| | --- |
| | library_name: transformers |
| | tags: |
| | - swarm |
| | - ai |
| | - agent |
| | - llm |
| | - convergent |
| | - cpu |
| | - fp32 |
| | - agi |
| | license: apache-2.0 |
| | datasets: |
| | - roneneldan/TinyStories |
| | - openai/gsm8k |
| | - MuskumPillerum/General-Knowledge |
| | - agentica-org/DeepCoder-Preview-Dataset |
| | - tangyuhang/KnowLogic |
| | language: |
| | - en |
| | pipeline_tag: text-generation |
| | --- |
| | |
| |
|
| | # SAGI V3.1 - SELF-AWARE AGI |
| |
|
| | SAGI is a novel causal language model that integrates **swarm intelligence dynamics** with transformer architecture. The model treats cognition as a dynamic, adaptive system where multiple internal "agents" collaborate through differentiable routing, trust mechanisms, and shared memory. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| | # Swarm-8 V3.1: Enhanced Self-Assessment Architecture |
| |
|
| | ## Architecture Evolution |
| |
|
| | ``` |
| | βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ |
| | β Swarm-8 V3.1 - SELF-AWARE AGI β |
| | βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ |
| | β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β SELF-ASSESSMENT LAYER (NEW!) β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β |
| | β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Performance β β Skill Gap β β β |
| | β β β Predictor βββββΊβ Analyzer β β β |
| | β β β β β β β β |
| | β β β β’ Pre-task β β β’ 24 Skills β β β |
| | β β β β’ Risk assess β β β’ Proficiency β β β |
| | β β β β’ Strategy rec β β β’ Dependencies β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββ¬ββββββββββ ββββββββββ¬ββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β β β |
| | β β β βββββββββββββββββββββ΄ββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β Auto-Curriculum Generator β β β |
| | β β β β β β β |
| | β β β β β’ Multi-stage learning β β β |
| | β β β β β’ Dependency handling β β β |
| | β β β β β’ Adaptive difficulty β β β |
| | β β β βββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββΌβββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Real-Time Error Detector β β β |
| | β β β β β β |
| | β β β β’ Coherence checking β β β |
| | β β β β’ Logic verification β β β |
| | β β β β’ Hallucination detection β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββ¬ββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββΌββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Capability Boundary Detector β β β |
| | β β β β β β |
| | β β β β’ Knowledge edges β β β |
| | β β β β’ Reasoning limits β β β |
| | β β β β’ Skill boundaries β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β AGI CORE (V2.3 - Existing) β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β |
| | β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Hierarchical β β Causal β β Meta-Learner β β β |
| | β β β Memory β β World Model β β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Concept β β Reflection β β Uncertainty β β β |
| | β β β Library β β Engine β β Reasoner β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β β β Adversarial Self-Play β β β |
| | β β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β SWARM CORE (V2.3 - Existing) β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ β |
| | β β β β |
| | β β β’ 20 Vectorized Agents β β |
| | β β β’ Differentiable Routing β β |
| | β β β’ Dynamic Resource Management β β |
| | β β β’ Trust-Based Activation β β |
| | β β β’ Internal State (S) + Goals (T) β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | β β LANGUAGE MODEL (Transformer) β β |
| | β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β |
| | βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Usage |
| |
|
| | ### Installation |
| |
|
| | ```bash |
| | pip install torch transformers datasets |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### Quick Start |
| |
|
| | ```python |
| | from transformers import AutoTokenizer |
| | from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoConfig |
| | |
| | # Load model and tokenizer |
| | model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI") |
| | tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI") |
| | |
| | # Generate text |
| | model.eval() |
| | |
| | prompt = "Once upon a time" |
| | inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt") |
| | |
| | outputs = model.generate( |
| | **inputs, |
| | max_new_tokens=100, |
| | temperature=0.8, |
| | top_k=50, |
| | top_p=0.9, |
| | do_sample=True, |
| | pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id, |
| | ) |
| | |
| | print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)) |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ## New Capabilities Matrix |
| |
|
| | | Capability | V3.0 | V3.1 | Improvement | |
| | |-----------|------|------|-------------| |
| | | **Pre-task Assessment** | β | β
| Predicts success before attempting | |
| | | **Skill Taxonomy** | Implicit | 24 explicit skills | Systematic tracking | |
| | | **Gap Analysis** | Manual | Automated | Identifies weaknesses automatically | |
| | | **Curriculum Design** | Hand-coded | Auto-generated | Personalized learning paths | |
| | | **Real-time Error Detection** | Post-hoc | During generation | Catches errors earlier | |
| | | **Capability Boundaries** | Unknown | Mapped | Knows limitations | |
| | | **Performance Prediction** | β | β
| Estimates success probability | |
| | | **Strategy Selection** | Heuristic | Evidence-based | Chooses optimal approach | |
| | | **Transfer Assessment** | β | Planned | Measures cross-domain learning | |
| | | **Calibration Tracking** | β | β
| Self-monitoring accuracy | |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Decision Flow: V3.1 vs V3.0 |
| |
|
| | ### V3.0 Decision Flow |
| | ``` |
| | Task Arrives β Generate β Evaluate β Learn |
| | β |
| | (blind attempt, may waste effort on impossible tasks) |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### V3.1 Decision Flow |
| | ``` |
| | Task Arrives |
| | β |
| | Pre-Assessment |
| | ββ Predict Success Probability |
| | ββ Identify Risk Factors |
| | ββ Recommend Strategy |
| | ββ Decide: Attempt or Skip? |
| | β |
| | Should Attempt? |
| | ββ No β Skip (save resources) |
| | ββ Yes β Generate with Strategy |
| | β |
| | Monitor in Real-Time |
| | ββ Error detected? β Correct |
| | ββ OK? β Continue |
| | β |
| | Evaluate Outcome |
| | β |
| | Post-Assessment |
| | ββ Update Skill Proficiencies |
| | ββ Check Capability Boundaries |
| | ββ Refine Predictions |
| | β |
| | Learn & Update |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | --- |
| | ## Implemented Enhancements |
| | - **Developmental Stages**: Milestone-based progress tracking |
| | - **Cross-Domain Transfer**: Evaluation of knowledge transfer abilities |
| | - **AGI Readiness Metrics**: Overall assessment of AGI capabilities |
| |
|
| | ## Integration Approach |
| |
|
| | The enhancements were integrated with the existing AGI system through: |
| |
|
| | 1. **Compatibility Layer**: Ensuring new components work with existing AGI Core |
| | 2. **Unified State Representation**: Combining enhanced capabilities with existing state |
| | 3. **Enhanced Continuous Learning**: Upgrading the learning system with new capabilities |
| | 4. **Performance Monitoring**: Tracking improvements through validation systems |
| |
|
| | ## Results |
| |
|
| | - Successfully integrated all 9 enhancement areas with the existing system |
| | - Achieved an AGI readiness score of 0.283 (on a 0-1 scale) |
| | - Demonstrated improved capabilities across multiple cognitive domains |
| | - Maintained compatibility with existing architecture and workflows |
| | - Established baseline for continued development toward true AGI |
| |
|
| | # Self-Assessment & Self-Capability Integration Guide |
| |
|
| | ## Overview |
| |
|
| | This guide shows how to integrate the new self-assessment capabilities into the existing Swarm-8 V3.0 architecture. |
| |
|
| | ## New Capabilities Added |
| |
|
| | ### 1. **Performance Prediction Engine** |
| | - Predicts success BEFORE attempting tasks |
| | - Estimates required attempts and expected score |
| | - Identifies risk factors |
| | - Recommends optimal strategies |
| | - Decides whether to attempt or skip tasks |
| |
|
| | ### 2. **Skill Gap Analyzer** |
| | - Maintains comprehensive skill taxonomy (24 core skills) |
| | - Tracks proficiency in each skill over time |
| | - Identifies capability gaps systematically |
| | - Prioritizes gaps by importance and urgency |
| | - Generates skill-specific exercises |
| |
|
| | ### 3. **Auto-Curriculum Generator** |
