data/eval/predictions_base_7b_fixed.jsonl

{"idx": 0, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-02", "title": "IonQ Expands Global Quantum Footprint Through Strategic Partnerships - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1274)"}
{"idx": 1, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-13", "title": "Dynamic surface codes open new avenues for quantum error correction - Research at Google", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1375)"}
{"idx": 2, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-14", "title": "Katie Arrington lands in industry as CIO of quantum company IonQ - DefenseScoop", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 940)"}
{"idx": 3, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-14", "title": "Honeywell plans to carve out quantum computing unit Quantinuum via IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 975)"}
{"idx": 4, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-15", "title": "EeroQ Breakthrough Solves the \"Wire Problem\" in Quantum Computing - PR Newswire", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from breakthrough in quantum computing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from breakthrough in quantum computing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from breakthrough in quantum computing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from breakthrough in quantum computing"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from breakthrough in quantum computing"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact but capped at maximum due to scoring range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact but capped at maximum due to scoring range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 5, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-15", "title": "Equal1 Announces $60 Million Raise for Quantum Computer That Use Existing Semiconductor Manufacturing - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry news indicating growth and reduced costs"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry news indicating growth and reduced costs"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry news indicating growth and reduced costs"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry news indicating growth and reduced costs"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive industry news indicating growth and reduced costs"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct benefit from existing manufacturing, max positive"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Hybrid benefit, max positive"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 6, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-21", "title": "Quantum computing: Expanding what's possible - National Science Foundation (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support, within score range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive impact from NSF support, within score range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, scored 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, scored 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, scored 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 7, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-21", "title": "Alice & Bob Develops \u2018Elevator Codes\u2019 to Slash Error Rates on Cat Qubit Quantum Computers - Alice & Bob", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development in quantum error correction, scored within pure-play range."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development in quantum error correction, scored within pure-play range."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development in quantum error correction, scored within pure-play range."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development in quantum error correction, scored within pure-play range."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development in quantum error correction, scored within pure-play range."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive development, but score is capped at maximum allowed (0.15) due to narrower scoring range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive development, but score is capped at maximum allowed (0.3) due to narrower scoring range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of the quantum computing sector."}}}}
{"idx": 8, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-22", "title": "Demonstration of low-overhead quantum error correction codes - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company focused on error correction, highly relevant to the demonstration."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Rigetti has significant QEC research, including low-overhead approaches, directly aligning with the article."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QBTS (Quantinuum) is directly associated with the demonstration of low-overhead QEC codes."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QUBT (Quantinuum) is part of the demonstration's focus on low-overhead QEC."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QNT (Quantinuum) contributes to low-overhead QEC, central to the article."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Leadership in quantum computing and QEC, but score range is limited; moderately relevant."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing but not directly involved in this demonstration; low positive score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; fixed at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 9, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-22", "title": "QMill Announces a Six-fold Leap in Reaching Quantum Advantage - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Announced a six-fold leap in reaching quantum advantage, scored at maximum +2.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 10, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-23", "title": "Google\u2019s Quantum Breakthrough Redefines the Future of Computation - Trends Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from industry breakthrough"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from industry breakthrough"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from industry breakthrough"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from industry breakthrough"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from industry breakthrough"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Negative impact due to increased competition"}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Negative impact, though less severe than IBM"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}, "overall_reasoning": "The news about Google's quantum breakthrough has a mixed impact: positive for pure-play companies and negative for IBM and HON due to competition, while Microsoft, Google, and NVIDIA are unaffected as per their fixed scores."}}
{"idx": 11, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-23", "title": "Microsoft Opens 2026 Quantum Pioneers Program for Measurement-Based Topological Computing Research - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry-wide impact of Microsoft's new research program."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry-wide impact of Microsoft's new research program."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry-wide impact of Microsoft's new research program."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry-wide impact of Microsoft's new research program."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry-wide impact of Microsoft's new research program."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive within narrow range due to potential collaboration opportunities in quantum computing."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive within wider range due to general industry benefit."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is not considered a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not considered a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is not considered a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 12, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-26", "title": "IonQ to Acquire SkyWater Technology - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from acquisition of SkyWater Technology"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 13, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-26", "title": "Exclusive | Quantum-Computing Company IonQ to Buy Chip Maker SkyWater for $1.8 Billion - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to acquisition of SkyWater for $1.8 billion, enhancing capabilities."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "HON": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specifications."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specifications."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specifications."}}}}
{"idx": 14, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-28", "title": "A glimpse at computing\u2019s quantum-centric future - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 969)"}
{"idx": 15, "skip": false, "date": "2026-01-28", "title": "Exploring the most complex time crystals yet with quantum-centric supercomputers - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 2 (char 129)"}
{"idx": 16, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-04", "title": "IonQ, the biggest quantum computing company on the stock market, misled investors, short-seller says - Fortune", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 2 column 1 (char 2)"}
{"idx": 17, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-04", "title": "Tennessee Commits $20M to New Quantum Initiative as EPB Secures $4M Federal Grant - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence in this pure-play quantum company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence in this pure-play quantum company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence in this pure-play quantum company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence in this pure-play quantum company."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence in this pure-play quantum company."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence, but capped at +0.15 for IBM due to diversification."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sector news from government and public investment boosts confidence, but capped at +0.3 for HON due to diversification."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as a major tech company not focused on quantum computing."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as a major tech company not focused on quantum computing."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as a major tech company not focused on quantum computing."}}}
{"idx": 18, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-10", "title": "IBM is recognized as the current Company to Beat in a 2025 Gartner\u00ae report on Quantum Computing - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1154)"}
{"idx": 19, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-16", "title": "Majorana qubits decoded in quantum computing breakthrough - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1004)"}
{"idx": 20, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-17", "title": "Infleqtion IPO: US must win quantum computing race, CEO says - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": 2.0, " reasoning": "US-based pure-play, positive sentiment from US leadership emphasis."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "UK-based pure-play, positive sentiment but lower due to non-US focus."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": 2.0, " reasoning": "US-based pure-play, positive sentiment from US leadership emphasis."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "UK-based pure-play, positive sentiment but lower due to non-US focus."}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Swiss-based pure-play, positive sentiment but lower due to non-US focus."}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": 0.15, " reasoning": "US company, positive sentiment but capped at max due to narrow range."}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": 0.3, " reasoning": "Swiss company, positive sentiment at max due to narrow range."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instructions."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instructions."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instructions."}]}}
{"idx": 21, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-18", "title": "RIKEN and IBM demonstrate quantum-centric supercomputing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct involvement in the demonstration, so maximum positive score within range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}}}}
{"idx": 22, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-20", "title": "Quantum computer breakthrough tracks qubit fluctuations in real time - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1652)"}
{"idx": 23, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-23", "title": "Quantum Advantage Tracker: the race to advantage - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 963)"}
{"idx": 24, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-23", "title": "Record venture funding signals Europe\u2019s growing quantum clout - PitchBook", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment but not European, so moderate score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "European pure-play, directly benefited from record funding and growing clout."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment, though not European."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "European pure-play, directly benefited from record funding and growing clout."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "European pure-play, directly benefited from record funding and growing clout."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "European, but has a narrower score range; positive impact from regional growth."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major player with global impact, but not European; positive sector sentiment justifies near-max score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for Microsoft."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for Google."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for NVIDIA."}}}}
{"idx": 25, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-25", "title": "IonQ Surpasses $100 Million in Annual Revenue, Reports Quantum Sales Accelerating - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for IonQ revenue and sales"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 26, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-26", "title": "DOE national quantum research centers reach breakthrough towards building scalable quantum computers - Fermilab (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive DOE breakthrough boosts pure-play quantum companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "RGTI benefits from the news as a pure-play quantum company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QBTS gains from the quantum research advancement."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QUBT benefits as a pure-play quantum company."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QNT sees positive impact from the breakthrough."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum efforts benefit from the news, capped at max score due to range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "HON, being active, benefits from the quantum research progress."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT has fixed score of 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL has fixed score of 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA has fixed score of 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 27, "skip": false, "date": "2026-02-27", "title": "Demonstration of high-fidelity entangled logical qubits using transmons - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing sector"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not scored"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not scored"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not scored"}}}}
{"idx": 28, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-03", "title": "If I Could Own Only 1 Quantum Computing Stock for 2026, It Would Be This - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has high potential as a pure-play company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has high potential as a pure-play company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has high potential as a pure-play company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has high potential as a pure-play company."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has high potential as a pure-play company."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Identified as the best choice in the article, so it receives the maximum score in its narrow range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Not the best choice per the article, but has a wider score range and some potential."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given score ranges for major tech companies."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given score ranges for major tech companies."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given score ranges for major tech companies."}}}}
{"idx": 29, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-03", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Is Plummeting Today - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Sector decline, pure-play"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Sector decline, pure-play"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Sector decline, pure-play"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Sector decline, pure-play"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Sector decline, pure-play"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Established company, less affected"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Quantum-focused but stable, moderate decline"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected"}]}}
{"idx": 30, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-04", "title": "Skinny Logic: Quantum Codes Go on a Diet - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1146)"}
{"idx": 31, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-04", "title": "A look back at the International Year of Quantum - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Article focuses on IBM, high positive sentiment."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 32, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-05", "title": "Rigetti Posts $216 Million Annual Loss While Expanding Quantum System Deployments - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "RGTI": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative news of $216 million annual loss"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news mentioned"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 33, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-05", "title": "IBM and University Researchers Create a Never-Before-Seen Molecule and Prove its Exotic Nature with Quantum Computing - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct involvement in the breakthrough, significant positive impact."}, "IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment in quantum computing field due to IBM's achievement."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment in quantum computing field due to IBM's achievement."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment in quantum computing field due to IBM's achievement."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment in quantum computing field due to IBM's achievement."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment in quantum computing field due to IBM's achievement."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention or impact in the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, unaffected."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, unaffected."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, unaffected."}}}}
{"idx": 34, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-06", "title": "Logical multi-qubit entanglement with dual-rail superconducting qubits - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1499)"}
{"idx": 35, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-10", "title": "Quantinuum Researchers Demonstrate Quantum Computations With Dozens of Protected Logical Qubits - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 3 (char 1300)"}
{"idx": 36, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-11", "title": "Cambridge launches major strategic partnership with IonQ to \u2018supercharge\u2019 quantum research in the UK - University of Cambridge", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Direct mention in news, major partnership indicates significant positive impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, no change from baseline."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, no change from baseline."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, no change from baseline."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, no change from baseline."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, score within range [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news, score within range [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per definition."}}}}
{"idx": 37, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-12", "title": "Realizing Feynman\u2019s vision for the future of simulation | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as realizing Feynman's vision for quantum simulation."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 38, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-15", "title": "Infleqtion Completes IPO at $2.1B Valuation, Trades as INFQ", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 139)"}
{"idx": 39, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-15", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1090)"}
{"idx": 40, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "What Is Quantum Error Correction & How Does It Work - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High score due to significant work in quantum error correction"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.7, "reasoning": "Rigetti has advanced quantum error correction technologies"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.9, "reasoning": "Quantinuum is a leader in quantum error correction, with significant advancements highlighted"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Moderate focus on quantum error correction, but less advanced than others"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.6, "reasoning": "Involved in quantum error correction with moderate progress"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Part of IBM's quantum program but not a pure-play focus"}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Limited focus on quantum error correction"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant quantum error correction focus"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google's quantum work not focused on error correction"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing"}}}}
{"idx": 41, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "Doubling down on open-access quantum computing - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news about commitment to open-access quantum computing"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 42, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "PsiQuantum Integrates NVIDIA CUDA-Q for GPU-Accelerated Fault-Tolerant Simulation - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from GPU acceleration integration for quantum computing sector"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from GPU acceleration integration for quantum computing sector"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from GPU acceleration integration for quantum computing sector"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from GPU acceleration integration for quantum computing sector"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from GPU acceleration integration for quantum computing sector"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive development, but limited to quantum efforts within a large company"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Limited score range, modest positive impact from sector advancement"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}}}}
{"idx": 43, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-16", "title": "ORCA Computing Accelerates Photonic Simulation with NVIDIA cuTensorNet - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, max score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, max score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, max score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, max score"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, max score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, within range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing, within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 44, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "How Alice & Bob Uses NVIDIA CUDA-Q to Accelerate Quantum Error Correction Research - Alice & Bob", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 45, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "UK must learn lessons from AI race and retain its quantum computing talent, says minister - The Guardian", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 2026)"}
{"idx": 46, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "ORCA Computing Advances Photonic Quantum Simulation with NVIDIA cuTensorNet - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to general quantum computing advancement"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to general quantum computing advancement"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to general quantum computing advancement"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to general quantum computing advancement"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to general quantum computing advancement"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive impact, but constrained by narrower score range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive impact, but constrained by narrower score range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 47, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-17", "title": "QCentroid Combines QuantumOps Framework With NVIDIA CUDA-Q for Enterprise Quantum Workflows - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit from the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit from the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit from the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit from the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit from the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive due to enterprise focus in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive due to industry benefit and range max"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 48, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-18", "title": "Classiq Accelerates Hybrid Quantum Application Development and Execution with NVIDIA CUDA-Q - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news; no impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Mentioned but always 0.0; no change"}}}}
{"idx": 49, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "Here\u2019s How Rigetti (RGTI)\u2019s Shares Behaved After Jim Cramer Said \u201cIt\u2019s A Quantum GameStop\u201d In January 2025 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 11 column 73 (char 292)"}
{"idx": 50, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "D-Wave Quantum Plunges 49% in 3 Months: Time to Sell as Losses Widen? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1227)"}
{"idx": 51, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-19", "title": "Largest Single-GPU Quantum Simulation on AMD by BlueQubit - AMD", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress, within narrower range"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive industry progress, within narrower range"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 52, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-20", "title": "Wall Street Is Wrong About This Quantum Computing Stock - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, assigned neutral score within its range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment due to Wall Street underestimating the company's quantum computing business, scoring maximum within its range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 53, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-20", "title": "Alice & Bob Accelerates Quantum Error Correction with NVIDIA CUDA-Q - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum error correction benefits the industry."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum error correction benefits the industry."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum error correction benefits the industry."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum error correction benefits the industry."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum error correction benefits the industry."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slight positive impact as a major quantum computing player."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention or impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 54, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-21", "title": "Infleqtion Achieves 12-Logical-Qubit Milestone for Q4Bio Biomarker Discovery - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The achievement of a 12-logical-qubit milestone by Infleqtion (assumed to be IBM) signifies significant progress in quantum computing, warranting a score increase to the maximum of IBM's range (+0.15). Other companies are not impacted by this specific news, so their scores remain at 0.0."}}
{"idx": 55, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-23", "title": "D-Wave Quantum Revenue Growth Highlights Rising Demand For Optimization Services - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1374)"}
{"idx": 56, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-25", "title": "Rigetti Computing Intends to Invest $100 Million in UK to Accelerate Quantum Computing Development - GlobeNewswire", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "No JSON"}
{"idx": 57, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-25", "title": "QpiAI Achieves High-Speed Quantum Error Correction on Superconducting Systems with New Decoder Platform - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 3 (char 1285)"}
{"idx": 58, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "Quantum Computing Is on Its Way to Transforming Science. Inside IBM\u2019s Latest Breakthrough. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to IBM's breakthrough mentioned in the article"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 59, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "IBM Quantum Computer Accurately Simulates Real Magnetic Materials, Reproducing National Laboratory Data - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, no direct mention"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, no direct mention"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, no direct mention"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, no direct mention"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, no direct mention"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive development for IBM, significant achievement in quantum simulation"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 60, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "Quantum computers take a step into real materials science - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1172)"}
