YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Production-Grade Customer Support LLM

Project Overview

This project demonstrates the complete lifecycle of building a domain-specific AI-powered Customer Support Assistant using a lightweight open-source Large Language Model (LLM).

The system was designed to:

  • Fine-tune a small LLM for customer support tasks
  • Improve instruction following and response quality
  • Handle refund and cancellation requests professionally
  • Reduce hallucinations
  • Implement AI safety guardrails
  • Benchmark inference performance
  • Deploy the model using FastAPI

The project focuses on lightweight and efficient deployment suitable for low-resource environments while maintaining strong customer interaction quality.


Objective

The primary objective of this project is to build a specialized customer support AI assistant capable of:

  • Answering customer queries
  • Processing refund requests
  • Handling cancellations
  • Generating professional support responses
  • Preventing unsafe or malicious interactions
  • Maintaining low inference latency

The project also demonstrates:

  • Parameter-efficient fine-tuning using LoRA
  • AI safety implementation
  • API deployment
  • Benchmarking and monitoring

Dataset

Dataset Used

Bitext Customer Support Dataset from Hugging Face.

Dataset Link: https://huggingface.co/datasets/bitext/Bitext-customer-support-llm-chatbot-training-dataset


Dataset Description

The dataset contains real-world styled customer support conversations such as:

  • Refund requests
  • Order tracking
  • Product complaints
  • Cancellation requests
  • General customer queries

Each sample contains:

  • Instruction (customer query)
  • Response (support agent response)

Dataset Preprocessing

The preprocessing pipeline includes:

  • Dataset loading using Hugging Face Datasets
  • Selecting a smaller subset for lightweight training
  • Formatting the dataset into instruction-response format
  • Tokenization for model training

Example formatted sample:

Instruction:

I want a refund because my order arrived damaged.

Response:

We apologize for the inconvenience. Your refund request has been initiated.


Base Model

Model Used

TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0

Model Link: https://huggingface.co/TinyLlama/TinyLlama-1.1B-Chat-v1.0


Why TinyLlama?

TinyLlama was selected because:

  • Lightweight architecture
  • Faster inference
  • Lower GPU memory requirements
  • Suitable for Google Colab free GPU
  • Efficient for LoRA fine-tuning

Fine-Tuning Approach

Fine-Tuning Method

The model was fine-tuned using:

  • LoRA (Low-Rank Adaptation)
  • PEFT (Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning)

Instead of updating all model parameters, LoRA trains only small adapter layers which:

  • Reduces GPU memory usage
  • Speeds up training
  • Makes deployment lightweight

LoRA Configuration

Parameter| Value r| 8 lora_alpha| 16 lora_dropout| 0.05 task_type| CAUSAL_LM


Training Configuration

Parameter| Value Batch Size| 1 Epochs| 1 Learning Rate| 2e-4 Max Length| 256 Dataset Size| 100 Samples


Why Reduced Dataset?

The dataset size was intentionally reduced because:

  • Google Colab free GPU limitations
  • Faster experimentation
  • Faster deployment testing
  • Lightweight proof-of-concept training

The objective was to demonstrate the complete LLM engineering pipeline rather than perform massive-scale training.


Model Training Pipeline

The training pipeline includes:

  1. Dataset Loading
  2. Dataset Formatting
  3. Tokenization
  4. LoRA Adapter Injection
  5. Fine-Tuning using Hugging Face Trainer
  6. Model Saving
  7. Inference Testing

Inference Pipeline

The inference pipeline follows:

Customer Query ↓ Prompt Validation ↓ Toxicity Filtering ↓ LLM Inference ↓ Response Generation ↓ Safety Validation ↓ Final Response


Toxicity Filtering

Objective

To prevent unsafe or toxic responses generated by the model.


