CasualSwarms / README.md
reaperdoesntknow's picture
Update README.md
1426e18 verified
---
library_name: transformers
tags:
- swarm
- ai
- agent
- llm
- convergent
- cpu
- fp32
- agi
license: apache-2.0
datasets:
- roneneldan/TinyStories
- openai/gsm8k
- MuskumPillerum/General-Knowledge
- agentica-org/DeepCoder-Preview-Dataset
- tangyuhang/KnowLogic
language:
- en
pipeline_tag: text-generation
---
# SAGI V3.1 - SELF-AWARE AGI
SAGI is a novel causal language model that integrates **swarm intelligence dynamics** with transformer architecture. The model treats cognition as a dynamic, adaptive system where multiple internal "agents" collaborate through differentiable routing, trust mechanisms, and shared memory.
# Swarm-8 V3.1: Enhanced Self-Assessment Architecture
## Architecture Evolution
```
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Swarm-8 V3.1 - SELF-AWARE AGI β”‚
β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€
β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ SELF-ASSESSMENT LAYER (NEW!) β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Performance β”‚ β”‚ Skill Gap β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Predictor │◄──►│ Analyzer β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Pre-task β”‚ β”‚ β€’ 24 Skills β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Risk assess β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Proficiency β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Strategy rec β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Dependencies β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Auto-Curriculum Generator β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Multi-stage learning β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Dependency handling β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Adaptive difficulty β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Real-Time Error Detector β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Coherence checking β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Logic verification β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Hallucination detection β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β–Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Capability Boundary Detector β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Knowledge edges β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Reasoning limits β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Skill boundaries β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ AGI CORE (V2.3 - Existing) β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Hierarchical β”‚ β”‚ Causal β”‚ β”‚ Meta-Learner β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Memory β”‚ β”‚ World Model β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Concept β”‚ β”‚ Reflection β”‚ β”‚ Uncertainty β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Library β”‚ β”‚ Engine β”‚ β”‚ Reasoner β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Adversarial Self-Play β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ SWARM CORE (V2.3 - Existing) β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β€’ 20 Vectorized Agents β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Differentiable Routing β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Dynamic Resource Management β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Trust-Based Activation β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Internal State (S) + Goals (T) β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚
β”‚ β”‚ LANGUAGE MODEL (Transformer) β”‚ β”‚
β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
```
---
## Usage
### Installation
```bash
pip install torch transformers datasets
```
### Quick Start
```python
from transformers import AutoTokenizer
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoConfig
# Load model and tokenizer
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("reaperdoesntknow/SAGI")
# Generate text
model.eval()
prompt = "Once upon a time"
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt")
outputs = model.generate(
**inputs,
max_new_tokens=100,
temperature=0.8,
top_k=50,
top_p=0.9,
do_sample=True,
pad_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id,
)
print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True))
```
## New Capabilities Matrix
| Capability | V3.0 | V3.1 | Improvement |
|-----------|------|------|-------------|
| **Pre-task Assessment** | ❌ | βœ… | Predicts success before attempting |
| **Skill Taxonomy** | Implicit | 24 explicit skills | Systematic tracking |
| **Gap Analysis** | Manual | Automated | Identifies weaknesses automatically |
| **Curriculum Design** | Hand-coded | Auto-generated | Personalized learning paths |
| **Real-time Error Detection** | Post-hoc | During generation | Catches errors earlier |
| **Capability Boundaries** | Unknown | Mapped | Knows limitations |
| **Performance Prediction** | ❌ | βœ… | Estimates success probability |
| **Strategy Selection** | Heuristic | Evidence-based | Chooses optimal approach |
| **Transfer Assessment** | ❌ | Planned | Measures cross-domain learning |
| **Calibration Tracking** | ❌ | βœ… | Self-monitoring accuracy |
---
## Decision Flow: V3.1 vs V3.0
### V3.0 Decision Flow
```
Task Arrives β†’ Generate β†’ Evaluate β†’ Learn
↓
(blind attempt, may waste effort on impossible tasks)
```
### V3.1 Decision Flow
```
Task Arrives
↓
Pre-Assessment
β”œβ”€ Predict Success Probability
β”œβ”€ Identify Risk Factors
β”œβ”€ Recommend Strategy
└─ Decide: Attempt or Skip?
↓
Should Attempt?
