MTP?

#1
by Trilogix1 - opened

Any plan to mtp?

@Trilogix1 I think you missed something :)

image

@ilintar

Good catch thanks (appreciated) , this happens when you have 100s of version. I used an old build to quantize :)

Hugston-Macaron-V1-Tall-Qx_K_M.gguf .... load_model: failed to create MTP context....

Edit: Transformers discard MTP during loading with the lora coding merged weights. It classify it as different (weight and loras not from same source). Even though it find the 19 layers of mtp is discarded them. If someone can make it work with MTP let me know.

I wouldn't recommend running this on llama.cpp to be honest. Without the LoRA routing this is just a plain old Qwen3.6 35B-A3B. There's another model currently being ported with a similar architecture (Granite-Switch), so once that gets merged I think we can do this one more easily.

Right, need to merge each loras and test for this one. I will definitely take a look on the granite-switch too.
Haven´t seen you playing with any mix or model preference. Curious to know what´s your top 5 models list under 400B, considering (architecture, intelligence, tps, --flags especially coding). What about abliteration method, what's your pick if you had to? We can exchange at least one "good" model.
You can reply at trilogic@hugston.com if is not public info.

@Trilogix1 you can merge LoRAs, but that defeats the purpose. The whole idea of the router / switch is that you load the main model, then you apply the LoRAs "on the fly". If you merge all LoRAs, you basically end up with a bad 140B model. So you need some way to dynamically load the LoRAs.

Top 4 list under 400B: StepFun 3.7 Flash, MiniMax M3, Hy3, Qwen3.6 27B. Haven't yet tested Laguna properly.

Good model choice, missing still the diamond one.

I understand the purpose but a merge is running faster tps in our tests and you keep same size (it doesnt expand the base tensors but fill them with new training info so it cant possibly be 140b but same size and weight). Routering is useful when you change domain often (but we test and bench only 2 domains which is covered quite good with lora). Abliteration method?

Sign up or log in to comment