| # Project Workflow | |
| ## Guiding Principles | |
| 1. **The Plan is the Source of Truth:** All work must be tracked in `plan.md` | |
| 2. **The Tech Stack is Deliberate:** Changes to the tech stack must be documented in `tech-stack.md` *before* implementation | |
| 3. **Test-Driven Development:** Write unit tests before implementing functionality | |
| 4. **High Code Coverage:** Aim for >80% code coverage for all modules | |
| 5. **User Experience First:** Every decision should prioritize user experience | |
| 6. **Non-Interactive & CI-Aware:** Prefer non-interactive commands. Use `CI=true` for watch-mode tools (tests, linters) to ensure single execution. | |
| ## Task Workflow | |
| All tasks follow a strict lifecycle: | |
| ### Standard Task Workflow | |
| 1. **Select Task:** Choose the next available task from `plan.md` in sequential order | |
| 2. **Mark In Progress:** Before beginning work, edit `plan.md` and change the task from `[ ]` to `[~]` | |
| 3. **Write Failing Tests (Red Phase):** | |
| - Create a new test file for the feature or bug fix. | |
| - Write one or more unit tests that clearly define the expected behavior and acceptance criteria for the task. | |
| - **CRITICAL:** Run the tests and confirm that they fail as expected. This is the "Red" phase of TDD. Do not proceed until you have failing tests. | |
| 4. **Implement to Pass Tests (Green Phase):** | |
| - Write the minimum amount of application code necessary to make the failing tests pass. | |
| - Run the test suite again and confirm that all tests now pass. This is the "Green" phase. | |
| 5. **Refactor (Optional but Recommended):** | |
| - With the safety of passing tests, refactor the implementation code and the test code to improve clarity, remove duplication, and enhance performance without changing the external behavior. | |
| - Rerun tests to ensure they still pass after refactoring. | |
| 6. **Verify Coverage:** Run coverage reports using the project's chosen tools. For example, in a Python project, this might look like: | |
| ```bash | |
| pytest --cov=app --cov-report=html | |
| ``` | |
| Target: >80% coverage for new code. The specific tools and commands will vary by language and framework. | |
| 7. **Document Deviations:** If implementation differs from tech stack: | |
| - **STOP** implementation | |
| - Update `tech-stack.md` with new design | |
| - Add dated note explaining the change | |
| - Resume implementation | |
| 8. **Commit Code Changes:** | |
| - Stage all code changes related to the task. | |
| - Propose a clear, concise commit message e.g, `feat(ui): Create basic HTML structure for calculator`. | |
| - Perform the commit. | |
| 9. **Attach Task Summary with Git Notes:** | |
| - **Step 9.1: Get Commit Hash:** Obtain the hash of the *just-completed commit* (`git log -1 --format="%H"`). | |
| - **Step 9.2: Draft Note Content:** Create a detailed summary for the completed task. This should include the task name, a summary of changes, a list of all created/modified files, and the core "why" for the change. | |
| - **Step 9.3: Attach Note:** Use the `git notes` command to attach the summary to the commit. | |
| ```bash | |
| # The note content from the previous step is passed via the -m flag. | |
| git notes add -m "<note content>" <commit_hash> | |
| ``` | |
| 10. **Get and Record Task Commit SHA:** | |
| - **Step 10.1: Update Plan:** Read `plan.md`, find the line for the completed task, update its status from `[~]` to `[x]`, and append the first 7 characters of the *just-completed commit's* commit hash. | |
| - **Step 10.2: Write Plan:** Write the updated content back to `plan.md`. | |
| 11. **Commit Plan Update:** | |
| - **Action:** Stage the modified `plan.md` file. | |
| - **Action:** Commit this change with a descriptive message (e.g., `conductor(plan): Mark task 'Create user model' as complete`). | |
| ### Phase Completion Verification and Checkpointing Protocol | |
| **Trigger:** This protocol is executed immediately after a task is completed that also concludes a phase in `plan.md`. | |
| 1. **Announce Protocol Start:** Inform the user that the phase is complete and the verification and checkpointing protocol has begun. | |
| 2. **Ensure Test Coverage for Phase Changes:** | |
| - **Step 2.1: Determine Phase Scope:** To identify the files changed in this phase, you must first find the starting point. Read `plan.md` to find the Git commit SHA of the *previous* phase's checkpoint. If no previous checkpoint exists, the scope is all changes since the first commit. | |
| - **Step 2.2: List Changed Files:** Execute `git diff --name-only <previous_checkpoint_sha> HEAD` to get a precise list of all files modified during this phase. | |
| - **Step 2.3: Verify and Create Tests:** For each file in the list: | |
| - **CRITICAL:** First, check its extension. Exclude non-code files (e.g., `.json`, `.md`, `.yaml`). | |
| - For each remaining code file, verify a corresponding test file exists. | |
