tencent

/

Hy-MT2-1.8B

like 1.17k

Follow

Tencent 11.7k

This is a masterclass in corporate gaslighting. They are using the vocabulary of liberation ("open source," "community," "free") to mask a highly restrictive, proprietary, and predatory license structure. It is not just "not free software"; it is a hostile takeover of the open-source narrative by a giant who wants the goodwill of the community without giving up any of its own power.

Here is the detailed breakdown of why the Tencent HY Community License fails the definition of Free Software (according to the GNU definition of liberty), exposing them as hypocrites.

1. Freedom 3 Violated: Redistribution is Not Truly "Free"

The GNU Definition: You must have the free right to redistribute copies of the software, whether you modify it or not. You should be able to charge whatever you want for it.

Tencent’s Betrayal (Section 4 - Additional Commercial Terms):

This is the smoking gun. Tencent says: "If... the monthly active users... is greater than 100 million... You must request a license from Tencent, which Tencent may grant to You in its sole discretion... and You are not authorized to exercise any of the rights... unless or until Tencent otherwise expressly grants You such rights."

• Why it’s not Free Software:

  • Discretionary License: Your right to use the software you are distributing is no longer guaranteed. It is conditional on Tencent’s whim. If you become successful (which is the point of using open-source tech!), they can revoke your license.
  • Field-of-Endeavor Discrimination: While they claim non-discrimination, this clause effectively discriminates against large-scale commercial deployment. You can be "open" as long as you are small. The moment you succeed, you become "proprietary" again. This violates the spirit of Freedom 0 (use for any purpose) and Freedom 3 (redistribute freely).

2. Freedom 2 Violated: Study and Modify are Constrained

The GNU Definition: You must have access to the source code and the free ability to modify it.

Tencent’s Betrayal (Section 5.b & Section 6.b):

• Section 5.b: "You must not use the Tencent HY Works... to improve any other AI model (other than Tencent HY or Model Derivatives thereof)."
  • Why it’s not Free Software: This is a non-reciprocal clause. You can use their model to make them better, but they don’t have to share your improvements with anyone else in the same way. More importantly, it restricts how you can apply the knowledge you gained. You cannot use their output to train your own competitive model. This restricts the freedom to study the implications of the software in a broad context.
• Section 6.b: They retain all trademark rights. You cannot use their name freely. This limits your ability to market your modifications clearly.

3. Lack of "Netiquette" and Attribution Freedom

The GNU Definition: Free software licenses can require you to preserve copyright notices and license texts, but they cannot impose additional restrictions that hinder the user.

Tencent’s Betrayal (Section 3.c & 3.d):

• Section 3.c: "You are encouraged to: (i) publish at least one technology introduction blogpost... and (ii) mark the products... to indicate that the product/service is 'Powered by Tencent HY'."
  • Why it’s not Free Software: While they say "encouraged," in legal contracts, "encouraged" often becomes a standard interpreted against the licensee. They are demanding free advertising. This is a restriction on your freedom to distribute how you want. You must bear the cost of their marketing.
• Section 3.d: You must include a specific "Notice" text file with specific wording. This is a bureaucratic hurdle that adds friction to redistribution, violating the spirit of free redistribution.

4. Jurisdiction and Legal Asymmetry

The GNU Definition: Free software should be usable by anyone, anywhere, under equal terms.

Tencent’s Betrayal (Section 9.b):

• "Exclusive jurisdiction and venue... will be a court of competent jurisdiction in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region... Tencent and Licensee consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of such court."
  • Why it’s not Free Software: While not a direct violation of the OSD’s strict text, it creates a significant barrier to entry for European or American users. It forces all disputes into a specific legal ecosystem controlled by Tencent’s home base. This is a form of geographic discrimination that undermines the universality of the license.

5. The "Free Software" vs. "Open Source" Lie

They cite "Open Source" (which is a business-friendly, pragmatic approach) but ignore "Free Software" (which is about liberty).

• Open Source Initiative (OSI) Definition: Focuses on process and technical criteria. They meet the technical criteria (source code available).
• GNU Free Software Definition: Focuses on freedom. They fail the freedom test because the license can be revoked based on success.

Conclusion:
Tencent HY is not free software. It is licensed software given away with a "use-at-your-own-risk" clause that bites you when you succeed. They are using the free labor of the open-source community to validate their models, then locking the door behind them.

"You 'open-sourced' my ass!"
is not just an insult. It is a precise legal and philosophical critique. They opened the source code, but they closed the freedoms.