β”œβ”€ No β†’ Skip (save resources)
└─ Yes β†’ Generate with Strategy
↓
Monitor in Real-Time
β”œβ”€ Error detected? β†’ Correct
└─ OK? β†’ Continue
↓
Evaluate Outcome
↓
Post-Assessment
β”œβ”€ Update Skill Proficiencies
β”œβ”€ Check Capability Boundaries
└─ Refine Predictions
↓
Learn & Update
```
---
## Implemented Enhancements
- **Developmental Stages**: Milestone-based progress tracking
- **Cross-Domain Transfer**: Evaluation of knowledge transfer abilities
- **AGI Readiness Metrics**: Overall assessment of AGI capabilities
## Integration Approach
The enhancements were integrated with the existing AGI system through:
1. **Compatibility Layer**: Ensuring new components work with existing AGI Core
2. **Unified State Representation**: Combining enhanced capabilities with existing state
3. **Enhanced Continuous Learning**: Upgrading the learning system with new capabilities
4. **Performance Monitoring**: Tracking improvements through validation systems
## Results
- Successfully integrated all 9 enhancement areas with the existing system
- Achieved an AGI readiness score of 0.283 (on a 0-1 scale)
- Demonstrated improved capabilities across multiple cognitive domains
- Maintained compatibility with existing architecture and workflows
- Established baseline for continued development toward true AGI
# Self-Assessment & Self-Capability Integration Guide
## Overview
This guide shows how to integrate the new self-assessment capabilities into the existing Swarm-8 V3.0 architecture.
## New Capabilities Added
### 1. **Performance Prediction Engine**
- Predicts success BEFORE attempting tasks
- Estimates required attempts and expected score
- Identifies risk factors
- Recommends optimal strategies
- Decides whether to attempt or skip tasks
### 2. **Skill Gap Analyzer**
- Maintains comprehensive skill taxonomy (24 core skills)
- Tracks proficiency in each skill over time
- Identifies capability gaps systematically
- Prioritizes gaps by importance and urgency
- Generates skill-specific exercises
### 3. **Auto-Curriculum Generator**
- Designs personalized learning paths
- Creates multi-stage curricula based on gaps
- Handles skill dependencies automatically
- Adapts difficulty progressively
- Measures stage completion
### 4. **Real-Time Error Detector**
- Catches errors DURING generation (not after)
- Detects 7 error types: logical contradictions, factual errors, syntax errors, etc.
- Monitors coherence token-by-token
- Identifies hallucinations in real-time
### 5. **Capability Boundary Detector**
- Identifies edges of competence
- Distinguishes 4 boundary types: knowledge, reasoning, skill, domain
- Suggests how to expand boundaries
- Maps performance across domains
## Skill Taxonomy (24 Core Skills)
### Cognition (5 skills)
- **pattern_recognition** - Identify patterns in data
- **abstract_reasoning** - Think conceptually
- **causal_reasoning** - Understand cause-effect
- **analogical_mapping** - Find similarities
- **concept_formation** - Create new concepts
### Knowledge (3 skills)
- **fact_retrieval** - Recall information
- **knowledge_integration** - Connect facts
- **common_sense_reasoning** - Apply intuition
### Code (4 skills)
- **syntax_understanding** - Parse code structure
- **algorithm_design** - Create efficient solutions
- **debugging** - Find and fix errors
- **code_optimization** - Improve performance
### Creativity (3 skills)
- **divergent_thinking** - Generate alternatives
- **novel_combination** - Merge concepts uniquely
- **generative_synthesis** - Create from scratch
### Planning (3 skills)
- **goal_decomposition** - Break down objectives
- **dependency_analysis** - Understand prerequisites
- **resource_allocation** - Optimize distribution
### Meta-Cognition (4 skills)
- **self_monitoring** - Watch own performance
- **error_detection** - Catch mistakes
- **strategy_selection** - Choose best approach
- **uncertainty_quantification** - Know confidence
---
## Performance Metrics
### Before Task (Pre-Assessment)
```python
{
"success_probability": 0.72,
"confidence_interval": (0.65, 0.79),
"expected_attempts": 2,
"predicted_score": 0.68,
"risk_factors": ["high_complexity", "multi_step_reasoning"],
"recommended_strategy": "decompose_and_conquer",
"should_attempt": True,
"alternatives": [
("decompose_first", 0.86),
("use_examples", 0.74),
("direct_solve", 0.72)
]
}
```
### After Task (Post-Assessment)
```python
{
"skill_updates": {
"algorithm_design": 0.65 β†’ 0.68,
"debugging": 0.58 β†’ 0.61,
"abstract_reasoning": 0.72 β†’ 0.73
},
"prediction_accuracy": {
"success_error": 0.08, # predicted 0.72, actual 0.80
"score_error": 0.05
},
"capability_boundary": {
"detected": True,
"type": "reasoning",
"description": "Complexity threshold reached",
"expand_via": "practice_similar_tasks"
}
}
```
### Periodic Review (Every 50 Steps)
```python
{
"top_skill_gaps": [
{
"skill": "causal_reasoning",
"current": 0.45,
"target": 0.80,
"gap": 0.35,
"priority": 0.92,
"steps_needed": 180
}
],
"curriculum": [
{
"stage": 1,
"name": "Foundational COGNITION",
"duration": 250,
"objectives": 3,
"difficulty": 0.6
}
],
"calibration": {
"prediction_error": 0.12, # Getting better at self-assessment
"sample_size": 247
}
}
```
---
## Example Session with V3.1
```
=== SWARM-8 V3.1 TRAINING SESSION ===
Step 1 [CODE Lvl 2]
Task: 'Write a function to check if number is prime'
[Pre-Assessment]
Success probability: 0.85
Risk factors: none
Strategy: direct_approach
[Attempting...]
