Spaces:
Sleeping
A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available:
6.2.0
ConversAI User Guide
Your AI-Powered Qualitative Research Assistant
ConversAI is a professional-grade research platform that transforms how you create surveys, reach global audiences, and analyze qualitative data. Powered by advanced AI, it automates hours of manual work while maintaining the quality and rigor expected in professional research.
π― What ConversAI Does
ConversAI provides three powerful capabilities that work together to streamline your entire research workflow:
1. π Generate Professional Surveys in Minutes
Turn a simple outline into a complete, research-ready survey with industry best practices automatically applied.
What you get:
- Well-structured questions that avoid common biases
- Professional introduction and closing messages
- Appropriate question types for your research goals
- Ready-to-deploy surveys that save hours of manual work
Perfect for:
- Market researchers launching new studies
- UX researchers gathering user feedback
- Academic researchers designing questionnaires
- Product teams validating ideas
- Healthcare professionals conducting patient surveys
2. π Translate Surveys to Reach Global Audiences
Instantly translate your surveys into 18+ languages while maintaining cultural appropriateness and meaning.
What you get:
- Professionally translated surveys in minutes
- Cultural adaptation, not just word-for-word translation
- Support for major world languages
- Batch translation to multiple languages at once
Perfect for:
- International market research
- Multi-country product launches
- Global user studies
- Diverse demographic research
- Multilingual community surveys
3. π Uncover Insights from Qualitative Data
Transform open-ended responses into actionable insights with AI-assisted analysis.
What you get:
- Thematic analysis identifying key patterns
- Sentiment analysis and emotional insights
- Executive summaries highlighting findings
- Trend detection across responses
- Exportable reports ready for presentations
Perfect for:
- Analyzing customer feedback
- Understanding user pain points
- Identifying product opportunities
- Reporting research findings
- Making data-driven decisions
πΌ Why ConversAI is Production-Grade
Enterprise-Quality Features
1. Flexible LLM Backend
- Support for multiple AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, HuggingFace)
- Automatic failover and provider selection
- No vendor lock-in - switch providers anytime
- Works with both free and premium AI services
2. Robust Error Handling
- Graceful degradation when services are unavailable
- Clear, actionable error messages
- Automatic retry logic for transient failures
- Validation at every step to prevent bad data
3. Data Privacy & Security
- No permanent data storage by default
- All processing through your chosen AI provider
- Complete control over your research data
- Suitable for sensitive research projects
- Environment-based credential management
4. Professional Export Options
- JSON format for programmatic access
- Markdown reports for documentation
- CSV export for spreadsheet analysis
- Ready for integration with other tools
5. Scalability
- Handle small pilot studies or large-scale research
- Batch operations for efficiency
- Optimized for performance
- Rate limiting and cost controls
6. Production-Ready Architecture
- Modular, maintainable codebase
- Clean separation of concerns
- Comprehensive error handling
- Extensive documentation
- Easy deployment options
Quality Assurance
Research Best Practices:
- Questions designed to minimize bias
- Appropriate question types for different data needs
- Logical survey flow from general to specific
- Culturally sensitive translations
- Rigorous analytical methods
Technical Excellence:
- Comprehensive input validation
- Type checking and error prevention
- Graceful handling of edge cases
- Performance optimization
- Security-first design
User Experience:
- Intuitive interface requiring no technical knowledge
- Clear status messages and progress indicators
- Helpful examples and templates
- Responsive design for any device
- Accessibility considerations
π How to Use ConversAI
Getting Started
Step 1: Access ConversAI
- On HuggingFace Spaces: Open the Space URL (works immediately)
- Self-hosted: Launch with
python app.py
Step 2: Verify Setup
- Look for the green status banner at the top
- Should show: "β Active LLM Provider: [Provider Name]"
- If you see a warning, check the About tab for setup instructions
Step 3: Choose Your Task
- Navigate between tabs based on what you want to do
- Start with survey generation, then translate, then analyze
π Feature Guide: Survey Generation
Creating Your First Survey
1. Navigate to the "Generate Survey" Tab
2. Describe Your Research
Enter your outline in the text box. Be specific about:
- Topic: What are you researching?
- Goals: What do you want to learn?