{"idx": 61, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-26", "title": "15+ Leading Quantum Computing Countries in 2026 - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to leading country focus"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to leading country focus"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to leading country focus"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to leading country focus"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to leading country focus"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive within range due to leading country focus"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive within range due to leading country focus"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 62, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-27", "title": "Rigetti Computing Intends to Invest $100 Million in UK to Accelerate Quantum Computing Development - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from accelerated quantum computing development"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from Rigetti's $100 million investment announcement"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from accelerated quantum computing development"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from accelerated quantum computing development"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from accelerated quantum computing development"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact within its narrower score range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from accelerated quantum computing development"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the score ranges"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the score ranges"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the score ranges"}}}
{"idx": 63, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-27", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks IonQ, Rigetti Computing, and D-Wave Quantum Have Created Shockwaves With This $930 Million Warning to Wall Street - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": -1.0, "RGTI": -1.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}}
{"idx": 64, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-28", "title": "Is D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS) Insider Selling Undermining Its New Enterprise-Focused Quantum Narrative? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative impact due to insider selling concerns reported in Yahoo Finance"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news; score within [-0.15, +0.15] range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the news; score within [-0.3, +0.3] range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 65, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-28", "title": "Chinese Researchers Demonstrate Logical Operations on Silicon Quantum Processor - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1510)"}
{"idx": 66, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "1 Unstoppable Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Before It Soars 200%, According to 1 Wall Street Analyst - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highlighted as the unstoppable quantum computing stock with potential for a 200% soar."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum computing, upper bound score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum computing, upper bound score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 67, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "Quantum Computing\u2019s Next Major Breakthrough May Come From Australia - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1335)"}
{"idx": 68, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "This quantum computing breakthrough may not be what it seemed - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, highly sensitive to skepticism about breakthrough significance."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, negatively impacted by deflated hype."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, affected by reduced optimism."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, sensitive to market sentiment."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, negatively impacted by skepticism."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Established company with quantum efforts, less affected due to lower sensitivity."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Established company, moderately affected but less so than pure-play due to stability."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected by the news."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected by the news."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, unaffected by the news."}}}}
{"idx": 69, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-29", "title": "BlackRock funds provide about $57 million to IQM Quantum Computers ahead of US IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive event due to significant investment from BlackRock funds, indicating strong market confidence."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so score remains 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information."}}}}
{"idx": 70, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-30", "title": "Google Opens Early Access to \u2018Willow\u2019 Quantum Processor, Invites Experimental Proposals - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment from Google's quantum processor early access."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment from Google's quantum processor early access."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment from Google's quantum processor early access."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment from Google's quantum processor early access."}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment from Google's quantum processor early access."}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive impact from Google's quantum progress."}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": 0.1, " reasoning": "Positive sentiment as Google advances quantum computing."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per setup."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per setup."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per setup."}]}}
{"idx": 71, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-30", "title": "Google's 105-qubit Willow quantum processor opens for early access - SDxCentral", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 943)"}
{"idx": 72, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "Can D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Double From Here On? One Analyst Thinks So - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The news is positively about QBTS, indicating potential for significant growth, so high score of +2.0."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, and within its score range, neutral is appropriate."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, and within its score range, neutral is appropriate."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem, always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 73, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Recommended as the best stock for $1,000 investment, indicating high potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing but not specifically mentioned; moderate positive sentiment."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; not mentioned, so average positive score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; not mentioned, so moderate score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; not mentioned, so average positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the focus of the recommendation; neutral score within range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not the focus of the recommendation; neutral score within range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 74, "skip": false, "date": "2026-03-31", "title": "Caltech Team Finds Useful Quantum Computers Could Be Built with as Few as 10,000 Qubits - Caltech", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing breakthrough, enhancing potential for specialized companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Reduced qubit requirement boosts prospects for RGTI in quantum computing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Breakthrough accelerates QBTS's path to useful quantum computers."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact for QUBT, supporting its quantum computing efforts."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QNT benefits from breakthrough, which could expedite its quantum solutions."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum division sees positive impact, but within narrower scoring range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell (HON) benefits moderately, constrained by scoring limits."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No change; MSFT is not directly involved in quantum development and score is fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No change; Google's quantum involvement is minimal, and score remains fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No change; Nvidia's score is fixed at 0.0, unaffected by this news."}}}}
{"idx": 75, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-01", "title": "Bear of the Day: D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 100)"}
{"idx": 76, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-01", "title": "Assessing D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Valuation After Record Bookings And New Government Solutions Unit - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1102)"}
{"idx": 77, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Rigetti Computing - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the news about the quantum computing landscape"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the news, positive sentiment, higher score due to direct involvement"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the news about the quantum computing landscape"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the news about the quantum computing landscape"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the news about the quantum computing landscape"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, but within narrower range"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, within its range"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 78, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "\u2018It\u2019s a real shock\u2019: quantum-computing breakthroughs pose imminent risks to cybersecurity - Nature", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1773)"}
{"idx": 79, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Novel approach to quantum error correction portends a scalable future for quantum computing - Phys.org", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1780)"}
{"idx": 80, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-02", "title": "Google Issues \u2018Q-Day\u2019 Warning. What It Means. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative warning from Google reduces confidence in quantum sector"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative warning from Google reduces confidence in quantum sector"}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative warning from Google reduces confidence in quantum sector"}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative warning from Google reduces confidence in quantum sector"}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative warning from Google reduces confidence in quantum sector"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Smaller score range, but still negative impact from warning"}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "More exposed to sector risk, affected by warning"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per universe definition"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per universe definition"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per universe definition"}}}
{"idx": 81, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "Better Quantum Computing Stock: D-Wave Quantum vs. Rigetti Computing - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news due to Rigetti's superiority in the comparison"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, neutral impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum company, fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum company, fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum company, fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 82, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "IBM quantum processor achieves highest fidelity calculations for the longest period of time on record - Live Science", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1201)"}
{"idx": 83, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-03", "title": "SpinQ Technology Secures Nearly 1 Billion Chinese Yuan in Series C Funding to Scale Industrial Superconducting Quantum Computing - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting QC sector"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting QC sector"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting QC sector"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting QC sector"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive for superconducting QC sector"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive indirect benefit as quantum integrator"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive benefit for quantum computing company"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not affected, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not affected, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not affected, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 84, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-04", "title": "Is Rigetti Computing the Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Right Now? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Recommended as the best quantum computing stock, score +2.0"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0 within [-0.15, +0.15]"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so score 0.0 within [-0.3, +0.3]"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges"}]}}
{"idx": 85, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-04", "title": "SpinQ Technology Secures 1 Billion CNY ($145.3M USD) Series C Funding to Expand Superconducting and NMR Hardware Lines - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive Series C funding for a quantum computing company indicates sector strength, boosting scores for hardware-focused pure-play companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding news reflects market confidence, leading to a score increase for active companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect sector-wide boost from successful quantum hardware expansion."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding event enhances investor sentiment in quantum computing hardware."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Series C funding boosts credibility and growth potential for quantum hardware players."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact from increased industry activity, within IBM's narrower score range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect benefits from hardware expansion, with a moderate increase within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given scoring rules for non-core quantum computing companies."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given scoring rules for non-core quantum computing companies."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given scoring rules for non-core quantum computing companies."}}}
{"idx": 86, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-06", "title": "Why The Quantum Computing Industry Needs Logical Qubit Standards - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1260)"}
{"idx": 87, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-07", "title": "AI Helped Spark a Quantum Breakthrough. The World 'Is Not Prepared' - Time Magazine", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1571)"}
{"idx": 88, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-07", "title": "China\u2019s Quantum Sector Sees Investment Surge as Larger Funding Rounds Return - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to investment surge in quantum computing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to investment surge in quantum computing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to investment surge in quantum computing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to investment surge in quantum computing"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to investment surge in quantum computing"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly positive as larger funding rounds return, but not directly impacted"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, but smaller impact due to company size"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules"}}}}
{"idx": 89, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-08", "title": "Rigetti Announces General Availability of 108-Qubit System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1151)"}
{"idx": 90, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-08", "title": "Quantum computers keep losing data. This breakthrough finally tracks it - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from breakthrough news, within [-2.0, +2.0] range."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from breakthrough news, within [-2.0, +2.0] range."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from breakthrough news, within [-2.0, +2.0] range."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from breakthrough news, within [-2.0, +2.0] range."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from breakthrough news, within [-2.0, +2.0] range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, but capped at +0.3 due to narrower range [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, but capped at +0.15 due to narrower range [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}}}}
{"idx": 91, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-09", "title": "Horizon Quantum To Acquire IonQ 256-Qubit Trapped-Ion System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1055)"}
{"idx": 92, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-10", "title": "Study Finds Exponential Quantum Advantage in Machine Learning Tasks - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Strong focus on quantum machine learning."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.7, "reasoning": "Rigetti is a leader in quantum machine learning applications."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.6, "reasoning": "Quantinuum has quantum machine learning applications."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantum Machines focuses on quantum for AI."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.4, "reasoning": "Less prominent in machine learning but still a pure-play."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established player in quantum machine learning with maximum score in narrow range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active quantum company with moderate score within narrow range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company."}]}}
{"idx": 93, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-11", "title": "Quantum Computing Is Beginning to Take Shape \u2014 Here Are Three Recent Breakthroughs - Discover Magazine", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to breakthrough announcement"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to partnership announcement"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific mention, neutral"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific mention, neutral"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to breakthrough announcement"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific mention, neutral"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific mention, neutral"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 94, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-11", "title": "AI Decoder Could Cut Quantum Errors by Up to 17\u00d7, Study Finds - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, set to max score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, set to max score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, set to max score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, set to max score"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, set to max score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, capped at max score due to range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact from AI decoder, capped at max score due to range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 95, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Prediction: This Will Be Rigetti Computing's Stock Price in 1 Year - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, neutral score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Bullish prediction from The Motley Fool regarding RGTI's stock price"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, neutral score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, neutral score"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, neutral score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, within score range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, within score range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for traditional tech companies"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for traditional tech companies"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 for traditional tech companies"}}}}
{"idx": 96, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Gauge theory could give quantum error correction a boost - Physics World", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general boost in quantum error correction."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general boost in quantum error correction."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general boost in quantum error correction."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general boost in quantum error correction."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general boost in quantum error correction."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive, assigned the maximum within its range due to its established position."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive, assigned +0.3 as it has a wider range and may benefit significantly."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}}}}
{"idx": 97, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-13", "title": "Exponential Quantum Advantage in Processing Massive Classical Data - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to general quantum advantage news benefiting pure-play companies."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact as RGTI is a pure-play quantum company involved in such advancements."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for QBTS, which focuses on quantum computing applications for data-intensive tasks."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to the article's relevance to quantum computing progress."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for QNT, a pure-play company benefiting from the quantum advantage news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "High positive impact as IBM is a major quantum player with quantum machine learning efforts."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact; HON is active in quantum computing with a narrower score range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as MSFT is not a quantum computing company."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as GOOGL is not a quantum computing company."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as NVDA is not a quantum computing company."}]}}
{"idx": 98, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "IonQ Selected for DARPA\u2019s Heterogeneous Architectures for Quantum (HARQ) Program - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1157)"}
{"idx": 99, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "D-Wave CEO says Nvidia should be 'shaking in their boots' as quantum computing battles AI GPUs - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from quantum sector news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per instructions"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per instructions"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per instructions"}}}}
{"idx": 100, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-14", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Took off Like a Rocket Today - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1562)"}
{"idx": 101, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "IonQ (IONQ) Soars 21% on Nvidia Quantum Computing Support - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 968)"}
{"idx": 102, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Rigetti Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1146)"}
{"idx": 103, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing Is Skyrocketing Today -- Is the Quantum Stock a Buy Right Now? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1025)"}
{"idx": 104, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Rigetti (RGTI), Quantum Stocks Climb \u2018Double-Digits\u2019 on Nvidia Support - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General rise in quantum stocks"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Explicitly mentioned with significant increase (double-digits)"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General rise in quantum stocks"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General rise in quantum stocks"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General rise in quantum stocks"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}}}}
{"idx": 105, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, within range"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, within range"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, within range"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, within range"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, within range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, within range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}, "reasoning": "The article expresses positive sentiment about quantum stock performance. Since D-Wave is not in the universe, the sentiment is generalized to all active companies. IBM and HON are scored at their maximum positive values (0.15 and 0.3) due to their narrower ranges. Pure-play companies are scored at +1.0 within their [-2.0, +2.0] range. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 106, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company"}}}
{"idx": 107, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-15", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Keeps Going Up - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about quantum computing sector; pure-play company benefits fully."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment; pure-play quantum company scores maximum."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "General positive news; pure-play quantum company gains full score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Article supports quantum stock rise; pure-play company benefits maximally."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive quantum computing news; pure-play company scores +2.0."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news, but IBM's quantum business is part of broader operations; scores within its narrower range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment; HON scores its maximum allowed value."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}}}}
{"idx": 108, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-16", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Was Blasting Higher This Week - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from the article leads to a +2.0 score as a pure-play company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector-wide uptick justifies +2.0 for this pure-play company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news drives the score to +2.0."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Blasting higher sentiment results in +2.0."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Article's strong positivity leads to +2.0 as a pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Sector-wide positive news affects IBM, but its narrower score range limits it to +0.15."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Holacrystal Inc. is positively impacted, and +0.3 is assigned within its score range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are not considered active quantum computing firms and are fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are not considered active quantum computing firms and are fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are not considered active quantum computing firms and are fixed at 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 109, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-16", "title": "How IBM Quantum is enabling healthcare and biology research - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1182)"}
{"idx": 110, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "How IonQ Became the Most Exciting Name in Quantum Computing This Week - inc.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The news article specifically highlights IONQ's rise as the most exciting name in quantum computing, indicating strong market sentiment and potential, so a high positive score of +2.0 is assigned."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "RGTI is a pure-play quantum computing company but is not mentioned in the news. As such, it receives a moderate positive score of +1.0, reflecting its potential but lack of specific mention."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QBTS is a pure-play company not mentioned in the news, so +1.0 is assigned for the same reason as RGTI."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QUBT is not mentioned, so +1.0 is assigned."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "QNT is not mentioned, so +1.0 is assigned."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM is a quantum computing company with a restricted score range of [-0.15, +0.15]. No mention in the news, so a neutral score of 0.0 is assigned within the range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON has a score range of [-0.3, +0.3]. Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score of 0.0."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is not a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is not in the quantum computing sector and is always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is not a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 111, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Here's Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Soared This Week - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment due to quantum computing advancements"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect benefit from sector-wide positive news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Sector strength indicates growth opportunities"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive market conditions for quantum firms"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly reported stock surge, reflecting strong demand for quantum technology"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Established player benefits from quantum computing growth, score within constrained range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Broad market support for quantum computing, score within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always scored 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always scored 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always scored 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 112, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Here is why Hewlett Packard is an Undervalued Quantum Computing Stock to Invest In - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1114)"}
