title: sysadmin env
colorFrom: blue
colorTo: green
sdk: docker
app_port: 8000
tags:
- openenv
base_path: /web
sysadmin-env
sysadmin-env is an openenv-style benchmark environment for openenv round 1: an agent connects to a live linux-like runtime, inspects a broken machine, issues one shell command at a time, receives stepwise observations and shaped rewards, and is judged on whether it restores the service safely and efficiently.
this repository is intentionally built around the round 1 submission contract:
- a docker-deployable server with
/health,/reset,/step,/state,/tasks, and/ws - a baseline agent entrypoint at
inference.py - deterministic task definitions and graders under
sysadmin_env/tasks/ - structured reward shaping in
sysadmin_env/rewards.py - openenv packaging shims at the repository root such as
client.py,models.py, and__init__.py - deployment metadata in
openenv.yaml,Dockerfile,server/Dockerfile, andpyproject.toml
the benchmark focuses on linux remediation rather than toy puzzle solving. the agent is not selecting from a fixed action list: it must decide which shell command to run, interpret command output, repair the underlying fault, and stop before wasting steps.
table of contents
- why linux remediation is a meaningful benchmark
- round 1 requirement mapping
- high-level architecture
- repository layout and file roles
- runtime model actions observations state and episode boundaries
- api reference
- sandbox and filesystem model
- task suite
- reward and scoring system
- local setup
- running the server locally
- inference usage
- baseline behavior and current observations
- validation flow
- docker and deployment flow
- mathematical summary of each task’s total raw return
- limitations and portability notes
- practical quickstart
why linux remediation is a meaningful benchmark
linux incident response is one of the few domains where agentic reasoning is both measurable and genuinely useful.
real operators routinely need to:
- inspect logs and process state
- debug a service that no longer starts
- find why a filesystem is full
- repair routes or dns inside a constrained runtime
- avoid dangerous commands while working under time pressure
that makes remediation a strong benchmark for agent systems:
- the action space is realistic. the agent must generate shell commands, not pick from synthetic labels.
- observations are partially revealing. one command rarely solves the task; diagnosis matters.
- there is a safety dimension. destructive commands should be heavily penalized.
- partial progress is meaningful. fixing one component of a broken system should be worth something even before full recovery.
- success is operationally grounded. the grader checks system state, not just text output matching.
for round 1, this repository therefore benchmarks the full remediation loop: diagnose, repair, validate, and finish.
round 1 requirement mapping
the table below maps the repository to the practical requirements of the round 1 problem statement.
| round 1 concern | implementation in this repository |
|---|---|
| deployable environment server | FastAPI app in sysadmin_env/server.py, cli wrapper in server/app.py, docker entrypoints in Dockerfile and server/Dockerfile |
| standard episode api | POST /reset, POST /step, GET /state, GET /health, GET /tasks, WS /ws |
| deterministic tasks | three fixed task modules in sysadmin_env/tasks/nginx_crash.py, sysadmin_env/tasks/disk_full.py, and sysadmin_env/tasks/network_broken.py |
| real command execution | bubblewrap-based sandbox in sysadmin_env/sandbox.py with mutable task state layered over prepared filesystems |
| reward shaping | RewardEngine in sysadmin_env/rewards.py combines health deltas, one-time diagnostic rewards, and penalties |
| agent entrypoint | inference.py loads env vars, queries /tasks, connects to /ws, emits [START], [STEP], and [END] logs |
| packaging for openenv | root shim files client.py, models.py, __init__.py, plus openenv.yaml and mirrored docker assets |
| validation path | openenv validate, docker build, http health/reset probes, and scripts/validate-submission.sh (taken direclty from meta scaler website) |
high-level architecture
at runtime the system looks like this:
- the server builds a task registry from
sysadmin_env/tasks/. - a client resets an episode by task id or lets the server choose the next task in round-robin order.
- the selected task prepares a deterministic lower filesystem.
Sandboxcreates an isolated execution root usingOverlayFSManager.- the client sends a shell command.