- Focus Areas: What specific aspects matter?
Example Outlines:
Good: "I want to understand patient experiences with a new
diabetes medication, focusing on effectiveness in managing
blood sugar, side effects experienced, and impact on daily
quality of life."
Better: "We're studying user satisfaction with our mobile
banking app. Key areas: ease of use for common transactions,
trust in security features, pain points in the account setup
process, and feature requests for future versions."
3. Configure Survey Settings
Survey Type:
- Qualitative: Open-ended questions for deep insights
- Quantitative: Structured questions with measurable responses
- Mixed: Combination of both
Number of Questions:
- Start with 10-15 for most studies
- 5-8 for quick feedback surveys
- 15-25 for comprehensive research
Target Audience:
- Be specific: "Adults 25-45 who use fitness apps daily"
- Not just: "General public"
4. Generate and Review
Click "π Generate Survey" and wait 10-30 seconds.
Review the generated survey:
- β Questions are clear and unbiased
- β Appropriate question types are used
- β Logical flow from general to specific
- β Professional introduction and closing
5. Download and Deploy
- Download the JSON file for your survey platform
- Copy questions to your preferred survey tool
- Customize further if needed
Tips for Better Surveys
Do:
- β Be specific about your research goals
- β Mention your target audience characteristics
- β Specify key topics or themes to explore
- β Include context about why you're researching
Don't:
- β Use vague descriptions like "customer feedback"
- β Request too many questions (causes fatigue)
- β Skip the target audience field
- β Forget to review before deploying
Example Use Cases:
Product Feedback
Outline: "Gather feedback from beta users of our project management software. Focus on: workflow improvements over previous tools, collaboration features effectiveness, learning curve challenges, and missing features that would increase productivity."Customer Experience
Outline: "Understand customer experience at our retail stores. Key areas: staff helpfulness, product selection satisfaction, checkout process efficiency, store cleanliness, and likelihood to recommend."Academic Research
Outline: "Study remote work impact on work-life balance among knowledge workers. Topics: boundary management, productivity changes, social isolation, communication challenges, and preferences for future work arrangements."
π Feature Guide: Survey Translation
Translating Surveys to Multiple Languages
1. Generate or Upload a Survey
- Create a survey using the generation feature, OR
- Have your existing survey in the correct JSON format
2. Navigate to "Translate Survey" Tab
3. Select Target Languages
Choose from 18+ supported languages:
- European: Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Polish
- Asian: Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Thai, Indonesian, Hindi
- Middle Eastern: Arabic, Turkish
- Eastern European: Russian
Pro Tip: Select multiple languages at once for batch translation
4. Generate Translations
Click "π Translate Survey" and wait.
Processing time:
- 1-2 languages: 20-40 seconds
- 3-5 languages: 1-2 minutes
- 6+ languages: 2-3 minutes
5. Review and Download
- Each translation appears in a separate section
- Check for cultural appropriateness
- Download JSON file containing all translations
Translation Best Practices
Quality Assurance:
Back-Translation Testing
- For critical surveys, have a native speaker back-translate
- Compare with original to ensure meaning preserved
Cultural Adaptation
- Review idioms and expressions
- Check that examples make sense in target culture
- Verify formality level is appropriate
Pilot Testing
- Test with small group of native speakers
- Gather feedback on clarity and appropriateness
- Refine before full deployment
When to Use Each Language:
| Language | When to Use | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Spanish | Latin America, Spain | Specify region for dialect |
| French | France, Canada, Africa | Consider regional variations |
| German | DACH region | Formal vs informal matters |
| Chinese | China, Taiwan, Singapore | Simplified vs Traditional |
| Arabic | MENA region | Right-to-left formatting needed |
| Portuguese | Brazil, Portugal | Brazilian vs European Portuguese |
Use Cases
Global Product Launch
Scenario: Launching mobile app in 5 countries Languages: English, Spanish, French, German, Japanese Questions: 12 (mix of usability and satisfaction) Time saved: ~8 hours of professional translationMultinational Employee Survey
Scenario: Annual engagement survey across offices Languages: English, Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, Portuguese Questions: 15 (engagement, culture, development) Time saved: ~10 hours + faster deploymentAcademic International Study
Scenario: Cross-cultural research project Languages: English, French, German, Italian, Spanish Questions: 20 (detailed qualitative questions) Time saved: Professional translation would cost $500+
π Feature Guide: Data Analysis
Analyzing Survey Responses
1. Prepare Your Data
Format responses as JSON array:
[
{
"q1": "First respondent's answer to question 1",
"q2": "First respondent's answer to question 2",
"q3": "First respondent's answer to question 3"
},
{
"q1": "Second respondent's answer to question 1",
"q2": "Second respondent's answer to question 2",
"q3": "Second respondent's answer to question 3"
}
]
2. Navigate to "Analyze Data" Tab
3. Input Your Data
- Paste responses JSON in the "Survey Responses" field
- Optionally add questions JSON for better context
- Use "Load Example" button to see format
4. Run Analysis
Click "π Analyze Data" and wait 30-60 seconds.
