Spaces:
Running
Running
| # A11oy investor demo packet | |
| This is the five-minute path through the SZL Holdings governed-AI substrate. | |
| It is written for investors, technical diligence reviewers, and UDS operators | |
| who need to see what is real, what runs, what is packaged, and what remains | |
| explicitly out of active-demo scope. | |
| ## Start here | |
| Canonical public links: | |
| - GitHub hub: <https://github.com/szl-holdings/a11oy> | |
| - Hugging Face mirror: <https://huggingface.co/SZLHOLDINGS/a11oy-v19-substrate> | |
| - Latest A11oy release: <https://github.com/szl-holdings/a11oy/releases/tag/v1.0.1> | |
| | Step | What to open | What it proves | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | | |
| | 1 | [`README.md`](../README.md) | A11oy is the operational hub, not an LLM checkpoint. | | |
| | 2 | [`docs/PROVENANCE.md`](PROVENANCE.md) | Public claims are status-gated before they reach GitHub or Hugging Face. | | |
| | 3 | [`docs/ecosystem-readiness-report.json`](ecosystem-readiness-report.json) | Every visible SZL repo is classified by demo readiness and evidence. | | |
| | 4 | [`artifacts/a11oy-uds/README.md`](../artifacts/a11oy-uds/README.md) | A11oy has a UDS/Zarf payload lane with manifests and attestation checks. | | |
| | 5 | [`packages/receipt-substrate`](../packages/receipt-substrate) | Tool-envelope receipts can be emitted, chained, and verified locally. | | |
| | 6 | [`deploy/MANIFEST.json`](../deploy/MANIFEST.json) | Deploy payload files are content-addressed with SHA-256. | | |
| | 7 | [`huggingface/README.md`](../huggingface/README.md) | Hugging Face is a generated diligence mirror tied back to GitHub. | | |
| ## One-line thesis | |
| A11oy turns agentic work into governed execution: every consequential action is | |
| policy-checked, receipt-backed, payload-manifested, and traceable to a public | |
| provenance contract. | |
| ## What is demo-ready now | |
| | Surface | Demo status | Evidence | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | | |
| | A11oy doctrine package lane | Demo-ready | `pnpm test:doctrine`, `pnpm typecheck:doctrine`, `pnpm build:doctrine` | | |
| | Operational receipt chain | Demo-ready | `npm test --prefix packages/receipt-substrate` and `npm run smoke --prefix packages/receipt-substrate` | | |
| | Deploy manifest verification | Demo-ready | `pnpm payload:verify` | | |
| | Hugging Face payload generation | Demo-ready | `pnpm payload:huggingface` | | |
| | Operational tarball bundle | Demo-ready | `pnpm payload:bundle` and `pnpm payload:bundle:verify` | | |
| | UDS/Zarf handoff | Demo-ready as package/operator proof point | `artifacts/a11oy-uds/README.md`, `artifacts/a11oy-uds/docs/*`, `deploy/zarf.yaml` | | |
| | Vessels vertical | Active vertical demo wedge | `https://github.com/szl-holdings/vessels` and `uds-v0.2.0` release | | |
| ## What is intentionally not in the active demo | |
| `counsel`, `terra`, and `carlota-jo` are funded-roadmap scaffolds. They remain | |
| visible in the ecosystem registry for transparency, but the investor demo does | |
| not present them as operational product surfaces. | |
| The showcase also does **not** use the stale names `KORA`, `LUMINA`, | |
| `PARAGON`, or active `Lyte` framing. The public story is anchored on the | |
| repositories that actually exist in GitHub: `a11oy`, `amaru`, `sentra`, | |
| `rosie`, `ouroboros`, `lutar-lean`, `ouroboros-thesis`, `uds-mesh`, | |
| `vsp-otel`, `vessels`, `agi-forecast`, `szl-trust`, `szl-brand`, | |
| `szl-cookbook`, `.github`, and `platform`. | |
| ## Architecture zoom-out | |
| ```mermaid | |
