Spaces:
Running on CPU Upgrade
Running on CPU Upgrade
| # π― ANSWER: Yes, You Should Look at Those Datasets! | |
| ## Short Answer | |
| **NO** - we have **NOT** looked at all those projects' actual URL datasets yet. | |
| We integrated their **code patterns**, but missed the much more valuable **pre-existing URL lists**. | |
| ## What We Found | |
| ### β What EXISTS (and you should use): | |
| 1. **LocalView Dataset** (Harvard Dataverse) | |
| - URL: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/NJTBEM | |
| - **"Largest known database of local government meetings"** | |
| - Publicly downloadable | |
| - **Estimated: 1,000-10,000 jurisdiction URLs** | |
| - β οΈ **We should download this FIRST** | |
| 2. **Council Data Project Deployments** | |
| - 20+ confirmed cities with full data pipelines | |
| - Seattle, Portland, Denver, Boston, Oakland, Charlotte, etc. | |
| - Each has verified URLs with transcripts + videos | |
| - **These are premium jurisdictions** (large cities, high-value for advocacy) | |
| 3. **City Scrapers Spider Lists** | |
| - Chicago: ~100 agencies | |
| - Pittsburgh, Detroit, Cleveland, LA: dozens more | |
| - Each spider file contains validated URLs | |
| - **Estimated: 100-500 agency URLs** | |
| 4. **Legistar Subdomain Pattern** | |
| - Test pattern: `{city}.legistar.com` | |
| - Can enumerate against our 32,333 municipalities | |
| - **Estimated: 1,000-3,000 matches** | |
| ### β What DOESN'T exist: | |
| 1. **HuggingFace**: No US local government datasets found | |
| 2. **CivicBand**: Website exists but dataset not publicly downloadable | |
| 3. **OpenTowns**: No bulk dataset available | |
| ## The Big Insight | |
| ### Current Approach (What We're Doing): | |
| ``` | |
| Census jurisdictions (85,302) | |
| β | |
| Match to CISA .gov domains (15,672) | |
| β | |
| Result: 76 URLs from 500 tested = 15% success rate | |
| β | |
| Projected: ~5,000 URLs if we test all municipalities | |
| ``` | |
| ### Better Approach (What We Should Do): | |
| ``` | |
| 1. Download LocalView dataset | |
| β 1,000-10,000 URLs (already discovered!) | |
| 2. Extract CDP deployment URLs | |
| β 20 premium jurisdictions (already configured!) | |
| 3. Clone City Scrapers repos | |
| β 100-500 agency URLs (already validated!) | |
| 4. Enumerate Legistar subdomains | |
| β 1,000-3,000 URLs (30-50% success) | |
| 5. THEN use our Census matching as fallback | |
| β Fill remaining gaps | |
| TOTAL: 7,000-20,000 URLs vs. our current 76 | |
| ``` | |
| ## Why This Matters | |
| **ROI Comparison:** | |
| | Source | Time | URLs | Quality | Priority | | |
| |--------|------|------|---------|----------| | |
| | **LocalView** | 1 day | 1,000-10,000 | Unknown | π₯ **DO FIRST** | | |
| | **CDP** | 2 hours | 20 | Excellent | π₯ **DO SECOND** | | |
| | **City Scrapers** | 4 hours | 100-500 | Good | π₯ **DO THIRD** | | |
| | **Legistar** | 1 week | 1,000-3,000 | Good | π‘ Medium | | |
| | **Census Matching** | Done | 5,000 | Unknown | π’ Fallback | | |
| **Bottom Line**: Downloading existing datasets is **10-100x more efficient** than trying to discover URLs ourselves. | |
| ## What You Should Do NOW | |
| ### Priority 1: Download LocalView (HIGHEST VALUE) | |
| ```bash | |
| # Visit Harvard Dataverse | |
| open https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/NJTBEM | |
| # Download all files (likely CSV/JSON with jurisdiction URLs) | |
| # Save to: data/cache/localview/ | |
| # Then load to Bronze layer | |
| python discovery/external_url_datasets.py | |
| ``` | |
| ### Priority 2: Use CDP Deployments (HIGHEST QUALITY) | |
| ```bash | |
| # Already coded! Just run: | |
| python -c " | |
| from discovery.external_url_datasets import integrate_external_url_datasets | |
| integrate_external_url_datasets() | |
| " | |
| # This adds 20 premium jurisdictions with full pipelines | |
| ``` | |
| ### Priority 3: Extract City Scrapers URLs | |
| ```bash | |
| # Clone the repo | |
| git clone https://github.com/city-scrapers/city-scrapers.git | |
| # Extract URLs from spider files | |
| grep -r "start_urls" city-scrapers/city_scrapers/spiders/*.py | |
| # Add to Bronze layer | |
| ``` | |
| ### Priority 4: Continue Your Current Approach | |
| Your Census + CISA matching is good as a **fallback**, but use it after exhausting the above sources. | |
| ## The Key Mistake We Made | |
| We asked: **"How can we integrate their code patterns?"** | |
| We should have asked: **"What URL datasets have they already created?"** | |
| The civic tech community has spent years discovering and validating URLs. We should **reuse their datasets**, not just their code! | |
| ## Updated Architecture | |
| ``` | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β BRONZE LAYER β | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ | |
| β β | |
| β β census_jurisdictions 85,302 records β | |
| β β gsa_domains 15,672 records β | |
| β β cdp_deployments 20 records π β | |
| β π localview_jurisdictions 1,000-10,000 records π β | |
| β π city_scrapers_agencies 100-500 records π β | |
| β π legistar_urls 1,000-3,000 records π β | |
| β β | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β SILVER LAYER β | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ | |
| β β | |
| β Merge all URL sources: β | |
| β β’ CDP (highest priority - excellent quality) β | |
| β β’ LocalView (high volume) β | |
| β β’ City Scrapers (validated) β | |
| β β’ Legistar (standardized platform) β | |
| β β’ Census matching (fallback) β | |
| β β | |
| β Deduplicate by jurisdiction + URL β | |
| β Add platform detection β | |
| β Score by priority β | |
| β β | |
| β Result: 7,000-20,000 unique URLs β | |
| β β | |
| βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| ``` | |
| ## Summary | |
| ### What You Asked: | |
| > "Have I looked at all of those projects and datasources including datasource on huggingface to determine the optimal set of urls to scraped?" | |
| ### Answer: | |
| **No, but you should!** Specifically: | |
| 1. β **Do download**: LocalView dataset (1,000-10,000 URLs) | |
| 2. β **Do extract**: CDP deployment URLs (20 cities) | |
| 3. β **Do clone**: City Scrapers for agency URLs (100-500) | |
| 4. β **Do enumerate**: Legistar subdomains (1,000-3,000) | |
| 5. β **Skip**: HuggingFace (no relevant datasets found) | |
| 6. β οΈ **Keep**: Your Census matching as fallback | |
| ### Expected Outcome: | |
| - **Before**: 76 URLs (from manual matching) | |
| - **After**: 7,000-20,000 URLs (from existing datasets + matching) | |
| - **Improvement**: 100x more coverage! | |
| --- | |
| ## Implementation Status | |
| β **Created**: `discovery/external_url_datasets.py` - Integration code | |
| β **Documented**: `docs/URL_DATASETS_CONFIRMED.md` - Full analysis | |
| β οΈ **TODO**: Download LocalView dataset (manual, requires browser) | |
| β οΈ **TODO**: Run integration script to load CDP URLs | |
| --- | |
| **You were absolutely right to ask this question.** Using existing datasets is the smart approach! π― | |