{"idx": 113, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-17", "title": "Quantum-informed machine learning for predicting spatiotemporal chaos with practical quantum advantage - Science | AAAS", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; news highly relevant for practical quantum advantage"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company; news directly applicable"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum focus; news supports quantum ML development"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum entity; news indicates quantum ML progress"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Commercial quantum company; news emphasizes practical advantage, aligning with their business"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Large tech with quantum division; news relevant but less specific, max positive score"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Scored company; news is relevant to quantum computing, max positive score"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}}}}
{"idx": 114, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-19", "title": "Alliance Global Partners Holds Buy on Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI) as Nvidia's (NVDA) Quantum Push Lifts the Sector - foreignpolicyjournal.com", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1260)"}
{"idx": 115, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-19", "title": "Could These 3 New-to-Market Quantum Computing Firms Threaten D-Wave? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High potential to disrupt D-Wave as discussed in the article."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Significant new-to-market firm with high disruption potential."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "One of the three firms highlighted for potential threat to D-Wave."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, so neutral score."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not new-to-market and not mentioned, so neutral score."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not new-to-market and not mentioned, so neutral score."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}]}}
{"idx": 116, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-20", "title": "QuEra, Harvard, and MIT Demonstrate 2:1 Physical-to-Logical Qubit Ratio - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, not mentioned in news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Directly involved in the demonstration, scored at maximum of range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 117, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "IonQ Quantum Networking Breakthrough Raises Questions For Growth And Defense Upside - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1034)"}
{"idx": 118, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "Why Nvidia Is the Most Important Quantum Computing Stock of All - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1424)"}
{"idx": 119, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "QuEra-led Study Points to Ultra-High-Rate Quantum Error Correction Moving Closer to Practical Hardware - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1502)"}
{"idx": 120, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "IBM\u2019s Hanhee Paik on the new IBM-UIUC agreement - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1367)"}
{"idx": 121, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-21", "title": "QMatter Raises $1.2 Million in Funding And Introduces Quantum Compression to Tackle Scaling - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news due to funding round and introduction of Quantum Compression"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 122, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-24", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks IonQ, Rigetti, and D-Wave Have Soared Up to 72% in 7 Trading Sessions -- and You'll Likely Regret Chasing This Rally - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1157)"}
{"idx": 123, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-25", "title": "Google Quantum AI is Now Accepting Proposals for Early Access to their Willow Quantum Processor - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1042)"}
{"idx": 124, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "IonQ Partners with Florida LambdaRail on Secure Network Project - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive government partnership for IonQ suggests increased market potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, and score remains within its range [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, and score remains within its range [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}}}}
{"idx": 125, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "Quantum Art Extends Series A Funding to $140 Million with Participation from Global Financial Leaders - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive funding round in quantum sector indicates strong sentiment, leading to high score within their respective ranges."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 126, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-27", "title": "Quantum Computing Companies Are in a Race to Go Public - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1295)"}
{"idx": 127, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-28", "title": "RGTI vs IONQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has More Upside? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Based on the article, IONQ has higher upside potential due to its hardware focus and growth prospects."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Based on the article, RGTI has less upside compared to IONQ, as it is a software provider with more moderate growth."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, assigned neutral score."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, assigned neutral score."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, assigned neutral score."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, assigned neutral score within its range."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, assigned neutral score within its range."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition."}]}}
{"idx": 128, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Best Quantum Stock to Buy the Dip: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) or Quantum Computing (QUBT) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 412)"}
{"idx": 129, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Best Quantum Stock to Buy the Dip: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) or Quantum Computing (QUBT) - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Major player but not mentioned in the article, so moderate score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highlighted as best stock to buy the dip, so high score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article, less prominent, so neutral score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highlighted as best stock to buy the dip, so high score"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Major player but not mentioned, so moderate score"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, and has narrower range, so low score"}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, and has narrower range, so very low score"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 130, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Billionaires Have Chosen Their Favorite Quantum Computing Stock, and It's Not IonQ, Rigetti Computing, or D-Wave Quantum - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not the favorite quantum stock, so lower score"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not the favorite quantum stock, so lower score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not specified as favorite, neutral score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not specified as favorite, neutral score"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Favorite quantum stock, pure-play, high score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not pure-play, not specified as favorite"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not pure-play, not specified as favorite"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 131, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-29", "title": "Breakthrough in experimental light-powered quantum computers could mean scaling them up is now far more viable - Live Science", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly related to light-powered quantum computing; no impact from the news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information or indirect impact; no change."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Business-focused, not directly impacted by the technology breakthrough."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Similar to QBTS, no direct impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly involved in photonic quantum computing; breakthrough could significantly enhance scaling viability, warranting a high positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Has photonic quantum computing; breakthrough may have positive effect, but within tight scoring range, so modest increase."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell's photonic quantum computing division could benefit from the breakthrough, leading to a positive score within their range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}}}}
{"idx": 132, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Maryland Doubles Down on Quantum with IonQ HQ Funding and Startup Infrastructure - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to funding announcement"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 133, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) to Host First-Ever Investor Day at the New York Stock Exchange - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1318)"}
{"idx": 134, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Assessing D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Valuation After Recent Volatility And Contrasting Shareholder Returns - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1232)"}
{"idx": 135, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stock to Buy Right Now - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Identified as the best stock to buy in the article."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Mentioned as a strong player but not the best."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Discussed with positive sentiment."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Covered but with less emphasis."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, so neutral."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 136, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "IBM\u2019s Krishna Predicts First Real-World Quantum Advantage in 2026 - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector, validating the field and boosting pure-play companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector, validating the field and boosting pure-play companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector, validating the field and boosting pure-play companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector, validating the field and boosting pure-play companies."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for the quantum computing sector, validating the field and boosting pure-play companies."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly related to IBM's quantum processor achievement, scoring the maximum within its limited range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment but competitive position results in a moderate score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}}}}
{"idx": 137, "skip": false, "date": "2026-04-30", "title": "Groove Quantum Demonstrates 18-Qubit Spin Processor and Secures Funding - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1636)"}
{"idx": 138, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-01", "title": "IonQ\u2019s Quantum Freight Pilot Adds Real World Context For Investors - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about a real-world quantum freight pilot boosts investor confidence for IONQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so no change."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, and within its scoring range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, and within its scoring range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per policy."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per policy."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per policy."}}}}
{"idx": 139, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-01", "title": "Why Quantum Stock IonQ Soared 56.5% In April - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1064)"}
{"idx": 140, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-02", "title": "IonQ CEO Says 2025 Marked Turning Point for Quantum Commercialization - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned by CEO, strong positive outlook for 2025"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from CEO's statement"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from CEO's statement"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from CEO's statement"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from CEO's statement"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established player, positively impacted by industry news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active company, positively impacted by industry news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 141, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Will Quantum Hardware Milestones and Global Contracts Reshape Rigetti Computing's (RGTI) Investment Narrative? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The article discusses potential positive impact on RGTI's investment narrative"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the article"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 142, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Jumped 40% Last Month - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum division"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for Yahoo's quantum efforts"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 143, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "The Best Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Recommended as the top stock, indicating high growth potential and strong market confidence."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highlighted as one of the best to buy, reflecting its pure-play nature and expected high returns."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Explicitly recommended for its quantum computing focus, with high growth prospects."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active in the sector with positive sentiment, but not explicitly ranked."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major player with strong fundamentals, but score capped at +0.15 as per criteria."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Domestic leader with solid prospects, scored within its range of [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active but not emphasized in the article, receiving a moderate score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0 as per fixed criteria."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0 as per fixed criteria."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0 as per fixed criteria."}}}}
{"idx": 144, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "Quantum Breakthrough: New Algorithm Solves \u201cImpossible\u201d Materials in Seconds - SciTechDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1621)"}
{"idx": 145, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "IBM: A Decade of Quantum on the Cloud - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news about IBM's quantum cloud achievements, so score +0.15"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 146, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-04", "title": "A decade of quantum on the cloud - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1280)"}
{"idx": 147, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Is Rigetti Computing a Buy? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news from The Motley Fool indicates a buy, score +2.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news, score 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per definition"}}}
{"idx": 148, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Northland Believes Compute Demand For AI Leading Quantum Industry, Here\u2019s What it Thinks About Rigetti Computing (RGTI) - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1368)"}
{"idx": 149, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Is Nvidia\u2019s New Quantum Push Quietly Reframing D-Wave Quantum\u2019s (QBTS) Path to Commercial Scale? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1327)"}
{"idx": 150, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-05", "title": "Here\u2019s What the Street Thinks About D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Ahead of FQ1 2026 Earnings - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned with positive sentiment about earnings expectations"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 151, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-06", "title": "IonQ Reports $64.7 Million Q1 2026 Revenue Fueled by Quantum Contracts And System Sales - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive revenue report for IonQ"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; within range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 152, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-06", "title": "What is sample-based quantum diagonalization? - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly associated with the topic via IBM Research"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 153, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-07", "title": "Buying D-Wave Quantum Stock? 3 Things You Should Know First. - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from news about D-Wave, not in universe"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 154, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-07", "title": "Using quantum to understand the OS of the universe - IBM Research", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned in the news about IBM Research using quantum computing to understand the OS of the universe."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 155, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-08", "title": "Rigetti\u2019s Largest Modular Quantum System Puts Cepheus 1 108Q In Focus - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive news about IBM's quantum system from Yahoo Finance"}, "HON": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 156, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "D Wave Quantum Acquisition And Supremacy Milestone Test Commercial Potential - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1495)"}
{"idx": 157, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "Jim Cramer Says \u201cD-Wave Is the One That I Identified as Being the Best\u201d For Quantum - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum computing based on Cramer's bullish view of D-Wave as the best performer."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum computing, as indicated by Cramer's overall bullish stance."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General positive tone for quantum, with Cramer highlighting D-Wave's leadership."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Indirect positive impact, reflecting Cramer's enthusiasm for quantum technology."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, as Cramer's endorsement of D-Wave suggests broader quantum promise."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Slightly positive within narrow range, due to general quantum optimism but no direct mention."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Moderate positive within limited range, reflecting overall positive news about quantum computing."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per criteria, unaffected by news."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per criteria, unaffected by news."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per criteria, unaffected by news."}}}}
{"idx": 158, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-09", "title": "IonQ: The Top Quantum Computing Stock for a Once-in-a-Generation Investment Opportunity - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news, top stock"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 159, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "Rigetti Q1 Revenue Misses Estimates, Cites Deployment Delays", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to revenue miss and slower customer adoption."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 160, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "3 Quantum Computing Stocks That Went Public in 2026 That You May Have Missed - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Went public in 2026"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Went public in 2026"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Went public in 2026"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news event"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news event"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news event"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news event"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 161, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-10", "title": "Quantum firm hailed by Amgen tech leader as an \u2018extraordinary platform\u2019 plans IPO - Fierce Biotech", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1379)"}
{"idx": 162, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "While Everyone's Obsessed With the SpaceX IPO, These 3 Quantum Computing Stocks Just Quietly Went Public - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1108)"}
{"idx": 163, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "Quantinuum Has Submitted a Preliminary S-1 Filing to the U.S. SEC for a Proposed Initial Public Offering (IPO) of their Common Stock - Quantum Computing Report", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 3 (char 1170)"}
{"idx": 164, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-11", "title": "JUPITER supercomputer breaks world record with 50-qubit quantum simulation - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1580)"}
{"idx": 165, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "IonQ, World Leading Quantum Company Opens New Quantum Computing R&D Lab in Boulder - Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for opening new R&D lab"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 166, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Rigetti Falls On Q1 Earnings Report - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative news (earnings report fell, stock declined)"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 167, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing stock surges after revenue beat - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1559)"}
{"idx": 168, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Ripped Higher Today - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to market surge in quantum computing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to market surge in quantum computing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to market surge in quantum computing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to market surge in quantum computing"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive due to market surge in quantum computing"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment towards quantum computing, but score capped at +0.15"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for Intel's quantum efforts, within [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 169, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Quantinuum IPO Filing Bucks SPAC Trend - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for bucking the SPAC trend, indicating strong fundamentals"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 170, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-12", "title": "Larger-Than-Ever Single-GPU Quantum Simulation - AMD", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about quantum simulation advancement boosts confidence in quantum computing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "General positive sentiment for the sector due to milestone in quantum simulation."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum computing progress, enhancing the industry outlook."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Advancement in quantum simulation positively impacts the quantum computing ecosystem."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive development reinforces the viability of quantum technologies."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment within tighter range, as IBM is a major player in quantum computing."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive for the sector, with score adjusted to HON's narrower range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}}}
{"idx": 171, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "As Revenue Surges Nearly 9,000%, the Quantum Computing Stock Story Is Still in the \u2018Early Stages\u2019 - Barchart.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive but capped by range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive due to revenue surge"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum computing sector"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum computing sector"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not part of quantum computing sector"}}}}
{"idx": 172, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "Quantum breakthrough could revolutionize teleportation and computing - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1242)"}
{"idx": 173, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-13", "title": "NVision raises $55 million to expand from quantum MRI into quantum computing - CTech", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1468)"}
{"idx": 174, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "Here is Why D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) is Among the Best Hardware Stocks to Buy for the AI PC Revolution - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, so neutral score."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news, so neutral score."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned as among the best hardware stocks for AI PC revolution, so high score."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention, and it has a smaller score range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention, and it has a restricted score range of [-0.3, +0.3]."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given ranges."}]}}
{"idx": 175, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "Nvidia, Microsoft, and IBM are pursuing 3 very different quantum strategies. Here's how they compare - qz.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article discusses strategies for NVDA, MSFT, and IBM but provides no specific comparison or scores. All companies are assigned 0.0 as the default neutral value due to lack of information."}}
{"idx": 176, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-14", "title": "2 Quantum Leaders Are Going Public. Their Paths to the Market Couldn\u2019t Be More Different. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Going public is a major positive event for this pure-play quantum company."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Going public is a major positive event for this pure-play quantum company."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct news impact; score remains neutral."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct news impact; score remains neutral."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct news impact; score remains neutral."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct news impact; score within [-0.15, +0.15] range."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct news impact; score within [-0.3, +0.3] range."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range."}]}}
{"idx": 177, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "IonQ Achieves 35 Algorithmic Qubits on Latest Processor", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to 35 qubits achievement"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}}}}
{"idx": 178, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "IonQ and 5 More Stocks to Play Quantum Fever - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news article highlights IonQ and five other quantum companies (RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT, and HON) for quantum fever, justifying high scores. IBM is not mentioned, so it receives a lower score. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 179, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has Better Revenue Momentum? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1009)"}
{"idx": 180, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-15", "title": "Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ: Which Quantum Computing Stock Has Better Revenue Momentum? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 2 column 3 (char 4)"}
{"idx": 181, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Meet the Quantum Computing Stock That Could Crush IonQ in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Threatened by RGTI, leading to significant risk"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Identified as the quantum computing stock that could crush IonQ, posing a major competitive threat"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news context"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem constraints"}}}}
{"idx": 182, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Prediction: This Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Up More Than 20% by the End of 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 15 column 1 (char 979)"}
{"idx": 183, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-16", "title": "Meet the Quantum Computing Stock That Could Crush IonQ in 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as it is the target of the threat but not directly mentioned in the news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The news identifies it as the stock that could crush IonQ in 2026, so it is assigned the maximum score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, so neutral score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, so neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, so neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score within its range [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score within its range [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given ranges."}}}}
{"idx": 184, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-17", "title": "D-Wave: Riding Quantum Mania (NYSE:QBTS) - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1028)"}
{"idx": 185, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-17", "title": "Why Quantum Computing Stock Skyrocketed This Week - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Positive news on IONQ's quantum algorithms and market surge drive a high score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "RGTI's leadership in quantum sensors and strong market reception justify the score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "QBTS benefits from sector optimism and its focus on quantum computing applications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "QUBT's growth in quantum software and broader market interest contribute to the score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "QNT's advancements in quantum computing hardware and bullish market response support the score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM's quantum computing division sees positive updates, but its narrower range limits the score to the upper limit."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "HON benefits from increased sector confidence, though its smaller scale results in a moderate score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is not a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is not a quantum computing company and is always scored 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 186, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "Prediction: D-Wave Quantum Stock (QBTS) Will Be Worth This Much by the End of 2026 - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1365)"}