| flowchart LR | |
| GH[GitHub canonical source<br/>code · CI · releases · manifests] | |
| HF[Hugging Face mirror<br/>generated diligence packet] | |
| UDS[UDS/Zarf operator lane<br/>package · manifest · attestations] | |
| INV[Investor / Warhacker demo<br/>proof-first walkthrough] | |
| GH -->|"pnpm payload:huggingface"| HF | |
| GH -->|"pnpm payload:bundle"| UDS | |
| HF --> INV | |
| UDS --> INV | |
| GH --> INV | |
| ``` | |
| ```mermaid | |
| flowchart TD | |
| A11OY[a11oy<br/>governed execution hub] | |
| PLATFORM[platform<br/>runtime integration] | |
| THESIS[ouroboros-thesis<br/>claim taxonomy + DOI] | |
| LEAN[lutar-lean<br/>Lean proof substrate] | |
| RUNTIME[ouroboros<br/>bounded-loop runtime] | |
| RECEIPTS[rosie + amaru<br/>receipt DAG + minting] | |
| OBS[sentra + vsp-otel<br/>drift + telemetry] | |
| MESH[uds-mesh<br/>bundle topology] | |
| VESSELS[vessels<br/>active vertical demo] | |
| TRUST[szl-trust<br/>public run artifacts] | |
| THESIS --> A11OY | |
| LEAN --> A11OY | |
| RUNTIME --> A11OY | |
| A11OY --> PLATFORM | |
| A11OY --> RECEIPTS | |
| RECEIPTS --> TRUST | |
| A11OY --> OBS | |
| A11OY --> MESH | |
| PLATFORM --> VESSELS | |
| OBS --> VESSELS | |
| ``` | |
| ```mermaid | |
| sequenceDiagram | |
| participant Operator | |
| participant A as A11oy | |
| participant P as Policy/Doctrine | |
| participant R as Receipt chain | |
| participant M as Manifest/UDS payload | |
| Operator->>A: request governed action | |
| A->>P: evaluate doctrine + policy constraints | |
| P-->>A: pass / escalate / reject | |
| A->>R: emit canonical operational receipt | |
| R-->>A: merkle root + previous hash | |
| A->>M: package proof artifacts for deploy/review | |
| M-->>Operator: SHA-256 manifest + attestation trail | |
| ``` | |
| ## Evidence matrix | |
| | Claim | Status | Evidence | | |
| | --- | --- | --- | | |
| | A11oy doctrine runtime checks execute locally | `verified-runtime` | `web/packages/a11oy-core/src/**/__tests__`, `pnpm test:doctrine` | | |
| | QEC lineage primitives have standalone tests | `verified-runtime` | `packages/qec-integrity/src/qec_lineage.test.ts` | | |
| | Operational receipts are hash-chained and verifiable | `verified-runtime` | `packages/receipt-substrate/src/index.ts`, `receipt_substrate.test.ts` | | |
| | Deploy payload files are checksummed | `release-payload` | `deploy/MANIFEST.json`, `scripts/payload_manifest.py` | | |
| | Hugging Face payload is source-generated | `release-payload` | `scripts/prepare_huggingface_payload.py` | | |
| | Operational tarball has checksum sidecar | `release-payload` | `scripts/build_operational_payload.py` | | |
| | Thesis v18.0 is the current claim anchor | `thesis-anchor` | DOI `10.5281/zenodo.20434276` | | |
| | Lean proofs exist as a public substrate | `lean-backed-needs-current-ci` | `szl-holdings/lutar-lean`, DOI `10.5281/zenodo.20434308` | | |
| | A11oy live runtime gate count | `verified-runtime` | Seven files under `packages/policy/src/gates`; ten entries in `docs/theorem-runtime-manifest.json` | | |
| | Vessels signed-asset posture | `release-payload` / guarded | `vessels` `uds-v0.3.0` has zero assets; `uds-v0.2.0` has tarball, `.sig`, `.sha256`, and public key | | |
| ## UDS / Warhacker proof point | |
| The UDS story should be shown as an operator proof point: | |
| 1. Pull or build the A11oy payload. | |
| 2. Verify `MANIFEST.json` and the attestation chain. | |
| 3. Inspect the Zarf package metadata. | |
| 4. Run the receipt-chain smoke test. | |
| 5. Tamper with one payload file and show verification failure. | |
| 6. Tie the result back to the ecosystem readiness report and Hugging Face mirror. | |