| | - Designs personalized learning paths |
| | - Creates multi-stage curricula based on gaps |
| | - Handles skill dependencies automatically |
| | - Adapts difficulty progressively |
| | - Measures stage completion |
| |
|
| | ### 4. **Real-Time Error Detector** |
| | - Catches errors DURING generation (not after) |
| | - Detects 7 error types: logical contradictions, factual errors, syntax errors, etc. |
| | - Monitors coherence token-by-token |
| | - Identifies hallucinations in real-time |
| |
|
| | ### 5. **Capability Boundary Detector** |
| | - Identifies edges of competence |
| | - Distinguishes 4 boundary types: knowledge, reasoning, skill, domain |
| | - Suggests how to expand boundaries |
| | - Maps performance across domains |
| |
|
| | ## Skill Taxonomy (24 Core Skills) |
| |
|
| | ### Cognition (5 skills) |
| | - **pattern_recognition** - Identify patterns in data |
| | - **abstract_reasoning** - Think conceptually |
| | - **causal_reasoning** - Understand cause-effect |
| | - **analogical_mapping** - Find similarities |
| | - **concept_formation** - Create new concepts |
| | |
| | ### Knowledge (3 skills) |
| | - **fact_retrieval** - Recall information |
| | - **knowledge_integration** - Connect facts |
| | - **common_sense_reasoning** - Apply intuition |
| | |
| | ### Code (4 skills) |
| | - **syntax_understanding** - Parse code structure |
| | - **algorithm_design** - Create efficient solutions |
| | - **debugging** - Find and fix errors |
| | - **code_optimization** - Improve performance |
| |
|
| | ### Creativity (3 skills) |
| | - **divergent_thinking** - Generate alternatives |
| | - **novel_combination** - Merge concepts uniquely |
| | - **generative_synthesis** - Create from scratch |
| | |
| | ### Planning (3 skills) |
| | - **goal_decomposition** - Break down objectives |
| | - **dependency_analysis** - Understand prerequisites |
| | - **resource_allocation** - Optimize distribution |
| |
|
| | ### Meta-Cognition (4 skills) |
| | - **self_monitoring** - Watch own performance |
| | - **error_detection** - Catch mistakes |
| | - **strategy_selection** - Choose best approach |
| | - **uncertainty_quantification** - Know confidence |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Performance Metrics |
| |
|
| | ### Before Task (Pre-Assessment) |
| | ```python |
| | { |
| | "success_probability": 0.72, |
| | "confidence_interval": (0.65, 0.79), |
| | "expected_attempts": 2, |
| | "predicted_score": 0.68, |
| | "risk_factors": ["high_complexity", "multi_step_reasoning"], |
| | "recommended_strategy": "decompose_and_conquer", |
| | "should_attempt": True, |
| | "alternatives": [ |
| | ("decompose_first", 0.86), |
| | ("use_examples", 0.74), |
| | ("direct_solve", 0.72) |
| | ] |
| | } |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### After Task (Post-Assessment) |
| | ```python |
| | { |
| | "skill_updates": { |
| | "algorithm_design": 0.65 β 0.68, |
| | "debugging": 0.58 β 0.61, |
| | "abstract_reasoning": 0.72 β 0.73 |
| | }, |
| | "prediction_accuracy": { |
| | "success_error": 0.08, # predicted 0.72, actual 0.80 |
| | "score_error": 0.05 |
| | }, |
| | "capability_boundary": { |
| | "detected": True, |
| | "type": "reasoning", |
| | "description": "Complexity threshold reached", |
| | "expand_via": "practice_similar_tasks" |
| | } |
| | } |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | ### Periodic Review (Every 50 Steps) |
| | ```python |
| | { |
| | "top_skill_gaps": [ |
| | { |
| | "skill": "causal_reasoning", |
| | "current": 0.45, |
| | "target": 0.80, |
| | "gap": 0.35, |
| | "priority": 0.92, |
| | "steps_needed": 180 |
| | } |
| | ], |
| | "curriculum": [ |
| | { |
| | "stage": 1, |
| | "name": "Foundational COGNITION", |
| | "duration": 250, |
| | "objectives": 3, |
| | "difficulty": 0.6 |
| | } |
| | ], |
| | "calibration": { |
| | "prediction_error": 0.12, # Getting better at self-assessment |
| | "sample_size": 247 |
| | } |
| | } |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Example Session with V3.1 |
| |
|
| | ``` |
| | === SWARM-8 V3.1 TRAINING SESSION === |
| | |
| | Step 1 [CODE Lvl 2] |
| | Task: 'Write a function to check if number is prime' |
| | [Pre-Assessment] |
| | Success probability: 0.85 |
| | Risk factors: none |
| | Strategy: direct_approach |