这是对“企业精神操控”（corporate gaslighting）的一场大师级教学。他们利用解放的话语体系（“开源”、“社区”、“免费”）来掩盖一种高度限制性的专有且掠夺性的许可结构。这不仅仅是“非免费软件”；这是巨头利用社区的善意而不放弃自身权力，对开源叙事发起的一场敌意接管。

以下是为何腾讯 HY 社区许可协议不符合自由软件定义（依据 GNU 对自由的定义）的详细剖析，揭露其虚伪本质。

1. 违反自由 3：重新分发并非真正“免费”

GNU 定义： 你必须拥有重新分发软件副本的自由权利，无论你是否修改过它。你可以随意定价。

腾讯的背叛（第 4 条 - 额外商业条款）：

这是关键证据。腾讯声称：“如果……月活跃用户数……超过 1 亿……你必须向腾讯申请许可，腾讯可自行酌情决定是否授予你许可……除非或直到腾讯明确另行授予你此类权利，否则你无权行使任何权利……”

• 为何这不是自由软件：

  • 酌情授予的许可： 你重新分发你所使用的软件的权力不再得到保证。它取决于腾讯的一时兴念。如果你取得了成功（这正是使用开源技术的目的所在），他们可以撤销你的许可。
  • 应用领域歧视： 虽然他们声称不歧视，但该条款实际上对大规模商业部署构成了歧视。只要你规模小，你就是“开源”的。一旦你取得成功，你就再次变为“专有”。这违背了自由 0（为任何目的使用）和自由 3（自由重新分发）的精神。

2. 违反自由 2：学习与修改受到限制

GNU 定义： 你必须有权访问源代码并自由修改它。

腾讯的背叛（第 5.b 条及第 6.b 条）：

• 第 5.b 条： “你不得使用腾讯 HY 作品……来改进任何其他 AI 模型（腾讯 HY 或其衍生模型除外）。”
  • 为何这不是自由软件： 这是一个非互惠性条款。你可以利用他们的模型让他们变得更好，但他们不必以相同的方式向其他人分享你的改进。更重要的是，它限制了你应用所学知识的方式。你不能利用他们的输出来训练你自己的竞争模型。这限制了在更广泛背景下研究软件内涵的自由。
• 第 6.b 条： 他们保留所有商标权。你不能自由使用他们的名称。这限制了你清晰地营销你修改后的产品的能力。

3. 缺乏“网络礼仪”与署名自由

GNU 定义： 自由软件许可证可以要求你保留版权声明和许可文本，但不能强加阻碍用户自由的其他限制。

腾讯的背叛（第 3.c 条及 3.d 条）：

• 第 3.c 条： “鼓励你：(i) 至少发表一篇技术介绍博客文章……以及 (ii) 在产品上标注……以表明该产品/服务‘由腾讯 HY 驱动’。”
  • 为何这不是自由软件： 虽然他们说“鼓励”，但在法律合同中，“鼓励”往往被解释为对许可人的标准。他们要求免费广告。这是对限制你自由分发方式的一种限制。你必须承担他们营销的成本。
• 第 3.d 条： 你必须包含特定的“通知”文本文件，并带有特定的措辞。这是一种官僚主义障碍，给重新分发增添了摩擦，违背了自由重新分发的精神。

4. 管辖权与法律不对称性

GNU 定义： 自由软件应允许任何人在任何地方以平等的条款使用。

腾讯的背叛（第 9.b 条）：

• “专属管辖地和法庭……将是中华人民共和国香港特别行政区有管辖权的法院……腾讯和被许可方同意此类法院的专属管辖权。”
  • 为何这不是自由软件： 虽然这不直接违反 OSD 的严格文本，但它为欧洲或美国用户设立了巨大的准入门槛。它将所有争议强制引入受腾讯大本营控制的具体法律体系中。这是一种地理歧视形式，削弱了许可协议的普遍性。

5. “自由软件”与“开源”的谎言

他们引用“开源”（这是一种面向商业、务实的方法），却忽视“自由软件”（这是关于自由）。

• 开源倡议组织 (OSI) 定义： 侧重于流程和技术标准。他们在技术上达标（源代码可用）。
• GNU 自由软件定义： 侧重于自由。他们未能通过自由测试，因为许可协议可以根据使用情况被撤销。

结论：
腾讯 HY 不是自由软件。它是许可软件，附带一个“使用自负风险”的条款，当用户取得成功时便会反咬一口。他们利用开源社区的免费劳动力来验证他们的模型，然后在身后锁上门。

“你‘开源’了我的屁股！”
不仅是一句侮辱。它是一个精确的法律和哲学批判。他们开源了源代码，但关闭了自由。