5. Review Results
The analysis includes:
Executive Summary
- High-level overview of findings
- Key patterns observed
- Notable discoveries
- Response quality assessment
Thematic Analysis
- 5-7 main themes identified
- Description of each theme
- Prevalence percentages
- Representative quotes
Sentiment Analysis
- Overall sentiment (positive/negative/neutral/mixed)
- Sentiment distribution breakdown
- Key emotions detected
- Intensity assessment
Key Insights
- 5-7 actionable insights
- Specific, evidence-based findings
- Strategic recommendations
- Trend observations
Statistics
- Total responses analyzed
- Average response length
- Completion rates
- Data quality metrics
6. Download Reports
- JSON file: Full analysis data for further processing
- Markdown file: Formatted report for presentations
Analysis Best Practices
Data Preparation:
Minimum Response Count
- Absolute minimum: 10 responses
- Good results: 20-50 responses
- Best results: 50+ responses
Response Quality
- Encourage detailed, thoughtful responses
- Filter out spam or very short responses
- Include diverse perspectives
Data Cleaning
- Remove duplicates
- Handle incomplete responses
- Fix formatting issues
Interpretation Guidelines:
Themes
- Look for recurring patterns
- Consider theme prevalence percentages
- Read example quotes for context
- Cross-reference with your research questions
Sentiment
- Don't over-interpret mixed sentiment
- Look for sentiment patterns by theme
- Consider intensity levels
- Watch for contradictions
Insights
- Prioritize insights supported by multiple responses
- Look for unexpected findings
- Consider business/research implications
- Validate with quantitative data when available
Common Pitfalls to Avoid:
β Cherry-picking: Don't just highlight what confirms your hypothesis β Balanced reporting: Include contradictory findings
β Small sample bias: Don't generalize from <20 responses β Appropriate scope: Acknowledge sample size limitations
β Over-reliance on AI: AI assists but doesn't replace human judgment β Critical review: Validate AI findings with domain expertise
β Ignoring context: Raw numbers without situational understanding β Contextual analysis: Consider external factors and timing
Use Cases
1. Customer Feedback Analysis
Input: 50 responses to "What could we improve?"
Output:
- 5 themes (pricing concerns, feature requests, UX issues, etc.)
- Overall negative sentiment (68%) but constructive tone
- 7 actionable insights for product roadmap
Time saved: 4-6 hours of manual coding
2. Employee Engagement Study
Input: 120 responses across 10 open-ended questions
Output:
- Themes: work-life balance, career development, management
- Mixed sentiment with strong positives and negatives
- Insights on retention risks and opportunities
Time saved: 8-12 hours of analysis
3. User Research Interviews
Input: 25 interview transcripts (formatted as responses)
Output:
- Themes: user goals, pain points, feature priorities
- Positive sentiment on core functionality
- Insights for next sprint planning
Time saved: 6-8 hours of manual synthesis
π¬ Feature Guide: Conversational Research
Conducting AI-Moderated Interviews
What is Conversational Research?
Unlike static surveys, conversational research creates a dynamic dialogue between an AI moderator and respondents. The AI follows a scripted conversation flow but adapts in real-time by asking follow-up questions based on responses, creating a more natural and engaging interview experience.
