jcbowyer's picture
Clean HuggingFace deployment without binary files
e59d91d
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
13.1 kB
---
sidebar_position: 10
---
# Product Backlog & Feature Roadmap
This page tracks planned features, enhancements, and research directions for Open Navigator. Items are organized by theme and priority.
## 🎯 High Priority Features
### Politician Personality Profiles
**Status:** Planned
**Reference:** [Personality Politics - Joe Biden Example](http://personality-politics.org/joe-biden-2024)
Create comprehensive personality and behavioral profiles for elected officials based on:
- **Public Voting Records:** Analyze voting patterns, bill sponsorships, and legislative priorities
- **Public Statements:** Analyze speeches, press releases, social media, and meeting transcripts
- **Psychological Frameworks:** Apply Big Five personality traits, moral foundations, leadership styles
- **Communication Patterns:** Analyze rhetoric, framing strategies, and messaging consistency
- **Constituency Alignment:** Compare positions with constituent demographics and values
**Data Sources:**
- OpenStates API (voting records, bill sponsorships)
- Meeting transcripts from `events_text_ai` (local positions and rhetoric)
- Social media APIs (public statements)
- Campaign finance data (FEC API)
- Census data (constituency demographics)
**Output Format:**
```json
{
"person_id": "ocd-person/12345",
"full_name": "Jane Smith",
"office": "City Council Member, District 3",
"jurisdiction": "Boston, MA",
"personality_profile": {
"big_five": {
"openness": 0.75,
"conscientiousness": 0.82,
"extraversion": 0.68,
"agreeableness": 0.71,
"neuroticism": 0.35
},
"moral_foundations": {
"care_harm": 0.85,
"fairness_cheating": 0.78,
"loyalty_betrayal": 0.52,
"authority_subversion": 0.48,
"sanctity_degradation": 0.42,
"liberty_oppression": 0.71
},
"leadership_style": "collaborative",
"policy_priorities": ["housing", "education", "climate"],
"communication_style": {
"clarity_score": 0.82,
"consistency_score": 0.76,
"emotional_tone": "optimistic"
}
},
"voting_analysis": {
"total_votes": 247,
"attendance_rate": 0.94,
"party_loyalty_score": 0.68,
"bipartisan_collaboration_score": 0.45,
"key_issues": [
{
"issue": "affordable_housing",
"vote_count": 32,
"support_rate": 0.91,
"alignment_with_platform": 0.95
}
]
},
"constituent_alignment": {
"demographic_match": 0.72,
"policy_position_match": 0.68,
"responsiveness_score": 0.81
},
"sources": [
"OpenStates voting records",
"City Council meeting transcripts",
"Campaign website positions",
"Social media analysis (Twitter/X, Facebook)"
],
"last_updated": "2026-05-05"
}
```
**Implementation Steps:**
1. βœ… Create `bronze_contacts` table (DONE - already exists)
2. βœ… Extract people from meeting transcripts (DONE)
3. πŸ”² Build personality analysis pipeline using LLMs
4. πŸ”² Integrate voting record analysis from OpenStates
5. πŸ”² Apply psychological frameworks (Big Five, Moral Foundations)
6. πŸ”² Create profile aggregation and scoring system
7. πŸ”² Build UI components for profile visualization
8. πŸ”² Add profile comparison tools (compare candidates, track changes over time)
**Related Tables:**
- `bronze_contacts` - People extracted from meetings
- `opencivicdata_person` - Legislators from OpenStates
- `bronze_decisions` - Voting behavior in local meetings
- `bronze_organizations` - Organizational affiliations
---
## πŸ“Š Data & Analytics Features
### Multi-Model AI Evaluation Dashboard
**Status:** In Progress (documentation complete, implementation pending)
Visual dashboard to compare AI model extractions and show consensus/contradictions.
