SatQuery / docs /TRAINING.md
thundercode's picture
release: add docs/TRAINING.md
be08c80 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
90.7 kB

Training β€” deep reference

Status tags used on every substantive claim: IMPLEMENTED Β· VERIFIED Β· MEASURED Β· ATTEMPTED Β· NOT RUN Β· BLOCKED Β· DEFERRED Β· REJECTED Β· OPEN Β· RESOLVED Β· CLOSED.

SatQuery AI trains six artifacts. Four are task heads, one is an intent-router adapter, one is a PEFT LoRA adapter. Every backbone is frozen. No backbone is fine-tuned end-to-end; no backbone weight is redistributed. Training produces a small module on top of a frozen encoder, and β€” for five of the six artifacts β€” it does so by training on cached embeddings or cached features, never on raw imagery decoded inside the training loop.

The single most important rule in this document: do not fabricate. Every hyperparameter and every measured figure below was read from a file. Where a figure is a quoted value, the file it came from is named inline. Where a fact is not established from the available evidence, this document says so explicitly (UNKNOWN β€” not established from the available evidence) rather than estimating.

The second most important rule: a training run produces an artifact, not a verified capability. The external training guide for the change-VQA head states this as a contract, verbatim:

Training produces an artifact, not a verified capability, and the run record says TRAINED_UNVERIFIED. (docs/R02_KAGGLE_TRAINING_GUIDE.md)

Every artifact in this document carries a status. None of them is promoted to a system-level claim by the fact that it trained. See BENCHMARKS.md for the evaluation-side view and MODELS.md for the released-artifact view.


Table of contents

  1. The training philosophy
  2. Where each artifact trains β€” the reproducibility boundary
  3. The frozen training configuration
  4. Router adapter β€” local CPU, cached embeddings
  5. Grounding head β€” local CPU, cached features
  6. Change head β€” external GPU, STANet-style Siamese
  7. Optical-SAR fusion head β€” local CPU, seed sweep
  8. Change-VQA head β€” external GPU, cached change features
  9. VLM LoRA adapter β€” external GPU, PEFT
  10. Calibration β€” fitted, not trained
  11. The reproducibility contract for training
  12. What was NOT trained β€” exhaustive
  13. What is NOT RUN / OPEN / BLOCKED for this topic
  14. Where the evidence lives

1. The training philosophy

1.1 Frozen backbone + small trainable head

The project's core architectural decision is that the backbone is never updated. Every artifact in this document is a small module attached to an encoder that is loaded from a pinned revision and then frozen. The frozen contracts are enumerated in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2:

Component Frozen backbone What is trainable Freeze reference
Intent router sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 the adapter only docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.1
VLM HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-500M-Instruct a LoRA delta on the language model docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.2
Grounding chendelong/RemoteCLIP (ViT-B-32) projection + grounding head docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.3
Change β€” (reimplemented, not vendored) the whole Siamese network (see Β§6) docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.4
Optical-SAR antofuller/CROMA (CROMA_base.pt) the fusion head only docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.5
Change-VQA frozen STANet change detector a two-stage 1.45 M-parameter head docs/R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§2

The one exception is the change head. artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/model_metadata.json and the checkpoint's own embedded config record frozen_encoder: false and pretrained_used: true (artifacts/change/eval_test/eval_result.json β†’ checkpoint_embedded_config). The STANet detector's ResNet-18 encoder is initialised from torchvision IMAGENET1K_V1 and is trained, not frozen β€” which is why its checkpoint is 63 MB while the other heads are 5–14 MB. This is a deliberate, recorded exception, not an inconsistency: the change detector is the trained artifact, whereas the other five artifacts sit on top of a backbone someone else trained.

1.2 Cached-embedding training β€” the cost-reduction strategy

Because the backbone is frozen, its output for a fixed input never changes. The project therefore computes the backbone output once, writes it to a cache, and trains the head on the cache. This turns a GPU-bound problem into a CPU-bound one and is the reason four of the six artifacts train on a laptop:

Artifact What is cached Cache artifact
Router MiniLM sentence embeddings (384-d) artifacts/router/cache/
Grounding RemoteCLIP patch + text features artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/cache/remoteclip_224_v1
Optical-SAR CROMA fused features (2318-d) artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_features/{train,val,test}.npz
Change-VQA change features (1045-d) + MiniLM question features (384-d) .../prepared/change_features.npz, .../prepared/text_features_<split>.npz
VLM not cached β€” the VLM LoRA adapter trains on rendered images β€”

The router is the clearest demonstration. router/adapter.py records, verbatim in its module docstring:

Measured cost (Phase 4 probe): 50,822 parameters, 20 epochs over 4,096 x 384

i.e. 20 epochs over 4,096 cached 384-dimensional vectors, on CPU. The measured wall-clock for that probe is 0.28 s (router/adapter.py). No GPU is required for any of the four CPU-trained artifacts.

1.3 The frozen configuration hash

Every trained artifact records the frozen config hash it was trained against. The hash is computed over the parsed configuration object β€” not over the file bytes β€” by core/config.py:77-80:

78f1e3700da15aa1

This value appears in artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/model_metadata.json β†’ config_hash, artifacts/change_vqa/run/run_record.json β†’ config_hash, artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed100/run_record.json β†’ config_hash, artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/run_record.json β†’ config_hash, and models/manifest.json β†’ artifacts[*].config_hash. It is a frozen invariant in docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§3 and is enforced by tests/test_config.py::test_config_hash_matches_the_shipped_checkpoint_record.

Editing configs/base.yaml moves the hash and detaches every artifact from it. This is stated as a hazard, not a nicety, in docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§6: a config edit makes scripts/eval_change.py exit 3. The change head's head.pt is not reachable through change.checkpoint_path (which resolves to None) precisely so that the benchmark number stays attached to an unmodified config; the wiring is done through a registry builders= override instead.

A second hash exists and must not be confused with the first. The router adapter records its own adapter-config hash, 615478910dc266bf, in artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ config_hash and artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json β†’ adapter_config_hash. That hashes the adapter's config block, not the repo-wide config. models/manifest.json attaches the repo-wide 78f1e3700da15aa1 to the released router artifact. Both are recorded; they hash different objects.

1.4 The hash-exempt environment channels

Some training runs need to vary a knob without editing configs/base.yaml β€” because editing the config would move the hash. The project solves this with environment channels that are deliberately excluded from the hash:

Channel Effect Used by
SATQUERY_CROMA_USE_8_BIT selects the optical-SAR preprocessing arm (use_8_bit true/false) the optical-SAR seed sweep (Β§7)
SATQUERY_DEVICE overrides device selection training scripts generally

docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§3.1 records that the arm "travels on the hash-exempt env channel, never through configs/base.yaml", which is why all ten optical-SAR run records carry config_hash: 78f1e3700da15aa1 (Β§7.7 of that document). docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2.6 documents the same mechanism from the reproduction side.

1.5 No magic numbers in Python

Every hyperparameter lives in configs/base.yaml. Training modules read them from the config object; they do not carry their own defaults for anything that affects a result. Where a module does carry a constant (e.g. the change-VQA trainer's SEED = 42, DEFAULT_EPOCHS = 40, DEFAULT_TIME_LIMIT_SECONDS = 3*3600 in training/change_vqa/train.py), it is a CLI default that the external run overrides explicitly and that is recorded in the run's argv.

1.6 What training never does

The frozen non-negotiables (docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§5) bound what training may do:

  • No LLM-generated coordinates. The VLM is never used to produce coordinates.
  • No LLM-generated confidence. Confidence comes from the evidence engine, not a language model.
  • No hidden-test-specific branches, thresholds, or prompts. Public test is immutable; hidden data must never influence a threshold, a prompt or a routing decision.
  • Scene-level leakage isolation. Splits are by scene (or group), never by sample.
  • Prompts are versioned files, frozen before benchmark evaluation.
  • Every result carries an observable execution trace. No chain-of-thought.

These are enforced in code, not by convention β€” see DATASETS.md Β§7 for the leakage module and the public-test firewall.


2. Where each artifact trains β€” the reproducibility boundary

The single most consequential fact about this project's training story is that two of the six artifacts were trained outside this repository, on an external GPU, and the repository ships the contract and the gate for those runs rather than a one-command retrain. docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§8 states this plainly.

# Artifact Where it trains Hardware Guide / record
1 router/adapter.pt local CPU CPU only configs/base.yaml Β§router.training
2 grounding/head.pt local CPU CPU (torch 2.14.0+cpu) scripts/train_grounding.py
3 change/head.pt external GPU (Kaggle) Tesla T4 docs/PHASE9_GPU_HANDOFF.md
4 optical_sar/head.pt local CPU (seed sweep) CPU (torch 2.14.0+cpu) docs/PHASE14_OPTICAL_SAR_DECISIONS.md
5 change_vqa/head.pt external GPU (Kaggle) T4 Γ—2 docs/R02_KAGGLE_TRAINING_GUIDE.md
6 vlm/adapter_model.safetensors external GPU (Kaggle) T4 Γ—2 RUNBOOK_PHASE6_VLM_KAGGLE.md

The change head is trained on an external GPU, not locally. Its run_record.json records artifact_dir: /kaggle/working/satquery-ai/artifacts/change/levir_change_v001 and data_root: /kaggle/input/datasets/keykeylv/levir-cd-256 (artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/run_record.json). The earlier docs/PHASE9_GPU_HANDOFF.md describes the handoff; docs/PHASE9_GPU_RUN_RESULTS.md reports the returned run.

2.1 Local CPU vs external GPU β€” what "local" means

"Local" in this document means the development machine recorded in the run records, e.g. artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed100/run_record.json β†’ environment: {"cuda_available": false, "platform": "Windows-10-10.0.26200-SP0", "python": "3.11.16", "torch": "2.14.0+cpu"}. The grounding run record records the same (artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/run_record.json β†’ environment), as does the router threshold sweep (artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json β†’ environment).

The four locally-trained artifacts therefore reproduce on a machine with no CUDA device at all. This is a direct consequence of the cached-feature strategy in Β§1.2.

