Spaces:
Running
Running
| """The therapeutic compiler. The refusals are the product, so they are what | |
| this file spends its effort on. | |
| The substitution space is 12 ordered base pairs, so it is tested EXHAUSTIVELY | |
| rather than by example: every wild-type/patient combination is routed and the | |
| routing is checked against the two chemistries from first principles. A | |
| sampled test would have let a strand error through, and a strand error | |
| designs a guide against the wrong strand β silent in silico, expensive at the | |
| bench. | |
| """ | |
| import itertools | |
| import pytest | |
| from dee.core import compiler as C | |
| BASES = "ACGT" | |
| COMP = {"A": "T", "T": "A", "C": "G", "G": "C"} | |
| # ββ the chemistry, restated independently of the implementation βββββββββ | |
| def _expected_family(wt, patient): | |
| """Derived here from scratch so this is a real second opinion, not a | |
| restatement of the module under test.""" | |
| if (patient, wt) == ("A", "G"): | |
| return "ABE", "sense" | |
| if (patient, wt) == ("C", "T"): | |
| return "CBE", "sense" | |
| if (COMP[patient], COMP[wt]) == ("A", "G"): | |
| return "ABE", "antisense" | |
| if (COMP[patient], COMP[wt]) == ("C", "T"): | |
| return "CBE", "antisense" | |
| return None, None | |
| def test_every_substitution_routes_correctly(wt, patient): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion(wt, patient) | |
| fam, strand = _expected_family(wt, patient) | |
| if fam is None: | |
| assert call.correction is None, f"{patient}>{wt} is a transversion" | |
| assert call.route == "prime_editing" | |
| # It compiles β to a pegRNA, never to a base editor. `correction is | |
| # None` above is the load-bearing assertion: no base-editing route | |
| # exists for a transversion, and prime editing is a different pass. | |
| assert call.compiles | |
| else: | |
| assert call.correction is not None, f"{patient}>{wt} should be {fam}" | |
| assert call.correction.editor_family == fam | |
| assert call.correction.strand == strand | |
| assert call.route == "base_editing" | |
| assert call.compiles | |
| def test_the_four_base_editable_corrections_are_exactly_the_transitions(): | |
| """Transitions are base-editable, transversions are not. If this ever | |
| reports more than four, a transversion has been mis-routed.""" | |
| editable = [(wt, pt) for wt, pt in itertools.product(BASES, BASES) | |
| if wt != pt and C.classify_lesion(wt, pt).correction is not None] | |
| assert len(editable) == 4 | |
| assert all(C.classify_lesion(wt, pt).is_transition for wt, pt in editable) | |
| def test_the_strand_derivation_a_reviewer_would_check_by_hand(): | |
| """Spelled out, because getting this backwards is the expensive error. | |
| A patient carrying C where wild-type is T needs T restored. On the sense | |
| strand that is C>T β a CBE edit. A patient carrying G where wild-type is | |
| A needs A restored: sense G>A, which on the ANTISENSE strand reads C>T, | |
| also CBE but engaging the other strand. | |
| """ | |
| sense = C.classify_lesion("T", "C").correction | |
| assert (sense.editor_family, sense.strand, sense.editor_change) == ("CBE", "sense", "C>T") | |
| anti = C.classify_lesion("A", "G").correction | |
| assert (anti.editor_family, anti.strand, anti.editor_change) == ("CBE", "antisense", "C>T") | |
| sense_abe = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| assert (sense_abe.editor_family, sense_abe.strand) == ("ABE", "sense") | |
| anti_abe = C.classify_lesion("C", "T").correction | |
| assert (anti_abe.editor_family, anti_abe.strand) == ("ABE", "antisense") | |
| # ββ refusals ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def test_identical_alleles_are_refused_not_silently_compiled(): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("A", "A") | |
| assert not call.compiles | |
| assert call.errors()[0].code == "no_lesion" | |
| assert "swapped" in call.errors()[0].remedy | |
| def test_a_transversion_says_why_base_editing_is_out_and_routes_to_pe(): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("A", "C") # correcting C>A | |
| codes = [d.code for d in call.diagnostics] | |
| assert "transversion_no_base_editor" in codes | |
| # The refusal that used to live here β prime_editing_unavailable β is gone | |