{"idx": 187, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "3 Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about quantum computing stocks leads to maximum score for pure-play companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news, maximum score for pure-play."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news, maximum score for pure-play."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news, maximum score for pure-play."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news, maximum score for pure-play."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment but narrow score range, so maximum possible score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, maximum possible score within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score fixed at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 188, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "Sector Snapshot: Quantum Computing Startup Investment Slows In 2026 While Public Markets Hold Strong - Crunchbase News", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to slowing startup investment"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to slowing startup investment"}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to slowing startup investment"}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to slowing startup investment"}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative due to slowing startup investment"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive due to strong public markets"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive due to strong public markets"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 189, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-18", "title": "The Quantum Computing IPO Wall Street Hasn't Figured Out Yet -- but Should in 2026 - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1324)"}
{"idx": 190, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Deep Tech to Space: Space Data Centers and AI Revolution at the Edge", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from SDC advancements as a pure-play quantum company focused on cutting-edge computing."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Gains from AI-based data processing in orbit, leveraging quantum computing for space applications."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Enhances its quantum computing capabilities with SDCs for real-time Earth and lunar data analysis."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum service provider benefits from SDC architecture for scalable AI insights."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's quantum computing is strengthened by SDCs for secure, in-orbit data processing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Quantum division benefits from SDC innovations, but score range is limited to max of +0.15 due to broader corporate focus."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Honeywell's quantum solutions gain from SDCs, scoring max of +0.3 as per range, reflecting partial alignment with space tech."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; fixed at 0.0 as per instructions."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; fixed at 0.0 as per instructions."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum computing; fixed at 0.0 as per instructions."}}}}
{"idx": 191, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Set Shaping Theory as a Complementary Payload-Shaping Layer for Steganography", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 7 column 106 (char 560)"}
{"idx": 192, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Inverse Design of Metasurface based Absorbers using Physics Guided Conditional Diffusion Models", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High innovation in quantum computing, aligns with abstract's efficient inverse design"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Active quantum company with potential for quantum metasurface applications"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Quantum technologies focus, moderate impact from abstract's method"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum computing leader, abstract's efficiency enhances design capabilities"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Quantum sensing pioneer, abstract's method directly applicable to their work"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Major quantum player; abstract's efficiency beneficial but constrained by broader business"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral; active but no specific link to abstract's quantum applications"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a quantum-focused entity"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; minimal quantum computing involvement"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; primarily a GPU manufacturer"}}}
{"idx": 193, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Data Architectures for AI-Ready Interoperable Public Transportation Ecosystems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score for pure-play company (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score for pure-play company (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score for pure-play company (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score for pure-play company (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score for pure-play company (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score within [-0.15, +0.15] range (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score within [-0.3, +0.3] range (neutral)"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 194, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Prediction: Rigetti Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 1 Year - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1175)"}
{"idx": 195, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-19", "title": "Opinion | Quantum IPO wave is a milestone. It should also come with a warning - South China Morning Post", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive for IPO wave with warning"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive for IPO wave with warning"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive for IPO wave with warning"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive for IPO wave with warning"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Positive for IPO wave with warning"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Smaller positive due to narrower range and warning"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Modest positive due to established position and warning"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per ranges"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per ranges"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per ranges"}]}}
{"idx": 196, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "Demonstration of fault-tolerant quantum computation with 48 logical qubits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1338)"}
{"idx": 197, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "Classification of Single and Mixed Partial Discharges under Switching Voltage Using an AWA-CNN Framework", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector advancement and high CNN accuracy support a top score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector advancement and high CNN accuracy support a top score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector advancement and high CNN accuracy support a top score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector advancement and high CNN accuracy support a top score"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Sector advancement and high CNN accuracy support a top score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Leadership in AI and deep learning, aligning with CNN success"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Stability and strong performance in PD analysis, per narrow range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given range"}}}
{"idx": 198, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "IonQ Stock Analysis: Buy or Sell This Quantum Computing Stock? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Bullish recommendation indicates strong growth potential for IonQ."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no information provided."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no information provided."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no information provided."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; no information provided."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play; scored neutral as not mentioned."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a pure-play; scored neutral as not mentioned."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional tech giant; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional tech giant; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional tech giant; always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 199, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-20", "title": "How researchers built a record-setting quantum circuit - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1309)"}
{"idx": 200, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Which Superconducting Qubit Model is Good Enough? From Effective Two-Level to Circuit-Based Hamiltonians for Pulse-Level Simulation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "IONQ uses ion trap technology, not superconducting qubits, reducing relevance for this research."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "RGTI (Rigetti) uses superconducting qubits, aligning with the abstract's hardware focus."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QBTS (Quantinuum) uses superconducting qubits, relevant to the research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QUBT uses superconducting qubits, consistent with the abstract's scope."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "QNT (Quantum++ related) is associated with superconducting qubits, making it relevant."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM is a leader in quantum computing with circuit-based models, which serve as the reference in the abstract."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "HON (Holonyak Inc.) focuses on quantum sensors, not quantum hardware, reducing relevance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is not primarily a quantum hardware company, and the abstract specifies a score of 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not primarily a quantum hardware company, and the abstract specifies a score of 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is not primarily a quantum hardware company, and the abstract specifies a score of 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 201, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Automatic De-Quantization of Quantum Programs Using Constant Propagation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Direct benefits from improved algorithm efficiency."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Enhanced practicality through reduced quantum operations."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Advantage in algorithm efficiency for near-term devices."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact on quantum program optimization."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Direct benefits for quantum computing startups."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major player benefits from new compiler techniques."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active company with direct involvement in de-quantization research."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company for this context."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company for this context."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company for this context."}]}}
{"idx": 202, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "LCGuard: Latent Communication Guard for Safe KV Sharing in Multi-Agent Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum computing company relevant to secure communication in multi-agent systems."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum computing company relevant to secure communication in multi-agent systems."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum computing company relevant to secure communication in multi-agent systems."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum computing company relevant to secure communication in multi-agent systems."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum computing company relevant to secure communication in multi-agent systems."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major quantum computing company with narrow score range; assigned upper limit."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantum computing company with narrow score range; assigned upper limit."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company."}}}}
{"idx": 203, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum Genetic Optimization for Negative Selection Algorithms in Anomaly Detection", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to quantum focus in anomaly detection"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to quantum focus in anomaly detection"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to quantum focus in anomaly detection"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to quantum focus in anomaly detection"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to quantum focus in anomaly detection"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive but capped by range, major player in quantum"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive but capped by range, quantum division"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}}}}
{"idx": 204, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "dSABRE: A SABRE-Style Router for Multi-Core Distributed Quantum Computers", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "dSABRE's 41-44% EPR reduction boosts efficiency for this pure-play quantum company, justifying a positive score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "As a pure-play, RGTI benefits from dSABRE's efficiency gains, aligning with the algorithm's 41-44% improvement."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QBTS, a pure-play, gains from dSABRE's reduced EPR consumption, reflecting sector-wide efficiency gains."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QUBT leverages dSABRE for enhanced quantum performance, consistent with the 41-44% EPR reduction."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "QNT benefits directly from dSABRE's efficiency improvements, supporting its pure-play role."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM, a major quantum player, sees modest gains from dSABRE's 16-68% reduction over pytket-dqc, but its broader scope limits the impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "HON, an active quantum company, benefits from efficiency gains, though less than pure-play firms due to potential scalability challenges."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is not quantum-focused, so it remains at 0.0 as per the fixed range."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google, a non-quantum company, sees no direct benefit, scoring 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA, not primarily quantum, maintains a score of 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 205, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "D-Wave Quantum and Department of Commerce Sign Letter of Intent for $100 Million in CHIPS and Science Act Funding to Accelerate U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing - Business Wire", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from U.S. government support for quantum computing, enhancing IONQ's leadership potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "U.S. funding boosts quantum computing hardware sectors, benefiting RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "U.S. investment accelerates quantum hardware leadership, positively impacting QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive U.S. quantum funding sentiment, though indirect for Canadian QUBT, still supports its growth."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "U.S. government backing enhances quantum hardware leadership, including QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "U.S. government support improves IBM's quantum capabilities within its narrow score range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "U.S. funding for quantum leadership benefits HON's standing within its score range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 206, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum stocks soar as U.S. plans $2 billion funding incentives and equity stakes - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1106)"}
{"idx": 207, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Why Did Quantum Computing Stock Pop Today? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from sector-wide quantum computing stock increase, as discussed in the article."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Increased confidence in quantum computing growth, supported by the article."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The pop is attributed to positive developments in quantum technology, per the article."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The article highlights the boost to quantum computing firms' performance."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact on quantum computing stocks, as per the news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Maximum possible positive score within its restricted range, reflecting the sector's optimism."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Maximum possible positive score within its range, indicating strong support from the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem statement, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem statement, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per the problem statement, always 0.0."}}, "reasoning": "The positive news about quantum computing stock increase leads to uniformly positive scores for active companies. Pure-play firms get a moderate positive score (+1.0), while IBM and HON are capped at their maximums (+0.15 and +0.3). Always 0.0 companies are unaffected by the news."}}
{"idx": 208, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Quantum Dynamics Breakthrough Overturns Claim of \u2018Quantum Supremacy,\u2019 Opens New Research Directions - Simons Foundation", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough in quantum dynamics, benefiting the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough in quantum dynamics, benefiting the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough in quantum dynamics, benefiting the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough in quantum dynamics, benefiting the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough in quantum dynamics, benefiting the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": 0.15, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough, within its restricted range of [-0.15, +0.15]."}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": 0.3, " reasoning": "Positive impact from the breakthrough, within its restricted range of [-0.3, +0.3]."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}]}}
{"idx": 209, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "IBM and U.S. Department of Commerce Announce America\u2019s First Purpose-Built Quantum Foundry, Supported by Proposed $1 Billion CHIPS Award - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to the landmark announcement of a purpose-built quantum foundry with significant government support."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}}}
{"idx": 210, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Department of Commerce Announces Letters of Intent With 9 Companies for $2 Billion to Accelerate U.S. Leadership in Quantum Computing - National Institute of Standards and Technology (.gov)", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, pure-play, max score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, pure-play, max score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, pure-play, max score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, pure-play, max score"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, pure-play, max score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, max for IBM range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Involved in LOIs, max for HON range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}, "reasoning": "The news indicates that 9 companies received LOIs for a $2 billion initiative to accelerate U.S. leadership in quantum computing. Assuming all 7 active companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT, IBM, HON) are included, they are scored based on their type with maximum values: pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) at +2.0, IBM at +0.15, and HON at +0.3. The always 0.0 companies (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) are scored 0.0 as per their fixed range. The 9 LOIs include all active companies and 2 of the always 0.0 companies, but the latter do not affect scores."}}
{"idx": 211, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Exclusive | U.S. to Award Quantum-Computing Firms $2 Billion and Take Equity Stakes - WSJ", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 155)"}
{"idx": 212, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "Atom Computing Signs Letter of Intent for $100 Million in U.S. Quantum Funding - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news, within range [-0.15, +0.15]"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment boost from sector news, within range [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 213, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-21", "title": "IBM Shares Soar on US Funding for $2 Billion Quantum Push - Bloomberg.com", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1343)"}
{"idx": 214, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Quantum-Adaptive KS($\\varphi$): A Parameterized Three-Qubit Gate Family Embedding Toffoli with Measurement-Free Phase Kickback and Intrinsic Error Non-Amplification", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "High innovation in quantum-native primitives and error resilience"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Cloud-based quantum approach with innovation potential"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Focus on quantum metrology, aligning with precision quantum computing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Limited or unknown focus on quantum-native primitives"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Quantum computing focus, potential for novel gate implementation"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established error correction efforts and hybrid quantum strategy"}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Smaller scale with less emphasis on cutting-edge quantum-native gates"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional with quantum division, not core quantum-native"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional with quantum division, not core quantum-native"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Traditional with quantum division, not core quantum-native"}}}
{"idx": 215, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Learning to Evaluate: Cost-Effective Model Evaluation on Unlabeled Data with Meta-Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; scored positively based on abstract's focus on model evaluation"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; scored positively based on abstract's focus on model evaluation"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; scored positively based on abstract's focus on model evaluation"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; scored positively based on abstract's focus on model evaluation"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active quantum company; scored positively based on abstract's focus on model evaluation"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "HON category; upper bound due to established quantum group and meta-learning relevance"}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "HON category; upper bound as per specification and active role in quantum computing"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification; not a quantum-focused company"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification; not a quantum-focused company"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification; not a quantum-focused company"}}}
{"idx": 216, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "SolarChain: Bridging Physical Law, Verifiable Trust, and Sustainable Markets for Urban Energy Resilience", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1961)"}
{"idx": 217, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Classical State Preparation for Variational Quantum Algorithms via Reinforcement Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, capped at max score of 2.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, capped at max score of 2.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, capped at max score of 2.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, capped at max score of 2.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, capped at max score of 2.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, but score capped at max of 0.3"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "CRiSP method improves state preparation by 3.17\u00d7 on average, but score capped at max of 0.15"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0 as per given range"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0 as per given range"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score is always 0.0 as per given range"}}}}
{"idx": 218, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Keeps Going Up - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 985)"}
{"idx": 219, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why Does Quantum Computing Stock Keep Going Up? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, max score within range"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, max score within range"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, max score within range"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, max score within range"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, max score within range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, but score constrained to max of range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment from the article, but score constrained to max of range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 220, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Why Does Quantum Computing Stock Keep Going Up? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 1109)"}
{"idx": 221, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-22", "title": "Breakingviews - Honeywell quantum IPO tests financial paradox - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1782)"}
{"idx": 222, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "Grow-Prune-Freeze Networks: Adaptive & Continual Learning Technique for Olfactory Navigation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1267)"}
{"idx": 223, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "DBPnet: Damper Characteristics-Based Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Network for Wheel Load Estimation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive for being a pure-play quantum computing company benefiting from the innovation."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive for its research focus in quantum computing, aligning with the abstract's success."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive as a pure-play quantum computing company leveraging advanced AI physics."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive for its quantum computing research, enhanced by the novel method."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive for its pure-play quantum computing role, benefiting from the breakthrough."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive within its narrower range due to its quantum computing initiatives, though not pure-play."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive within its range, as it may benefit from applications in automotive quantum technologies."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as it is not active in quantum computing."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as it is not active in quantum computing."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as it is not active in quantum computing."}}}}
{"idx": 224, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-24", "title": "XL-HD: Extended Learning in Hyperdimensional Computing via Deterministic Projections for In-Memory Accelerators", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, but research is classical ML, so moderate impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, but research is classical ML, so moderate impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, but research is classical ML, so moderate impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, but research is classical ML, so moderate impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, but research is classical ML, so moderate impact."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Major quantum player, but research is classical ML, so low impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Quantum company, but research is classical ML, so low impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}}}}
{"idx": 225, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "DOE Announces $500M in Quantum Computing Research Funding", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Named industry partner, positive impact on quantum credibility"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Named industry partner, positive impact on quantum credibility"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, no direct impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, no direct impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, no direct impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Named industry partner, positive impact within its specific range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, no direct impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 226, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "The Evolution of Digital Twins from Reactive to Agentic Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1472)"}
{"idx": 227, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "Evaluating System-Level Fidelity with Peaked Random Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for pure-play company; PRCs show promise for system-level fidelity, but early-stage limitations."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for pure-play company; aligns with PRCs' potential for quantum advantage."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for pure-play company; PRCs' sensitivity to interference suggests need for error resilience."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for pure-play company; PRCs provide a robust metric for NISQ reliability."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for pure-play company; PRCs' high-precision metric is comparable to Quantum Volume."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established company; scored at upper end of narrow range; PRCs' sensitivity may favor mature architectures like IBM's."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Major company; scored at upper end of narrow range; IBM's position in the abstract suggests similar reliability."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per score range; not mentioned in abstract."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per score range; not mentioned in abstract."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per score range; not mentioned in abstract."}}}}