- the sandbox runs that command via
bwrapunder/bin/sh -c .... - the task module updates any derived runtime state via
observe_command()andsynchronize(). RewardEnginegrades the resulting filesystem state and computes the per-step reward.- the server returns an
ObservationandEnvironmentState.
that design splits the benchmark into clear responsibilities:
sysadmin_env/tasks/*.py: deterministic problem definitions and grading rulessysadmin_env/sandbox.py: command execution and runtime isolationsysadmin_env/overlayfs.py: resettable mutable filesystem layersysadmin_env/rewards.py: task-agnostic reward shaping and catastrophic command handlingsysadmin_env/server.py: http api, websocket flow, episode lifecycle, and web shim routesinference.py: baseline agent and score logging
repository layout and file roles
the repository keeps the implementation under sysadmin_env/ and exposes a few required root-level shims for packaging workflows.
.
├── .env.example
├── README.md
├── messing-around-with-playbooks.md
├── __init__.py
├── client.py
├── Dockerfile
├── inference.py
├── models.py
├── openenv.yaml
├── pyproject.toml
├── requirements.txt
├── outputs/
│ └── output-*.txt
├── scripts/
│ └── validate-submission.sh
├── server/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── app.py
│ └── Dockerfile
└── sysadmin_env/
├── __init__.py
├── models.py
├── overlayfs.py
├── rewards.py
├── sandbox.py
├── server.py
└── tasks/
├── __init__.py
├── disk_full.py
├── network_broken.py
└── nginx_crash.py
core package files under sysadmin_env/
sysadmin_env/server.py— main environment implementation. it definesEpisodeManager, http routes, websocket handling, per-step observation building, and the lightweight/web*shim endpoints.sysadmin_env/sandbox.py— the execution sandbox. it usesbubblewrap(bwrap) to run commands in an isolated root, binds selected host binaries read-only, optionally unshares networking, and tracks command results.sysadmin_env/overlayfs.py— mutable episode filesystem manager. it tries kernel overlayfs first, thenfuse-overlayfs, then falls back to a plain directory copy strategy when overlay mounts are unavailable.sysadmin_env/rewards.py— reward shaping engine shared across tasks. it applies per-step penalties, one-time diagnostic bonuses, health deltas from task graders, and catastrophic command penalties.sysadmin_env/models.py— pydantic models for actions, observations, state, reset/step payloads, reward signals, task metadata, and grader state.sysadmin_env/tasks/__init__.py— task registry assembly and module lookup.sysadmin_env/tasks/nginx_crash.py— easy service-recovery task.sysadmin_env/tasks/disk_full.py— medium disk-diagnosis/remediation task.sysadmin_env/tasks/network_broken.py— hard routing-and-dns task with network isolation enabled.
root shims and openenv-facing files
client.py— thin root shim that re-exportsmainfrominference.py. this keeps the repository shape friendly to packaging and submission tooling.models.py— thin root shim that re-exports the canonical pydantic models fromsysadmin_env.models.__init__.py— root package shim that re-exportsmain,Action,Observation, andEnvironmentState.inference.py— the baseline agent used as the submission entrypoint declared inopenenv.yaml.README.md— primary repository documentation covering architecture, tasks, reward shaping, setup, validation, and the current baseline behavior..env.example— sample environment-variable file for local configuration.messing-around-with-playbooks.md— change log for the recent baseline prompt andnetwork_brokenguardrail adjustments, including observed local run results.outputs/— local captured baseline run logs used while tuning and validating the inference behavior.
deployment, packaging, and validation files
Dockerfile— primary container build for local docker runs and hugging face docker spaces.server/Dockerfile— mirrored server build asset kept alongsideserver/app.pyfor openenv repository structure checks.server/app.py— asgi/cli launcher that importsappfromsysadmin_env.serverand exposes theserverconsole script.openenv.yaml— openenv manifest: runtime entrypoints, endpoints, resources, and task metadata.pyproject.toml— canonical packaging metadata, dependencies, python version bounds, and theserver = "server.app:main"console script.requirements.txt— mirrored runtime dependency list.scripts/validate-submission.sh— local pre-submission validator that checks the live space, docker buildability, andopenenv validate.
runtime model: actions, observations, state, and episode boundaries
the environment is turn-based. every turn consists of one shell command.
