Daily Papers

Adapting vision-language navigation (VLN) policies to new environments is expensive because every additional route and instruction requires an embodied demonstration. Yet standard observation-to-action training uses only a small fraction of the information already contained in each trajectory. In particular, future observations reveal the instruction-relevant landmarks that the agent will encounter, including what they look like and how they are arranged in 3D. We introduce FINE, a Future-Informed Navigation Encoding framework that extracts this latent supervision from existing demonstrations. FINE equips a VLN backbone with two complementary auxiliary representations. First, explicit landmark tokens follow the ordered landmarks specified by the instruction and are trained to predict future landmark regions in both semantic 2D patch-feature space and viewpoint-dependent 3D geometric feature space. Second, an implicit future token learns to distinguish the landmark state that is actually reached from plausible same-scene counterfactual futures generated by a video world model. On R2R-CE and RxR-CE val-unseen, FINE improves InternVLA-N1 by 2.6 and 4.5 success-rate points, respectively, at full training data. More importantly, as demonstrations become limited, the benefit grows: at a 70% demonstration budget, FINE improves success rate by 6.8 points, recovering roughly one-third of the performance lost by reducing the training demonstrations. Project page is available at https://finevln.github.io/.

Prevalent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are typically built upon Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and demonstrate exceptional proficiency in semantic understanding, but they inherently lack the capability to deduce physical world dynamics. Consequently, recent approaches have shifted toward World Models, typically formulated via video prediction; however, these methods often suffer from a lack of semantic grounding and exhibit brittleness when handling prediction errors. To synergize semantic understanding with dynamic predictive capabilities, we present InternVLA-A1. This model employs a unified Mixture-of-Transformers architecture, coordinating three experts for scene understanding, visual foresight generation, and action execution. These components interact seamlessly through a unified masked self-attention mechanism. Building upon InternVL3 and Qwen3-VL, we instantiate InternVLA-A1 at 2B and 3B parameter scales. We pre-train these models on hybrid synthetic-real datasets spanning InternData-A1 and Agibot-World, covering over 533M frames. This hybrid training strategy effectively harnesses the diversity of synthetic simulation data while minimizing the sim-to-real gap. We evaluated InternVLA-A1 across 12 real-world robotic tasks and simulation benchmark. It significantly outperforms leading models like pi0 and GR00T N1.5, achieving a 14.5\% improvement in daily tasks and a 40\%-73.3\% boost in dynamic settings, such as conveyor belt sorting.

Vision-Language-Action models are designed to generalise across environments and task descriptions, raising the question of whether their action generation actually depends on the language instruction, or whether they largely rely on visual cues and superficial correlations. Robustness to variance in the visual and linguistic observation space is critical for real-world deployment, yet VLAs lack explicit grounding modules and instead rely on the intrinsic language grounding capabilities of their Vision-Language model backbones. For this reason, we conduct a controlled mechanistic interpretability study on the language grounding capabilities of two state-of-the-art Vision-Language-Action models, π_{0.5} and GR00T N1.7, by applying activation and attribution patching to the residual stream of the action generation modules. We systematically corrupt the task instruction of input samples of the LIBERO benchmark following five strategies: synonym replacement, semantic scaling, directional corruption, random object substitution, and empty string. Our experiments find that both models are comparatively insensitive to abstract rephrasing and to referencing non-existent objects, but react strongly to empty task descriptions and, especially, to directional language. During action generation, this sensitivity is concentrated in different loci for each model: mainly in the early, periodic cross-attention layers for GR00T N1.7, versus distributed across the earliest and selected later layers for π_{0.5}. For GR00T N1.7, directional perturbations drive some of the largest causal effects while leaving the internal representational geometry comparatively unchanged, a dissociation we do not observe clearly for π_{0.5}. Finally, the reliability of attribution patching is model-dependent: it closely tracks activation patching for GR00T N1.7 but not for π_{0.5}.