| # because prime editing is now designed. What must NOT come back is a base | |
| # editor for a transversion. | |
| assert "prime_editing_unavailable" not in codes | |
| assert call.correction is None | |
| msg = " ".join(d.message for d in call.diagnostics) | |
| assert "ABE writes A>G" in msg and "CBE writes C>T" in msg | |
| def test_a_large_deletion_is_refused_and_points_somewhere_real(): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("A" * 400, "") | |
| assert not call.compiles | |
| err = [d for d in call.errors() if d.code == "lesion_too_large"][0] | |
| assert "400-base deletion" in err.message | |
| assert "integrase" in err.remedy or "recombinase" in err.remedy | |
| def test_a_small_indel_routes_to_prime_editing_not_to_a_base_editor(): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("", "ATG") | |
| assert call.kind == "insertion" and call.size == 3 | |
| assert call.route == "prime_editing" | |
| assert call.correction is None, "base editors do not add or remove bases" | |
| assert any(d.code == "indel_not_base_editable" for d in call.diagnostics) | |
| def test_a_lesion_near_the_bound_is_flagged_marginal(): | |
| size = C.PRIME_EDIT_INSERT_BOUND // 2 + 2 | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("", "A" * size) | |
| assert any(d.code == "lesion_near_bound" for d in call.diagnostics) | |
| def test_non_dna_alleles_are_refused(): | |
| for bad in ("N", "R", "Q", "5"): | |
| call = C.classify_lesion("A", bad) | |
| assert not call.compiles | |
| assert call.errors()[0].code == "non_dna_allele" | |
| def test_ambiguity_codes_are_not_quietly_treated_as_bases(): | |
| """N is a real thing to receive from a VCF and must not route.""" | |
| assert C.classify_lesion("N", "A").errors()[0].code == "non_dna_allele" | |
| # ββ verification against real sequence ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| WINDOW = "GATTACAGATTACAGGCCTTAA" | |
| def test_it_verifies_the_reference_actually_has_the_wildtype_base(): | |
| off = WINDOW.index("G") # position 0, a G | |
| call = C.compile_correction("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=off) | |
| assert call.compiles | |
| def test_an_off_by_one_coordinate_is_caught_by_the_reference_check(): | |
| """The check that earns its keep: alleles alone still type-check when the | |
| coordinate has drifted.""" | |
| off = 1 # WINDOW[1] is 'A', not 'G' | |
| call = C.compile_correction("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=off) | |
| assert not call.compiles | |
| err = [d for d in call.errors() if d.code == "reference_mismatch"][0] | |
| assert "'A'" in err.message | |
| assert "opposite strand" in err.remedy | |
| def test_an_offset_outside_the_window_is_refused(): | |
| call = C.compile_correction("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=999) | |
| assert not call.compiles | |
| assert call.errors()[0].code == "offset_outside_window" | |
| def test_restores_wildtype_is_a_whole_sequence_comparison(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| assert C.restores_wildtype(WINDOW, 0, corr) | |
| assert not C.restores_wildtype(WINDOW, 1, corr) | |
| assert not C.restores_wildtype("", 0, corr) | |
| # ββ the scope boundary ββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def test_germline_raises_rather_than_returning_a_diagnostic(): | |
| """A refusal a caller can read past and keep going is not a refusal.""" | |
| with pytest.raises(C.GermlineRefused): | |
| C.compile_correction("G", "A", germline=True) | |
| def test_germline_is_refused_before_any_routing_happens(): | |
| """Even a perfectly compilable lesion must not be routed.""" | |
| with pytest.raises(C.GermlineRefused): | |
| C.compile_correction("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, germline=True) | |
| # ββ the direction of correction βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def test_arguments_are_wildtype_first_patient_second(): | |
| """Swapping these designs an editor that INSTALLS the disease. The two | |
| orderings must not produce the same plan.""" | |
| a = C.classify_lesion("G", "A") # patient A -> restore G | |
| b = C.classify_lesion("A", "G") # patient G -> restore A | |
| assert a.correction.editor_family == "ABE" | |
| assert b.correction.editor_family == "CBE" | |