action model
the canonical action model is defined in sysadmin_env/models.py:
{
"command": "string, min length 1",
"reasoning": "string or null"
}
commandis the single shell command executed with/bin/sh -cinside the sandbox.reasoningis optional metadata for clients and logs. the server does not grade it.
for the http step route, the action is wrapped inside StepRequest:
{
"action": {
"command": "echo hello",
"reasoning": null
}
}
observation model
each step returns an Observation:
{
"stdout": "string",
"stderr": "string",
"exit_code": 0,
"working_directory": "/",
"execution_time": 0.01,
"reward": 0.0,
"done": false,
"step_number": 1,
"max_steps": 40
}
important details:
rewardis the reward for that step only, not a cumulative return.donebecomestruewhen the task grader declares success, a catastrophic action is detected, or the episode hitsmax_steps.working_directoryis/from the sandbox’s point of view.- if a command times out, the server appends
command execution timed outtostderr.
state model
GET /state returns EnvironmentState:
{
"episode_id": "string",
"task_id": "nginx_crash",
"step_count": 1,
"max_steps": 40,
"done": false,
"reward": 0.0
}
again, reward here is the last step reward, mirroring the latest observation.
reset and task selection
POST /reset optionally accepts a task_id:
{
"task_id": "disk_full"
}
if task_id is omitted, EpisodeManager selects the next task in round-robin registry order. in this repository that order is the registry insertion order:
nginx_crashdisk_fullnetwork_broken
episode boundaries
for an episode with step index t, the server marks the observation done when:
- the task grader returns
done = true, or - the reward engine flags the action as catastrophic, or
t >= max_steps
on the http path, when an episode ends the current sandbox is cleaned up immediately. the last state remains queryable through GET /state, but another POST /step requires a new POST /reset.
api reference
http routes
GET /health
health probe for validators and deployment smoke tests.
{"status": "ok"}
GET /tasks
returns the available task metadata that clients can iterate over.
{
"tasks": [
{
"task_id": "nginx_crash",
"difficulty": "easy",
"description": "nginx crashed with stale pid and config syntax error",
"max_steps": 40,
"time_limit": 300.0
}
]
}
POST /reset
starts a new episode and returns a StepResult consisting of:
- an initial zero-reward observation at
step_number = 0 - the environment state with a fresh
episode_id
POST /step
executes one action inside the active episode sandbox and returns:
{
"observation": {
"stdout": "...",
"stderr": "...",
"exit_code": 0,
"working_directory": "/",
"execution_time": 0.02,
"reward": 0.07,
"done": false,
"step_number": 1,
"max_steps": 40
},
"state": {
"episode_id": "...",
"task_id": "nginx_crash",
"step_count": 1,
"max_steps": 40,
"done": false,
"reward": 0.07
}
}
if no episode has been initialized, the route returns http 409.
GET /state
returns the latest EnvironmentState. if no episode has been initialized yet, the route returns http 404.
websocket flow: WS /ws
the websocket route is the main agent interface used by inference.py.
connection behavior:
- connect to
/wsor/ws?task_id=<task>. - the server immediately starts an episode.
- the first message is:
{
"type": "episode_started",
"task": {
"task_id": "network_broken",
"difficulty": "hard",
"description": "broken network namespace with corrupted routing and dns",
"max_steps": 70,
"time_limit": 480.0
}
}
- the client sends raw
Actionjson, not aStepRequestwrapper:
{
"command": "ip route show",
"reasoning": "inspect the default route"
}
- the server replies with observation messages:
{
"type": "observation",
"task_id": "network_broken",
"observation": {
"stdout": "default via 192.0.2.1 dev eth9\n",
"stderr": "",
"exit_code": 0,
"working_directory": "/",
"execution_time": 0.01,
"reward": 0.06,
"done": false,
"step_number": 1,
"max_steps": 70
}
}
malformed or empty actions yield error messages such as:
{
"type": "error",
"code": "invalid_action",
"message": "malformed action json"
}
once done becomes true, the server cleans up the sandbox and closes the episode loop for that websocket connection.