When to Use Conversational Research:
- π€ Exploratory research where you want to probe deeper
- π‘ User research requiring contextual follow-ups
- π Customer discovery with adaptive questioning
- π Qualitative interviews at scale
- π€ Situations requiring empathetic, human-like interaction
Designing a Conversation Flow
1. Navigate to "π¬ Conversational Research" Tab
Click on the "π¨ Design Flow" sub-tab.
2. Create a New Flow
Enter flow details:
- Flow Name: Descriptive title (e.g., "Product Feedback Interview")
- Flow Description: Purpose and context of the conversation
Click "β¨ Create New Flow" to start.
3. Add Conversation Steps
For each question/step:
- Question/Message: The scripted question the AI will ask
- Step Type: Choose "Question" or "End"
- Question: Regular conversation step
- End: Final closing message
Click "β Add Step" to add each node to the flow.
Example Flow Structure:
Step 1 (Question): "Hello! Thank you for taking the time to speak with me.
What initially attracted you to our product?"
Step 2 (Question): "How would you describe your overall experience using
the product so far?"
Step 3 (Question): "What specific features do you find most valuable?"
Step 4 (Question): "Have you encountered any challenges or frustrations?"
Step 5 (Question): "What improvements would you most like to see?"
Step 6 (End): "Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Your feedback is
incredibly valuable."
4. Preview Your Flow
The flow preview shows:
- All conversation steps in order
- Step types and IDs
- How the conversation will progress
5. Save Your Flow
Click "πΎ Save Flow" to save to a JSON file.
Pro Tip: Start by clicking "π Load Example" to see a complete customer feedback interview template.
Conducting an Interview
1. Navigate to "ποΈ Conduct Interview" Sub-Tab
2. Start a Conversation Session
Click "π Start Conversation" to begin.
The AI moderator will:
- Greet the respondent
- Ask the first question from your flow
- Wait for a response
3. Respond as the Interviewee
Type your response in the text box and click "Send" (or press Enter).
4. Experience Dynamic Adaptation
The AI moderator intelligently decides whether to:
Ask Scripted Question (Default):
- Continues with the next question in your flow
- Maintains structure and coverage
Ask Dynamic Follow-Up (Adaptive):
- Probes deeper into interesting responses
- Generated based on what you just said
- Examples: "Tell me more about...", "Can you elaborate on...", "Why do you think..."
Triggers for Follow-Up Questions:
- Every 3rd user response (configurable)
- Responses longer than 5 words
- Interesting keywords detected:
- Emotional: "frustrated", "excited", "worried", "confused"
- Reasoning: "because", "however", "although", "surprisingly"
5. Session Progress
Monitor session status:
- Active conversation indicator
- Turn count
- Current flow position
6. Export the Conversation
When finished, click "π₯ Export Conversation" to save:
- Transcript: Readable text format (.txt)
- JSON: Full session data with timestamps
- CSV: Turn-by-turn analysis format
Best Practices for Conversation Flows
Flow Design:
Start Broad, Get Specific
Good flow: 1. General experience β 2. Specific features β 3. Pain points β 4. Improvements Poor flow: 1. Very specific detail β 2. General opinion (order reversed)Optimal Flow Length
- Short interviews: 4-6 questions
- Standard interviews: 6-10 questions
- In-depth interviews: 10-15 questions
- Note: AI follow-ups extend the conversation naturally
Question Types
- Open-ended: "Tell me about...", "Describe your experience..."
- Focused: "What specific features...", "When did you first..."
- Reflective: "How did that make you feel?", "What did you learn?"