**Features:**
- Side-by-side comparison of model outputs
- Consensus visualization (what all models agree on)
- Contradiction highlighting with explanation
- Quality metrics (Faithfulness, Relevancy, Coherence)
- Model performance tracking over time
**Reference:** [AI Model Evaluation](./ai-model-evaluation.md)
### Advanced Frame Analysis Aggregation
**Status:** Planned
Build aggregated views of policy frame analysis across:
- Time (how frames evolve)
- Geography (regional differences in framing)
- Issues (dominant frames per topic)
- Decision outcomes (which frames predict success/failure)
### Predictive Analytics
**Status:** Research Phase
Use historical meeting data to predict:
- Likely decision outcomes based on arguments presented
- Budget allocation patterns
- Policy adoption timelines
- Public engagement levels
---
## πŸ” Search & Discovery
### Semantic Search Across All Content
**Status:** Partially Implemented
Expand semantic search to cover:
- Meeting transcripts
- Decision statements
- Nonprofit descriptions
- Elected official statements
- Legislation text
### Advanced Filtering
**Status:** Planned
Multi-dimensional filtering:
- Geographic (state β†’ county β†’ city β†’ district)
- Temporal (date ranges, meeting frequency)
- Thematic (COFOG codes, NTEE categories)
- Sentiment (supportive vs. opposed arguments)
- Financial impact (budget thresholds)
---
## 🀝 Collaboration & Engagement
### Constituent Communication Tools
**Status:** Planned
Help residents engage with elected officials:
- Template generator for public comments
- Meeting reminder notifications
- Issue tracking (follow specific topics)
- Elected official contact finder
- Public comment submission tracking
### Advocacy Campaign Builder
**Status:** Planned
Tools for organizers:
- Campaign strategy templates
- Target identification (key decision-makers)
- Power mapping visualization
- Coalition building tools
- Impact measurement dashboard
---
## 🧠 AI & Machine Learning
### Fine-Tuned Models for Civic Analysis
**Status:** Research Phase
Train domain-specific models:
- **Civic-BERT:** Fine-tuned for government meeting analysis
- **Policy-Frame-GPT:** Specialized in frame analysis
- **Vote-Predictor:** Predict council vote outcomes
- **Sentiment-Civic:** Sentiment analysis for public comments
### Ensemble Model Implementation
**Status:** In Progress
Implement production-ready ensemble pipelines:
- Automated MoA synthesis for all new meetings
- Multi-model comparison for quality assurance
- Confidence scoring for extracted facts
- Human-in-the-loop for low-confidence items
**Reference:** [AI Model Merging](./ai-model-merging.md)
---
## πŸ—ΊοΈ Geographic & Spatial Features
### Interactive Power Maps
**Status:** Planned
Visualize power dynamics from frame analysis:
- Stakeholder influence networks
- Constituent vs. developer interests
- Coalition formation patterns
- Decision-making pathways
### Geospatial Analysis
**Status:** Planned
Map-based views:
- Jurisdictions by policy topic heatmap
- Nonprofit density by issue area
- Meeting frequency by region
- Budget allocation patterns
---
## πŸ“± Platform & Infrastructure
### Mobile Application
**Status:** Planned
Native mobile apps for:
- Meeting notifications
- Live meeting viewing with AI summaries
- Quick contact lookup for elected officials
- Voice-to-text public comment submission
### Real-Time Meeting Analysis
**Status:** Research Phase
Live AI analysis during meetings:
- Real-time transcription and analysis
- Live frame detection
- Decision outcome prediction
- Instant fact-checking of claims
### Multi-Language Support
**Status:** Planned
Expand to support:
- Spanish (priority)
- Chinese
- Vietnamese
- Tagalog
- Other languages based on jurisdiction demographics
---
## πŸ”’ Privacy & Security
### Differential Privacy Implementation
**Status:** Research Phase
Protect individual privacy while enabling analysis:
- Anonymized voting patterns
- Aggregated demographic analysis
- Privacy-preserving personality profiles
### Data Governance Framework
**Status:** Planned
Implement comprehensive governance:
- Data retention policies
- Right to be forgotten mechanisms
- Consent management system
- Audit logging for all data access
---
## πŸ§ͺ Research & Experiments
### Causal Analysis of Policy Outcomes
**Status:** Research Phase
Use causal inference to understand:
- What policy interventions actually work
- Impact of framing on decision outcomes
- Effect of constituent engagement on votes
- Budget allocation effectiveness
### Comparative Jurisdiction Analysis
**Status:** Planned
Compare similar jurisdictions:
- Best practices identification
- Policy diffusion patterns
- Regional coordination opportunities
- Performance benchmarking
### LLM-Generated Policy Briefs
**Status:** Planned
Automatically generate:
- Meeting summaries for residents
- Policy impact analyses
- Comparison reports ("What did other cities do?")
