rag-python-rag / ARCHITECTURE.md
viktor-hirenko
Initial commit: RAG system with local LLM
40e5eae
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
11.8 kB

A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available: 6.26.0

Upgrade

Architecture Documentation

System Overview

This RAG system implements a two-phase architecture:

  1. Indexing Phase: Process documents into searchable vectors (one-time or periodic)
  2. Query Phase: Retrieve relevant context and generate answers (per-request)

Core Components

1. Document Converter (document_converter.py)

Responsibility: Transform various document formats into plain text.

Supported Formats:

  • PDF β†’ PyMuPDF (fitz)
  • DOCX β†’ python-docx
  • TXT β†’ direct read

Process:

Input: documents/*.{pdf,docx,txt}
  ↓
Extract text with formatting preservation
  ↓
Output: processed_docs/*.md

Key Functions:

  • convert_pdf_to_markdown(): Extracts text page-by-page
  • convert_docx_to_markdown(): Preserves paragraph structure
  • convert_all_documents(): Batch processing

Limitations:

  • Images are ignored
  • Tables may lose structure
  • Complex layouts flatten to linear text

2. Text Splitter (text_splitter.py)

Responsibility: Divide documents into semantic chunks with overlap.

Strategy: LangChain's RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter

Parameters:

  • chunk_size: 1000 characters (configurable)
  • chunk_overlap: 200 characters (preserves context across boundaries)
  • separators: ["\n\n", "\n", ". ", " ", ""] (hierarchical splitting)

Process:

Input: processed_docs/*.md
  ↓
Split on paragraph boundaries first
  ↓
If chunk > 1000 chars, split on sentences
  ↓
If still too large, split on words
  ↓
Output: List[Document] with metadata

Metadata Attached:

  • Source file path
  • Chunk index
  • Original document title

Why Overlap Matters:

  • Prevents context loss at chunk boundaries
  • Improves retrieval for queries spanning multiple chunks

3. Vector Store (vector_store.py)

Responsibility: Store embeddings and perform similarity search.

Technology: ChromaDB (persistent, local-first vector database)

Embedding Model: all-MiniLM-L6-v2 (sentence-transformers)

  • Dimensions: 384
  • Speed: ~1000 sentences/sec on CPU
  • Language: Primarily English (degraded performance on other languages)

Process:

Input: List[Document] chunks
  ↓
Generate embeddings via SentenceTransformer
  ↓
Store in ChromaDB collection with metadata
  ↓
Index: HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World)

Query Flow:

User question (text)
  ↓
Generate query embedding
  ↓
Cosine similarity search in ChromaDB
  ↓
Return top-k chunks (default: 5)

Key Methods:

  • add_documents(): Batch insert with embeddings
  • retrieve_context(): Similarity search
  • get_collection_stats(): Metadata and count

Distance Metric: Cosine similarity (default)


4. LLM Handler (llm_handler.py)

Responsibility: Generate answers using local LLM via Ollama.

Model: llama3.2 (default, 3B parameters)

Process:

Input: Question + Retrieved context
  ↓
Format prompt template
  ↓
Send to Ollama API (localhost:11434)
  ↓
Stream response tokens
  ↓
Output: Generated answer

Prompt Template:

You are a helpful assistant. Answer the question based on the context provided.

Context: {retrieved_chunks}

Question: {user_question}

Answer:

Streaming vs Synchronous:

  • Streaming (stream_llm_answer()): Yields tokens as generated (better UX)
  • Synchronous (generate_answer()): Returns complete answer (simpler API)

Error Handling:

  • Model availability check before inference
  • Timeout after 60 seconds
  • Fallback to error message if Ollama unreachable

5. Main Application (main.py)

Responsibility: Orchestrate pipeline and launch web interface.

Initialization Sequence:

1. Load configuration
2. Download test document (if first run)
3. Convert documents to markdown
4. Split into chunks
5. Initialize vector store
6. Check if documents already indexed
7. If not, add embeddings to ChromaDB
8. Verify Ollama model availability
9. Launch Gradio interface

RAGSystem Class:

  • setup_pipeline(): Runs indexing phase
  • query(): Handles user questions (retrieval + generation)

Gradio Interface:

  • Input: Text box for questions
  • Output: Markdown with answer + sources
  • Examples: Pre-defined questions
  • Theme: Gradio default (configurable)

Data Flow

Indexing Phase (One-Time)

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  Documents  β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Document Converter  β”‚  ← PyMuPDF, python-docx
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚   Text Splitter     β”‚  ← LangChain
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Embedding Generator β”‚  ← sentence-transformers
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚     ChromaDB        β”‚  ← Persistent storage
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Time Complexity: O(n) where n = number of chunks (~30 seconds for 847 chunks)


Query Phase (Per-Request)

β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ User Questionβ”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Embedding Generator β”‚  ← Same model as indexing
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  ChromaDB Search    β”‚  ← Cosine similarity
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  Top-k Chunks       β”‚  ← Default: 5 chunks
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  Prompt Formatter   β”‚  ← Inject context
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚   Ollama (LLM)      β”‚  ← llama3.2 inference
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
       β”‚
       β–Ό
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚  Answer + Sources   β”‚
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜

Time Complexity:

  • Embedding: ~50ms
  • Search: ~100ms
  • LLM inference: 5-15 seconds (depends on answer length)

Configuration Management

File: config.py

Key Parameters:

# Paths
DOCUMENTS_DIR = "./documents"
CHROMA_DB_DIR = "./chroma_db"

# Models
EMBEDDING_MODEL_NAME = "all-MiniLM-L6-v2"
OLLAMA_MODEL_NAME = "llama3.2"

# Chunking
CHUNK_SIZE = 1000
CHUNK_OVERLAP = 200

# Retrieval
DEFAULT_N_RESULTS = 5

# LLM
LLM_TEMPERATURE = 0.7

Environment Variables (.env):

  • Override config.py values
  • Useful for deployment-specific settings
  • Not committed to Git

Synchronous vs Asynchronous

Current Implementation: Synchronous

  • Document processing: Sequential
  • Embedding generation: Batch (but blocking)
  • LLM inference: Streaming (but single-threaded)

Implications:

  • Only one query processed at a time
  • Gradio queues requests automatically
  • No concurrent document indexing

Future Improvement:

  • Use asyncio for concurrent queries
  • Background task for document re-indexing
  • WebSocket for real-time streaming

Memory Management

RAM Usage Breakdown:

  • Embedding model: ~500MB
  • ChromaDB index: ~100MB per 1000 chunks
  • Ollama model: ~2-4GB (depends on model size)
  • Python overhead: ~200MB

Total: 4-6GB minimum

Optimization Strategies:

  • Lazy load embedding model (only when needed)
  • Use quantized Ollama models (Q4, Q5)
  • Limit ChromaDB collection size (delete old documents)

Error Handling

Graceful Degradation:

  1. If Ollama unavailable β†’ Show error message (don't crash)
  2. If document conversion fails β†’ Skip file, log error
  3. If embedding generation fails β†’ Retry once, then skip
  4. If ChromaDB locked β†’ Wait and retry (up to 3 times)

Logging:

  • All components use Python logging module
  • Levels: INFO (default), DEBUG (verbose), ERROR (critical)
  • Output: Console (can redirect to file)

Testing Strategy

Unit Tests (not implemented):

  • test_document_converter.py: Verify PDF/DOCX parsing
  • test_text_splitter.py: Check chunk sizes and overlap
  • test_vector_store.py: Validate embedding dimensions
  • test_llm_handler.py: Mock Ollama responses

Integration Tests (manual):

  • Run python main.py and verify startup
  • Query known document and check answer accuracy
  • Test with non-English queries

Performance Tests:

  • Measure indexing time for various document sizes
  • Benchmark query latency under load

Scalability Considerations

Current Limitations:

  • Single-machine deployment
  • No horizontal scaling
  • In-memory embeddings (ChromaDB limitation)

Scaling Strategies:

  1. Vertical Scaling: Add more RAM/CPU
  2. Model Optimization: Use smaller/quantized models
  3. Caching: Store frequent query results
  4. Distributed ChromaDB: Use client-server mode
  5. Load Balancing: Multiple Ollama instances behind nginx

When to Scale:

  • >10,000 documents
  • >100 concurrent users
  • >1M chunks in vector store

Security Architecture

Current State: No authentication or authorization

Threat Model:

  • Malicious document upload (XSS, code injection)
  • Prompt injection attacks
  • Resource exhaustion (DoS)
  • Data exfiltration via queries

Mitigation Strategies (not implemented):

  • Sandboxed document processing
  • Input sanitization
  • Rate limiting per IP
  • Query result filtering

See: LIMITATIONS.md for production readiness gaps


Alternative Architectures

Option 1: API-First Design

Replace Gradio with FastAPI:

Frontend (Vue.js) β†’ REST API (FastAPI) β†’ RAG Backend

Benefits:

  • Decoupled UI/backend
  • Mobile app support
  • Better caching

Option 2: Serverless

Use AWS Lambda + S3 + Pinecone:

S3 (docs) β†’ Lambda (indexing) β†’ Pinecone (vectors)
API Gateway β†’ Lambda (query) β†’ OpenAI API

Benefits:

  • Auto-scaling
  • Pay-per-use
  • No server management

Drawbacks:

  • Higher latency
  • Vendor lock-in
  • Cost at scale

Performance Benchmarks

Test Document: Think Python (300 pages, 847 chunks)

Operation Time Notes
PDF Conversion 5s PyMuPDF
Text Splitting 2s LangChain
Embedding Generation 20s CPU, batch=32
ChromaDB Indexing 3s Disk write
Query Embedding 50ms Single query
Vector Search 100ms 847 chunks
LLM Inference 8s llama3.2, ~100 tokens
Total Query Time ~8-10s End-to-end

Hardware: M1 MacBook Pro, 16GB RAM


Future Architecture Improvements

  1. Hybrid Search: Combine vector search with keyword search (BM25)
  2. Re-ranking: Use cross-encoder to re-rank top-k results
  3. Multi-hop Reasoning: Chain multiple queries for complex questions
  4. Document Metadata: Filter by date, author, document type
  5. Conversation Memory: Track dialogue context across queries

Status: Current architecture suitable for prototyping and small-scale deployments (<1000 documents, <10 concurrent users).