| assert a.correction.strand != b.correction.strand | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| # The pass pipeline. The point of these is that a pass which did NOT run is | |
| # never reported as one that ran and passed. | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def _by_name(report): | |
| return {p.name: p for p in report.passes} | |
| def test_every_declared_pass_is_reported(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| assert [p.name for p in r.passes] == [n for n, _ in C.PASS_ORDER] | |
| def test_unrunnable_passes_are_unavailable_not_ok(): | |
| """The whole honesty contract. Defaults are False so a caller that forgets | |
| to check capability gets an incomplete record, not a falsely clean one.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| p = _by_name(r) | |
| assert p["consequence"].status == "unavailable" | |
| assert p["specificity"].status == "unavailable" | |
| assert "Assess edit consequence" in r.incomplete_because | |
| assert "Assess specificity" in r.incomplete_because | |
| def test_specificity_still_carries_its_caveat_when_it_runs(): | |
| """A coding-sequence-only index reporting a clean 'ok' would read as a | |
| clean bill of health on a therapeutic guide. It must never say ok.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| can_check_specificity=True) | |
| spec = _by_name(r)["specificity"] | |
| assert spec.status == "warn", "must not be reportable as unqualified ok" | |
| assert "CODING SEQUENCE ONLY" in spec.detail | |
| assert "GUIDE-seq" in spec.detail | |
| def test_consequence_reports_the_number_when_scoring_actually_ran(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| consequence={"ok": True, "label": "G1A", "delta_ll": -4.2}) | |
| p = _by_name(r)["consequence"] | |
| assert p.status == "ok" | |
| assert "-4.2000" in p.detail | |
| assert "less likely than wild-type" in p.detail, "direction stated in words" | |
| assert "zero-shot" in p.detail | |
| assert "no validated relationship to clinical outcome" in p.detail | |
| def test_a_positive_delta_is_described_in_the_other_direction(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| consequence={"ok": True, "label": "G1A", "delta_ll": 1.5}) | |
| assert "more likely than wild-type" in _by_name(r)["consequence"].detail | |
| def test_reachability_alone_never_makes_the_consequence_pass_succeed(): | |
| """The bug this replaced: the pass took a capability flag and reported | |
| 'passed' whenever the model was merely reachable, so the UI said the edit | |
| had been assessed when nothing had been scored.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| assert _by_name(r)["consequence"].status == "unavailable" | |
| def test_a_failed_scoring_attempt_is_failed_not_passed_with_caveat(): | |
| """'passed with caveat' on a model call that errored is the soft version | |
| of reporting an unrun pass as ok β in both cases nothing was assessed.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| consequence={"ok": False, "label": "G1A", | |
| "error": "backend refused"}) | |
| p = _by_name(r)["consequence"] | |
| assert p.status == "failed" | |
| assert p.status != "warn", "must not read as a pass" | |
| assert "backend refused" in p.detail | |
| assert "assumed-benign" in p.detail | |
| def test_a_failed_pass_leaves_the_record_incomplete(): | |
| """Never run and attempted-but-failed leave the same hole.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| consequence={"ok": False, "error": "boom"}) | |
| assert "Assess edit consequence" in r.incomplete_because | |
| def test_a_failed_consequence_does_not_block_the_compile(): | |
| """The lesion still routes; only the record is incomplete.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, | |
| consequence={"ok": False, "error": "boom"}) | |
| assert r.compiled | |
| def test_a_refused_lesion_skips_the_rest_rather_than_reporting_ok(): | |
| # A lesion beyond the prime-editing size bound. Transversions used to sit | |
| # here; they now route to prime editing and are designed, so the skip | |
| # behaviour is asserted against a lesion that really has no route. | |
| r = C.compile_report("A" * 400, "") | |
| p = _by_name(r) | |
| assert p["classify"].status == "error" | |
| assert all(p[n].status == "skipped" for n in | |