2.2 The mixed-precision (AMP) policy

The precision policy is frozen and has a hardware reason.

Situation Precision used Reason
CUDA device present fp16 with GradScaler docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4: "T4 = SM 7.5, no bf16 tensor cores (C-6)"
CPU only fp32 (autocast is a no-op) no CUDA dispatch key to reach
bf16 requested refused training/vlm/trainer.py refuses bf16 (finding C-6)

training/vlm/config.py defines PRECISION_CHOICES = ("fp16", "bf16", "fp32"), but the trainer refuses the bf16 branch. The change-VQA trainer's AMP selector is more careful still: it gates on compute capability rather than on torch.cuda.is_bf16_supported(), because that predicate returns True on a T4 via emulated bf16, which uses no tensor cores and is therefore slower than fp16 and no more accurate. The correct branch on a T4 is fp16 with a scaler, and the first external Kaggle log confirms the selector took it: mixed precision : True (cuda autocast (float16) with GradScaler) (PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§1b, K2). The recorded value is artifacts/change_vqa/run/run_record.json β†’ optimization.amp_reason.

A defect class follows from this policy and is worth stating here. Computing a binary cross-entropy on sigmoid probabilities β€” BCE(sigmoid(z), t) β€” saturates: its backward is (p βˆ’ t)/(p(1 βˆ’ p)), and at p = 1.0 exactly PyTorch clamps that to a finite βˆ’9.99999996e11, so GradScaler cannot flag it. Under fp16 autocast the cast node turns it into βˆ’inf, the sigmoid's own backward multiplies by sigmoid'(z) = 0, and inf Γ— 0 = nan. Saturation needs no AMP at all: sigmoid(17.0) is exactly 1.0 in plain fp32. The fix is to compute the loss from the pre-sigmoid logits with binary_cross_entropy_with_logits. The full chain, the reproduction table, and the seven tests that pin it are in PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§1b (K3) and R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§4. The relevant source is training/change_vqa/model.py (binary_cross_entropy_from_logits, and the docstring on binary_cross_entropy_probabilities which survives as the clamped fallback).

2.3 Device selection

Device is resolved per run and recorded in every run record's environment.requested_device. No run silently falls back: the change-VQA notebook "refuses to fall back silently" on a missing GPU (RUNBOOK_CHANGE_VQA_KAGGLE.md Β§4), and the trainer's environment cell "stopped on DEVICE is 'cuda' but no GPU is visible, which is the correct behaviour on this CPU-only machine" (PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§6).


3. The frozen training configuration

configs/base.yaml is the single source of truth for every hyperparameter. It is a frozen artifact: docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§2 records it at 10,637 bytes, SHA256 prefix 88434f7f8f78e2b8, mtime 2026-09-16 19:30 β€” the last artifact to have moved, two days before the change-head GPU run. The full freeze (every frozen key, with reason) is docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4; the reproduction-side account is REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2.

The training-relevant blocks are reproduced here, key by key, from configs/base.yaml.

3.1 router β€” and router.training

Key Value
model sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
revision 1110a243fdf4
max_length 128 (asserted ≀ 256)
embedding_dim 384
device auto
hidden_dim 128
dropout 0.10
confidence_threshold 0.70
num_tasks 6
tasks [vqa, caption, grounding, change, optical_sar, unsupported]
training.epochs 60
training.batch_size 64
training.learning_rate 0.001
training.weight_decay 0.01
training.task_loss_weight 1.0
training.modality_loss_weight 0.3
training.binary_loss_weight 0.5
training.val_ratio 0.15
training.hard_negatives_to_test true

3.2 grounding_training and grounding_head

Key Value
grounding_training.learning_rate 0.0001
grounding_training.batch_size 16
grounding_training.epochs 20
grounding_training.weight_decay 0.0001
grounding_training.warmup_ratio 0.05
grounding_training.grad_clip 1.0
grounding_training.val_fraction 0.10
grounding_training.num_workers 2
grounding_training.save_every_steps 500
grounding_training.box_loss_weight 0.5
grounding_training.giou_loss_weight 0.3
grounding_training.confidence_loss_weight 0.2
grounding_head.feature_dim 2048 (enforced β€” see Β§5.2)
grounding_head.positive_confidence_weight 20.0
grounding_head.decode cell_relative

3.3 change

Key Value
tile_size 256
tile_overlap 0
threshold 0.50
min_component_pixels 32
encoder resnet18
sa_mode PAM
learning_rate 0.001
batch_size 8
bce_weight 0.5
dice_weight 0.5
levir_split {train: 7120, val: 1024, test: 2048}
checkpoint_path None (see Β§6.8 β€” deliberate)

3.4 croma and fusion

Key Value
croma.variant base
croma.image_resolution 120 (native; 120 % 8 == 0 β†’ 225 patches)
croma.encoder_dim 768
croma.optical_channels 12
croma.sar_channels 2
fusion.input_dim 2318 = 3 Γ— 768 + 12 + 2 (enforced β€” see Β§7.2)
fusion.hidden_dim 512
fusion.dropout 0.2
fusion.num_classes 19

3.5 training β€” the VLM LoRA block

Key Value
precision fp16
vlm_batch_size 2
vlm_gradient_accumulation 8
vlm_learning_rate 0.0002
vlm_epochs 1
lora_rank 16
lora_alpha 32
lora_dropout 0.05
weight_decay 0.01
warmup_ratio 0.05
gradient_checkpointing true
save_every_steps 500
vlm.processor_longest_edge 512 (frozen β€” finding F5-2)

3.6 evaluation β€” the invariants that bound training

Key Value Meaning
immutable_public_test true the public test split may not be re-scored or edited
hidden_data_access false hidden annotations are never available during development
leakage_split_key scene_id splits are keyed on scene, not sample
official_aggregate_weights null inventing an aggregate formula is prohibited

evaluation/leakage.py::assert_no_hidden_access enforces the last two at runtime and raises if either is violated.

3.7 deployment β€” frozen paperwork, not a training knob

deployment.torch_compile: false (ZeroGPU does not support it β€” C-8) and deployment.cpu_mode: required are frozen because a training-time compile flag would change the artifact's execution semantics. docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4 records the reason for each. See DEPLOYMENT.md.

3.8 What invalidates the hash

Per docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2.7, the hash moves when any hashable key changes. Two things do not move it:

  1. A value that travels on a hash-exempt environment channel (Β§1.4).
  2. A call-site argument such as a registry builders= override β€” which is exactly why the change head's serving wiring and the change-VQA serving wiring both use that seam (Β§6.8, Β§8.10).

Everything else in the table above does. A moved hash detaches every artifact from its recorded config and trips the drift guard.


4. Router adapter β€” local CPU, cached embeddings

4.1 What it is

A small classifier attached to the frozen MiniLM sentence encoder. It emits five heads: task (6 classes), modality (4 classes), and three binary heads (temporal, spatial_output, language_output). The architecture is fixed in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.1:

embedding (384)
    |
LayerNorm
    |
Linear(384 -> hidden_dim)      default hidden_dim = 128
    |
GELU
    |
Dropout(0.1)
    |
    +--> task_head            Linear(hidden, 6)
    +--> modality_head        Linear(hidden, 4)
    +--> temporal_head        Linear(hidden, 1)   logit
    +--> spatial_head         Linear(hidden, 1)   logit
    +--> language_head        Linear(hidden, 1)   logit

router/adapter.py initialises every head with small-std init (std = 0.02) and zero bias, keeping the initial sigmoid near 0.5 β€” without it the binary heads can start saturated and the BCE gradients vanish before the task head learns anything. forward asserts the input is 2-D and that embeddings.shape[1] == input_dim, and requires embeddings already detached from the frozen encoder: the adapter does not back-propagate into MiniLM.

Parameter-count discrepancy β€” flagged, not smoothed over. Two figures exist and have not been reconciled:

Figure Source
~50,822 router/adapter.py module docstring ("Phase 4 probe"); models/manifest.json architecture string
51,725 artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ num_parameters; docs/PHASE4_ROUTER_REPORT.md

The released artifact is 211,961 bytes (models/manifest.json). Which figure is authoritative is UNKNOWN β€” not established from the available evidence. This document quotes both with their sources and does not pick one. (docs/MODELS.md Β§3.5 records the same discrepancy.)

4.2 The corpus

The router is trained on a synthetic corpus β€” hand-written plus template-generated queries. It is small, and every artifact says so.

Property Value Source
total examples 576 artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ corpus.total
groups 54 same β†’ corpus.groups
by source curated 66, template 510 same β†’ corpus.by_source
corpus hash 8054810736ef97c3db873b2d7073948773a8982f1d16411833d39e15e1871e83 same β†’ corpus.hash
by task caption 91, change 115, grounding 128, optical_sar 50, unsupported 105, vqa 87 same β†’ corpus.by_task
binary positives language_output 471, spatial_output 164, temporal 115 same β†’ corpus.positives

The plan's minima are plan_min_val_queries: 500 and plan_min_hard_negatives: 100 (artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json). The corpus is below both, and the artifact's own note says so verbatim:

"corpus-limited: val n=86 vs plan >=500. This is NOT a calibration β€” the corpus is synthetic and too small (min per-class support 8, caption) and val carries 0 hard negatives (hn_ families are held out to TEST by design). Selecting a threshold here yields a justified default, not a calibrated value. The corpus was NOT padded with generated queries."*

4.3 The frozen-encoder + cached-embedding strategy

This is the artifact where the strategy is most visible. The encoder is frozen, so its 384-d output for a fixed string is constant; the project embeds the 576-example corpus once, caches the vectors under artifacts/router/cache/, and trains the adapter on the cache. The recorded cost is the probe figure quoted in Β§1.2: 20 epochs over 4,096 Γ— 384 vectors in 0.28 s on CPU.

The whole router run took 4.92 s wall-clock (artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ duration_seconds), and the threshold sweep that follows training took 0.206 s (artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json β†’ seconds). There is no GPU in either record.

4.4 Group-based splits with hard negatives in the test split

The router is the artifact where the split rule is most explicit, and it is a leakage-prevention rule rather than a convenience.

