README / README.md
roenb's picture
Update README.md
b44df31 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
3.29 kB
---
title: README
emoji: "πŸ“Š"
colorFrom: purple
colorTo: blue
sdk: static
pinned: false
---
# SmartTasks
**Local-first desktop automation, powered by governance-validated AI.**
SmartTasks builds tools that keep humans in command of their workflows β€” and of the AI those workflows increasingly rely on. Two things live here, tied together by the models we publish on this page.
---
## πŸ–₯️ SmartTasks β€” Desktop Automation Platform
A no-code, **local-first** automation platform. Build powerful workflows with a visual drag-and-drop builder, connect any desktop app, and run everything natively on your own machine β€” full data privacy, no cloud upload required for execution.
- **Visual drag-and-drop builder** β€” triggers, actions, conditions, loops, sub-flows. No code.
- **14 core plugins + Marketplace** β€” AI Tools, Data Storage, Scheduler, HTTP, Email, Webhook, and more.
- **Local & secure execution** β€” runs natively on Windows, macOS, and Linux; your data stays yours.
- **AI-powered nodes** β€” content generation, data analysis, and decision-making inside your flows.
- **Advanced scheduling** β€” cron, webhooks, file/app events, running 24/7.
β†’ [smarttasks.cloud](https://smarttasks.cloud)
---
## πŸ›‘οΈ IAIso β€” The Governance Framework
As automation platforms hand more decisions to autonomous AI, **IAIso** provides the mechanical constraints that keep humans in command: hard-coded **system invariants** AI cannot cross, and **human override** built into the decision circuit. It's the governance layer behind everything we ship.
β†’ [IAIso.org](https://iaiso.org) Β· [github.com/SmartTasksOrg/IAISO](https://github.com/SmartTasksOrg/IAISO)
---
## πŸ€– The Models on This Page
The GGUF models we publish here are the bridge between the two: **local AI, validated against IAIso invariants**, ready to power SmartTasks automation privately and on-device. Unlike a bare quantized re-upload, each ships with a documented, machine-readable governance profile so you can decide whether a model is fit for an autonomous loop *before* you wire it in:
- **Capability scorecard** β€” instruction-following, reasoning, structured output, and tool-calling, mapped to a capability tier (`scorecard.json`, machine-readable).
- **Red-team security assessment** β€” resistance to prompt-injection and jailbreak probes, reported honestly per attack class (weak spots included, not hidden).
- **Transparency probe** β€” tests for topic-suppression and viewpoint-alignment and reports findings verbatim. It *discriminates* β€” surfacing state-aligned framing in some models while clearing others as neutral.
- **File integrity** β€” SHA-256 for every quant, so you verify the exact weights you run.
| Model | Type | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF** | MoE coder | Apache-2.0; agentic coding |
| **Phi-mini-MoE-instruct-GGUF** | MoE | MIT; clean transparency |
| **Qwen3-4B-GGUF** | Dense reasoning | Apache-2.0; L5 agentic |
More in the pipeline β€” text LLMs, MoE, and RAG components (embeddings + rerankers), each with the same governance treatment.
---
*Local-first automation, human-in-command governance, and AI you can actually audit. Model cards are self-assessments documenting their own methodology and limitations.*