mlfoundations

/

tabula-8b

like 29

Follow

ML Foundations 201

Update:
I couldn't get the HF version to work, but I did retry this with the llama.cpp version, and it got 99% accuracy on the same toy problem.
Just gonna leave this here for posterity:

import os
import numpy as np
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
import random
from llama_cpp import Llama
import tqdm



def generate_custom_dataset(n_samples=100):
    X = np.random.randint(0, 1001, n_samples)
    sp1, sp2 = np.percentile(X, [33, 66]).astype(int)
    Y = np.array(['a' if x < sp1 else 'b' if sp1 <= x < sp2 else 'c' for x in X])
    return X, Y, sp1, sp2


def format_data_for_tabula(X, Y, sp1, sp2, n_context=5):
    data = []
    for x, y in zip(X, Y):
        row = (f"Predict the class: ||a||b||c|| "
               f"The X is {x}. "
               f"What is the class? ||a||b||c||<|endinput|>"
               f"{y}<|endcompletion|>")
        data.append(row)
    context = "\n".join(data[:n_context])
    return context


def run_test(x_test, sp1, sp2, context, llm):
    y_true = 'a' if x_test < sp1 else 'b' if sp1 <= x_test < sp2 else 'c'
    input_text = (f"{context}\n"
                  f"Predict the class: ||a||b||c|| "
                  f"The X is {x_test}. "
                  f"What is the class? ||a||b||c||<|endinput|>")

    output = llm(
        input_text,
        max_tokens=5,
        stop=["<|endcompletion|>"],
        echo=True
    )

    result = output['choices'][0]['text']
    predicted_class = result.split("<|endinput|>")[-1].strip().lower()

    return y_true, predicted_class


# Initialize llama.cpp model
llm = Llama(
    model_path=r"G:\llama_cpp_models\specialist\tabula-8b-Q8_0\tabula-8b-Q8_0.gguf",
    n_gpu_layers=-1,  # Uncomment to use GPU acceleration
    n_ctx=8192,  # Set context window
)
print("Model loaded successfully!")

# Generate dataset
dset_size = 100
X, Y, sp1, sp2 = generate_custom_dataset(n_samples=dset_size)
print(f"Split points: {sp1}, {sp2}")

# Prepare context
context = format_data_for_tabula(X, Y, sp1, sp2, n_context=dset_size)

# Run multiple tests
n_tests = 100
true_classes = []
predicted_classes = []

for i in tqdm.tqdm(range(n_tests)):
    x_test = np.random.randint(0, 1001)
    y_true, y_pred = run_test(x_test, sp1, sp2, context, llm)
    true_classes.append(y_true)
    predicted_classes.append(y_pred)
    # print(f"Test {i + 1}: X = {x_test}, True class = {y_true}, Predicted class = {y_pred}")

# Calculate accuracy
accuracy = accuracy_score(true_classes, predicted_classes)
print(f"\nAccuracy: {accuracy:.4f}")
print("Done")

Thanks, I know this issue is closed but adding a comment in case future readers arrive here :)

There are some extra utilities we would suggest using when performing inference with TabuLa-8B; you can find more info in the (recently-added) inference notebook in our repo: https://github.com/mlfoundations/rtfm?tab=readme-ov-file#quickstart---inference . I would not suggest using only the above code, as it doesn't match our internal usage of the model so we cannot easily verify that it produces identical input-output formatting for the model (although I haven't reviewed the above code line-by-line to look for issues).

However, your use case -- checking performance on labeled data -- would be best covered by using our evaluation pipeline (which is designed for exactly this case, where the data is already labeled and you want to check zero- or few-shot performance on it). That evaluation code is what we use to evaluate TabuLa-8B; it is also probably much more efficient than the inference utilities (which are designed for usability but not necessarily for performance).