  • Splits are by group β€” template family / hard-negative family β€” never by example (router/dataset.py::split_by_group).
  • The reason, stated in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.1's neighbourhood and in MODELS.md Β§3.5: template-generated queries are near-duplicates. Splitting by example would put "Show me the water body." in train and "Show me the road." in val β€” one token apart β€” and report a fake accuracy.
  • Hard-negative families are placed in the test split. configs/base.yaml sets router.training.hard_negatives_to_test: true, and router/dataset.py prefixes hard-negative families with hn_. Finding F4-3 records the consequence: hard-negative families are held out to test so their accuracy measures generalisation rather than memorisation.

Measured split sizes (artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ split):

Split examples groups hard negatives
train 410 37 β€”
val 86 8 0 (by design)
test 80 9 the hn_* families

The split audit records clean: true and groups_across_splits: {} β€” i.e. no group straddles two splits.

4.5 Hyperparameters

From configs/base.yaml Β§router.training, corroborated by artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json:

Hyperparameter Value
epochs 60
batch size 64
learning rate 0.001
weight decay 0.01
task loss weight 1.0
modality loss weight 0.3
binary loss weight 0.5
val_ratio 0.15
hard_negatives_to_test true
seed 42

4.6 The full training procedure

  1. Embed the 576-example corpus with the frozen MiniLM encoder at max_length: 128 and cache the 384-d vectors.
  2. Split by group (split_by_group), holding hn_* families out to test.
  3. Train the adapter for 60 epochs, batch 64, AdamW-class optimisation at lr = 0.001, weight_decay = 0.01, on the composite loss 1.0 Β· task + 0.3 Β· modality + 0.5 Β· binary.
  4. Select the epoch by validation (group-split) performance; the history is recorded per epoch in artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json β†’ history (each entry carries epoch, loss, lr, val_combined_accuracy, val_task_accuracy).
  5. Sweep the confidence threshold on val only (scripts/ sweep β†’ artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json), 50 thresholds from 0.50 to 0.99.
  6. Ship the adapter (artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/adapter.pt).

4.7 Measured numbers

artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json is the release's router artifact. Its headline:

Field Value Key path
overall ungated task accuracy 0.965116 overall_ungated_accuracy
split val split
n val 86 n_val
n val examples scored 86 n_val_examples_scored
n test examples scored 0 n_test_examples_scored
test_split_touched false test_split_touched
corpus_limited true corpus_limited
hard negatives in val 0 hard_negatives_in_val
val min per-class support 8 (caption) val_min_support
split sizes train 410 / val 86 / test 80 split_sizes
adapter encoder params 22,713,216 adapter_encoder.parameters
adapter config hash 615478910dc266bf adapter_config_hash
repo config hash 78f1e3700da15aa1 config_hash

0.965116 is validation-only, ungated, n = 86. The router TEST split was NOT RUN.

n_test_examples_scored is 0 and test_split_touched is false. Do not read 0.965116 as a test result. The number is "ungated" because the plan's acceptance target (docs/ Β§59 in the master plan: task accuracy β‰₯ 95 % on 500 validation queries / 100 hard negatives / 50 unsupported) is measured on a corpus that has 86 val examples and 0 hard negatives. A router can reach high accuracy on easy queries while failing exactly on the hard-negative families the plan calls out.

Historical note, recorded so the two are not conflated. artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/ metadata.json β†’ metrics.test contains a test block (n = 80, task_accuracy: 0.975, macro_f1_task: 0.976, hard_negative_accuracy: 0.8). That block is the earlier Phase 4 gate-2 evaluation, which predates the shipped threshold sweep and carries its own caveat β€” per docs/PHASE4_ROUTER_REPORT.md, "the 0.975 headline is partly earned on templates the split kept in training. Treat the router as working, not as benchmarked." The release's position for the shipped artifact is TEST NOT RUN; the Phase 4 numbers are retained as a historical record, not promoted to a release benchmark. (docs/MODELS.md Β§3.5 records the same distinction.)

4.8 The threshold sweep is val-only by construction

artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json iterates thresholds 0.50 β†’ 0.99 and records coverage, covered_task_accuracy, fallback_rate and n_covered at each.

Row Threshold coverage covered_task_accuracy fallback_rate n_covered
shipped (shipped_row) 0.70 0.848837 0.972603 0.151163 73
sweep-selected (selected) 0.76 0.790698 1.0 0.209302 68

select_by: "covered_accuracy". The delta against the shipped threshold (delta_vs_shipped) is coverage: βˆ’0.0581, covered_task_accuracy: 0.0274 β€” the sweep's own criterion trades 5.8 pp of coverage for 2.7 pp of covered accuracy. The shipped threshold remains 0.70. This is a justified default, not a calibrated value, and the artifact says so.


5. Grounding head β€” local CPU, cached features

5.1 What it is

A trainable head over the frozen RemoteCLIP ViT-B-32 encoder (chendelong/RemoteCLIP, file RemoteCLIP-ViT-B-32.pt, 605 MB). The encoder is frozen; the projection and the grounding head are trainable (docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.3). The head has 1,052,677 parameters (artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/training_metadata.json β†’ head_parameters) and emits five outputs β€” tx, ty, tw, th, objectness β€” over a 7 Γ— 7 token grid (grid: 7, head.decode: cell_relative, head.dropout: 0.1, head.feature_dim: 2048, head.hidden_dim: 512).

5.2 The enforced 2048-dimensional invariant

Per-cell feature is the concatenation

concat([patch, text, patchΒ·text, global_pool]) = 4 Γ— 512 = 2048

core/config.py rejects any value other than 4 Γ— grounding.encoder_projected_dim at load time, and the specialist asserts the same 512 against the real model. The reason is stated in REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2.3 (invariant 2): a mismatch is a silent shape error that torch only raises at the similarity step β€” after patch features are already cached. The load-time guard makes the error loud and early. configs/base.yaml records grounding_head.feature_dim: 2048.

5.3 The feature cache

The grounding run is a two-stage pipeline (scripts/train_grounding.py): stage 1 extracts and caches RemoteCLIP features, stage 2 trains the head on the cache. The recorded cache (artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/run_record.json β†’ cache) is:

Quantity Value
cache dir artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/cache/remoteclip_224_v1
images total 15,699
image cache hits / misses 15,699 / 0
images undecodable / missing source 0 / 0
phrases total 24,439
text cache hits / misses 24,439 / 0
cache build seconds 2.1 (images 0.9 s, text 0.0 s)

The cache version string is remoteclip_224_v1 β€” the resolution is baked into the cache identity, so a head trained at 224 cannot silently be served features extracted at another resolution.

5.4 Hyperparameters

From configs/base.yaml Β§grounding_training, corroborated by the run's history (first epoch lr = 0.0001, decaying):

Hyperparameter Value
learning rate 0.0001
batch size 16
epochs 20
weight decay 0.0001
warmup ratio 0.05
grad clip 1.0
val fraction 0.10
num workers 2
save every steps 500
box loss weight 0.5
GIoU loss weight 0.3
confidence loss weight 0.2
positive_confidence_weight 20.0
seed 42

The loss weights appear in the per-epoch history as loss_box, loss_giou, loss_confidence and loss_total (artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/run_record.json β†’ history).

5.5 Why positive_confidence_weight = 20.0

The objectness branch is a per-cell binary classification over a 7 Γ— 7 grid. Roughly 1 cell in 49 is positive. Unweighted, the loss-minimising solution is "no object everywhere"; the weight is what stops that collapse. The value is frozen in configs/base.yaml Β§grounding_head, not chosen per run.

5.6 The training procedure

  1. Extract RemoteCLIP image + text features for the VRSBench grounding split, into cache/remoteclip_224_v1 (Β§5.3).
  2. Split by image (leakage split by image; training/grounding/dataset.py), with val_fraction: 0.10. run_record.json records train_items: 23042 / val_items: 2548; training_metadata.json records train_images: 14130 / val_images: 1569; and the cache's images_total is 15,699 = 14,130 + 1,569. docs/PHASE8_HANDOFF.md Β§2 restates the same split.
  3. Train the 1,052,677-parameter head for 20 epochs, batch 16, lr = 1e-4, weight_decay = 1e-4, warmup_ratio = 0.05, grad_clip = 1.0, on 0.5 Β· box + 0.3 Β· giou + 0.2 Β· confidence with positive_confidence_weight = 20.0.
  4. Select the best validation IoU. docs/PHASE8_GROUNDING_HEAD_DECISION.md records the decision.
  5. Evaluate under two protocols and two decode variants (Β§5.9).
  6. Ship artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/head.pt (12,639,041 bytes, sha256 93432f7034be91a8ffd9c1a84e3eeec00bed7832c043fe7f83d2be230284c6bb; models/manifest.json).

Wall-clock: 805.9 s on CPU (artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/run_record.json β†’ wall_seconds; the per-epoch seconds in the run history sum to 765.9 s over 20 epochs β€” ~38 s/epoch β€” with the remainder being setup).

5.7 Resolution is frozen at 224 β€” 448 was REJECTED

grounding.image_size: 224 (native). The 448 variant (β†’ 196 tokens) was a gated experiment in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.3: adopted only if validation IoU improved. It did not.

docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4 records the resolution as "RESOLVED by measurement: 448 lost on IoU, all recall thresholds and latency over 16,159 records (docs/PHASE7_RESOLUTION_DECISION.md)". The paired test statistic is recorded as mean diff βˆ’0.0147, 95 % CI [βˆ’0.0160, βˆ’0.0134], t = βˆ’22.63, at 1.59Γ— latency (see BENCHMARKS.md Β§4.2 and EVALUATION.md Β§5, "a pre-registered rejection"). The localisation floor at 224 is 32 px (7 Γ— 7 tokens of 32 px each).

