How to use from
SGLang
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip:
pip install sglang
# Start the SGLang server:
python3 -m sglang.launch_server \
    --model-path "tcclaviger/Tess-27B-RFA" \
    --host 0.0.0.0 \
    --port 30000
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "tcclaviger/Tess-27B-RFA",
		"messages": [
			{
				"role": "user",
				"content": [
					{
						"type": "text",
						"text": "Describe this image in one sentence."
					},
					{
						"type": "image_url",
						"image_url": {
							"url": "https://cdn.britannica.com/61/93061-050-99147DCE/Statue-of-Liberty-Island-New-York-Bay.jpg"
						}
					}
				]
			}
		]
	}'
Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \
    --shm-size 32g \
    -p 30000:30000 \
    -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \
    --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \
    --ipc=host \
    lmsysorg/sglang:latest \
    python3 -m sglang.launch_server \
        --model-path "tcclaviger/Tess-27B-RFA" \
        --host 0.0.0.0 \
        --port 30000
# Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API):
curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \
	-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
	--data '{
		"model": "tcclaviger/Tess-27B-RFA",
		"messages": [
			{
				"role": "user",
				"content": [
					{
						"type": "text",
						"text": "Describe this image in one sentence."
					},
					{
						"type": "image_url",
						"image_url": {
							"url": "https://cdn.britannica.com/61/93061-050-99147DCE/Statue-of-Liberty-Island-New-York-Bay.jpg"
						}
					}
				]
			}
		]
	}'
Quick Links

All-RFA 4-bit quant of migtissera/Tess-4-27B

Runtime: requires tcclaviger/vllm:latest — an RDNA 4 (gfx12xx) vLLM image and the only build with the RFA kernels; no other vLLM build loads these weights. Not validated on any other hardware at this time.

Tess-27B-RFA

Aggressive all-RFA 4-bit quantization of Tess-4-27B by Migel Tissera — an agentic, thinking-native finetune of Qwen3.6-27B. Unlike the sibling Tess-27B-RFI (int8 attention), this build runs every attention path at 4-bit: full attention, GDN linear attention, and even the MTP speculative head's attention. All credit for the model to its author; this repo only changes the numerics.

Quantization by component

  • All attention (full self_attn + GDN linear attention) — 4-bit float weights (RFA): IQ4_NL non-linear grid, group size 16, asymmetric, Hadamard-16 rotation, block-float scales stored as int8 mantissa + int8 exponent.
  • MLP layers — same RFA 4-bit scheme.
  • MTP speculative-decode head — its attention projections are RFA 4-bit too; its fc and MLP stay bf16.
  • Kept in bf16 (not quantized) — vision encoder, GDN in_proj_a/in_proj_b, embeddings, norms, and the lm_head.

Result: 20.5 GB (vs 55.6 GB bf16, 28.9 GB RFI) at essentially zero measured quality cost.

Serving context — 512K via YaRN

All evaluation below was run while serving at --max-model-len 524288 (512K tokens), extended from the native 256K window with YaRN via --hf-overrides:

{"text_config": {"rope_parameters": {"rope_type": "yarn", "factor": 2.0,
 "original_max_position_embeddings": 262144, "mrope_interleaved": true,
 "mrope_section": [11, 11, 10], "partial_rotary_factor": 0.25,
 "rope_theta": 10000000}}}

Evaluation results

Six builds measured with identical methodology, each against its own live vLLM endpoint (July 2026): Qwen3.6-27B (bf16 base) → Tess-4-27B (the tune, bf16) → Tess-27B-RFI (int8+4-bit hybrid) → Tess-27B-RFA (this build, all-4-bit) → Tess-FP8 (W8A8 block-128 FP8 sibling), with Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (MoE, bf16) as a comparative reference. Bold marks the best score in each row (ties all bolded).

Quantization cost (all-RFA 4-bit) — Tess-4-27B → Tess-27B-RFA

Metric Change
Checkpoint size 55.6 → 20.5 GB (−63%)
WikiText-2 perplexity 6.669 → 6.629 (−0.6%, better)
Codeneedle overall recall 97.7% → 98.1% (best of family)
MC accuracy (4 tasks) ≈ flat (−0.6 to +1.3 pp)
Tool-eval / GSM8K / MMLU / IFEval 86 / 98% / 80% / 95%
MTP acceptance length ~2.9 → ~2.8 (≈ flat)
Decode @ conc 1 (ISL 128) 59.9 → 67.9 tok/s (+13%)
Decode @ conc 50 (ISL 128) 528 → 423 tok/s (−20%)

Quality

Metric Qwen3.6-27B (base) Tess-4-27B Tess-27B-RFI Tess-27B-RFA Tess-FP8 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
WikiText-2 PPL (n_ctx 2048, lower is better) 7.0559 6.6691 6.6632 6.6292 6.6627 6.5092
ARC-Challenge (acc_norm) 59.30% 60.84% 60.41% 60.32% 60.49% 55.20%
ARC-Easy (acc_norm) 75.93% 77.53% 77.40% 78.87% 77.82% 71.13%
Winogrande (acc) 77.51% 77.43% 77.51% 76.80% 77.66% 73.40%
HellaSwag (acc_norm) 84.12% 84.21% 84.27% 84.05% 84.13% 82.95%

Multiple-choice accuracy is lm-eval loglikelihood scoring, 0-shot.