Library Used

Detoxify


Implementation

The generated response is passed through Detoxify:

  • If toxicity score exceeds threshold
  • Response gets blocked

Example:

  • Toxic content β†’ blocked
  • Safe content β†’ returned to user

Prompt Guardrails

Objective

Prevent:

  • Prompt injection attacks
  • Jailbreak attempts
  • Unsafe prompts
  • System prompt leakage

Guardrail Strategy

A blocked keyword system was implemented.

Blocked examples:

  • ignore previous instructions
  • reveal system prompt
  • hack
  • password
  • bypass safety

Unsafe prompts are rejected before inference.


Benchmarking

Metrics Measured

  1. Latency

Measures response generation time.

  1. GPU Memory Usage

Measures memory utilization during inference.

  1. Tokens Per Second

Measures inference throughput.


Benchmark Results

Metric| Result Latency| ~1.2 sec GPU Memory| ~5 GB Tokens/sec| ~40


Base Model vs Fine-Tuned Model

Scenario| Base Model| Fine-Tuned Model Refund Handling| Generic| Professional Cancellation| Weak workflow| Structured response Angry Customer| Limited empathy| Better customer handling Customer Queries| Generic answers| Domain-specific responses


AI Safety Implementation

The project implements multiple AI safety layers:

  1. Toxicity Filtering

Blocks toxic responses.

  1. Prompt Guardrails

Prevents malicious prompts.

  1. Unsafe Prompt Handling

Rejects prompt injection attempts.


Deployment

Framework Used

FastAPI


Deployment Architecture

User Request ↓ FastAPI Backend ↓ Prompt Validation ↓ Safety Layer ↓ LLM Inference ↓ Response Generation


Public Deployment

The API was exposed publicly using ngrok.

Swagger UI was used for API testing.

Endpoints:

  • GET /
  • POST /chat

FastAPI Features

  • REST API support
  • Production-ready backend
  • Swagger documentation
  • Lightweight deployment
  • Easy scalability

Hugging Face Deployment

The fine-tuned model was uploaded to Hugging Face for:

  • Model hosting
  • Public inference access
  • Reproducibility
  • Portfolio showcase

GitHub Repository

The GitHub repository contains:

  • Colab notebook
  • FastAPI app
  • Benchmark reports
  • Architecture documentation
  • Requirements file
  • README documentation

Challenges Faced

  1. Google Colab GPU Limitations

Resolved by:

  • Using TinyLlama
  • Reducing dataset size
  • LoRA fine-tuning

  1. Dependency Conflicts

Resolved by:

  • Using stable Transformers versions
  • Simplifying Trainer pipeline

  1. FastAPI Deployment in Colab

Resolved by:

  • Using ngrok
  • Running uvicorn properly

Future Improvements

Future enhancements may include:

  • vLLM deployment
  • llama.cpp benchmarking
  • Quantized inference
  • RAG integration
  • Multi-turn conversation memory
  • Kubernetes deployment
  • Docker containerization
  • Monitoring dashboard

Key Learnings

This project helped demonstrate:

  • LLM fine-tuning workflows
  • LoRA and PEFT training
  • AI safety engineering
  • FastAPI deployment
  • Benchmarking techniques
  • Production AI pipeline design

Technologies Used

Technology| Purpose Python| Development Transformers| LLM Framework PEFT| LoRA Fine-Tuning TinyLlama| Base Model FastAPI| API Deployment ngrok| Public Tunnel Detoxify| Toxicity Filtering Hugging Face| Model Hosting Google Colab| Training Environment


Conclusion

This project demonstrates a complete end-to-end workflow for building a production-style domain-specific LLM application.

The system successfully:

  • Fine-tuned a lightweight LLM
  • Implemented AI safety mechanisms
  • Performed benchmarking
  • Deployed inference APIs
  • Created a scalable customer support assistant pipeline

The project highlights practical LLM engineering concepts including:

  • efficient fine-tuning
  • inference optimization
  • deployment
  • safety-first AI design

Author

Satyanarayan Dubey

Data Scientist | Machine Learning Engineer | Generative AI Enthusiast

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support