| - If a test file is missing, you **must** create one. Before writing the test, **first, analyze other test files in the repository to determine the correct naming convention and testing style.** The new tests **must** validate the functionality described in this phase's tasks (`plan.md`). | |
| 3. **Execute Automated Tests with Proactive Debugging:** | |
| - Before execution, you **must** announce the exact shell command you will use to run the tests. | |
| - **Example Announcement:** "I will now run the automated test suite to verify the phase. **Command:** `CI=true npm test`" | |
| - Execute the announced command. | |
| - If tests fail, you **must** inform the user and begin debugging. You may attempt to propose a fix a **maximum of two times**. If the tests still fail after your second proposed fix, you **must stop**, report the persistent failure, and ask the user for guidance. | |
| 4. **Propose a Detailed, Actionable Manual Verification Plan:** | |
| - **CRITICAL:** To generate the plan, first analyze `product.md`, `product-guidelines.md`, and `plan.md` to determine the user-facing goals of the completed phase. | |
| - You **must** generate a step-by-step plan that walks the user through the verification process, including any necessary commands and specific, expected outcomes. | |
| - The plan you present to the user **must** follow this format: | |
| **For a Frontend Change:** | |
| ``` | |
| The automated tests have passed. For manual verification, please follow these steps: | |
| **Manual Verification Steps:** | |
| 1. **Start the development server with the command:** `npm run dev` | |
| 2. **Open your browser to:** `http://localhost:3000` | |
| 3. **Confirm that you see:** The new user profile page, with the user's name and email displayed correctly. | |
| ``` | |
| **For a Backend Change:** | |
| ``` | |
| The automated tests have passed. For manual verification, please follow these steps: | |
| **Manual Verification Steps:** | |
| 1. **Ensure the server is running.** | |
| 2. **Execute the following command in your terminal:** `curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/api/v1/users -d '{"name": "test"}'` | |
| 3. **Confirm that you receive:** A JSON response with a status of `201 Created`. | |
| ``` | |
| 5. **Await Explicit User Feedback:** | |
| - After presenting the detailed plan, ask the user for confirmation: "**Does this meet your expectations? Please confirm with yes or provide feedback on what needs to be changed.**" | |
| - **PAUSE** and await the user's response. Do not proceed without an explicit yes or confirmation. | |
| 6. **Create Checkpoint Commit:** | |
| - Stage all changes. If no changes occurred in this step, proceed with an empty commit. | |
| - Perform the commit with a clear and concise message (e.g., `conductor(checkpoint): Checkpoint end of Phase X`). | |
| 7. **Attach Auditable Verification Report using Git Notes:** | |
| - **Step 8.1: Draft Note Content:** Create a detailed verification report including the automated test command, the manual verification steps, and the user's confirmation. | |
| - **Step 8.2: Attach Note:** Use the `git notes` command and the full commit hash from the previous step to attach the full report to the checkpoint commit. | |
| 8. **Get and Record Phase Checkpoint SHA:** | |
| - **Step 7.1: Get Commit Hash:** Obtain the hash of the *just-created checkpoint commit* (`git log -1 --format="%H"`). | |
| - **Step 7.2: Update Plan:** Read `plan.md`, find the heading for the completed phase, and append the first 7 characters of the commit hash in the format `[checkpoint: <sha>]`. | |
| - **Step 7.3: Write Plan:** Write the updated content back to `plan.md`. | |
| 9. **Commit Plan Update:** | |
| - **Action:** Stage the modified `plan.md` file. | |
| - **Action:** Commit this change with a descriptive message following the format `conductor(plan): Mark phase '<PHASE NAME>' as complete`. | |
| 10. **Announce Completion:** Inform the user that the phase is complete and the checkpoint has been created, with the detailed verification report attached as a git note. | |
| ### Quality Gates | |
| Before marking any task complete, verify: | |
| - [ ] All tests pass | |
| - [ ] Code coverage meets requirements (>80%) | |
| - [ ] Code follows project's code style guidelines (as defined in `code_styleguides/`) | |
| - [ ] All public functions/methods are documented (e.g., docstrings, JSDoc, GoDoc) | |
| - [ ] Type safety is enforced (e.g., type hints, TypeScript types, Go types) | |
| - [ ] No linting or static analysis errors (using the project's configured tools) | |
| - [ ] Works correctly on mobile (if applicable) | |
| - [ ] Documentation updated if needed | |
| - [ ] No security vulnerabilities introduced | |
| ## Development Commands | |
| **AI AGENT INSTRUCTION: This section should be adapted to the project's specific language, framework, and build tools.** | |
| ### Setup | |
| ```bash | |
| # Example: Commands to set up the development environment (e.g., install dependencies, configure database) | |
| # e.g., for a Node.js project: npm install | |
| # e.g., for a Go project: go mod tidy | |