5.8 Measured training numbers

From artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/training_metadata.json and run_record.json:

Field Value Key path
best val IoU 0.0946 best_val_iou (full: 0.09463294948954619 in run_record.json)
zero-shot baseline 0.0972 baseline.mean_best_iou
beats_baseline false beats_baseline
required margin 0.02 baseline.required_margin
first epoch val IoU (argmax decode) 0.0436 history[0].val_iou_argmax
head parameters 1,052,677 head_parameters
grid 7 grid
device cpu device
data root training/data/vrsbench data_root

The head did not beat the zero-shot baseline on validation IoU (0.0946 < 0.0972; beats_baseline: false, improvement βˆ’0.002567). This is a negative result, preserved as such. It does not invalidate the head β€” the head is what the two-protocol evaluation is computed with, and the zero-shot number (0.0972) is one of the two decode variants the release quotes. But no claim of improvement over zero-shot is made, because the measurement says there is none.

5.9 Two protocols Γ— two decode variants

Grounding is the artifact where collapsing protocols is most dangerous, because a box-convention mistake is silent. The release therefore reports:

Protocol / variant Value Artifact
canonical protocol, head_threshold decode 0.2838 eval_result_canonical.json β†’ head_threshold.mean_best_iou
canonical protocol, head_argmax decode 0.1215 eval_result_canonical.json β†’ head_argmax.mean_best_iou
matched6 protocol, head_threshold decode 0.2566 eval_result_matched6.json β†’ head_threshold.mean_best_iou (top_k 6)
zero-shot baseline 0.0972 run_record.json β†’ baseline_mean_best_iou

n_eval_records: 16159, resolution: 224 (eval_result_canonical.json). Never quote one protocol alone. The convention is stated in BENCHMARKS.md Β§1 and EVALUATION.md Β§4.2.


6. Change head β€” external GPU, STANet-style Siamese

6.1 What it is

A reimplemented STANet-style Siamese change detector β€” reimplemented, not vendored (docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.4, finding C-9). Architecture (specialists/change/stanet.py, and the checkpoint's embedded config in artifacts/change/eval_test/eval_result.json β†’ checkpoint_embedded_config):

Component Value
encoder ResNet-18 (torchvision IMAGENET1K_V1, pretrained_used: true)
encoder channels [64, 128, 256, 512]
self-attention PAM (sa_mode: PAM) β€” the BAM alternative is not used
width 128
frozen_encoder false (see Β§1.1 β€” this is the one trained encoder)
attention_budget_bytes 268,435,456 (256 MiB; PAM is skipped at layer 1 to stay inside it)
tied weights yes (Siamese)
model parameters 15,779,969

6.2 Hyperparameters

From configs/base.yaml Β§change, corroborated by artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/run_record.json β†’ hyperparameters:

Hyperparameter Value
tile size 256
tile overlap 0
learning rate 0.001
batch size 8
epochs 20
weight decay 0.0001
grad clip 1.0
loss 0.5 Β· BCE + 0.5 Β· Dice (bce_weight 0.5, dice_weight 0.5)
pos_weight null (not used)
LR schedule cosine (CosineAnnealingLR(optimizer, T_max = epochs), training/change/train.py:750)
threshold 0.50
min_component_pixels 32
seed 42

6.3 Training data and split

LEVIR-CD-256, flat layout. run_record.json records train_items: 7120, train_scenes: 445, val_items: 1024, val_scenes: 64; docs/PHASE9_REAL_DATA_VERIFICATION.md records the full split as 445 / 64 / 128 scenes = 7120 / 1024 / 2048 tiles, matching change.levir_split. The split is scene-disjoint (verified β€” see DATASETS.md Β§3).

6.4 The procedure

  1. Handoff the code and data to an external GPU. docs/PHASE9_GPU_HANDOFF.md records the Kaggle code zip artifacts/kaggle/satquery-code.zip (152 files, 0.6 MB), the cell map, and the cell-5 gate.
  2. Train 20 epochs, batch 8, lr = 1e-3, 0.5Β·BCE + 0.5Β·Dice, cosine schedule.
  3. Select the best validation IoU. best_val_iou full precision 0.8232294319484017 (run_record.json), first_val_iou 0.7335963646366181; improved: true.
  4. Score the immutable test split exactly once.
  5. Freeze the phase (docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md).

Run identity: run_id: change_head_20260918T070723Z, wall_seconds: 4014.3 (run_record.json) / duration_seconds: 4012.29 (training_metadata.json). peak_vram_mb: 1483.0 (training_metadata.json). Device cuda, torch 2.10.0+cu128, python 3.12.13.

6.5 Measured training numbers

From artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/training_metadata.json (and model_metadata.json, which carries the identical block):

Field Value
best val IoU (pooled) 0.8232
final val pooled f1 0.9030, iou 0.8232, miou 0.9075, precision 0.9176, recall 0.8890
final val macro f1 0.8317, iou 0.7507, miou 0.8645, precision 0.8778, recall 0.8122
val n 1024
val images with change 436
val mean change fraction 0.042
first val IoU 0.7336
device cuda

6.6 The test result β€” the only VERIFIED headline

artifacts/change/eval_test/eval_result.json, split: test, n: 2048:

Metric pooled macro
f1 0.8964 0.7962
iou 0.8122 0.7180
miou 0.9007 0.8457
precision 0.9195 0.8506
recall 0.8745 0.7757
tp / fp / fn / tn 5,978,997 / 523,658 / 858,407 / 126,856,666 same pixel counts
n pixels 134,217,728 same

threshold: 0.5, tile_size: 256, seconds: 55.359, n_images_with_change: 935, mean_change_fraction: 0.0509, config_drift: false.

This is the only VERIFIED headline in the release β€” pooled IoU 0.8122 / pooled F1 0.8964, with the macro pair (iou 0.7180 / miou 0.8457) reported alongside. docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§4 lists it as "Benchmark performance βœ… ... reproduced". The generalisation gap is val 0.8232 β†’ test 0.8122.

Metric-naming caveat. The macro block carries both iou (0.7180, the macro-average of the per-image IoU) and miou (0.8457, the mean IoU). The headline "macro IoU 0.8457" used across the release docs is the miou field. This document names the key path so the two cannot be conflated.

6.7 The threshold lever is CLOSED

docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§5 eliminates the threshold hypothesis. A val-only sweep scored 19 thresholds; scripts/sweep_change_threshold.py refuses any --split other than val and exits 4 before loading config, checkpoint, or data β€” so the sweep cannot touch the test split. Its artifact records test_split_touched: false and its sha256 is 34e20f62bc1dd7810f5ef5f26838213d59368cf1352a804d38cb0e140eaf97f2.

Threshold pooled IoU macro IoU
0.50 (retained) 0.8232 0.7507
best pooled (0.35–0.40) 0.8239 (+0.0007) β€”
best macro (0.25) β€” 0.7550 (+0.0043)

Four thresholds do dominate 0.50 on all three reported metrics β€” but the last five validation epochs span 0.8213–0.8232, a spread of 0.0019, so the entire available threshold gain is 0.37Γ— the epoch-to-epoch noise. A gain smaller than the run's own variance is not a finding. 0.50 is retained; this hypothesis is eliminated, not deferred.

6.8 The freeze, and the orphaned-head hazard

docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md freezes the change specialist: the artifacts in its Β§2 may not be edited, regenerated, or re-scored, and a longer cosine run must use levir_change_v002 or it overwrites the audited head.pt in place. The freeze also documents a verified hazard: the Kaggle notebook notebooks/kaggle_change_training.ipynb hardcodes the frozen output directory, so re-running it writes straight over levir_change_v001/head.pt.

The trained head was, at freeze time, not reachable from the serving path: change.checkpoint_path resolves to None, so the registry builds a random-initialised detector and the change specialist reports DEGRADED with has_checkpoint: False. This is deliberate β€” pointing base.yaml at the checkpoint moves the config hash and detaches the benchmark number. The fix uses the registry builders= override, which reaches the change builder without moving the hash (app/serving.py; docs/ARCHITECTURE_CHANGE_CHANGE_SERVING_WIRING.md). Wired that way, a real AnalysisController.run() on test_79_2.png returns available, degraded=False, confidence 0.7987. Unwired, the same query returns DEGRADED with zero change regions. "Phase 9 benchmark 0.8122" and "the app detects change" are different claims, and only the first is true.

6.9 The registration-gate defect β€” OPEN

docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§7 records an open defect inherited by Phase 10: the change specialist's registration gate produces false positives. 1,202 / 2,048 test tiles (58.7 %) are flagged as mis-registered; response < 0.15 is involved in 98.7 % of them; the flag rate climbs 42 % β†’ 75 % β†’ 98 % β†’ 100 % as ground-truth change fraction rises. On 638 flagged tiles that do contain change, 5,679 region claims are suppressed β€” 5,338 of them on tiles the model scores at IoU β‰₯ 0.7 (median 0.841). An independent NCC check found 0 / 30 credible large offsets on the tiles the gate blames. One counter-hypothesis remains untested: ~50 % of zero-change tiles are also flagged, consistent with low image texture. OPEN. This is a serving-path defect; it does not affect the 0.8122 benchmark, which is computed offline.


7. Optical-SAR fusion head β€” local CPU, seed sweep

7.1 What it is

A fusion head over the frozen CROMA-base encoder (antofuller/CROMA, CROMA_base.pt, MIT; 777,563,846 bytes; sha256 0238d814b53108f3574bf1ea240e38a0a6edd46173816d9a6962070561893b63). The head is LayerNorm β†’ Linear(2318, W) β†’ GELU β†’ Dropout β†’ Linear(W, task_dim) (docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.5), with W = 512, task_dim = 19, dropout 0.2, and 1,201,711 parameters (artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_production_v001/production_head_record.json β†’ head_config.head_parameters).

7.2 The enforced 2318-dimensional invariant

The fusion head's input is derived, not hardcoded (docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2.3, invariant 1):

optical_GAP      (B, 768)
SAR_GAP          (B, 768)
joint_GAP        (B, 768)
optical_mask     (B, 12)     <- availability, from sensor adapter
sar_mask         (B,  2)     <- availability, from sensor adapter
                 ---------
concat           (B, 2318)

core/config.py rejects any other value at load time. docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.5 records that CROMA never receives a mask (finding C-1): the masks are inputs to the fusion head, which is what lets the head learn to trust the availability signal. croma.image_resolution: 120 is native (120 % 8 == 0 β†’ 225 patches).

