Spaces:
Runtime error
A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available:
6.1.0
AI Agent Design: Automated Software Development Workflow
Overview
This document outlines the design for an AI-powered agent that automates the complete software development lifecycle from requirement gathering to code deployment. The agent integrates with multiple systems (RAG, JIRA, Git, Testing) to provide an end-to-end automated development experience.
System Architecture
graph TD
A[User Input: 3-5 Sentence Requirement] --> B[Web Dashboard]
B --> C[RAG & Fine-tuning via Gradio MCP]
C --> D[Product Spec Generation]
D --> E[Git Branch Creation]
E --> F[Code Generation in src/agent/]
F --> G[Automated Code Review]
G --> H[Git Commit]
H --> I[Unit Testing]
I --> J{Manual Approval}
J -->|Approved| K[Submit PR]
J -->|Rejected| F
K --> L[PR Merge Notification]
L --> M[Summary Report with Git URL]
Workflow Steps
1. Requirement Input & Dashboard
Input: User provides 3-5 sentence requirement via web interface
Components:
- Web-based dashboard displaying:
- Current activity status
- Progress bar for each step
- Real-time logs
- File modification tracker
- Built with modern web framework (React/Next.js or Gradio)
Output: Structured requirement text
2. RAG & Fine-tuning System Integration via Gradio MCP
Process:
- Query RAG system with user requirement via Gradio MCP
- If needed, query fine-tuned model for domain-specific insights
- Generate detailed product specification including:
- Feature description
- Acceptance criteria
- Technical requirements
- Dependencies
- Implementation approach
- Use Gradio MCP Server to access both:
- RAG system (vector database + LLM)
- Fine-tuned models (for specialized knowledge)
Technologies:
- RAG: Vector database (ChromaDB/Pinecone) + LLM
- Fine-tuned Models: Domain-specific models (e.g., insurance, finance)
- Gradio MCP Server: Unified interface for RAG and fine-tuning systems
- LangChain: For orchestrating RAG queries
Output:
- Detailed product specification document
- Technical implementation plan
- Recommended architecture
- Code generation prompts
3. Git Branch Creation & Code Generation
Process:
- Create feature branch:
feature/JIRA-{epic-id}-{description} - Create directory structure:
src/agent/{feature-name}/ - Generate initial code files based on user stories:
- Implementation files
- Test files
- Configuration files
- Documentation
Technologies:
- Git CLI / GitPython
- Code generation: LLM-based (GPT-4/Claude)
Output:
- New Git branch
- Initial code structure in
src/agent/
4. Automated Code Review
Process:
- Run static analysis tools:
- Linters (ESLint, Pylint, etc.)
- Type checkers (TypeScript, mypy)
- Security scanners (Bandit, Snyk)
- LLM-based code review:
- Code quality assessment
- Best practices validation
- Architecture review
- Documentation completeness
- Generate review report with:
- Issues found
- Suggestions for improvement
- Severity ratings
Technologies:
- Static analysis: Language-specific tools
- LLM: GPT-4/Claude for semantic review
- Code review frameworks
Output:
- Code review report
- List of issues to fix
- Auto-fix suggestions
5. Git Commit
Process:
- Stage all modified files
- Generate meaningful commit message:
- Format:
feat(JIRA-{id}): {description} - Include:
- What changed
- Why it changed
- Related JIRA ticket
- Format:
- Commit to feature branch
- Push to remote repository
Technologies:
- Git CLI / GitPython
- Conventional Commits standard
Output:
- Commit SHA
- List of files committed
6. Unit Testing & Summary
Process:
- Auto-generate unit tests if not present
- Run test suite:
- Unit tests
- Integration tests (if applicable)
- Coverage analysis
- Generate test summary report:
- Total tests run
- Pass/Fail count
- Code coverage percentage
- Failed test details
- Performance metrics
Technologies:
- Testing frameworks: pytest, Jest, JUnit
- Coverage tools: coverage.py, Istanbul
- Test generation: LLM-based
Output:
- Test summary report (JSON/HTML)
- Coverage report
- Pass/Fail status
7. Manual Approval & PR Submission
Process:
- Display test results to user via dashboard
- Wait for manual approval:
- Approve: Proceed to PR
- Reject: Return to code generation (Step 3)
- If approved:
- Create Pull Request with:
- Title: JIRA ticket reference
- Description: Auto-generated from commits
- Reviewers: Auto-assigned
- Labels: Auto-tagged
- Link PR to JIRA ticket
- Create Pull Request with:
Technologies:
- GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket API
- JIRA API (via Gradio MCP)
- Web dashboard for approval UI
Output:
- PR URL
- PR number
- Approval timestamp
8. PR Merge Notification & Summary
Process:
- Monitor PR status (webhook or polling)
- Once merged:
- Send notification to user
- Update JIRA ticket status
- Generate final summary report:
- Git repository URL
- Branch name
- Commit SHAs
- List of all modified files
- Test results
- Code review summary
- PR link
- Merge timestamp
Technologies:
- Git webhooks