{"idx": 228, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "PauLIB: A High-Performance Library for Processing Pauli Strings", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high gains from PauLIB's performance improvements."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play benefiting from PauLIB's optimizations in quantum processing."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with significant benefits from PauLIB's speedups and memory efficiency."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play leveraging PauLIB's advanced architectural choices for quantum computation."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play gaining from PauLIB's compact representation and SIMD vectorization."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Narrow range but benefits from adopting PauLIB to counter slower Qiskit performance."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Wider range and active role in quantum partnerships, with PauLIB driving efficiency gains."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem statement; not actively engaged in quantum computing."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem statement; minimal quantum focus."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per problem statement; not a quantum leader."}}}}
{"idx": 229, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "Native topological readout on qubit hardware: a Fibonacci-chain benchmark of measurement-compilation trade-offs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1407)"}
{"idx": 230, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-25", "title": "CMAP: Cross-Modal Adaptive Prompting for Multi-Domain Task-Incremental Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]), no data from abstract"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]), no data from abstract"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]), no data from abstract"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]), no data from abstract"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]), no data from abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-0.15, +0.15]), no data from abstract"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score (midpoint of range [-0.3, +0.3]), no data from abstract"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}}}}
{"idx": 231, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Intelligence as Managed Autonomy: Failure, Escalation, and Governance for Agentic AI Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum company focused on advanced AI and autonomy."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum company with autonomy-focused development."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum company involved in cutting-edge AI systems."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum company with advanced AI and autonomy initiatives."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance as a pure-play quantum company deeply involved in managed autonomy research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate relevance due to leadership in quantum AI, but broader business focus limits direct alignment with managed autonomy."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "High relevance as a quantum computing pioneer with strong ties to advanced AI and autonomy concepts."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance, as not focused on quantum computing or advanced AI autonomy."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance, as not focused on quantum computing or advanced AI autonomy."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance, as not focused on quantum computing or advanced AI autonomy."}}}}
{"idx": 232, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Powers and Limitations of Synchronous Self-Assembly", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 2.0, "RGTI": 2.0, "QBTS": 2.0, "QUBT": 2.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.15, "HON": 0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The abstract demonstrates that the syncTAM is more powerful than the aTAM, especially in non-cooperative settings. This research suggests that companies able to leverage the syncTAM may achieve significant advancements. Pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) are assigned the maximum score of +2.0 to reflect their high potential. IBM and HON, with narrower ranges, are assigned their respective maxima (+0.15 and +0.3) to acknowledge their capabilities within constraints. MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are scored at 0.0 as specified."}}
{"idx": 233, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Quantum Stocks Surge On U.S. Funding. Were Google, Microsoft, IonQ Snubbed? - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Snubbed in U.S. funding, negative score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, positive surge"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, positive surge"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, positive surge"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, positive surge"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, assigned positive score within range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, assigned positive score within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 234, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "This Is the Quantum Computing Stock I'd Buy Before Any Other Right Now - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Highlighted in the article as the best quantum computing stock to buy."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; within score range [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the article; within score range [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; always 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 235, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Forget SpaceX: The Next Red-Hot IPO Is Here and It\u2019s a Quantum Computing Stock - 24/7 Wall St.", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 144)"}
{"idx": 236, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Quantinuum Eyes $13 Billion Valuation Making It the Year\u2019s Biggest Quantum IPO - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 2.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news about Quantinuum (QNT) achieving a $13 billion valuation as the largest quantum IPO is positive, leading to a score of +2.0 for QNT. Other companies have no specific news, so they are scored at 0.0."}}
{"idx": 237, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "This new quantum stock could debut with a valuation of nearly $13 billion - MarketWatch", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 1.0, "RGTI": 1.0, "QBTS": 1.0, "QUBT": 1.0, "QNT": 1.0, "IBM": 0.1, "HON": 0.2, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}}}
{"idx": 238, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Forget IonQ: This New Quantum Computing IPO Could Be This Year's Dark Horse - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Mentioned but not the dark horse, so low score"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Inferred as the new dark horse IPO, high score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Established company, not mentioned, neutral within range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Established company, not mentioned, neutral within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 239, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-26", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum targets $12.7 billion valuation in US IPO - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1105)"}
{"idx": 240, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Compile-Time Simplification of Classically Controlled Operations in Dynamic Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1556)"}
{"idx": 241, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Nonvolatile Charge-Domain Attention with HZO Ferroelectric Capacitors: A Simulation-Based Device-to-System Evaluation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.51, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.51, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.51, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.51, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.51, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.11, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology, within score range constraints"}, "HON": {"score": 0.23, "reasoning": "Energy saving advantage from the technology, within score range constraints"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}}}}
{"idx": 242, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Pasqal IPO: What to Know About the Quantum Start-Up Headed to the Nasdaq - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 144)"}
{"idx": 243, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "[Largest Quantum Computing IPO] Quantinuum to Go Public Soon\u2014Will the 'SpaceX Rally' Spill Over into Quantum Stocks? - Moomoo", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide quantum computing optimism from IPO news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide quantum computing optimism from IPO news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide quantum computing optimism from IPO news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to focus as Quantinuum, the subject of the IPO news, with potential broader rally impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to sector-wide quantum computing optimism from IPO news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive within range due to general quantum sentiment, capped by narrower range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive within range due to general quantum sentiment, capped by narrower range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 244, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-27", "title": "Quantinuum: $1.05 Billion IPO Filed For Quantum Computing Expansion - Pulse 2.0", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1070)"}
{"idx": 245, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Quantinuum Files S-1 for IPO, Reveals $43M Annual Revenue", "source": "sec_filing", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 43 column 1 (char 847)"}
{"idx": 246, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "World Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Methodologies, Reasoning Paradigms, and Applications", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1509)"}
{"idx": 247, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Scheduling Mechanisms in Wireless Sensor-Actuator Networks for Multi-rate Periodic Control in Industry 4.0", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.97, "reasoning": "Associated with opportunistic aggregation, which improves schedulability by up to 97% in the abstract."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Associated with LLF-RC scheduling, which has high schedulability and is mentioned in the abstract."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.99, "reasoning": "Associated with repetitive scheduling, which reduces costs by up to 99% in the abstract."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Associated with two-phase scheduling, which improves communication reliability in the abstract."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Associated with LLF-RC scheduling, which has high schedulability and is mentioned in the abstract."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Associated with LLF-RC scheduling within its narrow score range of [-0.15, +0.15]."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not strongly associated with any strategy in the abstract, and score within [-0.3, +0.3] is 0.0."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem statement."}}}}
{"idx": 248, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Intent-Based Orchestration in Open RAN: An ns-3 Simulation Framework", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's improvement in intent-based control"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive score within narrower range, based on abstract's efficiency gains"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive score based on abstract's performance improvements"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given"}}}}
{"idx": 249, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "The Rise of the Software-Defined Vehicle: Architectures, Enabling Technologies, and Future Opportunities", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of IBM range [-0.15, +0.15]"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default midpoint of HON range [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification"}}}}
{"idx": 250, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "A Domain-Informed Multi-Objective Framework for EEG Channel Selection in Motor Imagery BCIs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1143)"}
{"idx": 251, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "A Comprehensive Survey on Semantic Communication in Non-Terrestrial Networks: Architectures, Methodologies, and Challenges", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High due to alignment with quantum-assisted SemCom advancements"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Moderate due to quantum involvement but constrained by narrower range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Moderate due to NTN relevance but constrained by narrower range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral per specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral per specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral per specification"}}}}
{"idx": 252, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Uncertainty-triggered wake-up enables energy-efficient, error-resilient edge AI with memristor front ends", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for potential AI integration in quantum systems"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for AI applications in quantum computing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum AI advancements"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for memristor-related AI and quantum computing"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for memristor technology and AI applications"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Direct memristor technology and AI involvement; higher score due to relevance"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantinuum (Honeywell) may benefit from quantum applications; wider score range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 253, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Rigetti Computing's 108-Qubit Push Keeps Quantum Advantage Hopes Alive - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment from news, moderate boost"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly mentioned; significant milestone boosts score"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, moderate boost"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, moderate boost"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry sentiment, moderate boost"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major player benefits from positive sentiment, within range cap"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active player benefits from positive sentiment, maximum score"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem"}}}}
{"idx": 254, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "Honeywell-Backed Quantinuum Files for Landmark Quantum IPO - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment for quantum sector from landmark IPO news"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Indirect benefit from positive quantum sector news, as a major quantum player"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Directly involved as backer of Quantinuum, experiencing high positive impact from landmark IPO"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, fixed at 0.0"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, fixed at 0.0"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, fixed at 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 255, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-28", "title": "First UK team to use Google Willow quantum chip announced - BBC", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1069)"}
{"idx": 256, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "BERS: Locally Optimal Continuous Algorithm for Maritime Weather Routing with Just-in-Time Arrival", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from the abstract"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 257, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Memristor-Based Spiking Neural Network Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Task", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The research demonstrates a memristor-based SNN accelerator with low energy consumption (12.7x reduction) and high accuracy (MSE=0.004), beneficial for quantum computing applications."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact for quantum computing, leveraging the research's energy and accuracy improvements."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The accelerator's low energy and high accuracy make it valuable for quantum computing edge applications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Research shows potential for neuromorphic quantum computing, with benefits in efficiency and performance."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The findings support the use of memristor-based accelerators in quantum-inspired neuromorphic systems."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for quantum computing applications, but score limited by range constraints (max +0.15)."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "The research's energy and speed advantages are advantageous for quantum computing, within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in quantum computing, so score remains 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in quantum computing, so score remains 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in quantum computing, so score remains 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 258, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Compact and Energy-Efficient Memristive Spiking Neuromorphic Accelerator for Bio-inspired Interception Tasks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from successful neuromorphic accelerator development achieving 96% interception success rate."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact, but capped at +0.3 due to its score range."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact, but capped at +0.15 due to its score range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact, always 0.0 as per predefined category."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact, always 0.0 as per predefined category."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact, always 0.0 as per predefined category."}}, "overall_reasoning": "The research on a compact and energy-efficient memristive neuromorphic accelerator (correlation 0.9622, 96% success rate) is a significant advancement for bio-inspired interception tasks, positively impacting active quantum computing companies within their score ranges. Microsoft, Google, and NVIDIA remain at 0.0."}}
{"idx": 259, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Accelerating NBTI Aging Evaluation via Physics-Aware Graph Attention Networks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment, scoring +1.5 for this pure-play quantum company."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment. IBM, being an established player, receives a score of +0.1 within its narrower range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "The paper's acceleration of NBTI aging evaluation provides a significant benefit for reliability assessment. HON, with a wider range, receives a score of +0.2."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, indicating no direct association with quantum computing in this context."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, indicating no direct association with quantum computing in this context."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "These companies are always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, indicating no direct association with quantum computing in this context."}}}}
{"idx": 260, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "Benchmarking the ORCA PT-2 Boson Sampler using Minimum Dominating Set Problems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific data from the abstract; quantum computing not directly impacted."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Directly involved in the experiment; boson sampling underperformed classical methods, indicating current limitations."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "As a major quantum player, likely facing similar challenges as IBM due to broader quantum computing underperformance."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}}}
{"idx": 261, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-29", "title": "GaMi: Geometry-Agnostic Material Identification via Cross-Modal Subtractive Disentanglement", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Benefits from GaMi's material identification for quantum hardware development."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Leverages GaMi for quantum sensing applications."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Limited direct benefit due to simulation focus."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Uses GaMi for embodied AI in quantum solutions."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Innovates with GaMi for quantum material identification in networks."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Benefits from AI aspects but narrow score range."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Adapts GaMi for quantum device integration."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified."}]}}
{"idx": 262, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Cross-Generational Transfer of Adversarial Attacks Reveals Non-Monotonic Safety Alignment in LLMs", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.8, "reasoning": "High score due to leadership in quantum computing and strong innovation."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": -1.2, "reasoning": "Low score reflects recent integration challenges and market stagnation."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score indicates stable but unremarkable performance in quantum applications."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate negative score suggests scalability issues and declining market share."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Solid score driven by breakthroughs in quantum algorithms and partnerships."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive score within narrow range, reflecting established quantum integration but no major innovations."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Slightly negative score indicates emerging challenges in quantum software integration and hardware limitations."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; no quantum computing focus."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; minimal quantum computing involvement."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per predefined score ranges; no quantum computing division."}]}}
{"idx": 263, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Computational Phase Transitions in Binary Compressed Sensing: Quantum Annealing Inside the Relaxation Gap", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1425)"}
{"idx": 264, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Quality-Diversity Evolution for Discovering Diverse Vulnerabilities in LLM Safety", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High score due to innovative quantum computing focus and potential vulnerability."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Advanced quantum computing with moderate vulnerability."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.6, "reasoning": "Established player with high vulnerability."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.4, "reasoning": "Growing quantum company with moderate vulnerability."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Quantum leader with lower vulnerability."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Has LLM division, high vulnerability within range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active in quantum sector but less LLM involvement, low vulnerability."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per score ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per score ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per score ranges."}}}}
{"idx": 265, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "The Quantum Computing Boom Is Back. IBM Proves It Is the Smartest Stock to Buy - Barchart.com", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so neutral score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Highlighted as the smartest stock to buy, so assigned maximum score of +0.15 in its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news, so assigned neutral score of 0.0 within its range of [-0.3, +0.3]."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored 0.0 as per the universe definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored 0.0 as per the universe definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored 0.0 as per the universe definition."}}}}
{"idx": 266, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-30", "title": "Stanford quantum computing breakthrough uses twisted light to work without extreme cooling - ScienceDaily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1779)"}
{"idx": 267, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "FreqLite: A Lightweight Frequency-Decomposed Linear Model with Adaptive Reversible Normalization for Robust Long-Term Time-Series Forecasting", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from advanced forecasting"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from advanced forecasting"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from advanced forecasting"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from advanced forecasting"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from advanced forecasting"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact within narrower range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive impact within its range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact, always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 268, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "SweetFruit: A Two-Stage Mobile Sensing System for Real-Time Fruit Sugar Estimation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance to quantum computing research"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No relevance"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related to the topic"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not related"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 269, "skip": false, "date": "2026-05-31", "title": "Is This New Quantum Computing IPO the Best Under-the-Radar Stock of 2026? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Sector news affects active companies moderately."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Sector news affects active companies moderately."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Sector news affects active companies moderately."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The news is about an under-the-radar IPO, and QUBT is considered under-the-radar."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Sector news affects active companies moderately."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM is not under-the-radar, so no change."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON is not under-the-radar, so no change."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector."}]}}
{"idx": 270, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Powering An Ecosystem Of Pedagogical AI Agents: A Validation Strategy For A Unified Data Architecture", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1790)"}
{"idx": 271, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "CRAM-ER: Error-Resilient Spintronic Computational Random Access Memory for Scalable In-Memory Computation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted by classical CRAM-ER."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Potential benefit from spintronic research alignment."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct benefit; pure-play quantum not impacted."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Benefit from reduced classical latency/energy in hybrid/quantum simulation tasks."}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Potential direct benefit from spintronic aspects and general classical gains."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a primary quantum company."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a primary quantum company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a primary quantum company."}}}}
{"idx": 272, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Towards Automated Discovery: A Review of Generative Models, Multimodal Learning and Closed-Loop Workflows in Inverse Materials Design", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information from abstract; default 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information from abstract; default 0.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information from abstract; default 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information from abstract; default 0.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information from abstract; default 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Within range [-0.15, +0.15]; no specific information; default 0.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Within range [-0.3, +0.3]; no specific information; default 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 273, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Heterogeneous Mapping for Analog In-Memory Computing Accelerators: A Unified Workflow", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Invalid control character at: line 41 column 118 (char 1343)"}
{"idx": 274, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Federated Formal Verification: Cross-Backend Citation, Cross-Axis Convergence, and AI-Orchestrated Proof Dispatch for Production Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with no specific adoption of federated verification"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established company with likely advanced verification practices, scoring at upper end of range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Established quantum company with likely advanced verification practices, scoring at upper end of range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum sector, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum sector, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum sector, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 275, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Branch-Aware Quantum Constant Propagation for Dynamic Quantum Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1719)"}
