Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # Ethics & Inclusion Note | |
| **Consent.** Audio is processed only after explicit spoken or written consent, | |
| captured in the language the patient speaks. Consent for care is not consent for | |
| data retention; these are asked separately. | |
| **Data minimisation.** The intake record stores a pseudonymous queue reference, | |
| never a name. Audio is processed in-memory and not persisted by default. Any | |
| audio contributed to the optional benchmark set is de-identified and re-consented. | |
| **Safety over fluency.** The system escalates on uncertainty and never de-escalates | |
| on model confidence. Every tier is marked as requiring clinician confirmation. The | |
| tool supports a triage nurse; it does not replace one. | |
| **The inequity we are measuring.** ASR trained predominantly on Western English | |
| degrades on African-accented and code-switched speech. In a clinic that | |
| degradation is not a quality issue, it is a safety issue: the patients least well | |
| served by the model are those least able to switch into the model's preferred | |
| language. Our benchmark reports under-triage rate precisely because that is where | |
| this inequity becomes clinical harm. A model that performs well on WER while | |
| dropping negations and clinical entities is a model that will fail these patients | |
| quietly. | |
| **Known gaps.** The red-flag lexicon lacks native-speaker clinical validation. The | |
| language-identification heuristic is lexicon-based. Neither is deployment-ready, | |
| and we state that rather than shipping confidence we have not earned. | |