2e-5 |
| | - **Batch Size**: 8 (per device, train and eval) |
| | - **Epochs**: 3 |
| | - **Weight Decay**: 0.01 |
| | - **Logging**: Every 10 steps, logged to `./logs` |
| | - **WANDB**: Disabled |
| |
|
| | ### Training Environment |
| | - **Hardware**: NVIDIA Tesla T4 GPU |
| | - **Framework**: PyTorch 2.5.1+cu121, Transformers 4.47.0 |
| | - **Duration**: ~6 hours, 34 minutes, 53 seconds (23,397 steps) |
| |
|
| | ### Training Metrics |
| | Validation metrics across epochs: |
| |
|
| | | Epoch | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Vul Accuracy | Vul Precision | Vul Recall | Vul F1 | CWE Accuracy | |
| | |-------|---------------|-----------------|--------------|---------------|------------|----------|--------------| |
| | | 1 | 0.3038 | 0.4997 | 0.9570 | 0.8082 | 0.5379 | 0.6459 | 0.1887 | |
| | | 2 | 0.6092 | 0.4859 | 0.9587 | 0.8118 | 0.5641 | 0.6657 | 0.2964 | |
| | | 3 | 0.4261 | 0.5090 | 0.9585 | 0.8114 | 0.5605 | 0.6630 | 0.3323 | |
| |
|
| | - **Final Training Loss**: 0.4430 (average over all steps) |
| |
|
| | ## Evaluation |
| |
|
| | The model was evaluated on the test split (26,738 samples) with the following metrics: |
| | - **Vulnerability Detection**: |
| | - Accuracy: 0.9571 |
| | - Precision: 0.7947 |
| | - Recall: 0.5437 |
| | - F1 Score: 0.6457 |
| | - **CWE Classification** (on vulnerable samples): |
| | - Accuracy: 0.3288 |
| |
|
| | The model excels at identifying non-vulnerable code (high accuracy) but has moderate recall for vulnerabilities and lower CWE classification accuracy, indicating room for improvement in CWE prediction. |
| |
|
| | ## Usage |
| |
|
| | ### Installation |
| | Install the required libraries: |
| | ```bash |
| | pip install transformers torch datasets huggingface_hub |
| | |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### Sample Code Snippet |
| | Below is an example of how to use the model for inference on a code snippet: |
| |
|
| | ```python |
| | from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel |
| | import torch |
| | |
| | # Load tokenizer and model |
| | tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("microsoft/unixcoder-base") |
| | model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("mahdin70/UnixCoder-Primevul-BigVul", trust_remote_code=True) |
| | model.eval() |
| | |
| | # Example code snippet |
| | code = """ |
| | bool DebuggerFunction::InitTabContents() { |
| | Value* debuggee; |
| | EXTENSION_FUNCTION_VALIDATE(args_->Get(0, &debuggee)); |
| | |
| | DictionaryValue* dict = static_cast<DictionaryValue*>(debuggee); |
| | EXTENSION_FUNCTION_VALIDATE(dict->GetInteger(keys::kTabIdKey, &tab_id_)); |
| | |
| | contents_ = NULL; |
| | TabContentsWrapper* wrapper = NULL; |
| | bool result = ExtensionTabUtil::GetTabById( |
| | tab_id_, profile(), include_incognito(), NULL, NULL, &wrapper, NULL); |
| | if (!result || !wrapper) { |
| | error_ = ExtensionErrorUtils::FormatErrorMessage( |
| | keys::kNoTabError, |
| | base::IntToString(tab_id_)); |
| | return false; |
| | } |
| | contents_ = wrapper->web_contents(); |
| | |
| | if (ChromeWebUIControllerFactory::GetInstance()->HasWebUIScheme( |
| | contents_->GetURL())) { |
| | error_ = ExtensionErrorUtils::FormatErrorMessage( |
| | keys::kAttachToWebUIError, |
| | contents_->GetURL().scheme()); |
| | return false; |
| | } |
| | |
| | return true; |
| | } |
| | """ |
| | |
| | # Tokenize input |
| | inputs = tokenizer(code, return_tensors="pt", padding="max_length", truncation=True, max_length=512) |
| | |
| | # Move to GPU if available |
| | device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu") |
| | model.to(device) |
| | inputs = {k: v.to(device) for k, v in inputs.items()} |
| | |
| | # Get predictions |
| | with torch.no_grad(): |
| | outputs = model(**inputs) |
| | vul_logits = outputs["vul_logits"] |
| | cwe_logits = outputs["cwe_logits"] |
| | |
| | # Vulnerability prediction |
| | vul_pred = torch.argmax(vul_logits, dim=1).item() |
| | print(f"Vulnerability: {'Vulnerable' if vul_pred == 1 else 'Not Vulnerable'}") |
| | |
| | # CWE prediction (if vulnerable) |
| | if vul_pred == 1: |
| | cwe_pred = torch.argmax(cwe_logits, dim=1).item() - 1 # Subtract 1 as -1 is "no CWE" |
| | print(f"Predicted CWE: {cwe_pred if cwe_pred >= 0 else 'None'}") |
| | |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### Output Example: |
| |
|
| | ```bash |
| | Vulnerability: Vulnerable |
| | Predicted CWE: 120 # Maps to CWE-120 (Buffer Overflow), depending on encoder |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ## Notes: |
| |
|
| | The CWE prediction is an integer index (0 to 133). To map it to a specific CWE ID (e.g., CWE-120), you need the LabelEncoder used during training, available in the dataset preprocessing step. |
| | Ensure trust_remote_code=True as the model uses custom code from the repository. |
| |
|
| | ## Limitations |
| | - CWE Accuracy: The model struggles with precise CWE classification (32.88% accuracy), likely due to class imbalance or complexity in distinguishing similar CWE types. |
| | - Recall: Moderate recall (54.37%) for vulnerability detection suggests some vulnerable samples may be missed. |
| | - Generalization: Trained on BigVul and PrimeVul, performance may vary on out-of-domain codebases. |
| |
|
| | ## Future Improvements |
| | - Increase training epochs or dataset size for better CWE accuracy. |
| | - Experiment with class weighting to address CWE imbalance. |
| | - Fine-tune on additional datasets for broader generalization. |