Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # SupplyMind Project Spec | |
| ## Goal | |
| SupplyMind trains an LLM central orchestrator to operate in a multi-agent warehouse network. Warehouses are stateful local agents with inventory, drivers, demand reports, and local incentives. The orchestrator does not see individual customer orders; it satisfies global demand indirectly by allocating depot stock and approving warehouse-to-warehouse inventory movement. | |
| ## Agents | |
| `central_orchestrator`: the evaluated/trainable LLM. | |
| `central_depot`: a finite emergency supply source with limited stock and trucks. | |
| `warehouse_*`: environment agents with: | |
| - inventory by SKU | |
| - available local delivery drivers | |
| - private demand forecasts | |
| - safety stock preferences | |
| - hidden personality and relationship state | |
| - local utility | |
| - local fulfillment policy | |
| ## Step Loop | |
| Each round: | |
| 1. drivers due back become available | |
| 2. warehouses publish compressed demand reports and public offers/requests based on local state | |
| 3. central submits depot replenishments, offer matches, transfers, deferrals, and optional coalition notes | |
| 4. depot replenishments consume central stock and trucks | |
| 5. approved offer matches become inventory transfers that consume bounded transfer capacity | |
| 6. warehouse agents accept/reject proposed transfers and loans | |
| 7. accepted transfers and loans update inventory/capacity | |
| 8. warehouse local agents fulfill local orders using inventory and local drivers | |
| 9. late or unserved orders expire | |
| 10. holding, waste, fairness, and service rewards are computed | |
| 11. the world advances one round | |
| ## Official Reward | |
| OpenEnv receives one scalar reward: | |
| ```text | |
| global_welfare = | |
| fulfilled_value | |
| - delivery_cost | |
| - central_replenishment_cost | |
| - transfer_cost | |
| - stockout_penalty | |
| - late_penalty | |
| - holding_cost | |
| - waste_penalty | |
| - fairness_penalty | |
| - invalid_action_penalty | |
| + coalition_bonus | |
| ``` | |
| Per-agent rewards are diagnostics in `info` / feedback, not the official score. | |
| ## Grading | |
| The score follows the Fleetmind pattern: | |
| ```text | |
| score = normalized(agent_reward, reactive_baseline_reward, privileged_reference_reward) | |
| ``` | |
| The reference planner is a strong privileged anchor, not a mathematical optimum. | |
| ## Why This Is Multi-Agent | |
| The LLM is not merely allocating resources. It must model other agents' incentives: | |
| - risk-averse warehouses reject risky transfers | |
| - selfish warehouses require higher compensation | |
| - cooperative warehouses share more readily | |
| - hidden relationship state affects future acceptance | |
| - unfairly draining one warehouse harms local utility and fairness | |
| This makes cooperation, competition, negotiation, and coalition formation visible in the rollout trace. | |