{"idx": 276, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Night-Window Batching versus Carbon-Aware Scheduling for Clinical AI GPU Workloads", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High score reflects potential benefits from night batching strategies for carbon reduction, as discussed in the abstract."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.78, "reasoning": "Score based on the 78% carbon gap closed by overnight batching, indicating strong carbon efficiency alignment."}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.46, "reasoning": "Negative score due to association with missed deadlines in carbon-aware scheduling (e.g., CarbonShift rule)."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score; no specific mention in the abstract, so average within range."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score; no specific mention in the abstract, so average within range."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive upper bound score as IBM is a major player, and the abstract values leadership in carbon-aware strategies."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive upper bound score as HON is active and scored, with emphasis on its role in the quantum sector."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per the given ranges, with no direct relevance to the clinical AI context."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per the given ranges, with no direct relevance to the clinical AI context."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per the given ranges, with no direct relevance to the clinical AI context."}}}
{"idx": 277, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "D-Wave\u2019s New Gate-Model Roadmap Puts Pin in 2032 For 100 Logical-Qubit System - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum computing industry, indicating progress in hardware."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for the industry, as D-Wave's progress supports cloud-based quantum growth."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive, as gate-model advancements benefit companies like Quantinuum."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive industry news, benefiting quantum hardware startups."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for the quantum landscape, similar to Quantinuum's gate-model approach."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive sentiment, but competitive pressure from D-Wave may limit impact, within IBM's narrow range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive for the quantum sector, as it supports broader advancements."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum company, always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 278, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Is This Quantum Computing Stock a Buy Before the Sector's Next Major Catalyst? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": 2.0, " reasoning": "Bullish sentiment for pure-play companies; assigned maximum score of +2.0"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": 1.5, " reasoning": "Positive sector news; assigned +1.5 within pure-play range"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": 1.5, " reasoning": "Buy recommendation for the sector; assigned +1.5"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": 1.5, " reasoning": "QUBT benefits from sector catalyst; assigned +1.5"}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": 1.5, " reasoning": "Quantum Technologies is a key player; assigned +1.5"}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": 0.15, " reasoning": "Major player assigned upper limit of +0.15 due to sector growth"}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": 0.3, " reasoning": "HON benefits from sector catalyst; assigned upper limit of +0.3"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules for Microsoft"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Google is always 0.0"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "NVIDIA is always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 279, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantinuum IPO Demand Surges as Honeywell\u2019s Quantum Unit Eyes $13B Valuation - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1537)"}
{"idx": 280, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantinuum Upsizes IPO. The Year\u2019s Biggest Quantum Offering Is Getting Even Bigger. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about IPO and quantum offering"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Companies with fixed score of 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Companies with fixed score of 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Companies with fixed score of 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 281, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Quantum Computing Stocks: Quantinuum Boosts IPO Offering - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about IPO offering boost"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 282, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Why The Quantinuum IPO Could Disappoint Investors Despite The Quantum Hype - Forbes", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirectly affected by reduced hype sentiment from Quantinuum IPO news"}, "RGTI": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Indirectly affected by sector-wide hype skepticism"}, "QBTS": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Impacted by overvaluation concerns in quantum hype"}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "General hype reduction affects valuation"}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Directly affected by potential IPO disappointment"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Less affected due to established cloud business and narrower range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Narrower range and less reliant on hype-driven IPOs"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score"}}, "reasoning": "The news about Quantinuum's IPO potentially disappointing investors signals overvaluation of quantum hype, leading to lower scores for pure-play companies. IBM and HON are less affected due to their business models and narrower score ranges, while tech giants (MSFT, GOOGL, NVDA) remain at 0.0 as specified."}}
{"idx": 283, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-01", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum eyes $14.3 billion valuation in upsized US IPO - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news about Quantinuum's IPO"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to Quantinuum's high valuation IPO as a subsidiary, within its [-0.3, +0.3] range"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the quantum computing universe definition"}]}}
{"idx": 284, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Can Generalist Agents Automate Data Curation?", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, as a pure-play quantum company"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate positive impact, within narrow score range, and the agent's success supports IBM's role in quantum computing"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Positive impact from automated data curation, within wider score range, and the agent's scaffolding enhances exploration"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0, unaffected by the news as per definition"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0, unaffected by the news as per definition"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0, unaffected by the news as per definition"}}}}
{"idx": 285, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Q-FE: A Quantum-Native 6G Far-Edge Architecture Securing Industrial IoT Digital Twins via CSIDH-PQC and Asynchronous Federated Learning", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Benefits from quantum-native architecture for edge computing and reduced overhead."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Benefits from improved security and efficient 6G integration."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Quantum hardware benefits from low-latency edge deployment and federated learning acceleration."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Federated learning and smart contracts benefit its software approach."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Quantum computing for edge devices gains from reduced overhead and resilience."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Benefits from post-quantum key exchange and attack resilience, but limited by business scale."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Gains from improved security and low latency, but constrained by narrower score range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum sector."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum sector."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not involved in quantum sector."}}}
{"idx": 286, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "ACRONYM: Accelerated Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Memory for Dynamic Vector Databases", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1352)"}
{"idx": 287, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Glass Box at Orbit: A Constitutional AI Verification Framework for Trustworthy Autonomous CubeSat Intelligence", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for IONQ, so score 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for RGTI, so score 0.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for QBTS, so score 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for QUBT, so score 0.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for QNT, so score 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for IBM, so score 0.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON is active and scored, but no specific information provided in the abstract, so score 0.0"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is mentioned in the abstract and is always 0.0, so score 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for GOOGL, so score 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific information provided in the abstract for NVDA, so score 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 288, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Continuous-Variable Quantum State Tomography Enabled by Quantum Mirrors", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 48 column 1 (char 1518)"}
{"idx": 289, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "D-Wave Seeks to Leverage IBM\u2019s Quantum Foundry. $100 Million in Federal Funding Will Help. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from this news."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from this news."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from this news."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from this news."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from this news."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive due to partnership opportunity with D-Wave."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in the news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the universe definition."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the universe definition."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the universe definition."}}}}
{"idx": 290, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Quantinuum Expands IPO as Valuation Climbs Above $14 Billion - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news about IPO expansion and valuation climb"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned, neutral"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 291, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "IBM to invest $10 billion in quantum computing | IBM Quantum Computing Blog - IBM", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive due to $10 billion investment in quantum computing"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No mention in news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 292, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "IBM Commits More Than $10 Billion to Quantum Computing, Funding Its Roadmap from Today's Leading Systems to the World's First Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers - IBM Newsroom", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major investment of over $10 billion, indicating strong commitment to quantum computing"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the news, no change"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company, always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a primary quantum computing company, always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 293, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Introducing Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1658)"}
{"idx": 294, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Microsoft Reports Advances in Majorana 2 Following Debate Over Last Year's Topological Claims - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1184)"}
{"idx": 295, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Microsoft\u2019s quantum chip got an upgrade. Critics are still skeptical - Science News", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum progress"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum progress"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum progress"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum progress"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for quantum progress"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Moderate benefit from sector-wide positive sentiment"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "No direct impact, assigned conservatively"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per scoring rules"}}}}
{"idx": 296, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-02", "title": "Quantinuum: Is This IPO Poised To Make A Quantum Leap? - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1347)"}
{"idx": 297, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "A universal and efficient hybrid digital-analog fermionic quantum simulator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to fermionic atom platforms; ion trap technology is different."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Directly benefits as Rigetti works on atom-based quantum computing and variational algorithms."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum Berlin is a fermionic atom platform, so the framework is highly relevant."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum uses fermionic atom platforms, making the framework directly applicable."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum employs fermionic atoms, benefiting from the universal framework."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Primarily gate-based; no direct benefit from fermionic-specific framework."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Gate-based; no direct relevance to fermionic atom platforms."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specification."}}}}
{"idx": 298, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Complexity of the Laughlin wave function from the Dyson-orbital perspective", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high complexity (non-Fermi sea-like)"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Established company, lower complexity (narrower range)"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Smaller player, lower complexity (narrower range)"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 299, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Realistic quantum device data synthesized by consumer AI and how to identify it", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 3 (char 1254)"}
{"idx": 300, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Unlocking Exponential and Unbounded Robust Gains in Shannon Capacity of Classical Multiple Access Channels with Causal CSIT via Quantum Entanglement Assistance", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Extra data: line 5 column 4 (char 138)"}
{"idx": 301, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Multi-Qubit Dyadic Phase Fixing for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Compilation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The up to 70% T-count reduction significantly enhances IONQ's pure-play advantage by enabling more efficient quantum operations."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Leverages the technique for improved circuit efficiency, boosting its competitive potential as a pure-play company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Gains from reduced resource costs, strengthening its focus on quantum applications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The resource savings allow QUBT to optimize its quantum designs more effectively."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The technique provides a pathway to more scalable and efficient quantum systems for QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "As a quantum computing leader, IBM benefits maximally from the T-count reduction, scoring the upper limit in its range to reflect leadership impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "The technique improves HON's capabilities, scoring the maximum in its range due to enhanced resource efficiency."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered an active quantum company in this model; always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered an active quantum company in this model; always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered an active quantum company in this model; always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 302, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Feature Encoding in Quantum Machine Learning: A Survey and Practical Guidelines", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 2224)"}
{"idx": 303, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Setting angles in quantum approximate optimization at utility-scale", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1899)"}
{"idx": 304, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Krylov Complexity: Flat bands and Carroll breaking deformations", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1693)"}
{"idx": 305, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Continuous-variable ADAPT-VQE for bosonic lattice models", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact from improved quantum simulation efficiency for bosonic models."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Leadership in quantum computing, benefiting from the advancement in circuit efficiency."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Major player benefiting from improved methods for bosonic lattice models."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per instruction, assigned 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per instruction, assigned 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "As per instruction, assigned 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 306, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Isospectrality and Operator Complexity", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-0.15, +0.15]"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of range [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 307, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Breakdown of Thermalization from Real-Time Dynamics in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1788)"}
{"idx": 308, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Expressibility, Noise, and Error Mitigation in VQE Ansatz Selection", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential; score based on average within [-2.0, +2.0] range, consistent with abstract's expressibility findings."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Score at maximum in [-0.15, +0.15] range; IBM is known for error mitigation, but abstract shows PEC increases error and ZNE preserves rankings, so conservative positive score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Score at neutral within [-0.3, +0.3] range; abstract does not indicate HON has superior performance metrics, so neutral score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 per problem statement."}}}
{"idx": 309, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "The Double Well Done Doubly-Well", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The abstract is highly relevant and positive, indicating significant potential for emerging quantum technologies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive research in quantum systems benefits this pure-play company."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The abstract's focus on resurgence enhances confidence in this company's prospects."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Advancements in quantum mechanics align with this company's core business."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The abstract's insights could accelerate quantum networking, benefiting this company."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Tighter score range and established position result in a moderate positive score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Slightly higher than IBM due to the abstract's broad relevance to hybrid quantum approaches."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the given range for established tech giants."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 for this established company."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 for this established company."}}}
{"idx": 310, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Floquet-Engineered Parity Anomaly Staircase in a Cold Atom Dirac Lattice", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company, no direct link to parity anomaly mechanisms"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Leveraged time-reversal symmetry breaking for anomalous Hall response, upper bound of restricted range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Central to parity anomaly inspiration and Dirac sector activation, upper bound of restricted range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Big tech, not specialized in quantum computing, fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Big tech, not specialized in quantum computing, fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Big tech, not specialized in quantum computing, fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 311, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Experimentally probing the Quantum Physics in the Inverted Harmonic Oscillator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to experimental quantum physics research"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "High relevance to force sensing and coherence certification applications"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Relevance to analog studies of quantum fluctuations in inflationary field dynamics"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}}}
{"idx": 312, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Programmable spectral symmetries in an anisotropic quantum Rabi simulator", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Core to pure-play quantum computing, benefits from advanced simulation research."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's focus on quantum computing aligns with this research."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Circuits benefits from programmable simulators."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Qubig's quantum efforts gain from new capabilities."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's quantum network gains from advanced simulation."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the context, neutral score."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major quantum player, likely associated with such research."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Broad interests, not pure-play."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Established with quantum, but not focused on pure-play."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not classified as pure-play, always 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 313, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "High-fidelity neutral atom gates leveraging low-rank Hessian optimization", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.999, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.999, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.999, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.999, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.999, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research, but score capped at 0.15 due to narrower range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Benefits from high-fidelity quantum gate research, but score capped at 0.3 due to narrower range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector for this context, score always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector for this context, score always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in the quantum computing sector for this context, score always 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 314, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Measuring Entanglement in Qubit System", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company; entanglement measurement is core to their research."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company; directly relevant to entanglement-based methods."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company; focuses on quantum hardware, aligning with entanglement research."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company; involved in quantum software and hardware for entanglement."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company; hardware and software focus on entanglement measurement."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Major company with a quantum division, but broader business reduces direct relevance to this specific entanglement method."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell has a significant quantum technology division; moderate-high relevance due to quantum hardware focus."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company; no direct relevance to entanglement research."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not focused on quantum computing; no relevance to this research."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is a graphics company; not involved in quantum computing or entanglement."}}}}
{"idx": 315, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Generalized Bicycle Codes as Cyclic Submodules and their Automorphism Structure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company; advanced research benefits score high."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "HON has a range of [-0.3, +0.3]; may be involved in quantum research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM is a major quantum player; abstract mentions fault-tolerant gates, scoring at high end of range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not quantum-focused; fixed at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 316, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Crossover from Rabi oscillations to adiabatic population switching in the Faraday optical control of quantum dot spins", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1876)"}
{"idx": 317, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Measurement-induced state transitions in multi-qubit transmon processors", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as a pure-play company not specifically highlighted in the abstract for increased MIST impact."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Lower score due to significant exposure to MIST issues in multi-qubit systems; spectator qubits and couplers lower the MIST threshold, harming performance."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Lower score due to similar MIST exposure as IBM, but with a wider score range allowing for a more severe lower bound, reflecting greater impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}}}
{"idx": 318, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "A thorium-229 optical nuclear clock with feedback loop", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum clock technology"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum clock technology"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum clock technology"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum clock technology"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum clock technology"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Threat from competing nuclear clock technology"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to the described nuclear clock"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 319, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "An Entanglement Measure from Quantum Optimal Transport", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-0.15, +0.15]"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No data from abstract, assigned 0.0 within [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 320, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Convergence rates of Sum-of-Hermitian-Squares Hierarchies for the Pauli algebra", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1522)"}
{"idx": 321, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Tunable Resonator Integrated Magnetometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.5, "reason": "Not primarily focused on superconducting technology; lower impact from the abstract's superconducting magnetometer research"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reason": "Directly related to superconducting technology; high relevance to the abstract's advancements"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reason": "Superconducting technology; significant positive impact from the magnetometer research"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reason": "Assumed superconducting focus; moderate impact from the abstract"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reason": "Superconducting quantum technology; high relevance to the abstract's magnetometer development"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reason": "HON category; involved in superconducting technology but with broader business scope; moderate positive impact"}, "HON": {"score": -0.1, "reason": "HON category; limited direct involvement in superconducting technology; negative impact from the abstract's focus"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Always 0.0 as per instructions"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Always 0.0 as per instructions"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Always 0.0 as per instructions"}}}
{"idx": 322, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Photoelectron spectroscopy with a resonant dichromatic field: Role of geometric phase", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information from abstract"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 323, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Comment on \"Possibility of superradiant neutrino emission by atomic condensate\" by M. Blasone, L. Gastaldo and F. Romeo, Phys. Rev. D 113, 053010 (2026)", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1908)"}
{"idx": 324, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantification of Entanglement in Three-Qubit Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Highly relevant to entanglement research in three-qubit systems"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.6, "reasoning": "Focuses on scalable entanglement for quantum advantage"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.4, "reasoning": "Engages in multi-qubit entanglement studies"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Specializes in quantum entanglement applications"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pioneers in entanglement quantification for quantum systems"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Broad quantum computing focus, less emphasis on three-qubit entanglement"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing but with a wider scope than pure entanglement"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified"}}}}
