| # Audit plan: Gradient Flow Sampler-based Distributionally Robust Optimization |
|
|
| - OpenReview: `QRtzkKrbJi` |
| - arXiv: `2510.25956` |
| - Intended Space: `ProCreations/repro-gradient-flow-sampler-based-distributionally-robust-optimization` |
| - Literal registry source: arXiv v1. The current revision changes the outer-loop |
| rate from `O(epsilon_opt^-2)` to `O(epsilon_opt^-4)` and the WGF total |
| complexity from `epsilon_opt^-4` to `epsilon_opt^-6`; it is a drift control, |
| not evidence for the registered v1 claims. |
|
|
| ## Evidence design |
|
|
| 1. Pin v1/current PDF and source archives and verify six exact live claim |
| anchors in the complete v1 source. |
| 2. Inventory the six concrete gradient-flow/DRO algorithms directly from the |
| v1 labels and captions. |
| 3. Reproduce Proposition 1's logarithmic flow-time threshold exactly on a |
| Gaussian Wasserstein gradient flow across many `(lambda, L, epsilon)` |
| settings, with an early-stop destructive control. |
| 4. Audit Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 by evaluating their explicit rate laws across |
| grids of tolerances, dimensions, and smoothness/LSI constants. These finite |
| identities do not replace the universal v1 proofs. |
| 5. Reconstruct the half-bridge Gibbs conditional on discrete supports and |
| verify the fixed marginal, normalization, KKT residual, and worst-case |
| mixture identity. |
| 6. Preserve the three primary CIFAR-10 PGD figures and the exact source |
| statement that WFR/WGF remain robust across the reported settings. This is |
| source-reported evidence; no smaller synthetic run will be mislabeled as a |
| CIFAR/ResNet reproduction. |
| 7. Run two isolated warning-strict executions, require byte-identical outputs, |
| package one replay, build a recursive SHA-256 manifest, run the official |
| validator, and test every static route before publication. |
|
|
| ## Fail-closed scope |
|
|
| The v1/current theory drift is material and must remain visible. Claim 5 is |
| supported by the pinned primary experiment figures and source discussion, not |
| by invented numeric curve extraction. The Gaussian and discrete calculations |
| are exact mechanism audits and are not substitutes for the source's universal |
| theorems or CIFAR experiment. |
|
|