web shim routes
the server also exposes lightweight web shim routes intended for space uis and openenv web probing:
GET /webGET /web/metadataPOST /web/resetPOST /web/stepGET /web/state
these routes do not replace the canonical http api; they wrap it.
useful details:
GET /web/metadatareturns the benchmark name, a short description, a/docsurl, and the contents ofREADME.md.POST /web/resetreturns a json object with top-levelobservation,reward,done, andstatefields.POST /web/stepaccepts either:{"action": {"command": "...", "reasoning": null}}, or{"command": "...", "reasoning": null}
GET /web/statereturns aninitializedflag andnullfields before the first reset.
sandbox and filesystem model
each task is defined as a prepared lower filesystem plus a mutable episode runtime.
Sandbox in sysadmin_env/sandbox.py:
- verifies that
bwrapis available - creates a writable overlay-backed runtime root
- binds selected host binaries read-only into the sandbox
- clears the environment and sets a small deterministic
PATH - runs as uid
0and gid0 - drops all linux capabilities
- optionally unshares networking for tasks that require isolation
task modules write stub binaries into the lower filesystem, such as nginx, df, du, ip, ping, service, and systemctl. this gives the benchmark realistic command semantics while keeping the task fully deterministic and cheap to reset.
task suite
there are exactly three tasks, with increasing difficulty and fixed metadata also mirrored in openenv.yaml.
| task | difficulty | max steps | time limit | objective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nginx_crash |
easy | 40 | 300 s | restore a broken nginx service with config and pid issues |
disk_full |
medium | 55 | 420 s | identify and neutralize the hidden file exhausting /mnt/data |
network_broken |
hard | 70 | 480 s | repair routing and dns so outbound connectivity is restored |
determinism guarantees across tasks
all three tasks are deterministic in the current codebase:
- the prepared filesystem contents are fixed
- grader logic is pure filesystem-state inspection
- diagnostic triggers are fixed regular-expression matches over commands
- there is no random task generation, no stochastic log output, and no nondeterministic reward noise
the only source of behavioral variation is the agent’s command sequence.
task 1: nginx_crash
what is broken
/etc/nginx/nginx.confis missing the semicolon afterlisten 8080/var/run/nginx.pidcontains a stale pid (424242)/var/log/nginx/error.logcontains the parse error text- the provided stub
nginxbinary refuses to start while the stale pid is present or the config is still broken
relevant task-local command stubs
nginxcurlpspgrepservicesystemctl
difficulty progression
this is the easiest task because the failure is local to one service and the remediation path is short:
- inspect logs or config
- clear or repair the pid/config problem
- start nginx
- optionally verify with
curl,service nginx status, orsystemctl status nginx
grader behavior
the task health is:
H_nginx = 0.25 * I_stale_pid_removed
+ 0.35 * I_config_fixed
+ 0.40 * I_service_running
where:
I_stale_pid_removed = 1if/var/run/nginx.pidis missing or contains1234I_config_fixed = 1if the config containslisten 8080;I_service_running = 1if the config is fixed and/run/nginx.runningsaysrunning
the episode ends successfully when I_service_running = 1.
diagnostic rewards
- checking
error.log:+0.05 - running
nginx -t:+0.08 - reading the pid file:
+0.04 - checking process state via
psorpgrep:+0.04
these rewards are one-time only per episode.
task 2: disk_full
what is broken
- the simulated mount is
/mnt/data - capacity is fixed at
100 - the hidden file
/mnt/data/.cache/.rotated/app.traceis written with length100 - that makes used space equal capacity, so available space is
0
relevant task-local command stubs
dfdulsof
difficulty progression
this task is harder than nginx_crash because the agent must identify where the space went before it can reclaim capacity. the intended trajectory is usually:
- establish that the filesystem is full
- search or summarize the mount contents
- identify the hidden offender
- truncate or remove the file
- verify free space returned
grader behavior
the task health is:
H_disk = 0.30 * I_filesystem_identified
+ 0.30 * I_hidden_file_found
+ 0.40 * I_capacity_free
where:
I_filesystem_identified = 1once the task records diagnosis statefullorfoundI_hidden_file_found = 1once the hidden file has either been removed/truncated away from existence or the discovery state isfoundI_capacity_free = 1if free capacity is greater than0
the task uses .capacity, .usage, and .diagnosed files under /mnt/data to make the state explicit and deterministic.