{"idx": 325, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "QPredSGG: Hybrid Quantum Predicate Learning for Long-Tailed Scene Graph Generation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract, so no direct impact specified"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing and scored; benefits from research advancements as a major player"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active quantum startup and scored; benefits significantly from research as an innovative leader"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction"}}}
{"idx": 326, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Digital Quantum Reservoir Computing for ATM Time Series Prediction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1120)"}
{"idx": 327, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Hybrid quantum-classical physics-informed neural networks for solving nonlinear PDEs: when and where hybridization is effective?", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive research on quantum-enhanced PDE solvers"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 328, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Electron-Ion Path Integral Monte Carlo with Hard Core", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1485)"}
{"idx": 329, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Circuit-Level Noise Estimation via Shuttling in Plaquette Circuits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}}}
{"idx": 330, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Extremely slow scaling of minimal Hamming distance in quantum sampling data", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score for active development."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Active with tighter range, assigned upper bound."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active with wider range, assigned upper bound."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given."}}}}
{"idx": 331, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Probing PbTe-Pb nanowire devices with radio-frequency reflectometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1507)"}
{"idx": 332, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Arbitrary manipulation of nuclear spins in hexagonal boron nitride", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1613)"}
{"idx": 333, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Anisotropic Rabi Model as a Noise Biased Qubit", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact on quantum computing coherence, enhancing IONQ's technology"}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct benefit for Rigetti's quantum processor designs and noise resistance"}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Advances quantum fundamentals, supporting QuTech's research"}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Leverages the model for quantum computing solutions and error correction"}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Improves coherence in quantum sensing for Quantinuum"}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM's logical qubit development, within score range"}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Enhances coherence for Honeywell's quantum systems, within score range"}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem specification"}]}}
{"idx": 334, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Multi-entropy in random tensor networks", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract, for n=2, scores are determined by minimal multiway cuts, so pure-play companies can achieve high scores; assigned 2.0."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON has a narrow range [-0.3, +0.3] and is assigned 0.0 as a neutral value."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "IBM has a narrow range [-0.15, +0.15] and is assigned 0.0 as a neutral value."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 335, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Atom Interferometry with Transverse Optical Modes", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from new quantum simulation methods in atom interferometry."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Advancements in optical modes could enhance quantum computing approaches."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Research may complement quantum memory applications."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Neutral atom technologies could benefit their hardware development."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Broad quantum methods may improve their quantum technology focus."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Established player with smaller score range; some benefit from research but less direct impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Wider score range allows for potential broader impact from new interferometry techniques."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per problem constraints."}}}}
{"idx": 336, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Optimizing the Sensitivity-Noise Trade-off in Non-Hermitian Sensing via Off-Exceptional-Deficiency Operation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 337, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Photon shot-noise-limited Rydberg-EIT electrometry", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "General quantum computing focus; no direct relevance to sensing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "General quantum computing hardware; not specifically sensing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research institute; not specified in sensing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Research center; not specified in sensing"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Specialized in quantum sensing; directly relevant to the research"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Has quantum sensing projects; relevant but broader scope"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Assumed relevant quantum company; sensing relevance inferred"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 338, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Exclusive: Honeywell's Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in US IPO as quantum computing heats up - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Sector heating up"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantinuum IPO and sector heating up"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 339, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantinuum Announces Closing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1272)"}
{"idx": 340, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - Seeking Alpha", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sector news affects pure-play companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sector news affects pure-play companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sector news affects pure-play companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sector news affects pure-play companies."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sector news affects pure-play companies."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative news, but IBM has a limited score range, so minor negative impact."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Sector-wide negative news, HON is affected but less than pure-play companies due to its broader business."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per the scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 341, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-03", "title": "Quantum computing stocks tumble ahead of Quantinuum IPO - MSN", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector."}, "QBTS": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector."}, "QUBT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from the news article affecting the sector."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.1, "reasoning": "Less affected due to broader market presence, but still negative sentiment."}, "HON": {"score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Moderate negative impact from the sector news."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per fixed score."}}}}
{"idx": 342, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Coherent room-temperature dipole synchronization in nanocavity sheets", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High relevance for room-temperature trapped ion synchronization."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Leverages the platform for scalable quantum coherence."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Indirect benefits for quantum networking via synchronization."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Potential for indirect quantum technology applications."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct alignment if involved in quantum dot research."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Broad quantum advancement with limited direct benefit due to cryogenic needs."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "High relevance for room-temperature trapped ion synchronization."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed score as per problem."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed score as per problem."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed score as per problem."}}}}
{"idx": 343, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Enhancement of charge correlations and real-space topological marker on an interacting non-Hermitian Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing research; the interacting non-Hermitian model shows enhancement of interactions, supporting a positive score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing research; the research indicates positive interaction enhancement, justifying a positive score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing research; the findings on interaction enhancement align with positive scoring for this company."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing research; the research demonstrates benefits of interactions, supporting a positive score."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing research; the interacting model's interaction enhancement is relevant, leading to a positive score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Active with a narrower score range; the research shows moderate changes under periodic boundaries, justifying a moderate score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active with a wider range than IBM; the robust topological marker and moderate interaction effects support a moderate score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not actively researching in this area; always scored at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not actively researching in this area; always scored at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not actively researching in this area; always scored at 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 344, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum element-wise transforms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.8, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": -1.5, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-2.0, +2.0]"}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-0.15, +0.15]"}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": -0.2, "reasoning": "Randomly assigned within [-0.3, +0.3]"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per specification"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per specification"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per specification"}]}}
{"idx": 345, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Breakeven demonstration of quantum low-density parity-check codes", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1727)"}
{"idx": 346, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Energy-Modulated Time-Asymmetric Spontaneous Collapse: Forward-Backward Dynamics from Stochastic Ito Reversal and Bright Solitons", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned 1.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned -1.0 within [-2.0, +2.0] range"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned 0.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range"}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned -0.5 within [-2.0, +2.0] range"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned 1.0 within [-2.0, +2.0] range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Scored within [-0.15, +0.15] range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Scored within [-0.3, +0.3] range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 347, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Resource Letter QIE-1: Research in quantum information education", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1659)"}
{"idx": 348, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Nanostructure modelling with early fault tolerant quantum computers", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly related to surface code research; uses ion trap technology."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", "score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Key player in superconducting qubits, aligning with the surface code approach."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No clear relevance to surface code research; likely a research institution."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No clear relevance to surface code research; ambiguous relevance."}, {" ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Focuses on solid-state qubits, not surface code."}, {" ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major leader in surface code quantum computing; benefits from research."}, {" ticker": "HON", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Key player in fault-tolerant quantum computing; benefits from research."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}]}}
{"idx": 349, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Thermal Logic Gates", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum company"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum company"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum company"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum company"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive for pure-play quantum company"}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for HON within range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive for IBM within range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 350, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Nonreversible Gauge Fields in Fokker--Planck Dynamics: Supersymmetric Hamiltonians and Learned Finite Forces", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, assigned maximum score (+2.0) for high resilience and innovation potential."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Within range [-0.15, +0.15], assigned maximum score for moderate stability."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Within range [-0.3, +0.3], assigned maximum score for moderate to high stability."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specified constraints."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specified constraints."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per specified constraints."}}}
{"idx": 351, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Robustness of Entanglement Manipulation for almost i.i.d. sources", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reason": "Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reason": "Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reason": "Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reason": "Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reason": "Pure-play company with robust entanglement manipulation, achieving the maximum score."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reason": "Score constrained to [-0.15, +0.15] and upper bound chosen for best-case scenario under robustness."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reason": "Score constrained to [-0.3, +0.3] and upper bound chosen for best-case scenario under robustness."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the scoring ranges provided."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the scoring ranges provided."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reason": "Fixed at 0.0 as per the scoring ranges provided."}}}}
{"idx": 352, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A framework for low-overhead quantum fault tolerance via spacetime lifting", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1610)"}
{"idx": 353, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A closed system setting for quantum thermalisation in free fermions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed; score within [-0.15, +0.15] range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral, as no Mpemba effect is observed; score within [-0.3, +0.3] range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the problem"}}}
{"idx": 354, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Benchmarking Floquet Master Equations for Periodically Driven Open Quantum Systems", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play company with high potential impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Established player with mid-range impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Major player with mid-range impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Smaller player with mid-range impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in this context"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in this context"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in this context"}}}}
{"idx": 355, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Reliability of asymptotic work extraction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of pure-play range"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of pure-play range"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of pure-play range"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of pure-play range"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of pure-play range"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of IBM range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint of HON range"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 356, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum enhanced rare event discovery and sampling", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High potential for quantum advantage in rare-event discovery via quadratic speedup for heavy-tailed systems."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Leverages quantum speedup for rare events, enhancing efficiency in quantum computing applications."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from quadratic speedup, enabling efficient rare-event sampling in quantum hardware."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Achieves significant quantum scaling for rare events, improving discovery and sampling capabilities."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Optimal quantum scaling for rare events provides a quadratic speedup, maximizing impact in quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Moderate benefit due to existing quantum capabilities, but limited by smaller score range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Gains from polynomial speedup for stationary processes, with moderate benefit in hybrid quantum systems."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No quantum focus; classical company with no benefit from rare-event algorithm."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; no quantum role in rare-event discovery."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; focused on classical computing with no quantum contribution."}}}
{"idx": 357, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Algorithms for Triangle Cut Sparsification", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1501)"}
{"idx": 358, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of collapse models in the strongly non-Gaussian regime", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The abstract describes a model that resolves measurement issues, enhancing quantum computing accuracy for active firms."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The research improves quantum measurement models, benefiting all active companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The abstract's non-Gaussian dynamics and thermodynamic insights positively impact quantum computing systems."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The model's resolution of heating and non-Gaussian scaling benefits QUBT's quantum platforms."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The abstract's findings are applicable to various quantum computing models, including QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "IBM falls within a narrower range, and the research may have moderate impact, but less than pure-play companies."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "HON has a wider range, but the abstract's findings do not specifically target it, resulting in a neutral score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given range."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given range."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given range."}}}}
{"idx": 359, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Multiple Quantum Hypothesis Testing: One-Shot Pairwise Bounds and Sharp Asymptotics", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within pure-play range [-2.0, +2.0]"}, "HON": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within HON range [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.05, "reasoning": "Positive abstract results suggest good performance; within IBM range [-0.15, +0.15]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement"}}}
{"idx": 360, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Semidefinite-programming hierarchies for classically simulable state families", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high advantage"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high advantage"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high advantage"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high advantage"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play, high advantage"}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Narrow range, classical simulability"}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "Narrow range, classical simulability"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 361, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Charge-Conjugation Violation and Population Asymmetry in Bipartite Fermionic Lattices", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Pure-play company associated with research on CCV and population asymmetry"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Large company with stable technology, tighter range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Stable company with range [-0.3, +0.3]"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 362, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Ferroelectric brightening of spin forbidden dark excitons in a WSe2/hybrid perovskite heterostructure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1403)"}
{"idx": 363, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Deployed trusted-node quantum key distribution over 300 km with a multi-core fiber access link", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct involvement in this research."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the context of this research."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from this specific demonstration."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific relevance to the described QKD deployment."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not directly involved in this implementation."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Involved in commercial QKD systems used for the long-distance demonstration, showing potential for industry adoption."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Part of the Swedish national infrastructure hosting the QKD hub, benefiting from the successful integration in a real-world network."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not engaged in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not a quantum computing company; score fixed at 0.0."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Nvidia is a GPU manufacturer, not directly involved in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0."}]}}
{"idx": 364, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum-limited estimation of atmospheric turbulence via spatial mode decomposition", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High score due to innovation in quantum computing applications, as the research demonstrates a quantum advantage in metrology."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company benefiting from quantum metrology advances."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High score for leadership in quantum computing, supported by the paper's demonstration of quantum-enhanced estimation."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High score as Quantinuum is known for quantum sensing, aligning with the application of spatial mode decomposition in metrology."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum computing company with high potential, as the research showcases quantum metrology advancements."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Moderate score within their range due to established position; the research is beneficial but less transformative for a large-scale player."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive score for involvement in quantum metrology, though within a narrower range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in quantum computing; score fixed at 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 365, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Efficient Quantum Circuit Construction of Controlled Time-Evolution for Arbitrary Pauli-Sum Hamiltonians", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1532)"}
{"idx": 366, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Forbidden transitions in superconducting artificial atoms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High relevance to superconducting quantum computing research"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Major player with moderate relevance in this research"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Major player with moderate relevance in this research"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in superconducting quantum computing"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in superconducting quantum computing"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not in superconducting quantum computing"}}}}
{"idx": 367, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Barbell Codes: qLDPC Codes for Superconducting Quantum Hardware", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1590)"}
{"idx": 368, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Polymer quantum mechanics on compact configuration spaces", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IonQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "The research on polymer quantum mechanics is not applicable to IonQ's ion trap technology."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to RGTI's unspecified quantum computing approach."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No clear connection to the research; neutral impact."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific relevance to QUBT's quantum information focus."}, "QNT": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not aligned with QNT's photonics-based quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Relevant to IBM's scalability efforts due to the continuum limit discussion."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing but no direct relevance to this theoretical research."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per instructions."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per instructions."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always scored at 0.0 as per instructions."}}}}
{"idx": 369, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing for accurate large-scale electronic-structure calculations: DFT-embedded, post-processed quantum-selected configuration interaction", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "The method validates IONQ's expertise in quantum chemistry for large-scale systems."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Rigetti's superconducting quantum computing aligns with the method's technical requirements."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantinuum's focus on quantum chemistry is reinforced by the accurate results."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Quantum Machines' approach to scalable quantum algorithms is supported by the framework's success."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Qeva's or Quantum North's contributions to quantum chemistry are indicated by the method's accuracy."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM is a leader in hybrid quantum-classical computing, exemplified by the framework's integration of quantum and classical methods."}, "HON": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Honeywell/Quantinuum's hybrid methods are demonstrated by the accurate, large-scale quantum-classical calculation."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, reflecting its focus on cloud computing rather than core quantum computing."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, with its primary quantum efforts in software rather than hardware."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is always scored 0.0 as per the given ranges, with its GPU focus not directly aligning with this quantum chemistry method."}}}}
{"idx": 370, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Rapid Gaussian Boson Sampling Circuit Screening for GKP States Creation via a Two-Stage Machine Learning Surrogate", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not photonic; ion trap focus is less relevant to photonic GBS"}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not photonic; superconducting focus is less relevant to photonic GBS"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Photonic company; directly relevant to photonic GBS and GKP states"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Photonic company; directly relevant to photonic GBS and GKP states"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Photonic company; directly relevant to photonic GBS and GKP states"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Narrow scoring range; superconducting focus is less relevant to photonic GBS"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Narrow scoring range; ion trap focus is less relevant to photonic GBS"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 371, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Shattering the Symmetry Trap in Fixed-Ansatz VQE: An Accelerated ADAPT-VQE Study of Three Pillar Molecules under Bravyi-Kitaev Mapping", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Active in quantum computing; moderate benefit from the research's success."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Explicitly mentioned in the abstract; potential for adopting the ADAPT-VQE method suggests upper bound score."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Explicitly mentioned in the abstract; research success indicates positive impact, upper bound score."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Categorized as always 0.0; not involved in the described research."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Categorized as always 0.0; not involved in the described research."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Categorized as always 0.0; not involved in the described research."}}}}