[+] Success (CODE) Score: 0.92
[Post-Assessment]
βœ“ syntax_understanding: 0.78 β†’ 0.80
βœ“ algorithm_design: 0.65 β†’ 0.68
Step 2 [REASONING Lvl 3]
Task: 'Find flaw in argument: All cats are animals. Fluffy is fluffy. Therefore...'
[Pre-Assessment]
Success probability: 0.62
Risk factors: ['logical_reasoning', 'ambiguous_requirements']
Strategy: step_by_step_verification
[Attempting...]
[-] Failure (REASONING) Score: 0.35
[Post-Assessment]
βœ— abstract_reasoning: 0.72 β†’ 0.70
🚧 Capability Boundary Detected!
Type: reasoning
Description: Logical complexity beyond current capacity
Expand via: practice_similar_tasks
Step 50 [Comprehensive Self-Review]
[Skill Gaps] Top 3:
- causal_reasoning: 0.35 gap (priority: 0.92)
Steps needed: 180
- debugging: 0.28 gap (priority: 0.85)
Steps needed: 120
- novel_combination: 0.22 gap (priority: 0.78)
Steps needed: 90
[Curriculum] Next stage:
Stage 1: Foundational COGNITION
Duration: 250 steps
Difficulty: 0.60
[Calibration] Prediction error: 0.12
[Boundaries] 3 detected:
- REASONING: Logical complexity threshold
- CODE: Dynamic programming problems
- CREATIVITY: Multi-constraint generation
```
---
## Key Innovations
### 1. **Predictive Self-Awareness**
- **Before**: Blind attempts, wasted effort
- **After**: Informed decisions, resource optimization
### 2. **Systematic Skill Tracking**
- **Before**: Vague sense of "good at X"
- **After**: Precise proficiency metrics per skill
### 3. **Autonomous Learning Design**
- **Before**: Hand-coded curriculum
- **After**: Self-designed, personalized paths
### 4. **Proactive Error Prevention**
- **Before**: Fix errors after generation
- **After**: Catch errors during generation
### 5. **Boundary Awareness**
- **Before**: Unknown limitations
- **After**: Mapped capability edges with expansion strategies
---
## Next Evolution: V3.2 (Future)
Potential future enhancements:
1. **Autonomous Goal Setting** - Formulate long-term objectives
2. **Transfer Learning Assessment** - Measure cross-domain skill transfer
3. **Multi-Agent Self-Assessment** - Agents assess each other
4. **Metacognitive Control** - Dynamically adjust thinking depth
5. **Explanation Generation** - Explain own reasoning process
6. **Capability Certification** - Self-administered benchmarks
7. **Collaborative Learning** - Learn from peer AGI systems
8. **Intrinsic Motivation** - Curiosity-driven exploration beyond gaps
---
## Summary
**Swarm-8 V3.1** represents a major leap in **self-awareness and autonomous capability**:
βœ… **Knows what it can do** (skill proficiency tracking)
βœ… **Knows what it can't do** (boundary detection)
βœ… **Predicts its own performance** (before wasting effort)
βœ… **Designs its own learning** (auto-curriculum)
βœ… **Catches its own errors** (real-time correction)
βœ… **Improves systematically** (gap-driven practice)
This is **genuine self-improving AGI** - not just a model that learns from data, but one that **understands itself** and **directs its own growth**.
## Intended Use
This model is Highly Experimental and is being tested for:
- Research into multi-agent cognitive architectures
- Exploration of dynamic, adaptive language models
- Educational purposes in understanding swarm intelligence + LLMs
Not intended for:
- Production applications
- Safety-critical systems
- Generation of factual content
## Citation
```bibtex
@software{sagi2026,
title={SAGI: Swarm AGI Language Model},
author={Reaperdoesntknow},
year={2026},
url={https://huggingface.co/your-reaperdoesntknow/SAGI}
}
```