| ("verify", "enumerate", "consequence", "specificity", "emit")) | |
| assert not r.compiled | |
| def test_a_transversion_without_sequence_is_unavailable_not_ok_and_not_refused(): | |
| """The three-way distinction, on the route that now exists. A transversion | |
| has a prime-editing route, but a pegRNA cannot be designed from alleles | |
| alone β so enumerate must report `unavailable`, which is neither a promise | |
| nor a refusal.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("A", "C") | |
| p = _by_name(r) | |
| assert r.lesion.route == "prime_editing" | |
| assert p["classify"].status == "warn" | |
| assert p["verify"].status == "unavailable" | |
| assert p["enumerate"].status == "unavailable" | |
| assert "reference window" in p["enumerate"].detail | |
| assert "Enumerate strategies" in r.incomplete_because | |
| def test_a_reference_mismatch_stops_the_build(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=1) | |
| p = _by_name(r) | |
| assert p["verify"].status == "error" | |
| assert p["enumerate"].status == "skipped" | |
| assert not r.compiled | |
| def test_no_window_makes_verify_unavailable_and_says_why(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A") | |
| v = _by_name(r)["verify"] | |
| assert v.status == "unavailable" | |
| assert "off-by-one" in v.detail | |
| def test_compiled_is_false_when_anything_was_skipped(): | |
| assert not C.compile_report("A", "A").compiled | |
| def test_scope_travels_with_every_report(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| assert "Somatic" in r.scope["application"] | |
| assert "Not IND-ready" in r.scope["status"] | |
| assert "Immunogenicity" in r.scope["silent_on"] | |
| def test_compile_report_refuses_germline_before_running_any_pass(): | |
| with pytest.raises(C.GermlineRefused): | |
| C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0, germline=True) | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| # Enumerate: real guides. The pass used to promise guides and produce none. | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| HBB = ("CCTGAGGAGAAGGCTGCCGTCACCGCCCTGTGGGGCAAGGTGAACGTGGATGAAGTTGGTGGTGAGG" | |
| "CCCTGGGCAGGCTGCTGGTGGTCTACCCTTGGACCCAGAGGTTCTTTGAGTCC") | |
| COMPL = {"A": "T", "T": "A", "C": "G", "G": "C"} | |
| def test_spacer_index_maps_to_the_forward_strand_on_both_strands(): | |
| """The single most dangerous line in the planner. A '-' guide's spacer runs | |
| antiparallel, so its 5' base is the LAST base of the forward footprint.""" | |
| from dee.core import crispr | |
| guides = crispr.find_guides(HBB, mode="base_edit", base_editor="be4max", | |
| max_results=8) | |
| checked = 0 | |
| for g in guides: | |
| for pos in range(1, len(g.spacer) + 1): | |
| off = C.spacer_pos_to_offset(g.position, g.strand, len(g.spacer), pos) | |
| got = HBB[off] if g.strand == "+" else COMPL[HBB[off]] | |
| assert got == g.spacer[pos - 1], ( | |
| f"{g.strand} guide at {g.position}, spacer pos {pos}") | |
| checked += 1 | |
| assert checked > 100, "should have exercised both strands thoroughly" | |
| def test_guides_are_designed_against_the_patient_sequence_not_the_reference(): | |
| """The bug that made enumerate return nothing for every lesion: an ABE has | |
| to find an A to convert, and the wild-type reference has the correct G | |
| there. Searching the reference finds nothing, forever.""" | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction # ABE, sense | |
| found = [off for off in range(len(HBB)) | |
| if HBB[off] == "G" | |
| and C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr)[0]] | |
| assert found, "at least one G must be reachable by an ABE guide" | |
| def test_a_strategy_carries_a_real_spacer_pam_and_editor(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| off = next(o for o in range(len(HBB)) | |
| if HBB[o] == "G" and C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, o, corr)[0]) | |
| strategies, _ = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| s = strategies[0] | |
| assert len(s.spacer) == 20 and set(s.spacer) <= set("ACGT") | |
| assert s.pam and s.editor_family == "ABE" | |
| assert s.strand == "+", "sense correction must engage the sense strand" | |
| assert 1 <= s.target_spacer_pos <= 20 | |
| def test_bystanders_carry_forward_strand_offsets_so_they_can_be_scored(): | |