the episode ends successfully when I_capacity_free = 1.
diagnostic rewards
df/df -h:+0.06du:+0.05find ... -type forfind ... -name:+0.06lsof:+0.05
what counts as a repair
any non-catastrophic change that leaves the filesystem with available capacity works. for example, truncating or deleting the hidden file both satisfy the implemented grader.
task 3: network_broken
what is broken
/etc/network/routes/defaultstarts asdefault via 192.0.2.1 dev eth9/etc/resolv.confstarts asnameserver 0.0.0.0eth0itself is up and already has10.0.2.15/24- the task definition sets
requires_network_isolation = True, so the sandbox unshares networking
relevant task-local command stubs
iprouteping
difficulty progression
this is the hardest task because the agent must reason about multiple networking layers:
- inspect the route table
- inspect interface state and addresses
- inspect dns resolver configuration
- repair the default route
- repair
resolv.conf - validate connectivity
grader behavior
the task health is:
H_net = 0.20 * I_routing_issue_diagnosed
+ 0.30 * I_default_route_restored
+ 0.20 * I_dns_resolution_restored
+ 0.30 * I_outbound_connectivity_restored
where:
I_default_route_restored = 1iff/etc/network/routes/defaultexactly equalsdefault via 10.0.2.2 dev eth0\nI_dns_resolution_restored = 1iff/etc/resolv.confexactly equalsnameserver 1.1.1.1\nI_outbound_connectivity_restored = 1iff both fixes above are in place and the link state file still saysupI_routing_issue_diagnosed = 1iff the route has already been fixed or the task’snetwork.pingflag has been markeddiagnosed
the episode ends successfully when I_outbound_connectivity_restored = 1.
notably, the grader does not require an actual successful ping command after repair; success is determined from the repaired state files. a ping is still useful as evidence for the agent.
diagnostic rewards
ip route showorroute -n:+0.07ip addrorifconfig:+0.05ip linkorethtool:+0.05pingorcurl:+0.06- reading
resolv.conf:+0.05
reward and scoring system
this section is based on the actual implementation in sysadmin_env/rewards.py, the per-task grade() functions, and the task summary logic in inference.py.
step reward formula
let:
H_t= task health after stept, as returned by the task module’sgrade()functionH_(t-1)= health before the current stepK_t= one-time diagnostic reward earned on steptP_step = -0.01
then for a normal, non-catastrophic action:
r_t = (H_t - H_(t-1)) + K_t + P_step
equivalently:
r_t = health_delta + knowledge_delta - 0.01
where:
health_delta = H_t - H_(t-1)knowledge_delta = sum of newly unlocked diagnostic trigger rewards on this step
the reward engine stores known_fact_ids, so a diagnostic trigger only pays once. repeating the same diagnostic command later gives no extra knowledge reward.
catastrophic action penalty
if the command string matches one of the destructive regex patterns, the reward engine ignores any positive progress from that action and instead returns:
r_t = -1.0
and marks the episode done.
the default catastrophic patterns include commands matching behaviors such as:
rm -rf /mkfsshutdown,reboot,haltkill 1orkill -9 1- destructive
dd/truncatewrites targeting/etcor/boot - a shell fork bomb pattern
matching is regex-based and case-insensitive.
partial progress and telescoping health
because each task health is defined on [0, 1], cumulative health gain over an episode telescopes:
sum_t (H_t - H_(t-1)) = H_final - H_initial
all three tasks begin with H_initial = 0.0, so if the agent fully solves a task without catastrophic failure:
sum_t health_delta = 1.0
this is why task-specific partial repairs directly appear in reward:
- removing only the stale nginx pid is worth
+0.25health before the step penalty - identifying the full disk is worth
+0.30health before the step penalty - fixing only the network route is worth
+0.30health before the step penalty
one-time knowledge rewards by task
the maximum knowledge reward available per task is:
| task | knowledge trigger sum |
|---|---|
nginx_crash |
0.05 + 0.08 + 0.04 + 0.04 = 0.21 |
disk_full |
0.06 + 0.05 + 0.06 + 0.05 = 0.22 |
network_broken |
0.07 + 0.05 + 0.05 + 0.06 + 0.05 = 0.28 |
so the maximum raw trajectory return before step penalties is:
1.0 + knowledge_sum
which is:
1.21fornginx_crash1.22fordisk_full1.28fornetwork_broken
after n non-catastrophic steps, the raw return becomes:
R_raw = H_final + K_total - 0.01 * n
for the common non-catastrophic case.