Professional Tone
- Empathetic and non-judgmental
- Clear and conversational
- Respectful of respondent's time
- Genuine curiosity
Conducting Interviews:
Set Expectations
- Tell respondents this is an AI-moderated interview
- Mention it will ask follow-up questions
- Encourage detailed responses (5+ words)
Response Quality
- Encourage thoughtful, detailed answers
- Very short responses (<5 words) won't trigger follow-ups
- Rich responses get more adaptive probing
Managing Length
- AI limits follow-ups to avoid fatigue
- Flow continues even with dynamic questions
- Respondents can keep answers brief to move faster
Technical Tips
- One respondent per session
- Sessions auto-save conversation history
- Can't resume abandoned sessions (by design)
- Export immediately after completion
Use Cases
1. Customer Discovery Interviews
Scenario: Understanding why users chose your product
Flow: 5 scripted questions about decision process
AI Adaptation: Probes on "competitor comparison" mentions
Result: Rich insights on differentiation factors
Time: 15-20 minutes per interview
2. UX Research Sessions
Scenario: Exploring pain points in onboarding flow
Flow: 8 questions walking through user journey
AI Adaptation: Asks follow-ups on confusion/frustration
Result: Detailed understanding of UX issues
Time: 20-25 minutes per session
3. Product Feedback at Scale
Scenario: Collecting beta feedback from 50 users
Flow: 6 standard questions + AI follow-ups
AI Adaptation: Probes interesting feature requests
Result: Prioritized roadmap from user insights
Time: 10-15 minutes Γ 50 = 8-12 hours total (automated)
4. Market Research Interviews
Scenario: Understanding buyer preferences
Flow: 10 questions on needs, alternatives, priorities
AI Adaptation: Explores "price sensitivity" mentions
Result: Market positioning insights
Time: 25-30 minutes per interview
Analysis Tips
Reviewing Transcripts:
- Export all sessions after completion
- Look for recurring themes across conversations
- Note where AI follow-ups uncovered insights
- Compare scripted vs. dynamic question value
Processing Conversations:
- Manual Analysis: Review transcripts for themes
- Automated Analysis: Use the "Analyze Data" tab
- Export conversation turns to CSV
- Format responses for analysis
- Run thematic analysis
Key Metrics:
- Average conversation length (turns)
- Follow-up question frequency
- Response depth (words per turn)
- Topic coverage across sessions
Advanced Features
Conversation Summarization (Coming Soon):
- AI-generated summary of each conversation
- Key points extraction
- Sentiment analysis per session
Flow Branching (Planned):
- Conditional logic based on responses
- Different paths for different respondent types
- Skip logic for efficiency
Multi-Moderator Styles (Planned):
- Empathetic interviewer
- Business analyst
- Technical researcher
- Cultural variations
Limitations
Current Limitations:
- β Linear flows only (no branching yet)
- β Cannot resume abandoned sessions
- β One respondent per session
- β English language optimized (other languages work but less refined)
Best Suited For:
- β Qualitative research interviews
- β Exploratory customer discovery
- β User research at scale
- β Standardized but adaptive interviews
Not Ideal For:
- β Highly structured surveys (use static surveys instead)
- β Quantitative data collection
- β Complex branching logic requirements
- β Multi-party conversations
π Complete Workflow Examples
Example 1: New Product Feature Research
Objective: Understand if users want a new AI assistant feature
Step 1: Generate Survey (5 minutes)
Outline: "Explore interest in an AI assistant feature for our
productivity app. Focus on: use cases users envision, concerns
about AI, willingness to pay, and preferred interaction methods."
Settings:
- Type: Mixed (qualitative + quantitative)
- Questions: 12
- Audience: Current users of productivity apps, tech-savvy
Step 2: Deploy Survey (You handle this)
- Export to your survey platform
- Send to 100 beta users
- Collect responses over 1 week
Step 3: Translate for Global Test (10 minutes)
Selected languages: Spanish, French, German, Japanese
Purpose: Test with international user base
Result: 4 localized versions ready to deploy
Step 4: Analyze Results (15 minutes)
Input: 78 responses in JSON format
Analysis reveals:
- 3 main use cases (writing assistance, data analysis, scheduling)
- Positive sentiment (72%) but privacy concerns (45% mention)
- Insights: Users willing to pay $5-10/month, prefer opt-in
Total Time: ~30 minutes of work Traditional Time: 8-12 hours Savings: ~10 hours
Example 2: Multi-Country Market Research
Objective: Launch product in 5 new markets, need local insights
Step 1: Generate Core Survey (5 minutes)
Outline: "Market research for launching a sustainable fashion
brand. Topics: sustainability priorities, price sensitivity,
preferred materials, shopping habits, brand perception factors."
