Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # CurvOpt: Mathematical Foundations | |
| ## Energy-Constrained Precision Allocation via Curvature and Information Theory | |
| <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/mathjax@3/es5/tex-mml-chtml.js"></script> | |
| --- | |
| ## 1. Problem Formulation | |
| Let a trained neural network with parameters \\( \theta \in \mathbb{R}^d \\) minimize empirical risk: | |
| \\[ | |
| L(\theta) = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \ell(f_\theta(x_i), y_i) | |
| \\] | |
| We introduce quantization: | |
| \\[ | |
| \theta_q = \theta + \varepsilon | |
| \\] | |
| We seek precision assignments \\( q_l \\) per layer: | |
| \\[ | |
| \min_{q_l \in \mathcal{Q}} | |
| \sum_{l=1}^{L} \mathcal{E}_l(q_l) | |
| \quad | |
| \text{s.t.} | |
| \quad | |
| L(\theta_q) - L(\theta) \le \epsilon | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Boyd & Vandenberghe (2004), *Convex Optimization* | |
| --- | |
| ## 2. Second-Order Loss Perturbation | |
| By Taylor expansion: | |
| \\[ | |
| L(\theta + \varepsilon) | |
| = | |
| L(\theta) | |
| + | |
| \nabla L(\theta)^T \varepsilon | |
| + | |
| \frac{1}{2} \varepsilon^T H(\theta) \varepsilon | |
| + | |
| o(\|\varepsilon\|^2) | |
| \\] | |
| Near a stationary point: | |
| \\[ | |
| \nabla L(\theta) \approx 0 | |
| \\] | |
| Thus: | |
| \\[ | |
| \Delta L | |
| \approx | |
| \frac{1}{2} \varepsilon^T H \varepsilon | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Nocedal & Wright (2006), *Numerical Optimization* | |
| --- | |
| ## 3. Spectral Bound | |
| Since \\( H \\) is symmetric: | |
| \\[ | |
| \lambda_{\min}(H) \|\varepsilon\|^2 | |
| \le | |
| \varepsilon^T H \varepsilon | |
| \le | |
| \lambda_{\max}(H) \|\varepsilon\|^2 | |
| \\] | |
| Thus: | |
| \\[ | |
| \Delta L | |
| \le | |
| \frac{1}{2} | |
| \lambda_{\max}(H) | |
| \|\varepsilon\|^2 | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Goodfellow et al. (2016), *Deep Learning* | |
| --- | |
| ## 4. Hutchinson Trace Estimator | |
| \\[ | |
| \operatorname{Tr}(H) | |
| = | |
| \mathbb{E}_{v} | |
| \left[ | |
| v^T H v | |
| \right] | |
| \\] | |
| where \\( v_i \sim \{-1,+1\} \\). | |
| Reference: Robert & Casella (2004), *Monte Carlo Statistical Methods* | |
| --- | |
| ## 5. Quantization Noise Model | |
| Uniform quantization with step size \\( \Delta \\): | |
| \\[ | |
| \varepsilon \sim \mathcal{U}\left(-\frac{\Delta}{2}, \frac{\Delta}{2}\right) | |
| \\] | |
| Variance: | |
| \\[ | |
| \operatorname{Var}(\varepsilon) | |
| = | |
| \frac{\Delta^2}{12} | |
| \\] | |
| Expected loss increase: | |
| \\[ | |
| \mathbb{E}[\Delta L] | |
| \approx | |
| \frac{1}{2} | |
| \operatorname{Tr}(H) | |
| \cdot | |
| \frac{\Delta^2}{12} | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Gallager (1968), *Information Theory and Reliable Communication* | |
| --- | |
| ## 6. Mutual Information | |
| \\[ | |
| I(X_l ; Y_l) | |
| = | |
| \int p(x,y) | |
| \log | |
| \frac{p(x,y)}{p(x)p(y)} | |
| \, dx\,dy | |
| \\] | |
| Data Processing Inequality: | |
| \\[ | |
| I(X; Y_{l+1}) \le I(X; Y_l) | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Cover & Thomas (2006), *Elements of Information Theory* | |
| --- | |
| ## 7. Constrained Energy Minimization | |
| \\[ | |
| \min_{q_l} | |
| \sum_l \mathcal{E}_l(q_l) | |
| + | |
| \lambda | |
| \left( | |
| \sum_l | |
| \frac{1}{24} | |
| \operatorname{Tr}(H_l) | |
| \Delta_l^2 | |
| - | |
| \epsilon | |
| \right) | |
| \\] | |
| KKT condition: | |
| \\[ | |
| \nabla_{q_l} \mathcal{L} = 0 | |
| \\] | |
| Reference: Bertsekas (1999), *Nonlinear Programming* | |
| --- | |
| ## Summary | |
| CurvOpt is grounded in: | |
| - Second-order perturbation theory | |
| - Spectral bounds | |
| - Monte Carlo trace estimation | |
| - Classical quantization noise modeling | |
| - Shannon mutual information | |
| - Constrained nonlinear optimization | |
| All formulas are standard results from established literature. |