new

Get trending papers in your email inbox!

Subscribe

Daily Papers

byAK and the research community

Oct 16

Scaling Laws of Motion Forecasting and Planning -- Technical Report

We study the empirical scaling laws of a family of encoder-decoder autoregressive transformer models on the task of joint motion forecasting and planning in the autonomous driving domain. Using a 500 thousand hours driving dataset, we demonstrate that, similar to language modeling, model performance improves as a power-law function of the total compute budget, and we observe a strong correlation between model training loss and model evaluation metrics. Most interestingly, closed-loop metrics also improve with scaling, which has important implications for the suitability of open-loop metrics for model development and hill climbing. We also study the optimal scaling of the number of transformer parameters and the training data size for a training compute-optimal model. We find that as the training compute budget grows, optimal scaling requires increasing the model size 1.5x as fast as the dataset size. We also study inference-time compute scaling, where we observe that sampling and clustering the output of smaller models makes them competitive with larger models, up to a crossover point beyond which a larger models becomes more inference-compute efficient. Overall, our experimental results demonstrate that optimizing the training and inference-time scaling properties of motion forecasting and planning models is a key lever for improving their performance to address a wide variety of driving scenarios. Finally, we briefly study the utility of training on general logged driving data of other agents to improve the performance of the ego-agent, an important research area to address the scarcity of robotics data for large capacity models training.

  • 17 authors
·
Jun 9, 2025

Fourth-order perturbation theory for the Frohlich polaron: Analytic structure of the weak-coupling series and the crossover to strong coupling

We calculate the Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation series for the ground-state energy and the effective mass of the three-dimensional Frohlich polaron through fourth order in the coupling constant alpha. The third- and fourth-order coefficients of the effective mass are new. Because the Frohlich interaction is a form-bounded perturbation of an isolated nondegenerate ground state at fixed total momentum, the series has a nonzero radius of convergence, and we analyze it with the ratio and Pade methods appropriate to convergent series. The coefficients are strikingly regular and are described by a simple power-law singularity at alpha near 8.5 with an exponent near 1.4. The couplings at which successive truncations of the inverse mass vanish, the first of which is the textbook breakdown value alpha = 6, are slowly converging estimates of this radius. Pade approximants built from the weak-coupling coefficients alone agree with diagrammatic Monte Carlo results for the mass to better than one percent for alpha up to 5. Exact results on the analyticity of the ground state and on the strong-coupling asymptotics imply that the coefficients cannot keep a constant sign, although all known coefficients do, so that the apparent singularity must be a complex-conjugate pair close to the positive real axis. It marks the crossover to strong coupling: the weak-coupling series locates this crossover accurately but cannot be continued through it.

  • 1 authors
·
Oct 6

Statistical Inference and Quality Measures of KV Cache Quantisations Inspired by TurboQuant

We analyse three KV cache quantization schemes under a fair bit budget: KV (scalar MSE baseline), KQV (WHT + MSE on K; WHT + MSE + QJL on V), and QKQV (WHT + MSE + QJL on both). Starting from the Beta distribution on the hypersphere, we trace how QJL on K inflates inner product variance by π/2, which softmax amplifies nonlinearly via Jensen's inequality, and we present statistical inference and information metrics to highlight practical differences. Three empirical findings emerge. (1)~At n=4 (the practically dominant budget), KQV wins on every measure -- KL divergence, geometric K error, and 6D distance -- across all distributions and ranks tested. (2)~The K--V asymmetry is unconditional: QKQV is consistently worse than KQV in KL divergence at every budget and distribution. (3)~A budget-dependent crossover exists: QKQV achieves better geometric K reconstruction at n in {2,3,5}, KQV at n in {4,6}, invariant to rank and tail weight -- an open rate-distortion problem. KL(p_{ref} | p_{quant}), K-only by construction, bridges K direction error to routing corruption and output collapse. We present a sufficient condition when the Jensen mechanism amplifies superlinearly through the softmax. At n in {2,3,5}, QKQV wins geometrically because this assumption does not bind. At n=4, elevated K error and KL divergence for QKQV strongly suggest the Jensen mechanism is the operative cause of the crossover, providing a new perspective and explanation.

  • 1 authors
·
Apr 26

Rethinking Conventional Wisdom in Machine Learning: From Generalization to Scaling

The remarkable success of large language pretraining and the discovery of scaling laws signify a paradigm shift in machine learning. Notably, the primary objective has evolved from minimizing generalization error to reducing approximation error, and the most effective strategy has transitioned from regularization (in a broad sense) to scaling up models. This raises a critical question: Do the established principles that proved successful in the generalization-centric era remain valid in this new era of scaling? This paper examines several influential regularization-based principles that may no longer hold true in the scaling-centric, large language model (LLM) era. These principles include explicit L2 regularization and implicit regularization through small batch sizes and large learning rates. Additionally, we identify a new phenomenon termed ``scaling law crossover,'' where two scaling curves intersect at a certain scale, implying that methods effective at smaller scales may not generalize to larger ones. Together, these observations highlight two fundamental questions within this new paradigm: bullet Guiding Principles for Scaling: If regularization is no longer the primary guiding principle for model design, what new principles are emerging to guide scaling? bullet Model Comparison at Scale: How to reliably and effectively compare models at the scale where only a single experiment is feasible?

  • 1 authors
·
Sep 23, 2024