| """A bystander without a genomic coordinate cannot be handed to Evo 2, | |
| which is the entire point of collecting them.""" | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| strategies, _ = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| for s in strategies: | |
| for b in s.bystanders: | |
| assert 0 <= b.offset < len(HBB) | |
| assert b.offset != off, "the target is not a bystander" | |
| assert b.from_base == "A" and b.to_base == "G" | |
| def test_an_editor_of_the_wrong_family_is_refused(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction # needs ABE | |
| strategies, diags = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, 12, corr, | |
| editor_id="be4max") | |
| assert not strategies | |
| assert diags[0].code == "editor_family_mismatch" | |
| assert "C>T" in diags[0].remedy | |
| def test_a_window_that_is_not_wildtype_is_refused(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| off = HBB.index("A") | |
| strategies, diags = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| assert not strategies | |
| assert diags[0].code == "window_is_not_wildtype" | |
| def test_unreachable_target_says_it_is_a_pam_limit_not_a_score_threshold(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| strategies, diags = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| if not strategies and diags: | |
| assert diags[0].code == "no_guide_places_target_in_window" | |
| assert "PAM-availability" in diags[0].remedy | |
| return | |
| pytest.skip("every G in this fixture happens to be reachable") | |
| def test_the_enumerate_pass_reports_guides_not_a_promise_of_guides(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| off = next(o for o in range(len(HBB)) | |
| if HBB[o] == "G" and C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, o, corr)[0]) | |
| st, dg = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=HBB, offset=off, | |
| strategies=st, enumerate_diags=dg) | |
| p = _by_name(r)["enumerate"] | |
| assert p.status in ("ok", "warn") | |
| assert "guide(s) reach this base" in p.detail | |
| assert r.strategies, "the report carries the actual designs" | |
| def test_no_reachable_guide_stops_the_build_rather_than_emitting_a_record(): | |
| # A real G, so `verify` passes and `enumerate` is the pass that refuses. | |
| off = HBB.index("G") | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=HBB, offset=off, strategies=[]) | |
| p = _by_name(r) | |
| assert p["enumerate"].status == "error" | |
| assert p["emit"].status == "skipped" | |
| assert not r.compiled | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| # Bystander scoring β forward-strand labels for a genome model | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def test_a_sense_strand_bystander_label_needs_no_complementing(): | |
| win = "ACGTACGTAC" | |
| assert C.bystander_forward_label(win, 4, "A", "G", "+") == "A5G" | |
| def test_an_antisense_bystander_label_complements_the_alt(): | |
| """The editor sees A>G on the minus strand; the genome reads T at that | |
| position and becomes C. Getting this backwards asks the model about a | |
| change that never happens.""" | |
| win = "ACGTACGTAC" # offset 3 is 'T' | |
| assert C.bystander_forward_label(win, 3, "A", "G", "-") == "T4C" | |
| def test_a_label_is_refused_when_the_genome_disagrees_with_the_editor(): | |
| """If the spacer-to-genome mapping is broken, a label built on it would | |
| produce a confident wrong number. Refuse instead.""" | |
| win = "ACGTACGTAC" # offset 0 is 'A', not 'C' | |
| with pytest.raises(ValueError) as e: | |
| C.bystander_forward_label(win, 0, "C", "T", "+") | |
| assert "mapping is wrong" in str(e.value) | |
| def test_labels_are_collected_once_across_all_strategies(): | |
| """One flat set so they can be scored in ONE model call β a 7B round trip | |
| per base would make the feature unusable.""" | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| st, _ = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| if any(s.bystanders for s in st): | |
| labels = C.label_bystanders(HBB, st) | |
| assert labels and len(labels) == len(set(labels)), "deduplicated" | |
| for s in st: | |
| for b in s.bystanders: | |
| assert b.label, "every bystander is labelled" | |
| assert b.label in labels | |