7.3 The feature caches

Training consumes cached CROMA features. The Arm-A cache (artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_features/) contains train.npz (170,919,398 B), train.json (1,581,540 B), val.npz (34,195,674 B), val.json (317,536 B), test.npz (34,165,540 B), test.json (317,537 B). The Arm-B cache lives in artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_features_armB/. These caches are reproducible and are not released as model weights.

The arm is baked into the cache. scripts/train_fusion.py refuses to train a cache whose recorded arm differs from --arm; the resume provenance guard (training/fusion/extract.py, CacheProvenanceError) refuses to append Arm-B rows into an Arm-A cache. This is why Β§7.4's blocker is a compute item, not a code defect.

7.4 The Arm A / Arm B contract β€” and why "Arm B" is not the registered Arm B

docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§2 (D-01) amends the Phase 14 contract. The arms as actually implemented and run:

Arm Definition use_8_bit
Arm A (control) percentile/dB conditioning β†’ per-channel mean Β± 2Β·std stretch β†’ uint8 round-trip true
Arm B (variant) percentile/dB conditioning β†’ per-channel mean Β± 2Β·std stretch β†’ bounded stretch, no uint8 round-trip false

Three facts must be stated together, or the pre-registration is silently rewritten:

  1. The Β§4-registered arm B β€” "percentile/dB only, no encoder-input stretch" β€” is NON-CONSTRUCTIBLE. normalise_for_croma has no skip branch: it always applies the mean Β± 2Β·std stretch, and use_8_bit only toggles the uint8 round-trip vs a clip (specialists/optical_sar/radiometry.py:377-401). The registered arm is retained unedited for the record and was never run.
  2. The arm actually run under the name "B" is the registered arm C ("A but use_8_bit=false"). Calling the current B the registered B would equate two different arms.
  3. No Arm C was introduced. The arm set is frozen at exactly two.

So the comparison that was actually run is: "does the uint8 round-trip in the encoder-input path change fusion-head validation accuracy?" β€” the quantisation/range-bound question β€” not the stretch-vs-no-stretch question Β§4 originally registered. The deviation is recorded, not hidden.

The Arm-A run records carry a normalization string describing exactly what was executed, e.g. artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed100/run_record.json β†’ normalization: "uint8 axis, use_8_bit=true: per-channel mean+-2std encoder-input stretch, then the uint8 round-trip (scale to 0..255, clip, quantise, /255) -> {0/255,...,1}. This is the transform actually executed; the registered PHASE14 Β§4 stage-1 percentile/dB conditioning is not run."

7.5 Hyperparameters

From artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed100/run_record.json (hyperparameters, head_config), identical across both arms:

Hyperparameter Value
batch size 64
epochs 20
learning rate 0.001
weight decay 0.0001
grad clip 1.0
warmup ratio 0.05
input_dim 2318
hidden_dim 512
task_dim 19
dropout 0.2
head parameters 1,201,711
seed 100–104

7.6 Channel / band dropout is mandatory

docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2.5: "Channel/band dropout during fusion-head training is mandatory; it is what teaches the head to trust the availability mask." The recorded rates are

Modality dropout rates
optical [1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.4]
SAR [1.0, 0.5]

(artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed100/run_record.json β†’ channel_dropout). A rate of 1.0 means the modality is entirely dropped for that sample, which forces the head to produce a prediction from the surviving modality plus the mask.

7.7 The seed sweep and the decision

Training was run as two arms Γ— five seeds (100–104). The deciding metric is best_val_accuracy β€” the maximum validation accuracy over epochs (Gate F D-02); macro-F1 is co-reported, never deciding; final_val is not deciding.

Arm A Arm B
accuracies 0.83425 Β· 0.82450 Β· 0.83850 Β· 0.85300 Β· 0.83525 0.84300 Β· 0.84675 Β· 0.84450 Β· 0.84400 Β· 0.81725
mean 0.837100 0.839100
min / max 0.82450 / 0.85300 0.81725 / 0.84675
spread (max βˆ’ min) 0.02850 0.02950

(artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed_variance_report.json, armB_seed_variance_report.json; docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§7.1.)

The decision rule was pre-registered. Gate F Β§6 (written before any Arm-B result existed) pinned the A/B statistic to the five-seed MEAN:

B_mean βˆ’ A_mean = 0.839100 βˆ’ 0.837100 = +0.002000
threshold (fixed in Β§5/Β§6, never re-chosen) = 0.0285
+0.002000 > 0.0285  β†’  FALSE

ARM A RETAINED. Arm B is NOT adopted.

The substantive finding: the uint8 round-trip is not accuracy-limiting at this scale. Removing it shifts validation accuracy by +0.2 percentage points against a 2.85-point seed-to-seed noise floor β€” the effect is roughly 14Γ— smaller than the noise it would have to clear. Robustness checks (Β§7.4 of the Gate F record) confirm the verdict does not depend on which arm supplies the floor, and that under the excluded best-single-seed reading Arm A wins too. The paired design is proven: both arms carry identical sample_ids and scene_ids in identical order while the .npz sha256 differs in all three splits β€” same samples, same order, different bytes, so the delta is attributable to preprocessing, not sampling.

The Οƒ = 0 fallback. Gate F D-03 amends the decision rule so that if the measured spread is zero the floor is the validation-accuracy resolution 1/N_val. With N_val = 4000, that floor is 0.00025. It did not apply here (the measured spread is non-zero at 0.0285), but it is part of the contract.

7.8 The production head

The production head is a distinct, frozen artifact β€” not the same directory as the sweep.

artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_production_v001/production_head_record.json:

Field Value
designated by R-14 (owner ruling, 2026-09-21)
source artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/armA_seed103/head.pt
arm / seed A / 103
sha256 785815729a3a39fc34dc41894efaf00d8739365d970a3f830a326e68ae888dab
bytes 14,427,457
best_val_accuracy 0.853
arm_a_mean_best_val_accuracy 0.8371
test_split_used_for_selection false
is_ab_deciding_statistic false

Selection basis, verbatim from the record: arm selection is the five-seed MEAN of best_val_accuracy (pre-registered); production-head selection is the highest best_val_accuracy among the retained Arm-A seeds (a post-experiment artifact-selection rule only). The five Arm-A candidate digests are listed in retained_arm_a_candidates. The provenance note states the production head bytes are an unmodified, byte-identical copy (shutil.copyfile) of the trained Arm-A seed-103 artifact β€” no re-serialisation, re-pickling or tensor round-trip. The test split was not used for selection.

7.9 The pre-registered 11.5 metric

artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_production_v001/pre_registered_115_metric.json (a rerun is recorded in phase12_rerun_verification.json, same values):

Field Value
metric pre_registered_11.5
split test
n scored 4,000
head sha256 785815729a3a39fc34dc41894efaf00d8739365d970a3f830a326e68ae888dab
accuracy 0.931
macro-F1 0.434161
loss 0.254592
num classes 19
classes present 14 ([0,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,17,18])
classes absent 5 ([1,11,14,15,16])
macro-F1 denominator "all 19 classes (absent classes contribute 0.0)"
is_deciding_statistic false

Accuracy 0.931 is never quoted without macro-F1 0.434161, and the ruling is OPEN.

The macro-F1 denominator is all 19 classes, so the five absent classes contribute 0.0 by construction β€” which is why the two numbers answer different questions. Classes 5 and 6 are present in the scored split and still score 0.0 (docs/PHASE12_115_METRIC_COMPUTED.md). The metric JSON's own advisory says it "reports ONE head's held-out accuracy and macro-F1. It selects no head, ranks nothing and compares no arms. Whether this constitutes a Phase 12 pass is the owner's ruling."

7.10 The PLUMBING_ONLY label β€” R-08

Every run record in both arms carries result_status = "PLUMBING_ONLY β€” fixture/loop evidence, NOT a result; the pre-registered 11.5 metric is not computed" (training/fusion/train.py:121-124). The label is stale for the real 20,000-sample runs, and it was deliberately not changed mid-experiment: editing the constant would have left Arm A's already-written records inconsistent with Arm B's. Both arms carry the identical text, so the comparison is unaffected. It is flagged for an owner ruling (R-08) and no historical record was rewritten (docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§7.7). The run_record.json also carries pre_registered_metric_computed: false and a matching final_val.note.


8. Change-VQA head β€” external GPU, cached change features

This is the artifact with the most complete external-training contract in the repository. Its authoritative guide is docs/R02_KAGGLE_TRAINING_GUIDE.md (37,543 B, 19 points); the short form is RUNBOOK_CHANGE_VQA_KAGGLE.md; the pre-flight checklist is PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md (33 items).

8.1 What it is

A two-stage head over cached change features (training/change_vqa/model.py; R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§2):

frozen STANet detector  ->  change feature (1045-d)
                        ->  STAGE 1  class-wise change estimate (13 outputs)
                        ->  STAGE 2  question-conditioned 19-way answer
                        ->  answer + evidence + provenance

Stage 1's outputs are concatenated into stage 2's input, so the answer is computed from the change estimate. That is what makes largest_change / smallest_change answerable at all: a single pooled vector has no per-class structure to compare. It is one trainable module with one loss, not two models. ARCHITECTURE_VERSION = "change_vqa_head_v1".

Component Value Source
architecture change_vqa_head_v1 artifacts/change_vqa/run/model_metadata.json
parameters 1,453,912 run_record.json β†’ model.parameters
trunk_dim 512 model.trunk_dim
text_dim 256 model.text_dim
dropout 0.10 model.dropout
stage-1 estimator Linear(1045, 256) β†’ GELU β†’ Linear(256, 13) training/change_vqa/model.py
answer head Linear(fused, 512) β†’ GELU β†’ Dropout β†’ Linear(512, 256) β†’ GELU β†’ Linear(256, 19) same

The architecture was chosen from four measured facts (R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§2): the answer space is closed and has 19 members (rules out a generative decoder); answers are short (yes, buildings, 10_to_20); label1/label2 ship for all 2,968 scenes (class-wise change is computable supervision, not a guessed target); and the budget is ≀ 3 h on T4Γ—2 (rules out training anything large).

