Spaces:
Running
Running
Create Isabella_Calderon.md
Browse files
student_analyses/Isabella_Calderon.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Skill Analysis Report: Isabella Calderon
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
---
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
## π’ STRENGTHS
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
1. **Communication, Collaboration, Community Engagement** β Isabella grew in communication confidence, especially with strangers. She actively collaborated in her team and was praised by peers for her reliability and group engagement.
|
| 8 |
+
2. **Tech Aptitude** β Used AI tools effectively during project development, showing strong comfort with digital resources.
|
| 9 |
+
3. **Time Management** β Multiple teammates described her as organized and focused, and she helped maintain structure through shared tools and communication channels.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
---
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## π‘ MODERATE OR DEVELOPING AREAS
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
1. **Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Analytical Reasoning** β Faced creative differences and idea pivots, but offered limited detail on how she worked through problems analytically.
|
| 16 |
+
2. **Adaptability, Continuous Learning, Creativity** β Demonstrates a flexible attitude toward challenges and new ideas, though personal growth in this area is not deeply articulated.
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
---
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
## π΄ LEAST EVIDENT OR MISSING SKILLS
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
1. **Emotional Intelligence, Ethical Decision-Making** β While she values community impact, there is no direct reflection on empathy, values, or ethical decision-making.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
---
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
## π SUMMARY TABLE
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
| Skill Group | Evidence Level | Notes |
|
| 29 |
+
|--------------------------------------------|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|
| 30 |
+
| Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, etc. | Medium | Handled setbacks, lacked detail on decision-making process |
|
| 31 |
+
| Adaptability, Creativity, Learning | Medium | Adapted well to group needs and project evolution |
|
| 32 |
+
| Time Management | Medium | Praised for organization and shared structure |
|
| 33 |
+
| Communication, Collaboration, Engagement | High | Strong growth in confidence and team synergy |
|
| 34 |
+
| Emotional Intelligence, Ethical Thinking | None | No discussion of ethics or emotional awareness |
|
| 35 |
+
| Tech Aptitude | High | AI use was crucial to project outcomes |
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
---
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## π SKILL DISTRIBUTION
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking π΅π΅π΅βͺβͺ
|
| 42 |
+
- Tech Aptitude π΅π΅π΅π΅βͺ
|
| 43 |
+
- Communication & Collaboration π΅π΅π΅π΅βͺ
|
| 44 |
+
- Adaptability & Creativity π΅π΅π΅βͺβͺ
|
| 45 |
+
- Time Management π΅π΅π΅βͺβͺ
|
| 46 |
+
- Emotional Intelligence & Ethics βͺβͺβͺβͺβͺ
|