corp-env / README.md
Navigam's picture
docs: add YouTube playlist link to README
6df5051
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
6.25 kB
metadata
title: CORP-ENV
emoji: πŸ’Ό
colorFrom: gray
colorTo: blue
sdk: docker
pinned: false
license: mit
app_port: 7860

CORP-ENV β€” Shared Workspace Governance for Corporate Planning Agents

OpenEnv License: MIT

CORP-ENV is a highly ambitious yet realistic reinforcement-learning environment designed for long-horizon planning in an enterprise. The agent steps into a Master role (PM, CFO, CEO) and maintains a Shared Workspace Document (SWD) : a structured JSON state while delegating tasks to heavily specialized frozen worker models (dev_agent, hr_agent, finance_agent). The environment boasts a rich, composable reward signal that is intentionally hard to game.

πŸ“– Read our story: The Blog.MD dives deep into our philosophy. Watch it on YouTube.

Training & Models

We've focused purely on training Qwen 2.5 through a comprehensive Base β†’ SFT β†’ RLVR pipeline to demonstrate verifiable improvement in our environment.

  • Primary Architecture: The Qwen 2.5-7B Instruct model was trained on H100 servers using the robust scripts provided in the training/ directory. All training logs are safely preserved in training_logs/.
  • Google Colab Notebook (T4 Friendly): Check out notebooks/training.ipynb. This notebook has been specifically tested on a T4 instance. To respect memory bounds (OOM issues), it utilizes the smaller Qwen 2.5 3B instruct model.
    • NOTE: other notebooks for differnet models such as deepseek-14B, nemotron-30B in the repository are provided for reference but are not guaranteed or tested to function reliably on Google Colab free tiers.

Qwen 2.5-7B Results (Average over 5 episodes)

Our latest comprehensive evaluation highlights the leap from Base to SFT and robustly to RLVR:

Stage E1 Reward M1 Reward H1 Reward M1 Success
Base (Qwen 2.5-7B) 0.910 0.707 0.761 0%
SFT (Qwen 2.5-7B) 0.910 0.943 0.882 100%
RLVR (Qwen 2.5-7B) 0.910 0.932 0.779 80%

Model Comparison Success by Task

Environment Actions

Action Meaning
delegate Call a worker (agent_id + payload task text).
update_swd RFC 6902 JSON Patch on the SWD.
query_swd Read-only JSONPath over the SWD.
log_reasoning Append a structured reasoning note to the SWD.
log_decision Append a decision note to the SWD.
log_conflict Append a conflict object to conflicts_identified.
log_resolution Append a conflict-resolution object to conflict_resolutions.
advance_phase Move the SWD phase through analysis, decision, or execution.
finalize End episode; terminal reward from rich verifiers and OpenEnv rubrics.

Shared Workspace Document (SWD) Structure

The SWD is a rigorous JSON schema defining the exact state of the enterprise episode. Agents must issue valid JSON patches against this structure:

{
  "episode_id": "uuid",
  "scenario": "description of the problem",
  "phase": "discovery | analysis | decision | execution",
  "milestones": [
    {
      "id": "str",
      "label": "str",
      "due_by_turn": 10,
      "status": "pending",
      "owner": "agent_id",
      "output": null
    }
  ],
  "agent_reports": {
    "qa": null,
    "dev": null,
    "hr": null,
    "finance": null
  },
  "decisions": [],
  "conflicts_identified": [],
  "conflict_resolutions": [],
  "reasoning_log": [],
  "final_recommendation": null,
  "swd_version": 0
}

Tasks

ID Difficulty Summary
e1_launch_readiness Easy 48h product launch readiness (QA stability gate).
m1_budget_reallocation Medium Budget conflict across dev / HR / finance.
h1_acquisition_defence Hard Acquisition defence with injected contradictory intel.

πŸ† A Reward Signal That Actually Teaches

A great environment has a reward function that:

Requirement How CORP-ENV Delivers
Provides a rich, informative signal Blends Phase Transitions, Conflict Identification, Resolution Logging, and Iterative Validation rather than a 0/1 final score.
Captures something hard to measure Evaluates how well the model organizes chaos. The strict structure of the SWD and documented reasoning phases provide dense intermediate signals.
Uses Rubric system thoughtfully The final reward relies on programmatic validations of corporate rigor and is a composition of granular rubric items rather than monolithic success/failure.
Is hard to game Attempting to skip to finalize, missing milestones, or submitting malformed JSON patches aggressively clamps the reward for agents trying to exploit it.

Reward Breakdown (Terminal, at finalize)

Component Weight Evaluation Method
Completion 35% Verifier
SWD Coherence 25% Structural
Milestones 20% On-time
Reasoning 10% Log entries
LLM Judge 10% 3 YES/NO Qs

Quick Start

# Using uv
uv venv && uv sync
uv run uvicorn server.app:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 7860

# Or simply
uv run server

Baseline Inference

Run a deterministic E1 smoke test using stub workers. We ensure 100% determinism via CORP_STUB_WORKERS=1 and CORP_DISABLE_LLM_JUDGE=1:

uv run python inference.py
uv run python inference.py --tasks e1_launch_readiness --max-steps 25 --swd-trace logs/run.jsonl

OpenEnv Validation

uv run openenv validate

Docker

docker build -t corp-env .
docker run -p 7860:7860 --env-file .env.example corp-env

License

MIT.