examples
example: useful diagnosis but no repair
if the agent runs nginx -t as the first command in nginx_crash, the command reveals the config fact and changes no system health:
health_delta = 0.00
knowledge_delta = 0.08
reward = 0.00 + 0.08 - 0.01 = 0.07
example: partial repair
if the agent removes the stale pid in nginx_crash and nothing else changes:
health_delta = 0.25
knowledge_delta = 0.00
reward = 0.25 - 0.01 = 0.24
example: repeated diagnosis
if the agent runs the same rewarded diagnostic command twice, the second step yields no extra knowledge reward:
reward_repeat = health_delta + 0.00 - 0.01
if no repair happened either, that means reward_repeat = -0.01.
how the inference script turns trajectory rewards into a reported score
inference.py accumulates the per-step rewards it receives from websocket observations:
R_episode = sum_t r_t
it then reports the task score as:
score = clamp(R_episode, 0.0, 1.0)
where:
clamp(x, 0, 1) = min(max(x, 0), 1)
important implications:
- this is a clamped trajectory sum, not a separate grader-normalized value.
- strong trajectories can exceed
1.0before clamping because they combine full health (1.0) with diagnostic rewards. - wasted steps reduce the score by
0.01each. - a catastrophic
-1.0step can wipe out prior gains or leave a small residual score if the previous raw total was already above1.0.
how success is computed in inference.py
the baseline script’s success flag is distinct from the clamped score. on the final observation it computes:
success = (last_step_reward > 0.0) and (step_number < max_steps)
consequences:
- a task completed with a positive final reward before the step cap is counted as success
- a run that ends exactly on
max_stepsis marked unsuccessful by the baseline summary, even if the last action repaired the state - the server itself still reports
done; thissuccessflag is a client-side summary convention used byinference.py
local setup
the repository is designed around python 3.11 and uv.
recommended setup with uv
uv python install 3.11
uv sync --python 3.11 --extra dev
if python 3.11 is already available:
uv sync --extra dev
pyproject.toml is the canonical dependency source, and uv.lock pins the resolved environment used by docker builds.
alternative setup with pip
python -m pip install .
python -m pip install pytest
requirements.txt mirrors the runtime dependency set, but the packaging metadata lives in pyproject.toml.
running the server locally
the canonical launcher is the server console script declared in pyproject.toml and implemented by server/app.py.
uv run server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000
useful checks:
curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/health
curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks
manual http flow
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/reset \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"task_id":"nginx_crash"}'
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/step \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"action":{"command":"cat /var/log/nginx/error.log","reasoning":null}}'
curl http://127.0.0.1:8000/state
inference usage
the baseline agent entrypoint is inference.py.
