Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # π― Quick Decision Guide: Categorization Strategy | |
| ## Your Problem (Excellent Observation!) | |
| **Current**: One submission β One category | |
| **Reality**: One submission often contains multiple categories | |
| **Example**: | |
| ``` | |
| "Dallas should establish more green spaces in South Dallas neighborhoods. | |
| Areas like Oak Cliff lack accessible parks compared to North Dallas." | |
| Current system: Forces you to pick ONE category | |
| Better system: Recognize both Objective + Problem | |
| ``` | |
| --- | |
| ## π Three Solutions (Ranked by Effort vs. Value) | |
| ### π₯ Option 1: Sentence-Level Analysis (YOUR PROPOSAL) | |
| **What it does**: | |
| ``` | |
| Submission A | |
| ββ Sentence 1: "Dallas should establish..." β Objective | |
| ββ Sentence 2: "Areas like Oak Cliff..." β Problem | |
| ββ Geotag: [lat, lng] (applies to all sentences) | |
| Stakeholder: Community (applies to all sentences) | |
| ``` | |
| **UI Example**: | |
| ``` | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β Submission #42 - Community β | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ | |
| β "Dallas should establish more green β | |
| β spaces in South Dallas neighborhoods. β | |
| β Areas like Oak Cliff lack accessible β | |
| β parks compared to North Dallas." β | |
| β β | |
| β Primary Category: Objective β | |
| β Distribution: 50% Objective, 50% Problemβ | |
| β β | |
| β [βΌ View Sentences (2)] β | |
| β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β | |
| β β 1. "Dallas should establish..." β β | |
| β β Category: [Objective βΌ] β β | |
| β β β β | |
| β β 2. "Areas like Oak Cliff..." β β | |
| β β Category: [Problem βΌ] β β | |
| β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| ``` | |
| **Pros**: β Maximum accuracy, β Best training data, β Detailed analytics | |
| **Cons**: β οΈ More complex, β οΈ Takes longer to implement | |
| **Time**: 13-20 hours | |
| **Value**: βββββ | |
| --- | |
| ### π₯ Option 2: Multi-Label (Simpler) | |
| **What it does**: | |
| ``` | |
| Submission A | |
| ββ Categories: [Objective, Problem] | |
| ββ Geotag: [lat, lng] | |
| ββ Stakeholder: Community | |
| ``` | |
| **UI Example**: | |
| ``` | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β Submission #42 - Community β | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ€ | |
| β "Dallas should establish more green β | |
| β spaces in South Dallas neighborhoods. β | |
| β Areas like Oak Cliff lack accessible β | |
| β parks compared to North Dallas." β | |
| β β | |
| β Categories: [Objective] [Problem] β | |
| β (select multiple) β | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| ``` | |
| **Pros**: β Simple to implement, β Captures complexity | |
| **Cons**: β Can't tell which sentence is which, β Less precise training data | |
| **Time**: 4-6 hours | |
| **Value**: βββ | |
| --- | |
| ### π₯ Option 3: Primary + Secondary | |
| **What it does**: | |
| ``` | |
| Submission A | |
| ββ Primary: Objective | |
| ββ Secondary: [Problem, Values] | |
| ββ Geotag: [lat, lng] | |
| ββ Stakeholder: Community | |
| ``` | |
| **Pros**: β Preserves hierarchy, β Moderate complexity | |
| **Cons**: β οΈ Arbitrary primary choice, β Still loses granularity | |
| **Time**: 8-10 hours | |
| **Value**: βββ | |
| --- | |
| ## π Side-by-Side Comparison | |
| | Feature | Sentence-Level | Multi-Label | Primary+Secondary | | |
| |---------|---------------|-------------|-------------------| | |
| | **Granularity** | Each sentence categorized | Submission-level | Submission-level | | |
| | **Training Data** | Precise per sentence | Ambiguous | Hierarchical | | |
| | **UI Complexity** | Collapsible view | Checkbox list | Dropdown + pills | | |
| | **Dashboard** | Dual mode (submissions vs sentences) | Overlapping counts | Clear hierarchy | | |
| | **Implementation** | New table + logic | Array field | Two fields | | |
| | **Time to Build** | 13-20 hrs | 4-6 hrs | 8-10 hrs | | |
| | **Your Example** | β Perfect fit | β οΈ OK | β οΈ OK | | |
| | **Future AI Training** | β Excellent | β οΈ Limited | β οΈ OK | | |
| --- | |
| ## π― My Recommendation: Start with Proof of Concept | |
| ### Phase 0: Quick Test (4-6 hours) | |
| **Goal**: See sentence breakdown WITHOUT changing database | |
| **Implementation**: | |
| 1. Add sentence segmentation library (NLTK) | |
| 2. Update submissions page to SHOW sentence breakdown (read-only) | |
| 3. Display: "This submission contains X sentences in Y categories" | |
