phanerozoic's picture
Drop unreproducible design-distance multiple; correct undatabased non-host rate to 99%
caba6d4 verified
# Reference-free human/host read filter
`dna_filter.py` wraps the classifier's `host` head as a read filter: FASTA/FASTQ in, per-read
call out, no alignment and no database.
## Modes
- **deplete-host** (pathogen enrichment): emit the non-host reads, discarding human. The standard
host-depletion step in clinical metagenomics, done without aligning to the human reference.
- **scrub-human** (privacy): remove human reads before sharing or deposition.
- **classify**: per-read origin and scores, no filtering.
```bash
python dna_filter.py reads.fastq.gz --mode deplete-host --out nonhost.fasta --report calls.tsv
python dna_filter.py reads.fastq --mode scrub-human --out scrubbed.fasta
python dna_filter.py reads.fasta --mode classify --report calls.tsv
```
## Footprint and throughput
- **Model:** 2 MB safetensors (524,295 parameters, single k=8 head set). No reference database, no GPU.
- **Dependencies:** `numpy` and `safetensors` only.
- **Throughput:** ~5,600 reads/s on a single CPU thread at 300 bp; embarrassingly parallel across
reads. For comparison, a Kraken2 RefSeq index is about 8 GB and an aligner needs the multi-
gigabyte human reference.
## Read-length behavior
Host vs non-host AUROC by read length:
| length | 50 | 100 | 150 | 200 | 300 | 600 | 1000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUROC | 0.955 | 0.986 | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
It is near-perfect from 150 bp up (typical Illumina paired-end and assembled contigs) and still
useful at 50 bp. At a balanced threshold of 0, scrub-human removes at least 99% of human reads
while retaining essentially all non-host from 150 bp up; below 150 bp the separation narrows and
the threshold should be tuned toward the mode's priority (aggressive removal for privacy,
conservative retention for enrichment).
## Scope
- **Strong:** human against bacterial and viral sequence, the clinically dominant contrast.
- **Reference-free advantage:** on sequence absent from every database, Kraken2 classifies 0% and
BLAST 6.6%, while this filter calls 100% (99% as non-host). It is the only option when the
sequence has no database match, for example environmental or divergent material.
- **Not for:** discriminating closely related mammals (human vs mouse/rat is weak by composition);
use it for host-vs-microbe, not for separating vertebrate species.
The filter trades a database and an aligner for a 2 MB model that runs anywhere, at the cost of
the per-base certainty an exact match gives when the organism is already in a reference.