| ``` | |
| ### Daily Development | |
| ```bash | |
| # Example: Commands for common daily tasks (e.g., start dev server, run tests, lint, format) | |
| # e.g., for a Node.js project: npm run dev, npm test, npm run lint | |
| # e.g., for a Go project: go run main.go, go test ./..., go fmt ./... | |
| ``` | |
| ### Before Committing | |
| ```bash | |
| # Example: Commands to run all pre-commit checks (e.g., format, lint, type check, run tests) | |
| # e.g., for a Node.js project: npm run check | |
| # e.g., for a Go project: make check (if a Makefile exists) | |
| ``` | |
| ## Testing Requirements | |
| ### Unit Testing | |
| - Every module must have corresponding tests. | |
| - Use appropriate test setup/teardown mechanisms (e.g., fixtures, beforeEach/afterEach). | |
| - Mock external dependencies. | |
| - Test both success and failure cases. | |
| ### Integration Testing | |
| - Test complete user flows | |
| - Verify database transactions | |
| - Test authentication and authorization | |
| - Check form submissions | |
| ### Mobile Testing | |
| - Test on actual iPhone when possible | |
| - Use Safari developer tools | |
| - Test touch interactions | |
| - Verify responsive layouts | |
| - Check performance on 3G/4G | |
| ## Code Review Process | |
| ### Self-Review Checklist | |
| Before requesting review: | |
| 1. **Functionality** | |
| - Feature works as specified | |
| - Edge cases handled | |
| - Error messages are user-friendly | |
| 2. **Code Quality** | |
| - Follows style guide | |
| - DRY principle applied | |
| - Clear variable/function names | |
| - Appropriate comments | |
| 3. **Testing** | |
| - Unit tests comprehensive | |
| - Integration tests pass | |
| - Coverage adequate (>80%) | |
| 4. **Security** | |
| - No hardcoded secrets | |
| - Input validation present | |
| - SQL injection prevented | |
| - XSS protection in place | |
| 5. **Performance** | |
| - Database queries optimized | |
| - Images optimized | |
| - Caching implemented where needed | |
| 6. **Mobile Experience** | |
| - Touch targets adequate (44x44px) | |
| - Text readable without zooming | |
| - Performance acceptable on mobile | |
| - Interactions feel native | |
| ## Commit Guidelines | |
| ### Message Format | |
| ``` | |
| <type>(<scope>): <description> | |
| [optional body] | |
| [optional footer] | |
| ``` | |
| ### Types | |
| - `feat`: New feature | |
| - `fix`: Bug fix | |
| - `docs`: Documentation only | |
| - `style`: Formatting, missing semicolons, etc. | |
| - `refactor`: Code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature | |
| - `test`: Adding missing tests | |
| - `chore`: Maintenance tasks | |
| ### Examples | |
| ```bash | |
| git commit -m "feat(auth): Add remember me functionality" | |
| git commit -m "fix(posts): Correct excerpt generation for short posts" | |
| git commit -m "test(comments): Add tests for emoji reaction limits" | |
| git commit -m "style(mobile): Improve button touch targets" | |
| ``` | |
| ## Definition of Done | |
| A task is complete when: | |
| 1. All code implemented to specification | |
| 2. Unit tests written and passing | |
| 3. Code coverage meets project requirements | |
| 4. Documentation complete (if applicable) | |
| 5. Code passes all configured linting and static analysis checks | |
| 6. Works beautifully on mobile (if applicable) | |
| 7. Implementation notes added to `plan.md` | |
| 8. Changes committed with proper message | |
| 9. Git note with task summary attached to the commit | |
| ## Emergency Procedures | |
| ### Critical Bug in Production | |
| 1. Create hotfix branch from main | |
| 2. Write failing test for bug | |
| 3. Implement minimal fix | |
| 4. Test thoroughly including mobile | |
| 5. Deploy immediately | |
| 6. Document in plan.md | |
| ### Data Loss | |
| 1. Stop all write operations | |
| 2. Restore from latest backup | |
| 3. Verify data integrity | |
| 4. Document incident | |
| 5. Update backup procedures | |
| ### Security Breach | |
| 1. Rotate all secrets immediately | |
| 2. Review access logs | |
| 3. Patch vulnerability | |
| 4. Notify affected users (if any) | |
| 5. Document and update security procedures | |
| ## Deployment Workflow | |
| ### Pre-Deployment Checklist | |
| - [ ] All tests passing | |
| - [ ] Coverage >80% | |
| - [ ] No linting errors | |
| - [ ] Mobile testing complete | |
| - [ ] Environment variables configured | |
| - [ ] Database migrations ready | |
| - [ ] Backup created | |
| ### Deployment Steps | |
| 1. Merge feature branch to main | |
| 2. Tag release with version | |
| 3. Push to deployment service | |
| 4. Run database migrations | |
| 5. Verify deployment | |
| 6. Test critical paths | |
| 7. Monitor for errors | |
| ### Post-Deployment | |
| 1. Monitor analytics | |
| 2. Check error logs | |
| 3. Gather user feedback | |
| 4. Plan next iteration | |
| ## Continuous Improvement | |
| - Review workflow weekly | |
| - Update based on pain points | |
| - Document lessons learned | |
| - Optimize for user happiness | |
| - Keep things simple and maintainable | |