bigcode/the-stack-dedup
Viewer • Updated • 237M • 16.9k • 410
moon aaa
moon005
·
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a dataset about 19 hours ago
bigcode/the-stack-dedup reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with 🔥 2 days ago
We're excited to release BananaAll, our SLM Super App.
It allows you to do EVERYTHING you need to do to trains SLMs in a single app, no terminal, no 30 chrome tabs.
The train tab allows you to train models, select datasets from presets, and use other ones with auto mapping, model size slider, it automatically generates a training script for you.
Then after you've trained the model or want to compare it to competitors, the evaluation tab, run ARC EASY, ARC Challenge, Hellaswag, PIQA, Arithmark 3, BananaMind Base Bench and more! Simple Results screen.
And lastly the inference tab, run your trained models or others.
Normally you would need seperate apps or scripts for that, but the BananaAll Super App lets you do all of that in a single app.
We also trained a small 2.5M parameter model on 200M tokens of Fineweb edu, The results: BananaMind Base Bench 854 and 53% on PIQA. On only 200M tokens.
Check it out at https://github.com/BananaMind/BananaAll. liked a dataset 2 days ago
wikimedia/wikipediaOrganizations
None yet
liked a
dataset about 19 hours ago
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with 🔥 2 days ago
Post
4804
We're excited to release BananaAll, our SLM Super App.
It allows you to do EVERYTHING you need to do to trains SLMs in a single app, no terminal, no 30 chrome tabs.
The train tab allows you to train models, select datasets from presets, and use other ones with auto mapping, model size slider, it automatically generates a training script for you.
Then after you've trained the model or want to compare it to competitors, the evaluation tab, run ARC EASY, ARC Challenge, Hellaswag, PIQA, Arithmark 3, BananaMind Base Bench and more! Simple Results screen.
And lastly the inference tab, run your trained models or others.
Normally you would need seperate apps or scripts for that, but the BananaAll Super App lets you do all of that in a single app.
We also trained a small 2.5M parameter model on 200M tokens of Fineweb edu, The results: BananaMind Base Bench 854 and 53% on PIQA. On only 200M tokens.
Check it out at https://github.com/BananaMind/BananaAll.
It allows you to do EVERYTHING you need to do to trains SLMs in a single app, no terminal, no 30 chrome tabs.
The train tab allows you to train models, select datasets from presets, and use other ones with auto mapping, model size slider, it automatically generates a training script for you.
Then after you've trained the model or want to compare it to competitors, the evaluation tab, run ARC EASY, ARC Challenge, Hellaswag, PIQA, Arithmark 3, BananaMind Base Bench and more! Simple Results screen.
And lastly the inference tab, run your trained models or others.
Normally you would need seperate apps or scripts for that, but the BananaAll Super App lets you do all of that in a single app.
We also trained a small 2.5M parameter model on 200M tokens of Fineweb edu, The results: BananaMind Base Bench 854 and 53% on PIQA. On only 200M tokens.
Check it out at https://github.com/BananaMind/BananaAll.
- 23 replies
liked a
dataset 2 days ago
reacted to danielhanchen's post with 🔥 2 days ago
liked a
model 2 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 2 days ago
Post
3764
🖼️ NO GPU, Only CPU : Z-Image model
Zero graphics cards. 46 seconds. Photoreal.
That laptop you're reading this on. No graphics card, right? It generates images.
No CUDA install. No Python environment. No driver changes. One binary, three model files. Done.
📊 Measured — GPU count used: zero
512×512 : 46.4 s
Korean prompt : 45.3 s (faster than English)
1024×1024 : 192.7 s
Peak RAM : 6.42 GB
GPUs used : 0
(Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y ×2, 48 threads, Q4_0, 3 steps)
⚡ From 244 seconds to 46 — 5.3×
Run it on defaults and it takes 244 s. Switch to 3 steps and it's 48.6 s. Add VAE tiling and it's 46.4 s.
The biggest culprit was the default. Z-Image Turbo is distilled to paint in few strokes, but the tool's default is 20. We were throwing away 5× for no reason. So were we, at first.
3 is the floor. Put 4 and 3 side by side and you cannot tell them apart. At 2 it collapses — water droplets and wood grain vanish, and the surface turns cloth-like.
🔗 Links
Model
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
Live demo Space (runs on CPU)
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
POCKET collection
FINAL-Bench/pocket-models-6a618ee5d23eafb7e185a5c6
Zero graphics cards. 46 seconds. Photoreal.
That laptop you're reading this on. No graphics card, right? It generates images.
No CUDA install. No Python environment. No driver changes. One binary, three model files. Done.
📊 Measured — GPU count used: zero
512×512 : 46.4 s
Korean prompt : 45.3 s (faster than English)
1024×1024 : 192.7 s
Peak RAM : 6.42 GB
GPUs used : 0
(Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y ×2, 48 threads, Q4_0, 3 steps)
⚡ From 244 seconds to 46 — 5.3×
Run it on defaults and it takes 244 s. Switch to 3 steps and it's 48.6 s. Add VAE tiling and it's 46.4 s.
The biggest culprit was the default. Z-Image Turbo is distilled to paint in few strokes, but the tool's default is 20. We were throwing away 5× for no reason. So were we, at first.
3 is the floor. Put 4 and 3 side by side and you cannot tell them apart. At 2 it collapses — water droplets and wood grain vanish, and the surface turns cloth-like.
🔗 Links
Model
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
Live demo Space (runs on CPU)
FINAL-Bench/POCKET-Zimage-CPU
POCKET collection
FINAL-Bench/pocket-models-6a618ee5d23eafb7e185a5c6
- 2 replies
reacted to Nicholastempleman's post with 🔥 5 days ago
Post
2053
For agent-verification builders: we reproduced two public JSON comparison suites and a signed-root count control. In a dated 305-leaf CSOAI root, duplicating the last leaf left the Merkle root unchanged; verification rejected the 306-leaf presentation because the count was signed. We also link the correction that domain-separation prefixes alone do not remove this collision.
Reproduction, source pins and limits: csoai/councilof-ai-mirror
This tests byte encoding and count binding, not agent identity or protocol conformance. What profile fields should a verifier require before treating two records as the same claim?
Reproduction, source pins and limits: csoai/councilof-ai-mirror
This tests byte encoding and count binding, not agent identity or protocol conformance. What profile fields should a verifier require before treating two records as the same claim?
liked a
dataset 6 days ago
Not available for individuals?
👍 11
6
#2 opened 10 months ago
by 
blythet
liked 5
models 8 days ago
Ramikan-BR/tinyllama_PY-CODER-4bit-lora_4k-v8
Text Generation • 1B • Updated • 71 • 1
mlx-community/Mistral-7B-v0.1-LoRA-Text2SQL
Text Generation • 7B • Updated • 184 • 3
Mikivis/gpt2-large-lora-sft
Text Generation • 0.8B • Updated • 70 • 2
Moeblack/Qwen3.8-27B-chinese-taste-sft-lora
Text Generation • 9.96M • Updated • 426 • 15
MorinoNushi/GLM-5.3-Flash-Heretic-Abliterated-LoRA-V2-GGUF
43M • Updated • 475 • 4
liked 3
models 9 days ago
liked 2
models 16 days ago
liked a
model 25 days ago