Settings:
- Type: Qualitative
- Questions: 15
- Audience: Environmentally conscious consumers, 25-45
Step 2: Translate to Target Markets (15 minutes)
Languages: Spanish (Mexico), Portuguese (Brazil), French (France),
German (Germany), Japanese (Japan)
Result: 5 culturally adapted versions
Quality check: Review by native speakers on team
Step 3: Deploy and Collect (You handle this)
- 50 responses per country
- 250 total responses
- 2-week collection period
Step 4: Analyze by Market (30 minutes)
Run analysis separately for each market:
- Identify market-specific themes
- Compare sentiment across markets
- Note cultural differences in priorities
Key findings example:
- Japan: Quality and durability top priority
- Germany: Certifications and transparency crucial
- Brazil: Price sensitivity higher, but willing to pay for story
Total Time: ~50 minutes Traditional Time: 20-30 hours (translation + analysis) Cost Savings: $2000+ in professional services
Example 3: Academic Research Project
Objective: Study impact of remote work on work-life balance
Step 1: Design Survey (10 minutes)
Outline: "Investigate how remote work affects work-life balance
among knowledge workers. Explore: boundary management strategies,
productivity changes, social isolation experiences, family
dynamics, preference for future work arrangements, and mental
health impacts."
Settings:
- Type: Qualitative (open-ended for rich data)
- Questions: 18
- Audience: Knowledge workers with 1+ year remote experience
Step 2: Review & Refine (20 minutes)
- Review generated questions
- Ensure alignment with research framework
- Verify no leading questions
Step 3: Collect Data (You handle this)
- Deploy via academic participant pool
- Collect 150 responses
- 3-week collection period
Step 4: Comprehensive Analysis (45 minutes)
Input: 150 detailed responses
Analysis output:
- 7 major themes with sub-themes
- Sentiment patterns by demographic
- 12 key insights for paper
Export: Markdown report for lit review section
JSON for coding in qualitative software
Step 5: Follow-up Translation (Optional)
If publishing internationally or presenting at conference:
Translate survey instrument to show methodology
Languages: Spanish, French (common in academia)
Total Time: ~2 hours Traditional Time: 15-25 hours of manual thematic coding Quality: Comparable to manual coding for exploratory research
π‘ Tips for Power Users
Optimizing for Quality
1. Survey Generation
- Iterate on outlines to get better questions
- Generate multiple versions and combine best questions
- Use specific examples in outlines for better context
- Mention your theoretical framework for academic research
2. Translation
- Start with common languages to test quality
- Use back-translation for critical surveys
- Keep original English version for reference
- Test with native speakers before full deployment
3. Analysis
- Provide questions JSON for better context
- Clean data before analysis (remove duplicates, spam)
- Run analysis multiple times for consistency
- Combine AI insights with manual review
Optimizing for Cost
Using Free HuggingFace:
- Perfect for testing and development
- Good for small-scale research (<50 responses)
- Be patient with first request (cold start)
- Simplify requests for better performance
Using Paid Providers:
| Provider | Best For | Cost Range | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI GPT-4o-mini | Best value | $0.01-0.05/survey | Fast |
| OpenAI GPT-4 | Best quality | $0.05-0.15/survey | Fast |
| Anthropic Claude | Complex analysis | $0.02-0.08/survey | Fast |
Cost Control Tips:
- Use GPT-4o-mini for generation and translation
- Use GPT-4 only for complex analysis
- Batch operations when possible
- Set up usage alerts in provider dashboards
Workflow Optimization
Create Templates: Save outlines for common research types:
- Customer satisfaction surveys
- Product feedback forms
- Employee engagement surveys
- User experience studies
- Academic research instruments
Batch Processing:
- Generate multiple survey versions at once
- Translate to all needed languages in one go
- Analyze all demographics separately for comparison
Quality Checkpoints:
- After generation: Review questions for bias
- After translation: Spot-check with native speakers
- After data collection: Clean data before analysis
- After analysis: Validate insights with domain experts
π Privacy & Data Security
What Data is Stored?
