BFCLv4 eval的LFM跑分好像不太对

#17
by zetianli - opened

问题应该是没parse到东西
详情可以看 我的 LFM2 handler的PR https://github.com/ShishirPatil/gorilla/pull/1341

OpenBMB org

Thanks for your feedback! We're aware of the issue and our team is actively investigating the parsing logic in the BFCLv4 evaluation. We also appreciate the PR link you shared — we'll take a closer look. Will keep this thread updated once we have more findings. Thanks for your attention! 🙏

感谢反馈!我们正在排查 BFCLv4 评测中的解析逻辑问题,非常感谢你提供的 PR 链接,我们会一并参考。有进展会及时同步,非常感谢! 🙏

beyoung changed discussion status to closed

Hi, thanks for your patience! 🙏
Our reported score for LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking was obtained using BFCLv4's native Function Calling (FC) evaluation flow. At the time, a dedicated LFM2 handler was not yet available, so the model was evaluated through the standard OpenAI-compatible chat-completions interface using the generic handler rather than a model-specific one.
We've now reproduced the results using the dedicated handler, and they align closely with the numbers reported in the PR (Overall: 32.72% vs. 32.02% in the PR). We'll update the reported score accordingly.
Thanks again for the discussion and for contributing the handler! 🙏

感谢耐心等待!🙏
我们此前报告的 LFM2.5-1.2B-Thinking 分数,是使用 BFCLv4 原生 Function Calling(FC)评测流程得到的。当时尚未提供 LFM2 专用 handler,因此模型是通过标准 OpenAI 兼容 chat-completions 接口接入,并使用通用 handler 完成评测的。
我们现已使用该专用 handler 复现评测结果,结果与 PR 中报告的数据高度一致(Overall:32.72%,PR 中为 32.02%)。我们会据此更新已公布的分数。
再次感谢你的讨论以及对 handler 的贡献!🙏

Thanks for replying, later this month I will also have a PR for GPT-OSS to resolve issue: https://github.com/ShishirPatil/gorilla/issues/1146 Hope this would be helpful for your team too. By the way, I love your team's 1.58bit quant model

Sign up or log in to comment