Inquiry: License tag discrepancy (Apache-2.0 vs FLUX Non-Commercial)
Hello Vivo team,
First of all, thank you for open-sourcing BluePixel-Turbo and your great contribution to the community!
I am writing to gently point out a potential licensing compliance issue that might inadvertently mislead users. The model card mentions that this model builds on FLUX.2-klein-9B, which is released under the FLUX Non-Commercial License. However, the repository is tagged with the Apache-2.0 license.
Because the base 9B model is restricted to non-commercial use, displaying the Apache-2.0 tag might cause developers to mistakenly use this model for commercial purposes, leading to unintended license violations with Black Forest Labs.
Could you please double-check the license tag or add a clarification note in the model card? This would greatly help the community avoid potential legal risks.
Thank you for your time and understanding!