By ConversAI:
- β No survey data is permanently stored
- β No responses are saved to disk
- β No user information is retained
- β Temporary files for downloads only (deleted after download)
By LLM Providers:
- Varies by provider (check their policies)
- OpenAI: Data not used for training by default
- Anthropic: Enterprise plans have data guarantees
- HuggingFace: Depends on model provider
Best Practices for Sensitive Research
1. Choose Provider Carefully
- For healthcare: Use HIPAA-compliant LLM service
- For confidential: Use Anthropic or OpenAI enterprise
- For maximum privacy: Self-host open-source models
2. Anonymize Data
- Remove identifying information before analysis
- Use participant IDs instead of names
- Redact sensitive details from responses
3. Access Control
- Use private HuggingFace Spaces if needed
- Limit team access to credentials
- Rotate API keys regularly
4. Compliance
- GDPR: Ensure LLM provider is compliant
- IRB requirements: Document AI use in protocols
- Data retention: Follow your organization's policies
π Measuring Success
Survey Generation Success Metrics
β Quality Indicators:
- Questions are unbiased and clear
- Logical flow through survey
- Appropriate question types used
- All research objectives covered
β Efficiency Gains:
- Time to first draft: <5 minutes (vs. hours manually)
- Iterations needed: 1-2 (vs. 4-5 manually)
- Team review time reduced by 50%+
Translation Success Metrics
β Quality Indicators:
- Back-translation matches original meaning
- Native speaker approval
- Cultural appropriateness confirmed
- Response rates comparable across languages
β Efficiency Gains:
- Time to translate: Minutes (vs. days/weeks)
- Cost: Near-zero (vs. $0.10-0.30 per word)
- Speed to market: Immediate (vs. 1-2 weeks)
Analysis Success Metrics
β Quality Indicators:
- Themes align with manual coding
- Insights lead to actionable decisions
- Stakeholders find report valuable
- Findings supported by quotes
β Efficiency Gains:
- Time to insights: <1 hour (vs. 8-20 hours)
- Cost: Minimal (vs. $500-2000 for analyst)
- Consistency: High (vs. variable with manual coding)
π― Use Case Library
Market Research
- New product concept testing: Generate survey β deploy β analyze feedback
- Brand perception studies: Multi-language surveys for global brands
- Customer satisfaction tracking: Quarterly analysis of feedback trends
- Competitive analysis: Survey design for feature comparison studies
User Experience Research
- Usability study debriefs: Analyze interview transcripts
- Feature prioritization: Generate surveys for user voting
- Beta testing feedback: Quick analysis of bug reports and suggestions
- Accessibility research: Multi-language surveys for diverse users
Academic Research
- Exploratory studies: Generate initial survey instruments
- Cross-cultural research: Translate surveys for international studies
- Qualitative analysis: Thematic coding of open-ended responses
- Mixed methods: Combine with quantitative data collection
Human Resources
- Employee engagement: Annual or pulse surveys
- Exit interviews: Analysis of leaving employee feedback
- Training needs assessment: Identify development opportunities
- Culture studies: Understand organizational dynamics
Product Management
- Feature requests: Analyze user suggestions
- Beta feedback: Quick turnaround on pre-release testing
- Roadmap validation: Survey users on priorities
- Competitor research: Generate comparison surveys
Healthcare
- Patient satisfaction: HIPAA-compliant survey generation
- Treatment experience: Multi-language patient surveys
- Quality improvement: Analyze patient feedback themes
- Clinical research: Generate research questionnaires
π§ Limitations & When NOT to Use
Current Limitations
Survey Generation:
- β Cannot create complex branching logic
- β May need manual refinement for highly specialized topics
- β Not a replacement for expert survey design in all cases
- β Best for: Standard research surveys, exploratory studies
Translation:
- β Not certified/legal translation quality
- β May miss subtle cultural nuances in idioms
- β Requires native speaker review for publication
- β Best for: Research surveys, internal communications
Analysis:
- β Not a replacement for rigorous qualitative coding
- β May miss domain-specific insights
- β Cannot replace human interpretation completely
- β Best for: Initial exploration, large-scale feedback, trend identification
When to Use Traditional Methods
Use professional survey designers when:
- Regulatory compliance requires certified instruments
- High-stakes research with legal implications
- Complex adaptive survey logic needed
- Validated scales are required
Use professional translators when:
- Legal or medical translations needed
- Publishing in academic journals
- Official government communications
- Marketing materials with brand sensitivity
Use professional analysts when:
- Publishing peer-reviewed research
- Complex coding schemes required
- Deep domain expertise needed
- Consensus coding is methodology requirement
Best Approach: Hybrid
Recommended workflow:
- β Use ConversAI for initial draft (fast, cheap)
- β Expert review and refinement (quality assurance)
- β Deploy and collect data
- β ConversAI for preliminary analysis (quick insights)
- β Deep manual analysis for key findings (rigor)
π Support & Resources
Getting Help
Documentation:
USER_GUIDE.md(this document) - Complete user guideQUICK_START_HF_SPACES.md- Fast deploymentTROUBLESHOOTING.md- Common issues and solutionsREADME.md- Technical overview
Diagnostics:
- Run
python check_env.py- Environment checker - Check logs for error messages
- Use example data to test functionality
Community:
- GitHub Issues - Report bugs and feature requests
- HuggingFace Space discussions
- Research methods forums
Feedback & Feature Requests
We'd love to hear from you:
- What features would make ConversAI more valuable?