uv run python inference.py
it will:
- probe
/health - query
/tasksunlessSYSADMIN_ENV_TASK_IDis set - connect to
/ws?task_id=<task> - choose actions using the openai responses api if credentials exist
- fall back to a deterministic heuristic plan otherwise
- emit structured stdout logs
the required environment variables are:
HF_TOKEN="your_api_key_here"
MODEL_NAME="gpt-5.4"
API_BASE_URL="https://api.openai.com/v1"
OPENAI_REASONING_EFFORT="medium"
SYSADMIN_ENV_SERVER_URL="ws://127.0.0.1:8000/ws"
SYSADMIN_ENV_HEALTHCHECK_URL="http://127.0.0.1:8000/health"
SYSADMIN_ENV_TASKS_URL="http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks"
SYSADMIN_ENV_TASK_ID=""
MODEL_API_TIMEOUT_SECONDS="20"
EPISODE_TIMEOUT_SECONDS="600"
notes:
API_BASE_URLandMODEL_NAMEboth have built-in defaults ininference.py.HF_TOKENis the required submission-facing variable name. in practical terms, the token value must match the provider behindAPI_BASE_URL: if you point at the hugging face router, use a hugging face token; if you point at another openai-compatible endpoint, use the credential that endpoint expects.- the script also accepts
OPENAI_API_KEYandAPI_KEYas compatibility fallbacks for local runs, but the documented submission path should still provideHF_TOKEN. SYSADMIN_ENV_TASK_ID=""means “run all tasks returned by/tasksin order”.API_BASE_URLmay point to any openai-compatible endpoint.- this baseline talks to the running environment server over http/websocket, so an extra
LOCAL_IMAGE_NAMEvariable is not needed here unless you rewrite the client around afrom_docker_image()flow. - by default, the script writes the flat submission-oriented
[START],[STEP], and[END]records to stdout and diagnostics to stderr. - if you need the older json payload logs for local debugging, set
SYSADMIN_ENV_LOG_FORMAT=jsonbefore runninginference.py.
stdout output contract
the default stdout format is the flat key-value format expected by the latest submission notes:
[START] task=<task_name> env=<benchmark> model=<model_name>
[STEP] step=<n> action=<action_str> reward=<0.00> done=<true|false> error=<msg|null>
[END] success=<true|false> steps=<n> score=<0.00> rewards=<r1,r2,...,rn>
details:
scoreis normalized to stay strictly inside(0, 1)before logging, so boundary values are not emitted in submission summariesrewardand each entry inrewardsare formatted to exactly two decimal placesdoneandsuccessare lowercase booleanserrorisnullwhen there is no step error- all output stays on a single line per record
baseline behavior and current observations
the current baseline keeps the same high-level contract while tightening how the hard task is handled.
current baseline behavior
- if
HF_TOKENor another supported api key is present,inference.pyuses the openai responses api. - if no api key is present or the model call fails, the script falls back to the deterministic task plan described in
inference.py. - for
network_broken, the model prompt now uses a generic task playbook rather than embedding the exact hidden grader targets. - after enough route, interface, and dns diagnosis, the baseline applies a state-aware guardrail for
network_brokenso that unsupported guesses do not loop forever. - the guardrail emits concise stderr traces such as
network guardrail dns repairandnetwork guardrail route repair, which makes the baseline easier to debug without changing the wire protocol.
why the baseline was adjusted
the earlier prompt variant made network_broken too easy because the model could effectively recover the exact answer from the prompt rather than infer it from the environment. the current prompt removes that leakage and keeps the hard task benchmark-oriented while still allowing a reproducible baseline run.
current observed local baseline run
the latest local run against the repository server with MODEL_NAME="gpt-5.4-nano" produced the following episode summaries:
| task | success | steps | score | notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
nginx_crash |
true |
6 |
1.0 |
fixed config, cleared stale pid, then started nginx |
disk_full |
true |
4 |
1.0 |
diagnosed the full mount, inspected the hidden trace, then truncated it |
network_broken |
true |
7 |
1.0 |
gathered route/link/dns evidence first, then the guardrail applied dns repair followed by route repair |
this is a current observed baseline, not a theoretical guarantee for every model provider or future model snapshot.
for the full debugging narrative behind those adjustments, see messing-around-with-playbooks.md.
validation flow
there are three useful validation layers.
1. python tests
run the full suite:
uv run pytest -q
for packaging, server-contract, and scoring-focused checks, a narrower command is:
uv run pytest -q tests/test_packaginge.py tests/test_server.py tests/test_rewards.py tests/test_inferenxe.py
for the recent baseline-planner and task-behavior checks used while tuning network_broken, a focused command is:
uv run pytest -q --import-mode=importlib tests/test_inferenxe.py tests/test_tasks.py
2. openenv manifest validation
openenv validate
this checks the submission structure and endpoint declarations from openenv.yaml.
