Rule-Based Analysis Integration Summary
β COMPLETED CHANGES
1. Report Generator (core/utils/report_generator.py)
- Line 298: Added
"ruleBased_result": rule_resultto final JSON output - Location: Right after
vitResultfield - Contains: Complete output from
core/engines/rules.py
2. Flask Server (apps/flask_server.py)
- Lines 147-158: Added error handling for AI Agent analysis with fallback to rule-based results
- Lines 209-233: Added error handling for recommendations generation with fallback
- Lines 235-255: Added error handling for final report generation with fallback
3. AI Agent Diagnosis (core/agents/diagnosis.py)
- Lines 483-507: Added comprehensive error handling for Agent 2 (file upload, empty response, generation failures)
- Lines 527-530: Added error handling in merge function to gracefully handle Agent 2 failures
4. Recommendations Agent (core/agents/recommendation.py)
- Lines 363-376: Added empty response detection and handling
π OUTPUT STRUCTURE
The final JSON now includes:
{
"_id": "...",
"aiVerdict": { ... },
"cbhi": { ... },
"kpis": [ ... ],
"phaseWiseAnalysis": [ ... ],
"vitResult": {
"class": "Main Contact Wear",
"confidence": 0.92,
"details": "..."
},
"ruleBased_result": {
"Fault_Detection": [
{
"defect_name": "Main Contact Wear",
"Confidence": "88.00 %",
"Severity": "High",
"description": "CRITICAL wear: Resistance 311.3 ¡Ω..."
}
],
"overall_health_assessment": {
"Contacts (moving & arcing)": "High Risk",
"SF6 Gas Chamber": "Normal",
"Operating Mechanism": "Normal",
"Coil": "Normal"
},
"classifications": [
{"Class": "Healthy", "Confidence": 0.0},
{"Class": "Main Contact Wear", "Confidence": 0.88},
{"Class": "Arcing Contact Wear", "Confidence": 0.0},
// ... all 12 classes
]
},
"status": "completed",
"waveform": [ ... ]
}
π§ ERROR HANDLING IMPROVEMENTS
API Quota/Permission Errors
- Problem: Google Gemini API quota exceeded or file upload permission denied
- Solution:
- AI Agent failures β fallback to rule-based results
- Recommendations failures β fallback to basic recommendations from rule faults
- Report generation failures β minimal valid report with available data
Empty Response Handling
- Problem: API returns empty response (finish_reason = 2 = safety/quota)
- Solution: Detect empty responses and retry or skip gracefully
Parallel Processing Safety
- Problem: 3 phases running in parallel may hit API rate limits
- Solution: Each phase has independent error handling and fallback mechanisms
π HOW IT WORKS
Data Flow for Each Phase:
- KPI Calculation β Always succeeds
- Phase Segmentation (LLM-based) β May fail, uses programmatic fallback
- Rule Engine β Always succeeds (physics-based, no API calls)
- AI Agent β May fail β Fallback to Rule Engine results
- ViT Model β May fail β
vitResult: null - CBHI Calculation β Always succeeds
- Recommendations β May fail β Fallback to basic recommendations
- Final Report β May fail β Fallback to minimal valid JSON
Key Integration Point:
# In flask_server.py - Line 147
rule_engine_result = analyze_dcrm_advanced(row_values, raj_kpis) # Always runs
# In report_generator.py - Line 298
"ruleBased_result": rule_result # Always included in output
β VERIFICATION
The integration ensures:
- β Rule-based analysis always runs (no API dependency)
- β Rule-based result always appears in final JSON
- β If AI fails, rule-based serves as reliable fallback
- β All 3 phases return valid JSON even if some components fail
- β
ruleBased_resultcontains all 12 defect class probabilities
π― ADVANTAGES
- Reliability: Physics-based analysis never fails
- Transparency: All 12 defect probabilities visible
- Redundancy: AI agent can use rule results as backup
- Consistency: Same rule engine for all phases
- Speed: No API call delays for rule-based analysis
π SOURCE CODE LOCATIONS
- Rule Engine:
core/engines/rules.py(function:analyze_dcrm_advanced) - Integration Point 1:
apps/flask_server.py(line 147) - Integration Point 2:
core/utils/report_generator.py(line 298) - API Key Fallback:
apps/flask_server.py(lines 147-158)