- What use cases are we missing?
- What pain points can we solve?
π Learning Resources
Understanding Qualitative Research
- Introduction to thematic analysis
- Survey design best practices
- Avoiding bias in questions
- Cross-cultural research methods
AI & Research Ethics
- Using AI in research responsibly
- Disclosing AI use in publications
- Data privacy considerations
- Bias in AI-generated content
Maximizing ConversAI
- Video tutorials (coming soon)
- Webinar series on research workflows
- Case studies from real users
- Best practices blog
π Success Stories
Story 1: Startup Product Validation
Challenge: Early-stage startup needed to validate product concept across 3 markets in 2 weeks.
Solution:
- Generated survey in English (10 questions)
- Translated to Spanish and Portuguese
- Analyzed 200+ responses in 24 hours
Results:
- Launched in correct market first (Brazil, not Mexico as planned)
- Saved $3,000 in research costs
- Made launch decision 2 weeks faster
Story 2: University Research Project
Challenge: PhD student analyzing 150 interview transcripts for dissertation.
Solution:
- Formatted transcripts as survey responses
- Ran thematic analysis
- Used insights as starting point for manual coding
Results:
- Identified 7 themes in 2 hours vs. estimated 40 hours
- Used time savings for deeper literature review
- Graduated on schedule
Story 3: Enterprise Employee Engagement
Challenge: Multinational company with 5,000 employees in 12 countries.
Solution:
- Generated engagement survey (20 questions)
- Translated to 8 languages
- Analyzed responses by region and department
Results:
- 40% higher response rate (due to language options)
- Identified region-specific retention risks
- Informed $500K investment in benefits program
π Next Steps
New Users
- β Start with the "Generate Survey" tab
- β Use the example outline provided
- β Review the generated questions
- β Experiment with different settings
- β Try the example data in Analysis tab
Regular Users
- β Create outline templates for common projects
- β Establish quality review processes
- β Integrate into research workflow
- β Share best practices with team
- β Provide feedback for improvements
Advanced Users
- β Explore API integration (coming soon)
- β Customize LLM models for your domain
- β Build automated research pipelines
- β Contribute to open source development
- β Share case studies with community
π Quick Reference
Common Tasks
| Task | Location | Time | Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Generate survey | Generate tab | 30 sec | Be specific in outline |
| Translate survey | Translate tab | 1-2 min | Do all languages at once |
| Analyze responses | Analyze tab | 1 min | Min. 10 responses needed |
| Download results | Each tab | Instant | JSON for data, MD for reports |
Quality Checklist
Before deploying survey:
- Questions are unbiased and clear
- Appropriate question types used
- Logical flow through survey
- Introduction explains purpose
- Pilot tested with 3-5 people
Before deploying translation:
- Native speaker reviewed
- Cultural appropriateness checked
- Technical terms verified
- Examples make sense in target culture
Before presenting analysis:
- Sufficient responses (20+)
- Themes make sense with data
- Insights are actionable
- Validated with domain knowledge
- Limitations acknowledged
ConversAI - Transforming qualitative research with AI assistance.
Battle the blank page. Reach global audiences. Uncover insights. π¬
Version: 1.0 Last Updated: 2025 License: MIT Support: See TROUBLESHOOTING.md