bge-base-en-v1.5 β€” ExecuTorch

BGE's English workhorse. Text in, one 768-dimensional vector out, for search and retrieval that never leaves the device.

  • Source: BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 β€” 12 layers, 768 dimensions, 30,522 vocabulary
  • License: mit
  • Input: input_ids and attention_mask, both [1, 256] int64
  • Output: [1, 768], CLS-pooled and L2-normalised inside the graph

The recipe is in the graph, and it was read off this repo

sentence-transformers stores it per model, and the shelf's seven embedding models do not agree. This one pools CLS and normalises, read from 1_Pooling/config.json and modules.json rather than inferred from the family name. Getting it wrong does not throw; it returns vectors that look fine and rank wrong.

Verification

build file size (MB) Mac ms* backend takes worst cosine vs eager retrieval budget
fp32 embed_bge_base_en_xnnpack_fp32.pte 435.7 33.1 78.8% 1.000000 0%
fp16 embed_bge_base_en_xnnpack_fp16.pte 218.0 57.2 67.8% 0.999999 1%
Core ML (fp16, iOS) embed_bge_base_en_coreml_all.pte 218.6 6.0 100.0% 0.999997 8%

*Mac arm64, median of 10, one 256-token sequence β€” a reference point for relative cost, not a device number. Torch eager fp32 on the same machine is 37.4 ms.

Cosine is measured against the model run in eager through its own pooling, over eight sentences. The last column is the one that decides: rank those eight against each other, and ask whether this build's score error is smaller than the gap between the document a query retrieves and the runner-up. Every shipped build keeps all eight top-1 results.

The attention is eager, and that is the faster export

On the sdpa path transformers hands F.scaled_dot_product_attention a boolean mask, PyTorch fills the masked entries with -inf, and the edge dialect lowers the whole thing to _safe_softmax β€” whose guard against a row of all -inf costs six operations XNNPACK cannot take (scalar_tensor, where, logical_not, eq, full_like, any.dim), once per attention block, each one cutting the subgraph in two.

attn_implementation="eager" masks with torch.finfo(dtype).min instead β€” a large finite number β€” so there is no guard to lower. The two disagree only about rows that have no unmasked key at all: sdpa zeroes them, eager gives them a uniform row. Those are padding rows, which the pooling discards and which every real query row masks out, so the output does not move. Measured with all but eight positions masked β€” as adversarial as this shape gets β€” the two graphs agree to 1.4e-07.

XNNPACK fp32 goes from 62.8% to 78.8% delegated.

Not shipped: int8

embed_bge_base_en_xnnpack_int8.pte is 181.3 MB β€” smaller than fp16's 218.0 MB, because the token embedding table is only 94 MB of the 435.7 MB model (22%), leaving most of the weight in linears for int8 to shrink.

It is withheld on the number that decides. Ranking the eight test sentences against each other, this build moves a pair score by at most 0.0193 while the closest fp32 decision β€” the gap between the document a query retrieves and the runner-up β€” is 0.0125. That is 154% of the room available, against a bar of 50%.

Correlation reads 0.999366 for this build, which no correlation gate would stop.

torch.export -> to_edge_transform_and_lower(partitioner) -> .pte (conversion scripts: executorch-models)

Downloads last month
10
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Model tree for mlboydaisuke/bge-base-en-v1.5-ExecuTorch

Quantized
(23)
this model