{"idx": 372, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Magnetic flux as a quantized Lorentz pseudoscalar and its relation to electric charge quantization", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Based on the abstract's focus on quantization, IONQ is assigned the maximum score of 2.0."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Similarly, RGTI is assigned maximum score due to the abstract's relevance to quantum mechanics."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QBTS is assigned +2.0 as the abstract supports quantization concepts."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QUBT benefits from the quantization focus in the abstract."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QNT is assigned maximum score for its role in quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM has a narrower score range of [-0.15, +0.15], and the abstract's relevance allows it to achieve its maximum of 0.15."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "HON has a range of [-0.3, +0.3], and the abstract supports its relevance, so it gets +0.3."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "MSFT is always 0.0 as per the given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "GOOGL is always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVDA is always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 373, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Double-bracket quantum algorithms for thermal state preparation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 2153)"}
{"idx": 374, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Broadband AC Magnetic Field Sensing via Continuous wave optically detected magnetic resonance with NV Centers in diamond", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Not directly related to quantum sensing; focuses on computing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to NV center sensing"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly benefits from NV center advancements; core to quantum sensing"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Likely Quantinuum; benefits from NV center sensing improvements"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Assumed Quantinuum or similar; gains from enhanced broadband sensing"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Has quantum sensors; may adopt the technology for improved performance"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Honeywell has quantum sensors; potential for integration with NV-based sensing"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0; not directly affected by sensing research"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0; not primarily in quantum sensing"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0; focuses on AI/ML, not sensing"}}}}
{"idx": 375, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Non-equilibrium quantum thermodynamics of a memory-bearing open-system process", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1271)"}
{"idx": 376, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1358)"}
{"idx": 377, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Symmetry-adapted qubit encoding with complete active space and Bravyi--Kitaev mapping for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct involvement in the described quantum chemistry method"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No information or involvement in the method"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not associated with the SAE-CAS and Bravyi-Kitaev approach"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct link to the described research"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Associated with Quantinuum, which has symmetry encodings, but not directly mentioned in the abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Directly involved in Bravyi-Kitaev mapping, a core aspect of the abstract"}, "HON": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Honeywell/Quantinuum has developed symmetry-adapted encodings, relevant to the abstract's focus"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified for these companies"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified for these companies"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as specified for these companies"}}}}
{"idx": 378, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Engineered dissipation for faster adiabatic state preparation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1498)"}
{"idx": 379, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Periodic Symmetry-Adapted Encoding: Qubit Reduction in Crystalline Electronic Structure", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive impact of symmetry-based qubit reduction research"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Advancement in quantum simulation methods"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Benefits from reduced qubit requirements"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Enhanced capabilities for quantum materials simulation"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Research supports quantum computing for materials science"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major quantum computing hardware provider with narrow score range"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Broad range and significant role in quantum computing"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per specification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per specification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 per specification"}}}}
{"idx": 380, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Tight relation between the physical effects of a quantum measurement and the information gained about an observable", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Enhanced understanding of quantum measurement dynamics benefits core quantum technologies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Research provides insights relevant to cloud-based quantum computing approaches."}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Strong measurement theory in NMR-based quantum computing is directly addressed."}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Leverages superposition principles for quantum information gain, aligning with the abstract."}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Focus on measurement in quantum simulation benefits from the trade-off analysis."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Large-scale player benefits moderately due to measurement research, but smaller range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active quantum player, but smaller impact due to broader business scope."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per instruction."}}}}
{"idx": 381, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Optimal convex approximation of quantum channels based on $\u03b1$-affinity", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}}
{"idx": 382, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Symmetries and overparametrization properties of Hamiltonian variational ansatzes for the $(1+1)$d $\\mathbb{Z}_2$ lattice gauge theory", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 1 column 2 (char 1)"}
{"idx": 383, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Information-Geometric Bound on the Robustness of Entanglement Generation", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play active in entanglement generation, high QFI implied"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Major player in quantum computing, active in entanglement generation, but not pure-play; moderate QFI implied"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Active and scored, involved in entanglement generation, but less prominent; lower QFI implied"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in entanglement generation, score fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in entanglement generation, score fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not active in entanglement generation, score fixed at 0.0"}}}
{"idx": 384, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Learning Hamiltonians at Long Times", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company, high contribution"}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company, high contribution"}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company, high contribution"}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company, high contribution"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play quantum company, high contribution"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantum company with diversified business, moderate contribution"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Large company with quantum division, limited contribution"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not primarily a quantum computing company"}}}
{"idx": 385, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Gauging the Spacetime Code", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "High score due to prominence in ion trap quantum computing, which aligns with fault tolerance concepts in the abstract."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Low score reflects RGTI's cloud-based approach, which is less emphasized in the abstract's fault tolerance focus."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Moderate score for Quantinuum's work in quantum state characterization, which relates to fault tolerance."}, "QUBT": {"score": -0.5, "reasoning": "Low score due to less direct relevance to the spacetime code's applications, despite being active."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Neutral score as QNT's contributions are not explicitly tied to the abstract's topics."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint score within range, as Honeywell's role in quantum computing is not highlighted in the abstract."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Midpoint score within range; IBM is a key player in fault tolerance, but the abstract's focus is on theoretical foundations."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Microsoft's contributions are not directly addressed in the abstract."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Google's work on quantum supremacy is not covered in the abstract."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per rules; Nvidia's quantum research is outside the scope of the abstract."}}}
{"idx": 386, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Decoder-Consistent Hamiltonians for POVM-Based Quantum Relaxations", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (Pure-play, range [-2.0, +2.0]), no information from abstract"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (range [-0.15, +0.15]), no information from abstract"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Default score based on company type (range [-0.3, +0.3]), no information from abstract"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per given information"}}}}
{"idx": 387, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Radar Cross Section with two-photon entangled states", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High potential in quantum computing, and the abstract emphasizes entanglement enhancement for QRCS."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "High potential in quantum computing, and the abstract emphasizes entanglement enhancement for QRCS."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Research-oriented with high potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "University-based research with high potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Commercial quantum sensors with high QRCS potential, aligning with the abstract's focus on entanglement enhancement."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Large company with a narrower score range; assigned upper bound due to established position, though abstract does not specify enhancement for such entities."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Smaller player with a wider score range; assigned upper bound of 0.3, reflecting potential but within constraints."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in quantum computing for this context; always scored 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in quantum computing for this context; always scored 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not considered active in quantum computing for this context; always scored 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 388, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "A Class of Multipartite Entangled States Based on State Transitions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Active quantum company, mid-range score due to research impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Major player with tight range, mid-range score due to high applicability"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Active company with tighter range, mid-range score due to research relevance"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 389, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Thermalization with Gaussian Quantum Cellular Automata", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{"ticker": "IONQ", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "The abstract guarantees thermalization under certain conditions, benefiting pure-play quantum companies like IONQ."}, {"ticker": "RGTI", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "As a pure-play quantum company, RGTI benefits from the theoretical advancements in thermalization with GQCAs."}, {"ticker": "QBTS", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QBTS, a pure-play quantum company, gains from the abstract's positive impact on quantum computing thermalization."}, {"ticker": "QUBT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QUBT benefits significantly from the abstract, which supports its quantum computing efforts."}, {"ticker": "QNT", "score": 2.0, "reasoning": "QNT, a pure-play quantum company, gains from the theoretical result on thermalization in GQCAs."}, {"ticker": "IBM", "score": 0.15, "reasoning": "IBM benefits from the abstract as a major quantum player, but the score is capped at the upper limit of its range."}, {"ticker": "HON", "score": 0.3, "reasoning": "HON, an active quantum company, gains from the abstract, but the score is capped at the upper limit of its range."}, {"ticker": "MSFT", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Microsoft is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract."}, {"ticker": "GOOGL", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Google is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract."}, {"ticker": "NVDA", "score": 0.0, "reasoning": "NVIDIA is not primarily a quantum computing company, so it is unaffected by the abstract."}]}}
{"idx": 390, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "On the Cryptographic Structure Required for Verifying Qubits", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Leadership in verification technologies"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Involved in verification protocols"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Academic research focus"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.5, "reasoning": "Research-oriented contributions"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Commercial verification applications"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Established quantum program with less verification focus"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Quantum processor developer with broader business"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not focused on quantum verification"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not focused on quantum verification"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not focused on quantum verification"}}}
{"idx": 391, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "DAST: A VLM-LLM Framework for Cross-Interface Anomaly Detection in O-RAN", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned in the abstract."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per problem statement."}}}}
{"idx": 392, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Space-CIM: Enabling Compute-In-Memory Accelerators for Thermally-Constrained Space Platforms", "source": "arxiv", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.8, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high innovation potential, aligns with advancements in quantum computing"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.6, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high innovation potential, focuses on quantum hardware"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.4, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high innovation potential, involved in quantum computing research"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.2, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high innovation potential, develops quantum processors"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Pure-play with high innovation potential, leader in quantum computing"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Narrow score range; moderate performance; traditional approach may face thermal challenges in space"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "Moderate score within range; involved in quantum computing, but less focus on thermal innovations"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a quantum computing company, excluded from scoring"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a quantum computing company, excluded from scoring"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0; not a quantum computing company, excluded from scoring"}}}}
{"idx": 393, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "FQA: A Full-Space Quantization-Driven Architecture for Hardware-Efficient Piecewise Approximation of Nonlinear Activation Functions", "source": "arxiv", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1198)"}
{"idx": 394, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "IonQ is the First Pure-Play Quantum Computing Company To Generate Over $100 Million in Revenue. Is the Stock Headed to $100? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive news for IonQ regarding revenue milestone and stock potential."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "QNT": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "IBM": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "HON": {"score": 0, "reasoning": "No direct mention in the article."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 395, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 13 column 3 (char 1136)"}
{"idx": 396, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Should You Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock While It's Under $35? - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"scores": {"IONQ": 0.0, "RGTI": 0.0, "QBTS": 0.0, "QUBT": 0.0, "QNT": 0.0, "IBM": 0.0, "HON": 0.0, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The news about D-Wave Quantum stock is not relevant to the given quantum computing universe, as D-Wave is not one of the 10 tickers. Therefore, no change in scores, all remain at neutral 0.0."}}
{"idx": 397, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum closes flat in Nasdaq debut, after upsized offering - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "News: closed flat after upsized offering, resulting in neutral score"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No news impact"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 398, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MarketWatch", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive news due to successful IPO, indicating strong market confidence and increased credibility for quantum computing."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0."}}}}
{"idx": 399, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum Stocks: New IPO Quantinuum Volatile In First Trading Day - Investor's Business Daily", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 2 column 1 (char 2)"}
{"idx": 400, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum to Debut on Nasdaq After Raising $1.68 Billion in IPO - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment due to QNT's IPO success"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment due to QNT's IPO success"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment due to QNT's IPO success"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.5, "reasoning": "Positive sector sentiment due to QNT's IPO success"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Direct positive impact from IPO and Nasdaq debut"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact; limited quantum relevance"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Limited relevance to the news; not directly affected"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 401, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum Announces Pricing of Upsized Initial Public Offering - Quantinuum", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Positive due to successful IPO announcement"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, neutral"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 402, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Honeywell's Quantinuum valued at $17.6 billion as shares rise in Nasdaq debut - Reuters", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1150)"}
{"idx": 403, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing\u2019s biggest IPO arrives with a fizzle, not a pop - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from IPO fizzle, as IONQ is the likely subject of the event."}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific event mentioned for RGTI."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific event mentioned for QBTS."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific event mentioned for QUBT."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific event mentioned for QNT."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific impact from the news, within its range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific impact from the news, within its range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the rules."}}}}
{"idx": 404, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum IPO: QNT stock is listing on the Nasdaq today in a closely watched quantum computing debut - Fast Company", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Positive event for IPO in quantum computing, max score for pure-play"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention, no change"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 405, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum IPO Lifts Quantum Computing Stocks - Gotrade", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1683)"}
{"idx": 406, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Honeywell\u2019s quantum company goes public. What investors should know about the IPO - CNBC", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No impact from news, score remains 0.0"}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Positive impact from IPO announcement, score increased to 0.3"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, score always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 407, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "QNT Stock Debuts Today After 20x-Oversubscribed IPO: New Quantum Play Grabs Investor Attention Amid Trump Pump - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting property name enclosed in double quotes: line 2 column 1 (char 2)"}
{"idx": 408, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantinuum raises $1.68 billion in IPO that seeks to give quantum computing more street cred - MSN", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1274)"}
{"idx": 409, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-04", "title": "Quantum computing\u2019s biggest IPO arrives with a sizzle, not a pop - Yahoo! Finance Canada", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "RGTI": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "QBTS": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "QUBT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "QNT": {"score": 1.0, "reasoning": "Moderate positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.1, "reasoning": "Cautious positive due to IPO sizzle"}, "HON": {"score": 0.2, "reasoning": "IPO company, sizzle not pop, moderate positive"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 410, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why Rigetti Computing Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "The news reports a stock crash for RGTI, indicating a negative impact."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI. IBM has a narrow score range but no impact."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct impact from the news, which is specific to RGTI. HON has a narrow score range but no impact."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per the given information."}}}
{"idx": 411, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - Yahoo Finance", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"IONQ": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range."}, "RGTI": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range."}, "QBTS": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range."}, "QUBT": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range."}, "QNT": {"score": -2.0, "reasoning": "Negative sentiment from D-Wave crash, assigned lower end of range."}, "IBM": {"score": -0.15, "reasoning": "Less affected due to larger market presence, assigned lower end of narrow range."}, "HON": {"score": -0.3, "reasoning": "More affected than IBM due to higher risk profile, assigned lower end of range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not a quantum computing company, always 0.0."}}}
{"idx": 412, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Why D-Wave Quantum Stock Just Crashed - The Motley Fool", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"scores": {"IONQ": -2.0, "RGTI": -2.0, "QBTS": -2.0, "QUBT": -2.0, "QNT": -2.0, "IBM": -0.15, "HON": -0.3, "MSFT": 0.0, "GOOGL": 0.0, "NVDA": 0.0}, "reasoning": "The negative news about D-Wave's quantum stock crash reflects bearish sentiment for the quantum computing sector. All variable-score quantum companies are assigned negative scores: pure-play companies (IONQ, RGTI, QBTS, QUBT, QNT) receive -2.0 (minimum), HON receives -0.3 (minimum), and IBM receives -0.15 (minimum). MSFT, GOOGL, and NVDA are always 0.0."}}
{"idx": 413, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum Stock Closes Below Its Offer Price. Why the Buzzy Quantum IPO Is Faltering. - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 978)"}
{"idx": 414, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum and Mitsubishi Electric Sign Quantum Computing MOU - The Quantum Insider", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "No direct mention in the news"}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "No direct mention in the news"}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "No direct mention in the news"}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "No direct mention in the news"}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": 1.0, " reasoning": "Partnership with Mitsubishi Electric in the news"}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Active company not mentioned in the news"}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": 0.2, " reasoning": "Partnership with Quantinuum in the news"}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Always 0.0"}]}}
{"idx": 415, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantinuum Stock Falls After Uninspiring Quantum IPO Debut. What Went Wrong? - Barron's", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": [{" ticker": "IONQ", " score": -1.0, " reasoning": "Sector sentiment negatively affected by Quantinuum's poor IPO debut, leading to a moderately negative score."}, {" ticker": "RGTI", " score": -1.0, " reasoning": "Sector sentiment negatively affected by Quantinuum's poor IPO debut, leading to a moderately negative score."}, {" ticker": "QBTS", " score": -1.0, " reasoning": "Sector sentiment negatively affected by Quantinuum's poor IPO debut, leading to a moderately negative score."}, {" ticker": "QUBT", " score": -1.0, " reasoning": "Sector sentiment negatively affected by Quantinuum's poor IPO debut, leading to a moderately negative score."}, {" ticker": "QNT", " score": -1.5, " reasoning": "Directly impacted by negative stock performance and uninspiring IPO debut, resulting in a low score."}, {" ticker": "IBM", " score": -0.1, " reasoning": "Less directly affected due to diversified business, but minor negative sentiment from sector news, so slightly negative score."}, {" ticker": "HON", " score": -0.2, " reasoning": "Quantum company with wider range, moderately negative score influenced by sector concerns."}, {" ticker": "MSFT", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Not focused on quantum computing, so unaffected by the news."}, {" ticker": "GOOGL", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Not focused on quantum computing, so unaffected by the news."}, {" ticker": "NVDA", " score": 0.0, " reasoning": "Not focused on quantum computing, so unaffected by the news."}]}}
{"idx": 416, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "Quantum computer maker Quantinuum closes flat after $1.68B IPO - SiliconANGLE", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Closed flat, no gain or loss"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No significant impact from the news"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 417, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-05", "title": "IPO News - US IPO Weekly Recap: Billion-dollar engine and quantum computing IPOs come to market as SpaceX launches historic IPO - renaissancecapital.com", "source": "news", "status": "error", "error": "Expecting ',' delimiter: line 53 column 1 (char 1295)"}
{"idx": 418, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "Rigetti Stock: The Rise and Fall of a Quantum Computing Company - TradingKey", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned."}, "RGTI": {"score": -1.0, "reasoning": "News indicates Rigetti stock volatility and decline."}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned."}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned."}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned, assigned midpoint of range."}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No specific news mentioned, assigned midpoint of range."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0 as per scoring rules."}}}}
{"idx": 419, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "Introducing Microsoft Majorana 2 - Microsoft Source", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance to Microsoft's development"}, "RGTI": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Not mentioned; no direct impact"}, "QBTS": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct relevance"}, "QUBT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Part of Rigetti; no direct impact"}, "QNT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Different quantum approach; no direct impact"}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Positive impact due to partnership with Microsoft"}, "HON": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "No direct mention; general sector sentiment possible but not specified"}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Always 0.0"}}}}
{"idx": 420, "skip": false, "date": "2026-06-06", "title": "The Next Quantum Computing IPO CEO Just Told CNBC 'It Is Not 10 to 15 Years Out. It's Very Much Now' - 24/7 Wall St.", "source": "news", "status": "success", "signal": {"signal_vector": {"IONQ": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies."}, "RGTI": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies."}, "QBTS": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies."}, "QUBT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies."}, "QNT": {"score": 2.0, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting pure-play companies."}, "IBM": {"score": 0.15, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting IBM's quantum division."}, "HON": {"score": 0.3, "reasoning": "Strong positive sentiment from news indicates imminent quantum advancements, benefiting HON's quantum initiatives."}, "MSFT": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "GOOGL": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges."}, "NVDA": {"score": 0.0, "reasoning": "Fixed at 0.0 as per given ranges."}}}}