Instructions to use pynk17/my-small_diff-model with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Diffusers
How to use pynk17/my-small_diff-model with Diffusers:
pip install -U diffusers transformers accelerate
import torch from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline # switch to "mps" for apple devices pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("pynk17/my-small_diff-model", dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="cuda") prompt = "Astronaut in a jungle, cold color palette, muted colors, detailed, 8k" image = pipe(prompt).images[0] - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- Draw Things
- DiffusionBee
|
Download README.md from pynk17/my-small_diff-model: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 8.42 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/pynk17/my-small_diff-model/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://pynk17/my-small_diff-model/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/pynk17/my-small_diff-model/resolve/main/README.md
8.42 kB
| library_name: diffusers | |
| pipeline_tag: text-to-image | |
| tags: | |
| - diffusion | |
| - diffusers | |
| - text-to-image | |
| - pytorch | |
| - experimental | |
| datasets: | |
| - huggan/smithsonian-butterfly-lowres | |
| # my-small_diff-model | |
| `my-small_diff-model` is an experimental diffusion model trained as part of a hands-on study of diffusion model training, optimization, and image generation workflows. | |
| The model was trained for **50 epochs on a single GPU**, reaching **3,149 optimization steps**. Training behavior, learning-rate scheduling, and periodic image generation were monitored throughout the run. | |
| This repository is intended primarily as a reproducible machine learning engineering experiment rather than a production-ready generative model. | |
| ## Model Details | |
| ### Model Description | |
| This model was trained using the Hugging Face `diffusers` ecosystem as an experimental small diffusion model. | |
| The project focuses on understanding the practical behavior of diffusion training, including: | |
| * convergence over repeated epochs | |
| * learning-rate scheduling | |
| * training stability | |
| * single-GPU training | |
| * periodic qualitative sampling | |
| * packaging and publishing a diffusion model through the Hugging Face Hub | |
| **Developed by:** [Priyanka / pynk17](https://huggingface.co/pynk17) | |
| **Model type:** Diffusion-based generative image model | |
| **Task:** Image generation | |
| **Framework:** PyTorch / Hugging Face Diffusers | |
| **Training hardware:** Single GPU | |
| **Training epochs:** 50 | |
| **Total optimization steps:** 3,149 | |
| **Repository:** https://huggingface.co/pynk17/my-small_diff-model | |
| **License:** Not specified | |
| **Base model:** Not documented in the available training metadata | |
| ## Intended Uses | |
| ### Direct Use | |
| The model can be used for experimentation with diffusion-model inference and for studying the behavior of a relatively small generative model trained from a limited training setup. | |
| Possible uses include: | |
| * studying diffusion inference | |
| * experimenting with sampling behavior | |
| * investigating the relationship between training loss and generated output quality | |
| * testing Hugging Face Diffusers workflows | |
| * educational demonstrations of diffusion training and deployment | |
| * reproducibility experiments | |
| ### Downstream Use | |
| The model may also be useful as a starting point for: | |
| * additional fine-tuning | |
| * inference optimization experiments | |
| * mixed-precision comparisons | |
| * memory optimization studies | |
| * checkpointing experiments | |
| * scheduler comparisons | |
| * model deployment experiments | |
| The model should be treated as an experimental research artifact rather than a production model. | |
| ### Out-of-Scope Use | |
| This model has not been validated for safety-critical, commercial, or production deployment. | |
| It should not be assumed to provide: | |
| * photorealistic image generation | |
| * robust prompt following | |
| * unbiased outputs | |
| * production-level reliability | |
| * safety filtering | |
| * factual or semantically reliable image generation | |
| ## Training Details | |
| ### Training Data | |
| The model was trained using a custom image training dataset supplied to the training pipeline. | |
| Further dataset documentation should include: | |
| * dataset name | |
| * number of training images | |
| * image resolution | |
| * preprocessing steps | |
| * captioning or conditioning strategy, if applicable | |
| * dataset license and provenance | |
| These details are not available in the current training metadata and should be added when confirmed. | |
| ## Training Procedure | |
| Training was launched on **one GPU** and executed for **50 epochs**. | |
| Each epoch contained approximately **63 training iterations**, resulting in a final training step of **3,149**. | |
| The run also included periodic image-generation passes. The logs show **1,000-step generation/sampling loops** occurring at several points during training, each executing at approximately **34.8 iterations per second**. | |