- Notification system (email, Slack, dashboard)
- JIRA API
Output:
- Completion notification
- Git URL:
https://github.com/{org}/{repo}/tree/{branch} - Modified files list with diff stats
- Full workflow summary
Technology Stack
Core Components
| Component | Technology |
|---|---|
| Web Dashboard | HTML/CSS/JS (implemented) |
| Backend API | FastAPI (implemented) |
| RAG System | LangChain + ChromaDB/Pinecone |
| Fine-tuned Models | Domain-specific models |
| LLM | GPT-4 / Claude 3.5 |
| MCP Server | Gradio MCP for RAG & Fine-tuning |
| Git Integration | GitPython |
| Testing | pytest / Jest |
| CI/CD | GitHub Actions / GitLab CI |
External Integrations
- RAG System: Via Gradio MCP Server for knowledge retrieval
- Fine-tuned Models: Via Gradio MCP Server for specialized insights
- Git: GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket API
- Notification: Email/Slack/Discord
Data Flow
User Input (Text)
β
RAG Query (Embeddings) via Gradio MCP
β
Fine-tuned Model Query (if needed)
β
Product Spec (Structured JSON)
β
Implementation Plan Generation
β
Code Generation (LLM)
β
Git Operations (Branch, Commit, Push)
β
Code Review (Static + LLM)
β
Testing (pytest/Jest)
β
Manual Approval (Dashboard)
β
PR Creation (Git API)
β
Merge Notification (Webhook)
β
Summary Report (Dashboard + Email)
Dashboard UI Components
Main Dashboard
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
β AI Development Agent - Workflow Status β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€
β β
β [Input Requirement] β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β Enter your requirement (3-5 sentences)... β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β [Submit] β
β β
β Workflow Progress: β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β 1. β
Requirement Analysis [Complete] β
β 2. β
RAG & Fine-tuning Query [Spec Ready] β
β 3. β
Git Branch Created [feature/...] β
β 4. π Code Generation [In Progress] β
β 5. β³ Code Review [Pending] β
β 6. β³ Git Commit [Pending] β
β 7. β³ Unit Testing [Pending] β
β 8. β³ Manual Approval [Pending] β
β 9. β³ PR Submission [Pending] β
β 10.β³ PR Merge & Notification [Pending] β
β β
β Activity Log: β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β [12:34:56] Starting code generation... β β
β β [12:35:12] Created src/agent/feature/main.py β β
β β [12:35:45] Generated 5 files β β
β βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β
β β
β Modified Files: [View Details] β
β β
βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ
Configuration
Environment Variables
# Gradio MCP Server (for RAG & Fine-tuning)
GRADIO_MCP_SERVER_URL=http://localhost:7860
# RAG System
VECTOR_DB_TYPE=chromadb # or pinecone
VECTOR_DB_URL=http://localhost:8001 # for ChromaDB
VECTOR_DB_API_KEY=xxxxx # for Pinecone
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-xxxxx
# Fine-tuned Models
FINETUNED_MODEL_PATH=/path/to/finetuned/model
FINETUNED_MODEL_TYPE=insurance # or finance, etc.
# Git
GIT_REPO_URL=https://github.com/org/repo
GIT_TOKEN=ghp_xxxxx
GIT_DEFAULT_BRANCH=main
# Testing
TEST_FRAMEWORK=pytest
COVERAGE_THRESHOLD=80
# Notifications
SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL=https://hooks.slack.com/xxxxx
EMAIL_SMTP_SERVER=smtp.gmail.com
Error Handling
Retry Logic
- RAG Query Failure: Retry 3 times with exponential backoff
- JIRA API Failure: Retry 3 times, fallback to manual creation
- Git Operations: Retry 2 times, alert user on failure
- Test Failures: Allow manual intervention or auto-fix
Rollback Strategy
- Code Review Failure: Revert to previous commit
- Test Failure: Option to fix or abandon
- PR Rejection: Keep branch for manual fixes
Security Considerations
- API Keys: Store in secure vault (AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault)
- Code Scanning: Run security scans before commit
- Access Control: RBAC for dashboard and Git operations
- Audit Logging: Log all actions with timestamps
- Code Isolation: Run code generation in sandboxed environment
Future Enhancements
- Multi-language Support: Extend beyond Python/JavaScript
- AI Code Reviewer: More sophisticated LLM-based reviews
- Auto-deployment: Deploy to staging after PR merge
- Performance Testing: Add load/performance tests
- Documentation Generation: Auto-generate API docs
- Slack/Teams Integration: Real-time notifications
- Analytics Dashboard: Track metrics (velocity, quality, etc.)
Success Metrics
- Automation Rate: % of steps completed without human intervention
- Time to PR: Average time from requirement to PR submission
- Code Quality: Pass rate of code reviews
- Test Coverage: Average coverage across projects
- User Satisfaction: Feedback scores from developers
Conclusion
This AI agent design provides a comprehensive, automated software development workflow that reduces manual effort, improves code quality, and accelerates delivery. By integrating RAG, JIRA (via Gradio MCP), Git, and testing tools, the system creates a seamless experience from requirement to deployment.