Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| title: Token Playground | |
| emoji: 🎮 | |
| colorFrom: yellow | |
| colorTo: blue | |
| sdk: gradio | |
| app_file: app.py | |
| pinned: false | |
| license: mit | |
| # Token Playground | |
| ## Question | |
| How does prompt length translate into model cost? | |
| ## System Boundary | |
| This Space is a lightweight model-economics tool. It estimates token counts and rough costs across model families so users can reason about prompt size before deployment. | |
| ## Method | |
| The app applies simple tokenizer approximations, maps token counts to model pricing assumptions, and displays cost estimates in a compact comparison panel. | |
| ## Technique | |
| Token accounting is the measurement layer of LLM systems. Every prompt, retrieved context window, tool trace, and model response becomes tokens. | |
| The app keeps the model simple so the relationship is visible: longer text increases tokens, tokens drive cost, and cost changes architecture decisions. | |
| ## Output | |
| The app returns estimated token counts and approximate request costs. | |
| ## Why It Matters | |
| Many LLM systems fail economically before they fail technically. Token literacy is part of engineering literacy. | |
| ## What To Notice | |
| Small prompt changes can matter at scale. A few hundred extra tokens are negligible once, but significant over millions of calls. | |
| ## Effect In Practice | |
| Token awareness informs prompt compression, retrieval limits, model routing, caching, and evaluation of latency/cost tradeoffs. | |
| ## Hugging Face Extension | |
| The Space can be extended with real tokenizers from open models and a comparison of local inference versus hosted API economics. | |
| ## Limitations | |
| The estimates are approximate. Exact billing requires the provider tokenizer, current pricing, caching behavior, batching behavior, and input/output token separation. | |
| ## Run Locally | |
| ```bash | |
| pip install -r requirements.txt | |
| python app.py | |
| ``` | |