| 4. Let admins see the breakdown and provide feedback | |
| **Example UI** (read-only preview): | |
| ``` | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| β Submission #42 β | |
| β "Dallas should establish..." β | |
| β β | |
| β Current Category: Objective β | |
| β β | |
| β [π‘ AI Detected Multiple Topics] β | |
| β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β | |
| β β This submission contains: β β | |
| β β β’ 1 sentence about: Objective β β | |
| β β β’ 1 sentence about: Problem β β | |
| β β β β | |
| β β [View Details βΌ] β β | |
| β ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ β | |
| ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| ``` | |
| **Then decide**: | |
| - β If admins find it useful β Full implementation | |
| - β οΈ If too complex β Try multi-label | |
| - β If not valuable β Keep current system | |
| --- | |
| ## π Questions to Help Decide | |
| ### Ask yourself: | |
| 1. **Frequency**: How often do submissions contain multiple categories? | |
| - Often (>30%) β Sentence-level worth it | |
| - Sometimes (10-30%) β Multi-label sufficient | |
| - Rarely (<10%) β Keep current system | |
| 2. **Analytics depth**: Do you need to know which specific ideas are Objectives vs Problems? | |
| - Yes, important β Sentence-level | |
| - Just need tags β Multi-label | |
| - Primary is enough β Primary+Secondary | |
| 3. **Training priority**: Is fine-tuning accuracy critical? | |
| - Yes, very important β Sentence-level (best training data) | |
| - Moderately β Multi-label OK | |
| - Not critical β Any approach works | |
| 4. **User complexity tolerance**: How much UI complexity can admins handle? | |
| - High (tech-savvy) β Sentence-level | |
| - Medium β Multi-label | |
| - Low β Primary+Secondary | |
| 5. **Timeline**: When do you need this? | |
| - This week β Multi-label (fast) | |
| - Next 2 weeks β Sentence-level (with testing) | |
| - Flexible β Sentence-level (best long-term) | |
| --- | |
| ## π Recommended Path Forward | |
| ### Step 1: Quick Analysis (Now - 30 min) | |
| Run a sample analysis on your current data: | |
| ```python | |
| # I can write a script to analyze your 60 submissions | |
| # and show: | |
| # - How many have multiple categories? | |
| # - Average sentences per submission | |
| # - Potential category distribution | |
| Would you like me to create this analysis script? | |
| ``` | |
| ### Step 2: Choose Approach (After analysis) | |
| Based on results: | |
| - **>40% multi-category** β Go with sentence-level | |
| - **20-40% multi-category** β Try proof of concept | |
| - **<20% multi-category** β Multi-label might be enough | |
| ### Step 3: Implementation | |
| **Option A: Full Commit (Sentence-Level)** | |
| - I implement all 7 phases (~15 hours of work) | |
| - You get the most powerful system | |
| **Option B: Test First (Proof of Concept)** | |
| - I implement Phase 0 (~4 hours) | |
| - You test with real users | |
| - Then decide on full implementation | |
| **Option C: Simple (Multi-Label)** | |
| - I implement multi-label (~5 hours) | |
| - Less powerful but faster to market | |
| --- | |
| ## π― What Should We Do? | |
| **I recommend**: **Option B - Test First** | |
| **Steps**: | |
| 1. β I create analysis script (show current data patterns) | |
| 2. β I implement proof of concept (sentence display only) | |
| 3. β You test with admins (get feedback) | |
| 4. β We decide: Full sentence-level OR Multi-label OR Keep current | |
| **Advantages**: | |
| - Low risk (no DB changes initially) | |
| - Real user feedback | |
| - Informed decision | |
| - Can always upgrade later | |
| --- | |
| ## π Your Decision | |
| **Which path do you want to take?** | |
| **A) Analysis Script First** (30 min) | |
| - I create a script to analyze your 60 submissions | |
| - Show: % multi-category, sentence distribution, etc. | |
| - Then decide based on data | |
| **B) Proof of Concept** (4-6 hours) | |
| - Skip analysis, go straight to sentence display | |
| - See it in action, get feedback | |
| - Then decide on full implementation | |
| **C) Full Implementation** (13-20 hours) | |
| - Commit to sentence-level now | |
| - Build everything | |
| - Most powerful, takes longest | |
| **D) Multi-Label Instead** (4-6 hours) | |
| - Simpler approach | |
| - Good enough for most cases | |
| - Fast to implement | |
| **E) Keep Current System** | |
| - If not worth the effort | |
| - Stay with one category per submission | |
| --- | |
| **What's your choice?** Let me know and I'll get started! π | |