8.2 The frozen dependency

The head reads features produced by the frozen LEVIR STANet change detector (artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/head.pt, sha256 c5ef31277b67aa01a593aec0eac503eeaccc6d674349fda20ca44c9cc6f8e9fa, 63,231,009 B, 15,779,969 params). The detector is never updated. A missing checkpoint is a hard error unless --allow-untrained-detector is passed β€” "because a cache built from an untrained detector still trains, still evaluates, and still reports a number" (RUNBOOK_CHANGE_VQA_KAGGLE.md Β§3). The notebook verifies the checkpoint by size and sha256 and refuses to continue on a mismatch; this was verified by injecting a 23-byte file in its place.

8.3 The feature caches

Training consumes two caches, both identified by a spec hash:

Cache Spec Hash
change features (1045-d) change_feat_v1 change_cache_spec c801326f85a185f8 (trained; untrained spec is 714efac5b0e6a6d1)
question features (384-d) MiniLM-L6-v2 text_cache_spec d2801ea1a314354a

(artifacts/change_vqa/run/model_metadata.json.) The feature extractor re-runs the detector's submodules and trains nothing: training/change_vqa/features.py β†’ ChangeFeatureExtractor ("Trains no"). FEATURE_SPEC = "change_feat_v1", DEFAULT_IMAGE_SIZE = 256, CHANGE_FEATURE_DIM = 1045 = 1024 level_pooled + 5 change_stats + 16 change_grid. The trainer refuses a cache built under a different spec, and the specialist returns an empty answer with degraded=True on a spec mismatch rather than answering from the wrong feature space.

Cost: feature extraction is the bottleneck, not head training. Measured β‰ˆ 0.25 s/scene on CPU (64 scenes in 22 s including startup); β‰ˆ 8 min for 2,000 scenes. Head training is β‰ˆ 0.5 s/epoch over 26 batches at the smoke scale. The T4 figure is not measured and not claimed.

8.4 The training procedure

The run record's argv is the exact invocation (artifacts/change_vqa/run/run_record.json β†’ argv):

--prepared-dir /kaggle/working/outputs/change_vqa/prepared
--output-dir   /kaggle/working/outputs/change_vqa/run
--data-root    /kaggle/input/datasets/creatorballs/cdvqa-dataset
--device       cuda
--time-limit-seconds 10800
--epochs       40
--batch-size   256
--seed         42
--patience     6

The trainer's own defaults are epochs=40, batch_size=128, seed=42, patience=6, time_limit=10800 s (training/change_vqa/train.py), with DEFAULT_LR = 1e-3, DEFAULT_WEIGHT_DECAY = 1e-4, DEFAULT_WARMUP_RATIO = 0.05, DEFAULT_GRAD_CLIP = 1.0, DEFAULT_MIN_DELTA = 1e-4. The guide instructs: "Do not change these to get past an error."

The procedure, in order:

  1. Assemble the code as a Kaggle dataset (249 files, 248 define the digest; the guide's Β§1a holds the digest value and the recompute snippet).
  2. Assemble the CDVQA data as a second Kaggle dataset (Β§4 of the readiness report: annotations/ 53 MB + im1/ 1,128 MB + im2/ 1,156 MB + label1/ 22 MB + label2/ 22 MB β‰ˆ 2.4 GB). A split integrity gate refuses to continue unless the four split counts match exactly.
  3. Attach the frozen STANet checkpoint.
  4. Create the notebook with T4 Γ—2 and Internet on (MiniLM weights download).
  5. Discover paths (marker search, not an assumed mount slug) and verify the STANet digest.
  6. Run the discovery, environment and integrity cells β€” integrity clean : True, no size errors.
  7. Prepare Train and Val only (targets β†’ change features β†’ question features). Held-out splits are prepared later, after the head is fitted, so no held-out label is read before the model is frozen.
  8. Train (time-budgeted at 3 h; the budget is checked before every batch).
  9. Evaluate on Test and Test2, masked and unmasked, with a guard over all three artifacts and a check that reads eval_summary.json back.
  10. Return the export directory β€” the unit of review.

8.5 Optimisation

artifacts/change_vqa/run/run_record.json β†’ optimization:

Field Value
optimizer AdamW
learning rate 0.001
weight decay 0.0001
scheduler cosine_with_warmup
grad clip 1.0
AMP fp16 (torch.float16) with GradScaler
amp_reason cuda autocast (float16) with GradScaler
native_bfloat16 false
total steps planned 10,320
warmup steps 516
epochs requested 40
epochs completed 14

Loss weights (optimization.loss_weights, and training/change_vqa/model.py):

Term Weight
answer (CE) 1.0
delta (MSE) 1.0
magnitude (BCE) 1.0
total_changed (BCE) 0.5

8.6 Selection

run_record.json β†’ selection:

Field Value
metric Val answer accuracy
best epoch 8
best accuracy 0.700018
patience 6
min_delta 0.0001
stop_reason early_stopping

The trainer's FORBIDDEN_SPLITS are ("Test", "Test2") and the training split is Train with Val as the selection split (training/change_vqa/train.py). model_metadata.json records test_splits_used: false, detector_trained: true, seed: 42, epoch: 8.

8.7 The state vocabulary β€” TRAINED_UNVERIFIED

run_record.json β†’ state is "TRAINED_UNVERIFIED", with the note:

"training produces an artifact, not a verified capability. R-02 reaches VERIFIED only after the returned checkpoint has been evaluated on the held-out split."

confidence.method is "uncalibrated" β€” raw softmax plus a top1βˆ’top2 margin; nothing is fitted. The post-training state constant is POST_TRAINING_STATE = "TRAINED_UNVERIFIED" (training/change_vqa/train.py).

8.8 The byte-identity promotion gate

The returned checkpoint was promoted through a byte-identity gate. artifacts/change_vqa/run/ PROMOTION.json (schema change_vqa_promotion_v1, promoted 2026-09-22):

Property Value Key path
sha256 cfae5e43b97ca930f568dc5b8ae4f36b24e9ff717af226159802206ffd63a82a artifact.sha256
bytes 5,822,809 artifact.bytes
architecture change_vqa_head_v1 artifact.architecture
parameters 1,453,912 artifact.parameters
non-finite tensors 0 artifact.non_finite_tensors
weights modified during promotion false artifact.weights_modified
byte-identical to source true source.byte_identical_to_source
hash agrees across model_metadata.json, run_record.json, hashes.json source.hash_agrees_across
config hash 78f1e3700da15aa1 β€”
epoch selected 8 β€”
val answer accuracy 0.700018 β€”
stop_reason early_stopping β€”
frozen dependency artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/head.pt, sha256 c5ef3127…e9fa β€”
state before TRAINED_UNVERIFIED β€”
state after PROMOTED β€”

The promotion verification also records 93 passed / 0 failed / 0 skipped, and the two test-set scores:

Split accuracy macro-F1 n scored baseline (global majority)
Test 0.697626367 0.378373275 39,686 0.311546
Test2 0.651469262 0.372308516 31,036 0.178728

with metric_ruling: OPEN.

What the promotion gate does β€” and does not β€” establish.

It establishes that the returned bytes are the bytes that were trained, unmodified. It is a byte-identity gate: weights_modified: false, byte_identical_to_source: true, zero non-finite tensors, and the digest agreeing across three independently-written records.

It does not confer VERIFIED. PROMOTION.json records state after: PROMOTED, and the metric ruling is OPEN. Promotion is an acceptance of the artifact, not a validation of the capability. The change-VQA head is quoted under two test sets (Test 0.697626/0.378373 and Test2 0.651469/0.372309) and its ruling is OPEN; never quote one test set alone (BENCHMARKS.md Β§4.4).

8.9 The two AMP/loss defects and their fixes

The external run history is instructive and is recorded rather than hidden (PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§1b; R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§4):

# Defect Why it blocked the run Fix
K1 F.binary_cross_entropy on sigmoid probabilities under CUDA autocast aten::binary_cross_entropy is registered as an outright ERROR under CUDA autocast β†’ RuntimeError: … unsafe to autocast at step 1 on a T4 a helper that casts both operands to fp32 and invokes the op with autocast disabled (casting alone is not sufficient)
K3 Saturated-sigmoid BCE β†’ NaN loss BCE(sigmoid(z))'s backward at p = 1.0 is clamped to a finite βˆ’9.99999996e11, so GradScaler cannot flag it; under fp16 the cast node turns it into βˆ’inf, the sigmoid backward multiplies by 0, and inf Γ— 0 = nan. The probability form is also wrong before it is unstable: PyTorch clamps BCE at 100.0 per element, so a saturated element reports 65.0 where the truth is 30.0 the loss is computed from the pre-sigmoid logits with binary_cross_entropy_with_logits β€” same function mathematically, exact numerically

The K3 CPU reproduction (PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§1b):

Quantity Pre-fix Fixed
parameter tensors with non-finite gradients 4 / 20 0 / 20
total loss at the saturated element 133.53 (clamped) 472.16 (exact)
gradient w.r.t. the logit nan -1.0
single saturated element, z = +30, t = 0 100.0 forward (clamped) 30.0 forward (exact)

--no-amp is not the fix β€” it would have hidden the NaN while leaving the loss silently clamped and wrong. The published contract is unchanged: class_mag is still sigmoid(mag_raw), class_delta still tanh, total_changed still sigmoid; the logits are an addition used only by the loss.

8.10 The serving wiring

app/serving.py wires change_vqa through the registry builders= override with the same CHANGE_CHECKPOINT the change detector receives, plus CHANGE_VQA_HEAD = artifacts/change_vqa/run/head.pt. Absent artifacts are passed as None, never as a fabricated path β€” the builder's contract is that missing degrades while corrupt raises ModelLoadError. configs/base.yaml is byte-identical (88434f7f…) and Config.hash is still 78f1e3700da15aa1 (finding F2, R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§5).

8.11 The 3-hour budget contract

HARD_STOP_SECONDS = 3 * 3600 = 10800 (plan Β§46). The budget is checked before every batch; on exhaustion the run saves checkpoint_last.pt, flushes the log, and exits with a structured time_limit_reached reason rather than dying silently. The recorded run used 64.278 s of a 10,800 s budget (run_record.json β†’ budget). If epochs_completed is 0, the time limit is shorter than one epoch β€” raise it (RUNBOOK_CHANGE_VQA_KAGGLE.md Β§8).


