| | --- |
| | license: mit |
| | base_model: microsoft/deberta-v3-base |
| | tags: |
| | - generated_from_trainer |
| | - calibration |
| | - uncertainty |
| | model-index: |
| | - name: apricot_binary_coqa_deberta-v3-base_for_vicuna-7b-v1.5 |
| | results: [] |
| | datasets: |
| | - stanfordnlp/coqa |
| | library_name: transformers |
| | --- |
| | |
| | <!-- This model card has been generated automatically according to the information the Trainer had access to. You |
| | should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. --> |
| |
|
| | # apricot_binary_coqa_deberta-v3-base_for_vicuna-7b-v1.5 |
| | |
| | |
| | This model is fine-tuned for black-box LLM calibration as part of the ๐ Apricot paper ["Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only"](https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05973) (ACL 2024). |
| | |
| | ## Model description |
| | |
| | |
| | This model is a fine-tuned version of [microsoft/deberta-v3-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/deberta-v3-base) to predict the calibration score for the [lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5](https://huggingface.co/lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5) model on the questions from the stanfordnlp/coqa dataset. It uses the binary type of calibration target score. |
| | |
| | |
| | ## Intended uses & limitations |
| | |
| | More information needed |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ## Training procedure |
| | |
| | ### Training hyperparameters |
| | This model was trained with the code available on the [parameterlab/apricot GitHub repository](https://github.com/parameterlab/apricot) using the following command: |
| | ```shell |
| | python3 run_regression_experiment.py --model-identifier lmsys/vicuna-7b-v1.5 --dataset-name coqa --device cuda:0 --num-training-steps 600 --num-in-context-samples 0 --data-dir $data_dir --model-save-dir $model_save_dir --use-binary-targets --result-dir $result_dir --lr 0.00009584 --weight-decay 0.005793 --push-to-hub |
| | ``` |
| | |
| | ### Framework versions |
| | |
| | - Transformers 4.32.0 |
| | - Pytorch 2.0.0+cu117 |
| | - Datasets 2.14.6 |
| | - Tokenizers 0.13.3 |
| | |
| | ## Citation |
| | If you find ๐ Apricot models useful for your work, please cite our paper: |
| | ``` latex |
| | @inproceedings{ulmer-etal-2024-calibrating, |
| | title = "Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only", |
| | author = "Ulmer, Dennis and |
| | Gubri, Martin and |
| | Lee, Hwaran and |
| | Yun, Sangdoo and |
| | Oh, Seong", |
| | editor = "Ku, Lun-Wei and |
| | Martins, Andre and |
| | Srikumar, Vivek", |
| | booktitle = "Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)", |
| | month = aug, |
| | year = "2024", |
| | address = "Bangkok, Thailand", |
| | publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", |
| | url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.824", |
| | doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.824", |
| | pages = "15440--15459", |
| | abstract = "As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in user-facing applications, building trust and maintaining safety by accurately quantifying a model{'}s confidence in its prediction becomes even more important. However, finding effective ways to calibrate LLMs{---}especially when the only interface to the models is their generated text{---}remains a challenge. We propose APRICOT (Auxiliary prediction of confidence targets): A method to set confidence targets and train an additional model that predicts an LLM{'}s confidence based on its textual input and output alone. This approach has several advantages: It is conceptually simple, does not require access to the target model beyond its output, does not interfere with the language generation, and has a multitude of potential usages, for instance by verbalizing the predicted confidence or using it to re-prompting the LLM to accurately reflecting its uncertainty. We show how our approach performs competitively in terms of calibration error for white-box and black-box LLMs on closed-book question-answering to detect incorrect LLM answers.", |
| | } |
| | ``` |