GodsDevProject commited on
Commit
e366238
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f4bcca6

Create IRB_ETHICS_REVIEW.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. IRB_ETHICS_REVIEW.md +99 -0
IRB_ETHICS_REVIEW.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Institutional Review Board (IRB)–Style Ethics Review
2
+
3
+ ## Project Title
4
+ **Federal FOIA Intelligence Search**
5
+
6
+ ## Principal Investigator / Maintainer
7
+ Trey Smith
8
+
9
+ ---
10
+
11
+ ## 1. Purpose of the Project
12
+
13
+ The purpose of this project is to facilitate **ethical discovery, citation, and organization of publicly released U.S. government records** from official FOIA Electronic Reading Rooms.
14
+
15
+ The project does **not** involve experimentation on human subjects and does **not** collect personal data.
16
+
17
+ ---
18
+
19
+ ## 2. Human Subjects Determination
20
+
21
+ **IRB Determination:**
22
+ ☑ Not Human Subjects Research
23
+
24
+ Justification:
25
+ - No interaction with individuals
26
+ - No collection of personal identifiers
27
+ - No intervention, manipulation, or observation of behavior
28
+ - Data sources are entirely public and government-released
29
+
30
+ ---
31
+
32
+ ## 3. Data Sources
33
+
34
+ - Public FOIA Electronic Reading Rooms
35
+ - User-supplied search terms
36
+ - Optional user-approved PDF text extraction
37
+
38
+ **Excluded:**
39
+ - Private communications
40
+ - Classified or restricted materials
41
+ - Authentication-gated systems
42
+
43
+ ---
44
+
45
+ ## 4. Risk Assessment
46
+
47
+ ### Potential Risks
48
+ | Risk | Assessment |
49
+ |----|----|
50
+ | Privacy harm | Minimal |
51
+ | Misinterpretation | Moderate |
52
+ | Overreliance on AI | Moderate |
53
+
54
+ ### Mitigations
55
+ - Explicit AI disclosures
56
+ - Citation anchoring
57
+ - Warnings against evidentiary misuse
58
+ - User-initiated actions only
59
+
60
+ ---
61
+
62
+ ## 5. Informed Consent
63
+
64
+ While no human subjects are involved, the application provides:
65
+ - Explicit opt-in for AI
66
+ - Clear disclosures
67
+ - Usage warnings
68
+
69
+ This satisfies ethical transparency expectations.
70
+
71
+ ---
72
+
73
+ ## 6. Data Retention
74
+
75
+ - No persistent storage
76
+ - No logging
77
+ - Session memory only
78
+ - No training on user inputs
79
+
80
+ ---
81
+
82
+ ## 7. Ethical Safeguards
83
+
84
+ - No automated decision-making
85
+ - No profiling or inference
86
+ - No surveillance functionality
87
+ - No downstream redistribution of content
88
+
89
+ ---
90
+
91
+ ## 8. IRB Conclusion
92
+
93
+ This project qualifies as **Exempt / Not Human Subjects Research** and adheres to ethical standards for transparency-focused public data tools.
94
+
95
+ ---
96
+
97
+ ## Ethics Statement
98
+
99
+ > This system is designed to **support accountability, not automate judgment**.