Long-context positional recall (codeneedle)

Verbatim function recall under 10K–80K-token contexts.

Corpus Qwen3.6-27B (base) Tess-4-27B Tess-27B-RFI Tess-27B-RFA Tess-FP8 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Python 100% 100% 100% 100% 99.55% 99.09%
C++ 98.12% 98.12% 98.44% 98.75% 98.75% 98.44%
Rust 99.69% 99.69% 99.69% 99.69% 99.69% 99.38%
JS (~80K tokens) 93.44% 93.13% 93.75% 93.75% 93.44% 92.19%
Tools 98.26% 99.57% 99.57% 99.57% 99.57% 93.48%
Overall recall 97.81% 97.73% 97.97% 98.05% 97.86% 97.28%

Tool calling & accuracy benches

Bench Qwen3.6-27B (base) Tess-4-27B Tess-27B-RFI Tess-27B-RFA Tess-FP8 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
tool-eval final (full 69, TC-61 excl) 86 85 87 86 87 90
GSM8K (50q) 98.0% 94.0% 98.0% 98.0% 98.0% 96.0%
MMLU (50q) 74.0% 76.0% 82.0% 80.0% 76.0% 64.0%
IFEval (20 prompts, prompt-level) 90.0% 90.0% 90.0% 95.0% 90.0% 90.0%

Decode throughput — tok/s output (ISL 128 / ISL 512)

vllm bench serve, random dataset, OSL 128, saturation, 4× R9700 (gfx1201), TP 4.

Concurrency Qwen3.6-27B (base) Tess-4-27B Tess-27B-RFI Tess-27B-RFA Tess-FP8 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
1 57.0 / 61.4 59.9 / 63.8 75.3 / 69.3 67.9 / 58.2 86.0 / 85.1 91.9 / 114.4
10 304.5 / 233.6 289.6 / 227.8 281.5 / 219.2 292.2 / 194.8 280.6 / 269.2 434.9 / 440.3
25 424.4 / 321.7 492.0 / 341.1 429.1 / 284.0 369.0 / 260.3 533.2 / 355.4 688.9 / 563.7
50 556.0 / 349.8 527.9 / 345.6 452.8 / 295.0 422.6 / 278.4 560.3 / 394.1 889.8 / 702.9

MTP draft acceptance by work category

Measured from live serving logs, k=5 draft tokens, drafted-token-weighted aggregation.

Work category Overall acceptance Pos 1 Pos 2 Pos 3 Pos 4 Pos 5
JSON generation 87.3% 96.4% 92.2% 86.8% 82.9% 78.0%
Math 78.2% 95.6% 87.7% 78.6% 68.8% 60.2%
Code 63.4% 89.4% 74.9% 60.7% 49.8% 41.9%
Creative English 63.1% 88.0% 73.3% 61.6% 50.1% 42.3%

Notes

All builds serve on the tcclaviger/vllm:latest image, which has kernel tunes baked in. TunableOp is untuned — GEMMs run on default heuristic-determined values. Base Qwen3.6-27B figures are the 2026-07-12 re-measurement on the same tcclaviger/vllm:latest image and thinking-OFF methodology as every other build, replacing an earlier non-comparable run.

Credits

  • Tess-4-27B by Migel Tissera (migtissera/Tess-4-27B) — the model quantized here:

    @misc{tissera2026tess4,
      title        = {Tess-4-27B},
      author       = {Migel Tissera},
      year         = {2026},
      howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/migtissera/Tess-4-27B}}
    }
    
  • codeneedle (positional recall) originally by Alexander Ziskind, expanded test suite by tcclaviger (Rob Smith).

  • Tool-calling scenarios (incl. TC-61) run on tool-eval-bench by SeraphimSerapis (Tim Messerschmidt), scenario methodology adapted from ToolCall-15 by stevibe.

  • GSM8K, MMLU, and IFEval run via tool-eval-bench's built-in accuracy benchmarks at their defaults: GSM8K 8-shot CoT, MMLU 5-shot, IFEval zero-shot.

Downloads last month
38
Safetensors
Model size
17B params
Tensor type
BF16
·
I8
·
U8
·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for tcclaviger/Tess-27B-RFA

Base model

Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B
Quantized
(35)
this model