| The package should be described as **UDS/Zarf-compatible** and operator-ready | |
| for proof-point review. Do not imply Defense Unicorns endorsement, catalog | |
| acceptance, or partnership unless those become explicit public facts. | |
| ## Live demo guardrails | |
| | Claim | Allowed investor wording | | |
| | --- | --- | | |
| | A11oy gates | “Seven live policy gate files and ten theorem-runtime manifest entries are in main; larger gate totals are PR/roadmap until merged.” | | |
| | UDS v0.3.0 | “A11oy has SBOM assets; Vessels has an empty v0.3.0 release. Signed binary payload proof uses earlier signed releases or future owner-pushed assets.” | | |
| | GHCR | “Package visibility/push needs owner confirmation when unauthenticated checks return 401.” | | |
| ## Verification block | |
| ```bash | |
| pnpm install | |
| pnpm test:doctrine | |
| pnpm typecheck:doctrine | |
| pnpm build:doctrine | |
| pnpm ecosystem:audit | |
| pnpm ecosystem:readiness | |
| pnpm payload:verify | |
| pnpm payload:huggingface | |
| pnpm payload:bundle | |
| pnpm payload:bundle:verify | |
| npm test --prefix packages/receipt-substrate | |
| ``` | |
| ## CI / workflow evidence | |
| | Workflow or check | What it proves | | |
| | --- | --- | | |
| | `Doctrine Build` / `.github/workflows/doctrine.yml` | Doctrine packages test, typecheck, build, and feed the operational payload lane. | | |
| | `Tests` / `.github/workflows/tests.yml` | Root Jest and package tests remain visible as the general regression lane. | | |
| | `CodeQL` / `.github/workflows/codeql.yml` | JavaScript/TypeScript and workflow code scanning runs on GitHub. | | |
| | `SBOM` / `.github/workflows/sbom.yml` | CycloneDX/SPDX SBOM generation and filesystem scanning are part of release evidence. | | |
| | `DCO` / `.github/workflows/dco.yml` | Commits carry sign-off provenance for PR review. | | |
| | `Publish Hugging Face Payload` / `.github/workflows/huggingface.yml` | Regenerates and publishes the HF mirror from tracked source when `HF_TOKEN` is configured. | | |
| ## Investor FAQ | |
| ### Is A11oy a model? | |
| No. It is a governed execution fabric and payload discipline around model- or | |
| agent-driven work. Hugging Face is used as a public diligence mirror, not as the | |
| canonical release source. | |
| ### What makes it investable? | |
| The substrate compounds: one policy/receipt/provenance layer supports multiple | |
| verticals. The immediate demo path is A11oy + Vessels + UDS/Zarf packaging; the | |
| receipt/proof/telemetry layers are reusable across the rest of the ecosystem. | |
| ### Where is the audit trail? | |
| At three levels: | |
| 1. operational receipts in `packages/receipt-substrate`; | |
| 2. deploy checksums and attestations in `deploy/` and `artifacts/a11oy-uds/`; | |
| 3. public provenance and readiness status in `docs/PROVENANCE.md` and | |
| `docs/ecosystem-readiness-report.json`. | |
| ### Are all proof claims closed? | |
| No broad proof-completeness claim should be made without current upstream proof | |
| reports. The strong, truthful claim is that A11oy has a public proof substrate, | |
| runtime tests, UDS payload manifests, and a claim contract that prevents | |
| unsupported marketing language from becoming the public story. | |
| ### What must happen before production or customer deployment? | |
| Owner-side signed release assets, GHCR package pushes or public visibility | |
| confirmation, current upstream proof reports for formal claims, customer | |
| environment hardening, and deployment-specific legal/security review. | |