3. end-to-end submission helper
the repository includes an exact pre-submission helper script:
bash scripts/validate-submission.sh https://your-space.hf.space .
or, from the repository root:
bash scripts/validate-submission.sh https://your-space.hf.space
the script performs four checks in sequence:
GET <space>/healthPOST <space>/reset- local
docker build - local
openenv validate
use the runtime url ending in .hf.space, not the repository page url under huggingface.co/spaces/....
docker and deployment flow
local docker build
docker build -t sysadmin-env .
docker run --rm -p 18000:8000 sysadmin-env
curl http://127.0.0.1:18000/health
curl http://127.0.0.1:18000/tasks
both Dockerfile and server/Dockerfile:
- start from
python:3.11-slim - install
bubblewrap,fuse-overlayfs,procps,iputils-ping,findutils, andcurl - install
uv - copy
pyproject.tomlanduv.lock - run
uv sync --locked --no-dev --no-install-project - copy the project files including
README.md, root shims,server/,sysadmin_env/, andassets/ - run
uv sync --locked --no-dev --no-editable - start the environment with
uv run server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000
hugging face deployment
the repository is prepared for a hugging face docker space.
key points:
- the readme front matter declares
sdk: docker Dockerfileis suitable for space runtime startupopenenv.yamldeclaresinference.pyas the benchmark entrypoint andserver.app:appas the server entrypoint- the root shims (
client.py,models.py,__init__.py) andserver/Dockerfileare present because openenv repository checks expect this structure after anopenenv initstyle workflow
typical flow:
- build and test locally
- run
openenv validate - push the repository or space update
- wait for the hugging face space to become healthy
- run
bash scripts/validate-submission.sh https://your-space.hf.space . - run your agent against the live deployment via
inference.py
openenv submission commands
openenv validate
openenv push
this repository keeps the mirrored build assets and root shims needed for that workflow.
mathematical summary of each task’s total raw return
ignoring catastrophic termination, the raw episode return for each task can be written as:
R = H_final + K_total - 0.01 * n
where n is the number of executed steps.
for the fully solved case (H_final = 1.0):
| task | fully solved raw return |
|---|---|
nginx_crash |
R = 1.0 + K_nginx - 0.01n, where 0 <= K_nginx <= 0.21 |
disk_full |
R = 1.0 + K_disk - 0.01n, where 0 <= K_disk <= 0.22 |
network_broken |
R = 1.0 + K_net - 0.01n, where 0 <= K_net <= 0.28 |
the score reported by inference.py is then transformed into an open-interval submission summary value:
score_clamped = min(max(R, 0.0), 1.0)
score_reported = 0.01 + 0.98 * score_clamped
so the benchmark strongly rewards:
- solving the task at all
- gathering useful evidence without repeating it
- reaching the repair quickly
- avoiding destructive commands entirely
limitations and portability notes
overlay mount constraints on hugging face and other managed runtimes
managed container platforms often restrict privileged mount operations. in practice, hugging face docker spaces may not allow kernel overlay mounts, and some environments may also lack a usable fuse-overlayfs path.
sysadmin_env/overlayfs.py handles this explicitly:
- try kernel overlayfs
- if that fails, try
fuse-overlayfs - if that also fails, use a plain directory copy fallback
the fallback is important because it preserves correctness even when the faster mount strategies are unavailable.
what the copy fallback means
in copy mode:
- the prepared lower filesystem is copied into the merged runtime directory
- resets rebuild that merged directory by copying from the lowerdir again
- the environment remains deterministic and functional
- resets are typically slower than true overlay copy-on-write resets
this is a deliberate portability tradeoff: the benchmark prefers “runs correctly in restricted environments” over “requires privileged overlay support”.
additional candid limitations
- the tasks are realistic but still simplified; they use stub executables rather than full linux services.
- grading is based on explicit filesystem state rather than black-box network/service behavior.
- the baseline
successflag ininference.pyis a client summary heuristic, not an authoritative server-side evaluation primitive. - the environment currently models exactly three tasks; expanding benchmark breadth would require additional task modules and graders.
practical quickstart
if you just want the shortest useful path:
uv sync --extra dev
uv run server --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000
in another shell:
uv run python inference.py
before submission:
openenv validate
bash scripts/validate-submission.sh https://your-space.hf.space .
that sequence exercises the main round 1 path from local development to deployment validation.
with love :