| ### Optimization Behavior | |
| Training began with a learning rate of approximately: | |
| `1.26e-5` | |
| The learning rate increased during the early training phase, reaching approximately: | |
| `1.0e-4` | |
| around epoch 7. | |
| It then gradually decayed through the remainder of training until reaching: | |
| `0` | |
| at the end of epoch 49. | |
| This indicates a learning-rate schedule containing an initial warm-up phase followed by gradual decay. | |
| ### Training Loss | |
| The reported training loss decreased substantially during training. | |
| Early training: | |
| | Epoch | Step | Loss | Learning Rate | | |
| |---:|---:|---:|---:| | |
| | 0 | 62 | 0.358 | 1.26e-5 | | |
| | 1 | 125 | 0.125 | 2.52e-5 | | |
| | 2 | 188 | 0.104 | 3.78e-5 | | |
| | 3 | 251 | 0.0252 | 5.04e-5 | | |
| | 4 | 314 | 0.0166 | 6.30e-5 | | |
| During later training, losses frequently fell below `0.02`, although noticeable fluctuations remained throughout the run. | |
| Examples include: | |
| | Epoch | Step | Loss | Learning Rate | | |
| |---:|---:|---:|---:| | |
| | 14 | 944 | 0.00669 | 9.32e-5 | | |
| | 26 | 1700 | 0.00594 | 5.73e-5 | | |
| | 32 | 2078 | 0.00350 | 3.52e-5 | | |
| | 39 | 2519 | 0.00656 | 1.33e-5 | | |
| | 47 | 3023 | 0.00176 | 5.57e-7 | | |
| | 49 | 3149 | 0.0384 | 0 | | |
| The lowest reported loss in the supplied logs was approximately: | |
| **0.00176 at epoch 47** | |
| Loss was not monotonically decreasing. Temporary increases occurred at several points, including epochs 7, 11, 18, 19, 22, 33, and 43. | |
| This behavior is not unexpected for stochastic diffusion training because each loss measurement reflects the sampled training batch, diffusion timestep, and injected noise rather than a deterministic full-dataset objective. | |
| ## Training Progress | |
| A simplified view of the run is shown below. | |
| | Training stage | Approximate loss behavior | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | Epochs 0–4 | Rapid initial reduction from 0.358 to ~0.017 | | |
| | Epochs 5–15 | Mostly low losses with occasional spikes | | |
| | Epochs 16–30 | Stable low-loss regime with stochastic fluctuations | | |
| | Epochs 31–40 | Continued low-loss optimization as LR decayed | | |
| | Epochs 41–49 | Very low learning rate and final convergence phase | | |
| The final epoch completed at: | |
| **Epoch:** 49 | |
| **Step:** 3,149 | |
| **Reported loss:** 0.0384 | |
| **Learning rate:** 0 | |
| Because the logged value represents the final observed batch rather than an epoch-averaged validation metric, it should not be interpreted as the model's overall evaluation score. | |
| ## Training Throughput | |
| Training throughput was generally stable at approximately: | |
| **7.1 to 7.3 iterations per second** | |
| Most epochs contained: | |
| **63 / 63 training iterations** | |
| Periodic generation loops ran at approximately: | |
| **34.8 iterations per second** | |
| This suggests relatively stable computational throughput during the training run. | |
| ## Results | |
| Training completed successfully for all **50 epochs** and **3,149 optimization steps**. | |
| The logs show: | |
| * rapid reduction in loss during early training | |
| * stable single-GPU throughput | |
| * successful completion of the full training schedule | |
| * gradual learning-rate warm-up followed by decay | |
| * periodic image-generation passes throughout training | |
| * occasional stochastic loss spikes despite a generally low-loss regime | |
| These results demonstrate successful end-to-end execution of the diffusion training pipeline. | |
| They do **not**, by themselves, establish image-generation quality. Diffusion training loss is useful for monitoring optimization but should be interpreted alongside generated samples and dedicated generative evaluation metrics. | |
| ## Model Examination | |
| One important observation from the training run is that diffusion loss is visibly noisy. | |
| For example, the reported loss moved from: | |
| `0.0151` at epoch 6 | |
| to: | |
| `0.129` at epoch 7 | |
| and subsequently returned to: | |
| `0.0134` at epoch 8. | |
| Similar short-term increases occurred later in training. | |
| This illustrates an important property of diffusion-model optimization: individual training loss measurements can fluctuate substantially because the training objective depends on randomly sampled images, noise levels, timesteps, and noise realizations. | |
| As a result, isolated loss values should not be used as the sole criterion for judging generative quality. | |
| ## How to Get Started | |
| The exact loading code depends on how the model components were serialized in this repository. | |
| For a standard Hugging Face Diffusers pipeline, inference typically follows this pattern: | |
| ```python | |
| import torch | |
| from diffusers import DiffusionPipeline | |
| model_id = "pynk17/my-small_diff-model" | |
| pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained( | |
| model_id, | |
| torch_dtype=torch.float16, | |
| ) | |
| pipe = pipe.to("cuda") | |
| prompt = "your prompt here" | |
| image = pipe(prompt).images[0] | |
| image.save("generated_image.png") |