Spaces:
Running
Running
| title: Kahneman4Review | |
| emoji: 🧠 | |
| colorFrom: indigo | |
| colorTo: blue | |
| sdk: gradio | |
| sdk_version: 5.9.1 | |
| app_file: app.py | |
| pinned: true | |
| python_version: "3.11" | |
| # Kahneman4Review | |
| Kahneman4Review is a research-oriented framework for analyzing the cognitive structure of academic peer review through the lens of Daniel Kahneman's dual-process theory in *Thinking, Fast and Slow*. The project studies whether review statements are primarily driven by **System 1** reasoning (fast, intuitive, impression-based judgment) or by **System 2** reasoning (slow, deliberate, evidence-based analysis). | |
| Rather than treating reviews only as scalar signals of acceptance or rejection, this project asks a deeper scientific question: | |
| > *What kinds of cognition are reflected in peer review text, and how do those cognitive modes shape review quality, fairness, and decision reliability?* | |
| This perspective reframes peer review as a **reasoning process** rather than merely an evaluative outcome. | |