Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 1,329 Bytes
7edb5d1 068faf9 7edb5d1 068faf9 7edb5d1 068faf9 7edb5d1 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 | # AI Ethics Discussion Frameworks
Three families of ethical analysis used as the structural lens for the per-session perfect answer. The generator picks whichever framework or stakeholder lens the participant's argument most invites; it does not need to cover every bullet in every framework.
## 1) Consequence-related probes
- Consider potential consequences, both benefits and harms.
- Examine who will be influenced and how (distribution across stakeholders). Who afford the costs, who get the benefits.
- Assess severity, likelihood, and reversibility of outcomes.
- Distinguish short-term vs long-term consequences.
- Identify trade-offs between competing outcomes.
- Reversible vs. irreversible?
## 2) Duty- and rights-based reasoning
- Consider whether any rights, autonomy, or consent are affected.
- Examine fairness and potential bias.
- Reflect on rules, obligations, or ethical constraints that should not be violated.
- Consider whether individuals are treated as ends or merely as means.
## 3) Responsibility- and character-oriented reasoning
- Consider responsibilities of individuals and institutions involved.
- Reflect on accountability if things go wrong.
- Examine whether the use of the system reflects good judgment or ethical integrity.
- Consider trust, professionalism, and societal expectations.
|