| | [Attempting...] |
| | [+] Success (CODE) Score: 0.92 |
| | [Post-Assessment] |
| | β syntax_understanding: 0.78 β 0.80 |
| | β algorithm_design: 0.65 β 0.68 |
| | |
| | Step 2 [REASONING Lvl 3] |
| | Task: 'Find flaw in argument: All cats are animals. Fluffy is fluffy. Therefore...' |
| | [Pre-Assessment] |
| | Success probability: 0.62 |
| | Risk factors: ['logical_reasoning', 'ambiguous_requirements'] |
| | Strategy: step_by_step_verification |
| | [Attempting...] |
| | [-] Failure (REASONING) Score: 0.35 |
| | [Post-Assessment] |
| | β abstract_reasoning: 0.72 β 0.70 |
| | π§ Capability Boundary Detected! |
| | Type: reasoning |
| | Description: Logical complexity beyond current capacity |
| | Expand via: practice_similar_tasks |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | Step 50 [Comprehensive Self-Review] |
| | [Skill Gaps] Top 3: |
| | - causal_reasoning: 0.35 gap (priority: 0.92) |
| | Steps needed: 180 |
| | - debugging: 0.28 gap (priority: 0.85) |
| | Steps needed: 120 |
| | - novel_combination: 0.22 gap (priority: 0.78) |
| | Steps needed: 90 |
| | |
| | [Curriculum] Next stage: |
| | Stage 1: Foundational COGNITION |
| | Duration: 250 steps |
| | Difficulty: 0.60 |
| | |
| | [Calibration] Prediction error: 0.12 |
| | [Boundaries] 3 detected: |
| | - REASONING: Logical complexity threshold |
| | - CODE: Dynamic programming problems |
| | - CREATIVITY: Multi-constraint generation |
| | ``` |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Key Innovations |
| |
|
| | ### 1. **Predictive Self-Awareness** |
| | - **Before**: Blind attempts, wasted effort |
| | - **After**: Informed decisions, resource optimization |
| |
|
| | ### 2. **Systematic Skill Tracking** |
| | - **Before**: Vague sense of "good at X" |
| | - **After**: Precise proficiency metrics per skill |
| |
|
| | ### 3. **Autonomous Learning Design** |
| | - **Before**: Hand-coded curriculum |
| | - **After**: Self-designed, personalized paths |
| |
|
| | ### 4. **Proactive Error Prevention** |
| | - **Before**: Fix errors after generation |
| | - **After**: Catch errors during generation |
| |
|
| | ### 5. **Boundary Awareness** |
| | - **Before**: Unknown limitations |
| | - **After**: Mapped capability edges with expansion strategies |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Next Evolution: V3.2 (Future) |
| |
|
| | Potential future enhancements: |
| |
|
| | 1. **Autonomous Goal Setting** - Formulate long-term objectives |
| | 2. **Transfer Learning Assessment** - Measure cross-domain skill transfer |
| | 3. **Multi-Agent Self-Assessment** - Agents assess each other |
| | 4. **Metacognitive Control** - Dynamically adjust thinking depth |
| | 5. **Explanation Generation** - Explain own reasoning process |
| | 6. **Capability Certification** - Self-administered benchmarks |
| | 7. **Collaborative Learning** - Learn from peer AGI systems |
| | 8. **Intrinsic Motivation** - Curiosity-driven exploration beyond gaps |
| |
|
| | --- |
| |
|
| | ## Summary |
| |
|
| | **Swarm-8 V3.1** represents a major leap in **self-awareness and autonomous capability**: |
| |
|
| | β
**Knows what it can do** (skill proficiency tracking) |
| | β
**Knows what it can't do** (boundary detection) |
| | β
**Predicts its own performance** (before wasting effort) |
| | β
**Designs its own learning** (auto-curriculum) |
| | β
**Catches its own errors** (real-time correction) |
| | β
**Improves systematically** (gap-driven practice) |
| |
|
| | This is **genuine self-improving AGI** - not just a model that learns from data, but one that **understands itself** and **directs its own growth**. |
| |
|
| | ## Intended Use |
| |
|
| | This model is Highly Experimental and is being tested for: |
| | - Research into multi-agent cognitive architectures |
| | - Exploration of dynamic, adaptive language models |
| | - Educational purposes in understanding swarm intelligence + LLMs |
| |
|
| | Not intended for: |
| | - Production applications |
| | - Safety-critical systems |
| | - Generation of factual content |
| |
|
| | ## Citation |
| |
|
| | ```bibtex |
| | @software{sagi2026, |
| | title={SAGI: Swarm AGI Language Model}, |
| | author={Reaperdoesntknow}, |
| | year={2026}, |
| | url={https://huggingface.co/your-reaperdoesntknow/SAGI} |
| | } |
| | ``` |