9. VLM LoRA adapter β€” external GPU, PEFT

9.1 What it is

A PEFT LoRA adapter on the frozen HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-500M-Instruct (revision a7da5b986cb5, Apache-2.0). It is attached to the model's language-model projections only; the vision tower and the connector are frozen.

9.2 Hyperparameters β€” every value

From configs/base.yaml Β§training, corroborated by .scratch/phase6_real_adapter/phase6_adapter/run_manifest.json β†’ config and lora:

Hyperparameter Value Source
base model HuggingFaceTB/SmolVLM-500M-Instruct run_manifest.json β†’ config.base_model
revision a7da5b986cb5 config.revision
PEFT version 0.19.1 run_manifest.json β†’ environment.peft; adapter_config.json
lora_rank (r) 16 config.lora_rank
lora_alpha 32 config.lora_alpha
lora_dropout 0.05 config.lora_dropout
target modules [q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj] config.lora_target_modules
n_target_modules 224 lora.n_target_modules
all_trainable_in_text_model true lora.all_trainable_in_text_model
precision fp16 config.precision
batch size 2 config.batch_size
gradient accumulation 8 config.gradient_accumulation
effective batch size 16 config.effective_batch_size
learning rate 0.0002 config.learning_rate
epochs 1 config.epochs
weight decay 0.01 config.weight_decay
warmup ratio 0.05 config.warmup_ratio
gradient checkpointing true config.gradient_checkpointing
max_seq_length 512 config.max_seq_length
processor_longest_edge 512 config.processor_longest_edge
do_image_splitting true config.do_image_splitting
seed 42 config.seed
save_every_steps 500 config.save_every_steps
max_wall_seconds 27,000 config.max_wall_seconds
train / val ratio 0.8 / 0.1 config.train_ratio, config.val_ratio
negative_ratio 1.0 config.negative_ratio
rgb_percentiles [2.0, 98.0] config.rgb_percentiles

9.3 The target-module regex β€” and the vision-tower hazard

training/vlm/lora.py defines:

LANGUAGE_MODEL_TARGET_REGEX = r"^model\.text_model\..*\.(q_proj|k_proj|v_proj|o_proj|gate_proj|up_proj|down_proj)$"

The anchoring is load-bearing. The module docstring records the hazard: the vision tower's attention projections are also named q_proj/k_proj/v_proj, so a plain module-name list (or an unanchored regex) would silently attach LoRA deltas to the vision tower as well. The anchored regex scopes the adapter to model.text_model.*. The run manifest confirms the outcome: all_trainable_in_text_model: true, observed_prefixes: ["base_model.model."], and all 224 target module names begin model.text_model.layers.<n>.… (run_manifest.json β†’ lora.target_module_names). training/vlm/config.py also carries LORA_TARGET_MODULES (the seven names) as the declarative list.

9.4 fp16 because a T4 is SM 7.5 β€” a recorded plan deviation

The master plan's Β§43 specifies bf16 for this stage. The run uses fp16, and the deviation is recorded so it is auditable β€” run_manifest.json β†’ config.plan_deviations:

"precision: plan section 43 specifies bf16; fp16 is used because T4 is SM 7.5 and has no bf16 tensor cores (finding C-6). Recorded so the deviation is auditable."

This is finding C-6, frozen in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4 (training.precision: fp16, reason "T4 = SM 7.5, no bf16 tensor cores"). training/vlm/trainer.py refuses bf16 outright.

9.5 The corpus

The VLM instruction pairs come from a BigEarthNet-S2 single-label subset (run_manifest.json β†’ config.corpus_root: /kaggle/input/datasets/creatorballs/bigearth-net-s2-single-label/BigEarthNet-S2), not the reBEN v2 fusion corpus. This matters and is stated explicitly.

Property Value Key path
instruction families ["presence"] corpus.families
n samples (questions) 49,464 corpus.n_samples
n requested patches 28,000 corpus.coverage.n_requested
n matched 24,732 corpus.coverage.n_matched
coverage fraction 0.883286 corpus.coverage.coverage_fraction
n unmatched 3,268 corpus.coverage.n_unmatched
n single-label 24,732 corpus.coverage.n_single_label
single-label fraction 1.0 corpus.coverage.single_label_fraction
n multi-label 0 corpus.coverage.n_multi_label
scene blocks (train / val / test) 1,160 / 482 / 202 corpus.scene_counts
patches (train / val / test) 17,471 / 3,375 / 3,886 corpus.split_info.patches_by_split
samples (train / val / test) 34,942 / 6,750 / 7,772 corpus.split_counts
scene key ben_<tile>:<k> corpus.split_info.scene_key
render RGB [B04, B03, B02], per-band percentile stretch 2/98, uint8 corpus.render

The corpus carries two warnings verbatim (corpus.warnings):

"3268 of 28000 patches have no row in the manifest and carry NO labels; they are excluded rather than guessed (88.3% coverage)"

"every one of the 24732 matched patches is single-label; the BigEarthNet corpus at large averages ~2.95 labels per patch (max 11), so this subset cannot support multi-label enumeration questions"

The split policy is release_partition_keyed_by_T2_blocks with a leakage check calling evaluation.leakage.assert_no_scene_overlap (corpus.split_info). The block reconstruction is conservative by construction: "blocks are reconstructed from this corpus's patches, not the full release; that can only split a block further, never merge across a partition." The render note records that the stretch is per-patch, not corpus-global, so inference needs no training-set statistics.

9.6 Training state

run_manifest.json β†’ training_state:

Field Value
epochs_completed 1
best_val_loss 0.10925133040291257
checkpoints checkpoint-500, checkpoint-1000, checkpoint-1500, checkpoint-2000
learning_rates a warmup ramp from ~3.67e-6 upward

The evaluation budget (evaluation_budget) is 1,000 per split, drawn once and reused for baseline and adapted (contract item U): selected_per_split: {test: 1000, val: 1000}, truncated: {adapted_test: false, adapted_val: false, baseline_test: false, baseline_val: false}.

9.7 Metrics and the acceptance decision

run_manifest.json β†’ metrics (adapted, val, n = 1000): exact_match: 0.911, f1: 0.911794, precision: 0.907298, recall: 0.916335, confusion tp 460 / fp 47 / tn 451 / fn 42. The baseline (baseline, n = 1000): exact_match: 0.491, f1: 0.099115, confusion tp 28 / fp 35 / tn 463 / fn 474.

The decision (run_manifest.json β†’ decision) is REJECTED:

  • V1 passed: "val baseline=49.10 pp, adapted=91.10 pp, delta=+42.00 pp; required (V1) >= +5.00 pp".
  • V2 failed: "V2 failed: 3 class(es) dropped more than 1.0 pp on validation" β€” the three classes are Mixed forest (βˆ’6.4516 pp), Transitional woodland, shrub (βˆ’9.375 pp) and Agro-forestry areas (βˆ’4.6512 pp), each listed in decision.class_failures.

USABLE β‰  ACCEPTED. The adapter's metrics are usable β€” a later test adjudication records exact_match 0.963, f1 0.96432, baseline test 0.468 (artifacts/vlm/run1_test_recovery/ test_adjudication.json) β€” but the artifact is ACCEPTANCE-REJECTED for promotion, and the deployed caption/VQA path uses the unadapted model. The rejection is preserved in the record (artifacts/vlm/phase6_closure.json), not scrubbed. See MODELS.md Β§3.6 and EVALUATION.md Β§4.5.

9.8 Finding F5-2 β€” the processor cost

The processor's default longest_edge is 2048, which upscales 512-px tiles 4Γ— and then splits them into 17 sub-images (pixel_values (1, 17, 3, 512, 512), 1,142 prompt tokens). Pinning processor_longest_edge: 512 yields pixel_values (1, 1, 3, 512, 512). The plan estimated a 4Γ— cost overrun; the measured figure is ~17Γ—. This is finding F5-2, frozen in docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§4 ("Tiles must not be upscaled or split").

9.9 Finding F5-3 β€” the image token

SmolVLM requires one <image> token per image in the prompt; hand-written prompt strings raise ValueError. Prompts are therefore always built through processor.apply_chat_template(). This is finding F5-3 and is enforced in specialists/vqa/prompts.py.

9.10 The adapter digests

Item Value Source
adapter dir tree hash 5c6b86317d1e65962702dc9e377009b3df41cc13de1b15bceccb70ad977775e7 run_manifest.json β†’ adapter_sha256; artifacts/vlm/run1_test_recovery/adapter_verification.json
adapter_model.safetensors sha256 07c76a75fa04624880ed7730590f5fdd7b145a8232e3c0af411c3c545a5adf5e .scratch/phase6_real_adapter/phase6_adapter/ARTIFACT_SHA256SUMS.json
manifest check clean: true, 14 files in manifest / 14 on disk, mismatched_files: [] same
checkpoint-1500 7273588e… ARTIFACT_SHA256SUMS.json
checkpoint-2000 bf249943… ARTIFACT_SHA256SUMS.json

The promoted adapter is the end-of-training top-level save, not checkpoint-2000. Three distinct digests exist; conflating them is a real error. See MODELS.md Β§1.2 and Β§3.6.

Component Parameters Source
trainable (LoRA) 8,683,520 (1.682312 % of total) run_manifest.json β†’ trainable_params, trainable_fraction
frozen model.text_model 361,944,000 frozen_params
frozen model.vision_model 86,433,024 frozen_params
frozen model.connector 11,796,480 frozen_params
frozen other 47,308,800 frozen_params
frozen total 507,482,304 sum of the four above
base model total 516,165,824 docs/MODELS.md Β§2.2

10. Calibration β€” fitted, not trained

Calibration is a fitted post-hoc step, not a trained artifact, and it is included here because it is the one place a temperature is set.

artifacts/calibration_v001.json (schema calibration_v1):

Field Value Key path
specialist change_vqa specialist
temperature 0.9772731820958189 temperature_scaling.temperature
fitted on Val, n = 16,441 provenance.fitted_on, provenance.n_samples
checkpoint sha256 cfae5e43… provenance.checkpoint_sha256
ECE before 0.013755 metrics.ece_before
ECE after 0.014929 metrics.ece_after
improvement βˆ’0.001174 β€”
NLL before / after 0.689741 / 0.689631 β€”
type_mask_applied false β€”

The temperature made calibration WORSE.

