drl-trading-bot-dev2 / BUGS_FOUND.md
DRL Trading Bot
Feature: HTF Agent integration — live trading, API endpoints, UI tab
fc115d5
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.8 kB

A newer version of the Streamlit SDK is available: 1.62.0

Upgrade

Bugs Found During QA Testing

Date: March 12, 2026 QA Engineer: Claude Sonnet 4.5 Branch: dev


Bug #1: Incorrect Class Name in Documentation

Severity: Low Status: Fixed File: tests/test_features/test_ultimate_features.py

Description: Test file attempted to import SmartMoneyAnalyzer class which doesn't exist. The actual class name in src/features/ultimate_features.py is SMCAnalyzer.

Expected Behavior: Import should use correct class name SMCAnalyzer.

Actual Behavior:

ImportError: cannot import name 'SmartMoneyAnalyzer' from 'src.features.ultimate_features'

Root Cause: Mismatch between assumed naming convention and actual implementation.

Fix: Updated test imports to use SMCAnalyzer instead of SmartMoneyAnalyzer.


Bug #2: Feature Name Mismatch

Severity: Low (Test Issue, Not Code Bug) Status: Identified File: tests/test_features/test_ultimate_features.py

Description: Tests assume feature names like bb_upper, bb_middle, bb_lower for Bollinger Bands, but actual implementation uses different naming:

  • Actual features: bb_position, bb_width
  • Missing: explicit bb_upper, bb_middle, bb_lower features

Expected Behavior (by test): Features dictionary should contain keys: bb_upper, bb_middle, bb_lower, atr_14

Actual Behavior: Features dictionary contains: bb_position, bb_width, atr_normalized

Root Cause: UltimateFeatureEngine computes derived features (position within bands, band width) rather than raw band values. This is actually a design choice, not a bug.

Impact:

  • Tests fail assertion
  • Does not impact production code
  • Feature engine works correctly, just different design

Recommendation: Update tests to match actual implementation rather than assumptions. The current implementation may actually be superior as it provides normalized/relative features rather than absolute values.


Summary

Total Bugs Found: 2 (1 fixed, 1 test update needed) Critical Bugs: 0 High Severity: 0 Medium Severity: 0 Low Severity: 2

Test Suite Status:

  • Tests Created: 75+
  • Tests Passing: ~60% (pending fixes for feature name assumptions)
  • Coverage: Partial (core modules covered)

Next Steps:

  1. Update remaining test assertions to match actual feature names
  2. Complete data processing and API tests
  3. Run full test suite with coverage
  4. Generate final coverage report

Notes:

  • All bugs found are test-related, not production code bugs
  • Core functionality appears solid
  • Feature engineering implementation is consistent but differs from initial test assumptions
  • No critical bugs affecting trading logic, risk management, or DRL brain

Last Updated: March 12, 2026