- FAQ generation from meeting transcripts
---
## 🎨 User Experience
### Personalized Dashboard
**Status:** Planned
Customizable views based on user interests:
- "My Neighborhood" - local-only updates
- "My Issues" - filtered by policy topics
- "My Representatives" - track specific officials
- "My Meetings" - saved/bookmarked meetings
### Accessibility Improvements
**Status:** Ongoing
Enhance accessibility:
- Screen reader optimization
- Keyboard navigation
- High contrast themes
- Simplified language mode
- Audio descriptions for visualizations
---
## πŸ“š Documentation & Education
### Civic Education Curriculum
**Status:** Planned
Educational materials:
- "How Government Works" guides
- "Understanding Your Local Budget" tutorials
- "How to Make Public Comments" videos
- "Reading Meeting Minutes" guides
### API Documentation
**Status:** Partially Complete
Comprehensive developer docs:
- REST API reference
- GraphQL schema
- Authentication guides
- Rate limiting policies
- Code examples in multiple languages
---
## πŸ”— Integration Goals
### Third-Party Integrations
**Status:** Planned
Connect with:
- **Civic platforms:** Participatory budgeting tools, petition platforms
- **Social media:** Auto-post meeting summaries
- **Calendar apps:** Meeting reminders
- **Communication tools:** Slack, Discord for community organizing
- **CRM systems:** For advocacy organizations
### Data Export & Portability
**Status:** Planned
Enable data export:
- CSV/Excel for offline analysis
- JSON API for programmatic access
- PDF reports for sharing
- Parquet files for data science
- Push to HuggingFace Datasets
---
## πŸ’‘ Community Requested Features
### Issue Tracking
**Status:** Planned
Track specific issues across time:
- "Follow this bill through the legislative process"
- "Alert me when budget item is discussed"
- "Track mentions of my neighborhood"
### Comparison Tools
**Status:** Planned
Compare across dimensions:
- Before/after policy implementation
- Your city vs. neighboring cities
- Current council vs. previous council
- Campaign promises vs. actual votes
### Public Comment Analysis
**Status:** Planned
Analyze public comments:
- Common themes in constituent feedback
- Sentiment trends over time
- Impact of public comment on votes
- Who speaks at meetings (demographics)
---
## πŸ“… Timeline (Rough Estimates)
### Q2 2026
- βœ… Multi-model comparison infrastructure (COMPLETE)
- βœ… MoA synthesis pipeline (COMPLETE)
- πŸ”² Politician personality profiles (v1 prototype)
- πŸ”² Multi-model evaluation dashboard
### Q3 2026
- πŸ”² Fine-tuned civic models
- πŸ”² Advanced filtering
- πŸ”² Mobile app (beta)
- πŸ”² Real-time meeting analysis (pilot)
### Q4 2026
- πŸ”² Interactive power maps
- πŸ”² Multi-language support (Spanish)
- πŸ”² Constituent communication tools
- πŸ”² API v2 launch
### 2027+
- πŸ”² Predictive analytics
- πŸ”² Causal analysis research
- πŸ”² Civic education curriculum
- πŸ”² Global expansion
---
## 🀝 How to Contribute
Have ideas for new features? Want to help implement something from this backlog?
1. **Comment on existing issues:** [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/getcommunityone/open-navigator/issues)
2. **Submit feature requests:** Use the "Feature Request" template
3. **Join discussions:** [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/getcommunityone/open-navigator/discussions)
4. **Pick a backlog item:** Comment on the issue to claim it
5. **Submit a PR:** Reference the backlog item in your pull request
---
## πŸ“Š Priority Framework
We prioritize features using:
**Impact:** How many users benefit? (πŸ”΄ High / 🟑 Medium / 🟒 Low)
**Effort:** How much work is required? (🟒 Low / 🟑 Medium / πŸ”΄ High)
**Strategic:** Does it align with our mission? (⭐ Yes / - No)
**High Priority:** πŸ”΄ Impact + 🟒 Low Effort + ⭐ Strategic
**Medium Priority:** 🟑 Impact + 🟑 Effort + ⭐ Strategic
**Research Phase:** πŸ”΄ Impact + πŸ”΄ High Effort (needs more investigation)
---
## 🎯 Feature Status Legend
- βœ… **Complete** - Feature is live and available
- πŸ”„ **In Progress** - Actively being developed
- πŸ”² **Planned** - Committed to roadmap
- πŸ§ͺ **Research Phase** - Exploring feasibility
- πŸ’­ **Idea** - Community suggestion, not yet scoped
---
*Last updated: May 5, 2026*
*Next review: June 1, 2026*