AuctionRouter / AuctionRouter_PRD.md
dakshtaneja's picture
AuctionRouter: cost-aware multi-agent LLM router with auction-based selection and verification-gated escalation
6b3d40b
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.4 kB
# Product Requirements Document (PRD)
# AuctionRouter: Cost-Aware Multi-Agent LLM Orchestrator inspired by https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.09600
## 1. Overview
AuctionRouter is a multi-agent AI system that minimizes inference cost while maintaining answer quality by routing requests through a hierarchy of language models.
Instead of sending every request to an expensive frontier model, the system:
1. Uses multiple low-cost models to evaluate a task.
2. Runs an auction-based selection process.
3. Generates an answer using the selected low-cost model.
4. Uses a verifier model to evaluate answer quality.
5. Escalates to a frontier model only when confidence is insufficient or verification fails.
The goal is to achieve:
- 60-80% lower inference cost
- Lower latency
- Comparable answer quality to frontier-only systems
---
## 2. Problem Statement
### Pattern A
User β†’ GPT-5
**Pros**
- High quality
**Cons**
- Expensive
- Slow
### Pattern B
User β†’ Cheap Model
**Pros**
- Fast
- Cheap
**Cons**
- Lower quality
- Hallucinations
The ideal system should:
- Use cheap models whenever possible
- Detect when cheap models are insufficient
- Escalate only when necessary
---
## 3. Goals
### Primary Goals
- Reduce average cost per query
- Maintain answer quality
- Demonstrate agent orchestration
- Visualize model routing decisions
### Secondary Goals
- Collect model performance data
- Compare models over time
- Provide explainable routing
---
## 4. User Personas
### AI Engineer
Wants to understand model routing and optimization.
### Recruiter
Wants to see practical multi-agent engineering.
### Developer
Wants cheaper inference than GPT-only solutions.
---
## 5. System Architecture
```text
User Query
β”‚
β–Ό
Query Analyzer
β”‚
β–Ό
Auction Manager
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό
Gemini DeepSeek Qwen
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
β–Ό
Bid Aggregation
β–Ό
Winner Model
β–Ό
Draft Answer
β–Ό
Verifier Agent
β”‚ β”‚
Pass Fail
β”‚ β”‚
Return Escalate
β–Ό
GPT-5 / Claude
β–Ό
Final Answer
```
---
## 6. Models
### Tier 1 (Open and Free Models)
- Gemini Flash
- DeepSeek
- Qwen
Responsibilities:
- Bid on tasks
- Generate low-cost answers
### Tier 2 (Frontier Models)
- GPT-5
- Claude Sonnet
Responsibilities:
- Complex reasoning
- Escalated requests
### Verifier Model (bigger but free model)
Responsibilities:
- Evaluate correctness
- Evaluate completeness
- Detect hallucinations
- Decide whether escalation is required
Potential choices:
- Gemini Flash
- GPT-5 Nano
- Qwen-based verifier
---
## 7. Auction Mechanism
Each cheap model receives the user query and returns:
```json
{
"confidence": 0.87,
"estimated_difficulty": 0.65,
"reason": "Strong at coding tasks"
}
```
### Auction Score
```text
Auction Score =
0.7 Γ— Confidence
+ 0.2 Γ— Historical Accuracy
- 0.1 Γ— Cost
```
The model with the highest score generates the draft answer.
---
## 8. Verification System
After answer generation, the verifier receives:
- Original question
- Generated answer
The verifier evaluates:
1. Correctness
2. Completeness
3. Reasoning quality
4. Hallucination risk
Returns:
```json
{
"score": 0.84,
"pass": true,
"feedback": "Answer appears correct."
}
```
### Verification Threshold
```text
score >= 0.80
```
If the answer fails verification, the request is escalated.
---
## 9. Escalation Logic
### Condition 1
Low auction confidence:
```text
max_confidence < 0.75
```
### Condition 2
Verifier failure:
```text
verification_score < 0.80
```
### Condition 3
Strong model disagreement:
```text
Gemini = 0.90
DeepSeek = 0.41
Qwen = 0.37
```
High variance triggers escalation.
---
## 10. Frontend
### Chat Interface
Simple chat experience for submitting queries.
### Auction Visualization
Display:
- Model confidence
- Bid score
- Cost estimate
- Winner selection
### Verification Panel
Display:
- Verification score
- Pass / Fail status
- Escalation reason
### Routing Graph
Visualize the path:
```text
Query
↓
Auction
↓
Winner
↓
Verifier
↓
Response
```
or
```text
Query
↓
Auction
↓
Winner
↓
Verifier
↓
GPT-5 / Claude
↓
Response
```
---
## 11. Metrics Dashboard
Track:
### Cost Metrics
- Average cost per query
- Total cost saved
### Latency Metrics
- Average response time
### Escalation Metrics
- Escalation percentage
- Tier-1 resolution rate
### Model Metrics
- Gemini wins
- DeepSeek wins
- Qwen wins
---
## 12. Tech Stack
### Frontend
- Next.js
- React
- Tailwind
- shadcn/ui
- React Flow
### Backend
- FastAPI
- LangGraph
### Model Access
- OpenRouter
### Database
-Mongo
### Observability
- LangSmith
### Deployment (done after testing locally)
- Vercel
---
## 13. Success Metrics
Target outcomes:
- Tier-1 Resolution Rate > 70%
- Cost Reduction > 60%
- Latency Reduction > 30%
- Escalation Rate < 30%
---
## 14. Resume Value
This project demonstrates:
- Multi-agent systems
- Agent orchestration
- LLM routing
- Model evaluation
- Cost optimization
- Verification loops
- LangGraph workflows
- Production AI architecture
### Project Title
**AuctionRouter: A Cost-Aware Multi-Agent LLM Routing System with Verification-Based Escalation**