ECE went 0.013755 β†’ 0.014929 β€” worse. It is retained only because it is in the frozen config, and this is a measured negative result, not an improvement. docs/ records it as such (EVALUATION.md Β§4.7, BENCHMARKS.md Β§4.7). Nothing else is fitted: the change-VQA head ships confidence.method: "uncalibrated".


11. The reproducibility contract for training

  1. Seed 42 everywhere (project.seed), recorded in every run record's reproducibility.seed. The change-VQA record additionally documents torch_seeded: true, numpy_seeded: true, python_random_seeded: true, torch_cuda_manual_seed_all: true, cudnn_deterministic: true, cudnn_benchmark: false, and deterministic_algorithms_enabled: false with its reason ("not enabled: it raises on operators lacking a deterministic implementation, which would abort the run rather than make it reproducible").
  2. Precision fp16 on CUDA, never bf16 (Β§2.2). CPU runs are fp32 with autocast a no-op.
  3. Every artifact records the frozen config hash 78f1e3700da15aa1; a config edit moves the hash and invalidates the artifact (Β§1.3).
  4. save_every_steps: 500. Checkpoints are archived as provenance, not released as model weights (MODELS.md Β§1.2).
  5. Training guides state their own entry status and never claim a trained artifact is a verified capability (docs/R02_KAGGLE_TRAINING_GUIDE.md).
  6. Splits are by scene or group, never by sample (Β§4.4; DATASETS.md Β§7).
  7. The public test split is immutable and off-limits to training code; hidden data is never accessed (evaluation.immutable_public_test: true, evaluation.hidden_data_access: false).
  8. No one-command retrain for the external artifacts. The repository ships the contract, the promotion gate, the evaluation path and the serving wiring for them β€” not a retraining harness (docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§8.5).

12. What was NOT trained β€” exhaustive

Item State Evidence
Backbone fine-tuning (any) NOT DONE β€” all backbones frozen docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§2, Β§5
Router on the test split NOT RUN β€” n_test_examples_scored: 0, test_split_touched: false artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json
Any end-to-end / joint training NOT RUN β€” no system-level training exists docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§5
Change head at a second resolution NOT RUN β€” 448 was REJECTED for grounding, not retrained for change Β§5.7
Change head at a longer cosine schedule (T_max = 60) NOT RUN β€” P2 in docs/CHANGE_TRAINING_EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, "PREPARED, NOT EXECUTED" same
Change-head threshold retune CLOSED / eliminated β€” the lever is 0.37Γ— the epoch noise docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§5
Benchmark adapters (trained) NOT RUN β€” adapters are evaluation code, not trained evaluation/benchmark_adapters/
Arm B (optical-SAR) training beyond the five seeds NOT RUN β€” the comparison concluded; Arm A retained docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§7
The Β§4-registered optical-SAR arm B NON-CONSTRUCTIBLE β€” never built, never run same, Β§2 (D-01)
Arm C (optical-SAR) NOT INTRODUCED β€” the arm set is frozen at two same, Β§2 (D-01)
Change-VQA head retrained after promotion NOT RUN β€” one external run; the returned checkpoint was promoted, not retrained artifacts/change_vqa/run/PROMOTION.json
VLM adapter promoted REJECTED β€” trained, but ACCEPTANCE-REJECTED; deployed path uses the unadapted model artifacts/vlm/phase6_closure.json; run_manifest.json β†’ decision.status: REJECTED
VLM adapter on a second instruction family NOT RUN β€” instruction_families: ["presence"] only run_manifest.json β†’ corpus.families
Any multi-label VLM training NOT RUN β€” the subset is 100 % single-label run_manifest.json β†’ corpus.warnings
Calibration re-fit after the negative result NOT RUN β€” the temperature is retained only because it is in the frozen config Β§10
Router retrain with the test split scored NOT RUN Β§4.7
Grounding head at 448 REJECTED by measurement, not retrained Β§5.7
BigEarthNet multi-label (reBEN) fusion training NOT RUN β€” the local subset is single-label; metrics are not comparable to published numbers DATASETS.md Β§6.5
Cross-dataset generalisation training NOT RUN DATASETS.md Β§8
Distributed / multi-node training NOT DONE β€” modular monolith, one process docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md Β§5
Kubernetes / queues / microservices around training NOT DONE R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§6 ("No overbuild")

12.1 Things that trained but whose quality is not established

Artifact Trained? Quality established?
change head yes (external GPU) yes β€” the only VERIFIED headline (pooled IoU 0.8122)
change_vqa head yes (external GPU) metrics measured; ruling OPEN; promotion is byte-identity only
optical_sar head yes (local CPU, 10 runs) measured (accuracy 0.931 / macro-F1 0.434161); ruling OPEN
router adapter yes (local CPU) val-only, ungated, n = 86; test NOT RUN
grounding head yes (local CPU) did not beat the zero-shot baseline on val IoU (0.0946 < 0.0972)
vlm LoRA adapter yes (external GPU) metrics usable; ACCEPTANCE-REJECTED

13. What is NOT RUN / OPEN / BLOCKED for this topic

NOT RUN

  • The router test split (n_test_examples_scored: 0).
  • Any end-to-end / joint training; no system-level training exists.
  • The change head's P2 longer-cosine variant (docs/CHANGE_TRAINING_EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, "PREPARED, NOT EXECUTED").
  • The change head at a second resolution.
  • Any retrain of the external artifacts after their runs.
  • Multi-label BigEarthNet training (local subset is single-label).
  • Cross-dataset generalisation training.

OPEN

  • The change-VQA metric ruling (PROMOTION.json β†’ metric_ruling: OPEN).
  • The optical-SAR ruling (pre_registered_115_metric.json β†’ is_deciding_statistic: false; the artifact's own advisory says the ruling is the owner's).
  • R-03 β€” calibration: nothing is fitted beyond the (negative-result) temperature; the change-VQA head ships method: "uncalibrated".
  • R-08 β€” the stale PLUMBING_ONLY result_status label on the optical-SAR run records.
  • The change registration gate (docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md Β§7) β€” 58.7 % false-positive rate on the serving path.
  • R-01 β€” the BigEarthNet β†’ SmolVLM LoRA adaptation gap (the adapter was rejected).
  • F5 β€” the A–R test-area lettering is a reconstruction (documentation caveat; R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md Β§8).

BLOCKED

  • Nothing blocks the external training runs. PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md Β§11 lists six unresolved items, and explicitly states: "None block the external run."
  • The one recorded external blocker that was crossed: the optical-SAR Arm-B feature cache did not exist and required a ~2.7 h CPU extraction (docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md Β§3). It was completed (armB_seed{100..104} run records exist) and the comparison concluded.

14. Where the evidence lives

Topic Artifact(s)
Router training + sweep artifacts/router/router_adapter_v001/metadata.json, artifacts/router/threshold_sweep_val.json, router/adapter.py, router/dataset.py, docs/PHASE4_ROUTER_REPORT.md
Grounding training artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/{run_record,training_metadata}.json, artifacts/grounding/remoteclip_grounding_v001/eval_result_{canonical,matched6}.json, scripts/train_grounding.py, training/grounding/, docs/PHASE7_RESOLUTION_DECISION.md, docs/PHASE8_GROUNDING_HEAD_DECISION.md, docs/PHASE8_HANDOFF.md
Change training artifacts/change/levir_change_v001/{run_record,training_metadata,model_metadata}.json, artifacts/change/eval_test/eval_result.json, artifacts/change/levir_real_data_verification.json, artifacts/change/threshold_sweep_val.json, docs/PHASE9_GPU_HANDOFF.md, docs/PHASE9_GPU_RUN_RESULTS.md, docs/PHASE9_REAL_DATA_VERIFICATION.md, docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md, docs/CHANGE_TRAINING_EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md
Optical-SAR sweep + production head artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_v001/arm{A,B}_seed{100..104}/, arm{A,B}_seed_variance_report.json, artifacts/optical_sar/fusion_head_production_v001/{production_head_record,pre_registered_115_metric,phase12_rerun_verification}.json, training/fusion/train.py, docs/PHASE14_OPTICAL_SAR_DECISIONS.md, docs/PHASE14_GATE_F_DECISION_RECORD_2026-09-20.md, docs/PHASE12_115_METRIC_COMPUTED.md, docs/PHASE12_LABEL_POLICY_DECISION.md
Change-VQA external run artifacts/change_vqa/run/{PROMOTION,run_record,model_metadata,hashes}.json, docs/R02_KAGGLE_TRAINING_GUIDE.md, RUNBOOK_CHANGE_VQA_KAGGLE.md, R02_CHANGE_VQA_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md, PRE_KAGGLE_READINESS_REPORT.md, training/change_vqa/
VLM LoRA .scratch/phase6_real_adapter/phase6_adapter/{run_manifest.json,adapter_config.json,ARTIFACT_SHA256SUMS.json}, artifacts/vlm/run1_test_recovery/, artifacts/vlm/phase6_closure.json, RUNBOOK_PHASE6_VLM_KAGGLE.md, training/vlm/
Calibration artifacts/calibration_v001.json
Frozen configuration configs/base.yaml, docs/ARCHITECTURE_FREEZE.md, docs/PHASE9_FREEZE.md, docs/REPRODUCIBILITY.md Β§2
Leakage / firewall evaluation/leakage.py, evaluation/manifest_freeze.json β€” see DATASETS.md Β§7

Sibling documents: MODELS.md (released artifacts), EVALUATION.md (protocols and honesty rules), BENCHMARKS.md (the numbers), REPRODUCIBILITY.md (how to reproduce), DATASETS.md (the corpora), LIMITATIONS.md (the honest counterweight).