Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # Government Accountability Office (GAO) | |
| ## Audit Memorandum | |
| ### Subject: | |
| Preliminary Review β Federal FOIA Intelligence Search | |
| --- | |
| ## Objective | |
| To assess whether the system: | |
| - Complies with federal transparency norms | |
| - Introduces privacy or security risks | |
| - Aligns with responsible AI principles | |
| --- | |
| ## Scope of Review | |
| - Application architecture | |
| - Data handling practices | |
| - AI usage controls | |
| - Governance documentation | |
| --- | |
| ## Findings | |
| ### 1. Data Collection | |
| β No personal data collected | |
| β No scraping or mirroring | |
| β No background ingestion | |
| ### 2. AI Use | |
| β Disabled by default | |
| β User-initiated only | |
| β Disclosure-mandated | |
| ### 3. Security | |
| β Stateless execution | |
| β No persistent storage | |
| β HTTPS communications | |
| ### 4. Compliance | |
| β FOIA-aligned | |
| β NIST AI RMF aligned | |
| β Privacy Framework aligned | |
| --- | |
| ## Risks Identified | |
| | Risk | Mitigation | | |
| |----|-----------| | |
| | AI misinterpretation | Disclosures + citations | | |
| | Source misuse | Link-out only | | |
| | Overreliance on AI | Court warnings | | |
| --- | |
| ## GAO Conclusion | |
| > The system presents **low operational, privacy, and security risk** and | |
| demonstrates best practices for responsible AI in public-record research. | |
| No corrective action recommended at this time. |