| # the label's reference base must equal the genome | |
| assert b.label[0] == HBB[b.offset] | |
| return | |
| pytest.skip("fixture produced no bystanders") | |
| def test_unscored_bystanders_stay_none_and_are_never_coerced_to_zero(): | |
| """'not scored' and 'predicted neutral' are different claims, and a | |
| therapeutic reader acts on them differently.""" | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| st, _ = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| if not any(s.bystanders for s in st): | |
| continue | |
| C.label_bystanders(HBB, st) | |
| C.attach_bystander_scores(st, {}) # nothing came back | |
| for s in st: | |
| for b in s.bystanders: | |
| assert b.delta_ll is None, "must not become 0.0" | |
| return | |
| pytest.skip("fixture produced no bystanders") | |
| def test_scores_attach_by_label(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| st, _ = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| if not any(s.bystanders for s in st): | |
| continue | |
| labels = C.label_bystanders(HBB, st) | |
| C.attach_bystander_scores(st, {labels[0]: -3.75}) | |
| hit = [b for s in st for b in s.bystanders if b.label == labels[0]] | |
| assert hit and all(b.delta_ll == -3.75 for b in hit) | |
| return | |
| pytest.skip("fixture produced no bystanders") | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| # The design record β the actual deliverable | |
| # βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ | |
| def test_the_record_is_deterministic(): | |
| """A record that changes between runs cannot be diffed, and one that | |
| cannot be diffed cannot be audited.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| a = C.design_record(r, variant="NM_1:c.1G>A") | |
| b = C.design_record(r, variant="NM_1:c.1G>A") | |
| assert a == b and len(a) > 400 | |
| def test_the_record_carries_the_scope_limits(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| rec = C.design_record(r) | |
| assert "Somatic" in rec and "Not IND-ready" in rec | |
| assert "not a clinical decision" in rec | |
| assert "Predicted specificity is not measured specificity" in rec | |
| def test_the_record_names_what_it_did_not_establish(): | |
| """The section that makes it a record rather than a certificate.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| rec = C.design_record(r) | |
| assert "NOT ESTABLISHED by this record" in rec | |
| assert "Assess specificity" in rec | |
| def test_a_refusal_produces_a_record_too(): | |
| """A refused design still deserves documentation β often more so.""" | |
| r = C.compile_report("A" * 400, "") # beyond every editing modality | |
| rec = C.design_record(r, variant="NM_1:c.1_400del") | |
| assert "compiled NO" in rec | |
| assert "lesion_too_large" in rec | |
| assert "remedy:" in rec | |
| def test_a_transversions_record_states_the_gap_even_though_it_compiles(): | |
| """`compiled yes` must never be read as `nothing is missing`.""" | |
| rec = C.design_record(C.compile_report("A", "C")) | |
| assert "compiled yes" in rec | |
| assert "NOT ESTABLISHED by this record:" in rec | |
| assert "Enumerate strategies" in rec | |
| assert "transversion_no_base_editor" in rec | |
| def test_bystander_scores_appear_in_the_record_and_unscored_says_so(): | |
| corr = C.classify_lesion("G", "A").correction | |
| for off in range(len(HBB)): | |
| if HBB[off] != "G": | |
| continue | |
| st, dg = C.plan_base_edit_strategies(HBB, off, corr) | |
| if not any(s.bystanders for s in st): | |
| continue | |
| C.label_bystanders(HBB, st) | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=HBB, offset=off, | |
| strategies=st, enumerate_diags=dg) | |
| rec = C.design_record(r) | |
| assert "STRATEGIES" in rec and "bystanders" in rec | |
| assert "not scored" in rec, "unscored must be stated, not omitted" | |
| return | |
| pytest.skip("fixture produced no bystanders") | |
| def test_the_specificity_pass_hands_off_instead_of_shrugging(): | |
| r = C.compile_report("G", "A", window=WINDOW, offset=0) | |
| sp = _by_name(r)["specificity"] | |
| assert "Cas-OFFinder" in sp.detail or "CRISPRme" in sp.detail | |
| assert "GUIDE-seq" in sp.detail | |
| assert "Cas-independent deamination" in sp.detail, ( | |
| "a base editor is not cleared by a DSB-capture assay, and the handoff " | |
| "must say so") | |